Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T21:41:41.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Narrative Networks in Routine Dynamics

from Part II - Methodological Issues in Routine Dynamics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2021

By
Brian T. Pentland  and
Inkyu Kim
Edited by
Martha S. Feldman ,
Brian T. Pentland ,
Luciana D'Adderio ,
Katharina Dittrich ,
Claus Rerup  and
David Seidl
Martha S. Feldman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Brian T. Pentland
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Luciana D'Adderio
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Katharina Dittrich
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus Rerup
Affiliation:
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
David Seidl
Affiliation:
University of Zurich
Get access

Summary

Narrative networks provide a way to summarize the "pattern-in-variety" that is typical of organizational routines. Unlike social networks, the nodes in a narrative network represent actions or events. By formalizing action patterns as networks, narrative networks provide a foundation for visualizing and analysing stability and change in routines.

Keywords

Routinesroutine dynamicsnetworksdigital trace data
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics , pp. 184 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. (1990). A primer on sequence methods. Organization Science, 1(4), 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, M. A. (2013). Towards the Analysis of Narrative Networks. Retrieved from University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. W. and Goodman, L. A. (1957). Statistical inference about Markov Chains. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, T. (1952). The Summa Theologica: Great Books of the Western World. (F. o. t. E. D. Province, Trans. Vol. 19): Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
Avgerou, C. (2019). Contextual explanation: Alternative approaches and persistent challenges. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 977–1006.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 78–108.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. (1990). Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1(3), 220–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, P. S. and Stovel, K. (2000). Becoming a Nazi: A model for narrative networks. Poetics, 27(2–3), 69–90.Google Scholar
Bedi, P. and Sharma, C. (2016). Community detection in social networks. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 6(3), 115–135.Google Scholar
Berente, N., Seidel, S. and Safadi, H. (2018). Research commentary: Data-driven computationally intensive theory development. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, K. (1962). A Grammar of Motives, and a Rhetoric of Motives. Cleveland, OH: World Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Chao, C.-A. (2016). The impact of electronic health records on collaborative work routines: A narrative network analysis. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 94, 100–111.Google Scholar
Cloutier, C. and Langley, A. (2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution? Organization Theory, 1(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the study of routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danner-Schröder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization science, 27(3), 633–658.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present, and future. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3), 505–513.Google Scholar
Freelon, D. (2014). On the interpretation of digital trace data in communication and social computing research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. and Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.Google Scholar
Goh, J. M., Gao, G. and Agarwal, R. (2011). Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Information Systems Research, 22(3), 565–585.Google Scholar
Goh, K. T. and Pentland, B. T. (2019). From actions to paths to patterning: Toward a dynamic theory of patterning in routines. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1901–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hærem, T., Pentland, B. T. and Miller, K. D. (2015). Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M. and Morris, M. (2008). Statnet: Software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. Journal of Statistical Software, 24(1), 1548.Google Scholar
Hayes, G. R., Lee, C. P. and Dourish, P. (2011). Organizational routines, innovation, and flexibility: The application of narrative networks to dynamic workflow. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(8), e161–e177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendricks, W. O. (1972). The structural study of narration: Sample analyses. Poetics, 1(3), 100–123 (Reprinted in 1973, Essays on Semiolinguistics and Verbal Art. Mouton, The Hague, 1152–1174.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernes, T. (2007). Understanding Organization as Process: Theory for a Tangled World (Vol. 2). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.Google Scholar
Leenders, R. T. A., Contractor, N. S. and DeChurch, L. A. (2016). Once upon a Time: Understanding team processes as relational event networks. Organizational Psychology Review, 6(1), 92–115.Google Scholar
Mahringer, C. A., Dittrich, K. and Renzl, B. E. (2019). Interdependent Routines and Innovation Processes–An Ethnographic Study of Scrum Teams. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.Google Scholar
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., Chklovskii, D. and Alon, U. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298(5594), 824–827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moody, J., McFarland, D. and Bender-deMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1206–1241.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2007). Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 781–795.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., and Goh, K. (2021). Organizational Routines and Organizational Change, In M, Poole, S. and Van de Ven, A. H., eds., Oxford Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T. and Hillison, D. (2010). Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organization Studies, 31(7), 917–940.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T. and Hillison, D. (2011). The (N) ever-changing world: Stability and change in organizational routines. Organization Science, 22(6), 1369–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Liu, P. (2017). Network models of organizational routines: Tracing associations between actions. In Jain, S. and Mir, R., eds., The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 422–438.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Recker, J., Wolf, J. R. and Wyner, G. (2020). Bringing context into the analysis of process with digital trace data. The Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 21(5), 1214–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Recker, J. and Wyner, G. (2017). Rediscovering handoffs. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3(3), 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T., Vaast, E. and Wolf, J. R. (2021) Theorizing process dynamics with directed graphs: A diachronic analysis of digital trace data. MIS Quarterly, 45(2), 967–984.Google Scholar
Rossetti, G. and Cazabet, R. (2018). Community Discovery in dynamic networks: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(2), 1–37.Google Scholar
Sailer, K. (2019). Action Network: Exploring Dynamic Organizational Routines in Outpatient Clinics. Paper presented at the the 4th European Conference on Social Networks, Zurich.Google Scholar
Sailer, K. and McCulloh, I. (2012). Social networks and spatial configuration: How office layouts drive social interaction. Social Networks, 34(1), 47–58.Google Scholar
Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2018). Watching the clock: Action timing, patterning, and routine performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1253–1280.Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. (2011). Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. (2019). A practitioner’s guide to process mining: Limitations of the directly-follows graph. Procedia Computer Science, 164, 321–328.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, M. R. and Veltri, N. F. (2013). Virtual communities as narrative networks: Developing a model of knowledge creation for crowdsourced environments. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 9(1), 21–41.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 41–74.Google Scholar
Yeow, A. and Faraj, S. (2011). Using narrative networks to study enterprise systems and organizational change. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(2), 116–125.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×