Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-30T10:38:39.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Qualitative Sociology

from Part III - Sociological Research Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2017

Kathleen Odell Korgen
Affiliation:
William Paterson University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology
Core Areas in Sociology and the Development of the Discipline
, pp. 134 - 142
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Leon. 2006. Analytic Autoethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35(4): 375395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Paul and Hammersley, Martyn. 1994. Ethnography and Participant Observation. In Handbook of Qualitative Research. Edited by Denzin, Norman and Lincoln, Yvonna S.. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, New Delhi: Sage, 248260.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul and Hammersley, Martyn. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul, Coffey, Amanda, Delamont, Sara, Lofland, John, and Lofland, Lyn. eds. 2001. Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1953. Becoming a Marihuana User. The American Journal of Sociology 59(3): 235242.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S., Geer, Blanche, Hughes, Everett C., and Strauss, Anselm L.. 1961. Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bednarz, Dan. 1985. Quantity and Quality in Evaluation Research: A Divergent View. Evaluation and Program Planning 8: 289306.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Burrel, Gibson and Morgan, Gareth. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy and Mitchell, Richard. 2001. Grounded Theory in Ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography. Edited by Atkinson, Paul, Coffey, Amanda, Delamont, Sara, Lofland, John, and Lofland, Lyn. London: Sage, 160175.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary-Jo. 2001. The Chicago School of Ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography. Edited by Atkinson, Paul, Coffey, Amanda, Delamont, Sara, Lofland, John, and Lofland, Lyn. London: Sage, 1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, Norman and Lincoln, Yvonna S.. eds. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1931. Qualitative Thought. In Philosophy and Civilization. New York, NY: Minton, Balch and Company.Google Scholar
Ellis, Carolyn, Adams, Tony E., and Bochner, Arthur P.. 2011. Autoethnography: An Overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12(1), Art. 10. Available at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108, accessed September 18, 2015.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Silvana K. 2008. The Grounded Theory and the Analysis of Audio-Visual Texts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11(3): 112.Google Scholar
Flick, Uve. 2014. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory. Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney and Strauss, Anselm L.. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Gobo, Giampietro. 2008. Doing Ethnography. London, New Delhi, Singapore: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, David. 1994. A World without Words. The Social Construction of Children Born Deaf or Blind. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Kleinknecht, Steven. 2007. An Interview with Robert Prus: His Career, Contributions, and Legacy as an Interactionist Ethnographer and Social Theorist. Qualitative Sociology Review 3(2): 221288.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, Hubert. 2005. Focused Ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(3), Art. 44. Available at www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/20/43, accessed September 17, 2015.Google Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T. 2011. Visual Grounded Theory: A Methodological Outline and Examples from Empirical Work. Revija za sociologiju 41(2): 131160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konecki, Krzysztof T., Kacperczyk, Anna M., and Marciniak, Lukasz T.. 2005. Polish Qualitative Sociology: The General Features and Development. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(3), Art. 27. Available at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503270, accessed September 18, 2015.Google Scholar
Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research: Intersubjectivity and the Study of Human Lived Experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Prus, Robert and Sharper, C. R. D.. 1977. Road Hustlers. The Career Contingencies of Professional Card and Dice Hustlers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Prus, Robert and Grills, Scott. 2003. The Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rock, Paul. 2001. Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnography. In Handbook of Ethnography. Edited by Atkinson, Paul, Coffey, Amanda, Delamont, Sara, Lofland, John, and Lofland, Lyn. London: Sage, 2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Fritz. 1983. Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis 13: 283293.Google Scholar
Shaw, Clifford R. 1930. Jack Roller. A Delinquent Boy's Own Story. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, David. 2010. Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sinatti, Giulia. 2008. The Polish Peasant Revisited. Thomas and Znaniecki's Classic in the Light of Contemporary Transnational Migration Theory. Sociologica 2: 122.Google Scholar
Stanley, Liz. 2010. To the Letter: Thomas and Znaniecki's The Polish Peasant and Writing a Life, Sociologically. Life Writing 7(2): 139151.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm L. 1978. A Social World Perspective. In Studies in Symbolic Interaction. Edited by Denzin, Norman. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 119128.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm L. and Corbin, Juliet. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stubbe, Maria, Lane, Chris, Hilder, Jo, Vine, Elaine, Vine, Bernadette, Marra, Meredith, Holmes, Janet, and Weatherall, Ann. 2003. Multiple Discourse Analyses of a Workplace Interaction. Discourse Studies 5(3): 351388.Google Scholar
Sudnow, David. 1967. Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Edwin H. 1937. The Professional Thief. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, William I. and Znaniecki, Florian. 1958. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Vols. I and II. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas P. 1970. Normative and Interpretive Paradigms in Sociology. In Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge. Edited by Douglas, J. D.. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing, 5779.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, ed. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. 4 Volumes. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wojciechowska, Magdalena. 2015. Men Who Like Using and Abusing Women: The Perspective of Clients on Escort Agency Workers. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 45: 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×