Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:47:12.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Labor’s Obstacles and Democracy’s Demise

from Part I - Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2022

Angela B. Cornell
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Mark Barenberg
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Labor’s role in forging and sustaining democracies has long been recognized in international human rights law and social science literature, but union rights and density are declining around the globe, and unfavorable domestic law jurisprudence in many parts of the globe has undermined collective rights. This chapter explores the juxtaposition of labor’s exalted place in international human rights law with its subordinate position in domestic law. In international human rights instruments and jurisprudence, labor unions hold a special position, and freedom of association is the critical foundational right upon which other rights and interests are advanced. In social science literature labor unions have pro-democracy attributes. This chapterexplores whether the decline in union strength has created a political void that has been filled by more authoritarian tendencies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, Benjamin. 1986. “Unfair Labor Practices and the Right to Strike in the Public Sector.” Stanford Law Review 38, 4: 10971122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornell, Angela B. 2017. “Inter-American Court Recognizes Elevated Status of Trade Unions, Rejects Standing of Corporations.” International Labor Rights Case Law: Annotated Jurisprudence on Fundamental Rights at the Workplace 3, 1: 3944.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’Art, Daryl, and Turner, Thomas. 2007. “Trade Unions and Political Participation in the European Union: Still Providing a Democratic Dividend?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 1: 103126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Franz Christian, and Olez, Martin. 2012. “Bridging the Gap between Labour Rights and Human Rights: The Role of ILO Law in Regional Human Rights Courts.” International Institute for Labor Studies Discussion Paper DP/212. International Labor Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_192786.pdfGoogle Scholar
Erne, Roland. 2008. European Unions: Labor’s Quest for a Transitional Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D., and Hendy, John. 2010. “The Dramatic Implications of Demir and Baykara.” Industrial Law Journal 39, 1: 165192.Google Scholar
Farber, Henry S., Herbst, Daniel, Kuziemko, Ilyana, and Naidu, Suresh. 2018. “Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data.” Working Paper #620 Princeton University Industrial Relations Section, May 2018 Version. http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gx41mm54wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fick, Barbara. 2009. “Not Just Collective Bargaining: The Role of Trade Unions in Creating and Maintaining a Democratic Society.” Journal of Labor and Society 12, 2: 249264Google Scholar
Foot, Paul. 2005. The Vote: How It Was Won and How It Was Undermined. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2019. Freedom in the World 2019. Washington, DC: Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Feb2019_FH_FITW_2019_Report_ForWeb-compressed.pdfGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2020. Freedom in the World 2019. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Freeman, Richard B., and Medoff, James L.. 1984. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1952. American Capitalism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gentile, Antonina, and Tarrow, Sidney. 2009. “Charles Tilly, Globalization, and Labor’s Citizen Rights.” European Political Science Review 1, 3: 465493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Hug, Aziz Z., and Versteeg, Mila. 2018. “The Coming Demise of Liberal Constitutionalism,” The University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (March): 239256.Google Scholar
Gross, James A., ed. 2003. Workers’ Rights as Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
International Trade Union Confederation. 2019. Global Rights Index 2019. Brussels: ITUC. www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/2019-06-ituc-global-rights-index-2019-report-en-2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kazin, Michael, 2021. “The Cornerstone – What Is Living and What Is Dead in the New Deal.” The Nation (Book Review of Why the New Deal Matters by Erich Rauchway); www.thenation.com/article/society/eric-rauchway-why-the-new-deal-matters/Google Scholar
Kerrissey, Jasmine, and Schofer, Evan. 2013. “Union Membership and Political Participation in the United States.” Social Forces 91, 3: 895928.Google Scholar
Lambert, Josiah Bartlett. 2005. If the Workers Took a Notion: The Right to Strike and American Political Development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Meltz, Noah M.. 2004. The Paradox of American Unionism: Why Americans Like Unions More than Canadians Do but Join Much Less. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mosimann, Nadja, Rennwald, Line, and Zimmermann, Adrian. 2019. “The Radical Right, the Labour Movement, and the Competition for the Workers’ Vote,” Economic and Industrial Democracy 40, 1: 6590.Google Scholar
OECD. 2017. Employment Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. Trade Unions, Employer Organizations, and Collective Bargaining in OECD Countries. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. www.oecd.org/els/emp/FlyerCollective%20bargaining.pdfGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Jake. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stevens, Evelyne Huber, and Stevens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Chiriboga, Oswaldo R. 2013. “The American Convention and the Protocol of San Salvador: Two Intertwined Treaties.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 31, 2: 159186.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1979. “Still the Century of Corporatism.” In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, edited by Schmitter, Philippe and Lehmbruch, Gerhard. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., and Karl, Terry Lynn. 1991. “What Democracy Is … and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2, 3: 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinyai, Clayton. 2006. Schools of Democracy: A Political History of the American Labor Movement. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Summers, Clyde W. 2000. “From Industrial Democracy to Union Democracy.” Journal of Labor Research 21, 1: 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syad, Lydia. 2018. “Labor Unions Approval Steady at 15-Year High.” Gallup, Washington DC. August 2018. https://news.gallup.com/poll/241679/labor-union-approval-steady-year-high.aspx?version=printGoogle Scholar
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2021. Union Membership (Annual) News Release 2020. Washington, DC: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/union2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1989. “Labor Movements in Transitions to Democracy: A Framework for Analysis.” Comparative Politics 21, 4: 445472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Paul. 1984. “Striking a New Balance: Freedom of Contract and the Prospects for Union Representation.” Harvard Law Review 98, 2: 351420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissbrodt, David, and Mason, Matthew, Compliance of the United States with International Labor Law, 98 MINN. L. REV. 1842 (2014), available at https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/faculty_articles/368Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×