Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
4 - The Meanings of Experience
from Part I - The New Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
Summary
The categories of “experience” and “experiment” lay at the heart of the conceptions of natural knowledge that dominated European learning at both the beginning and the end of the Scientific Revolution. The Latin words generally used to denote “experience” in both the medieval and early modern periods, experientia and experimentum, were generally interchangeable, with no systematic distinction between them except in particular contexts to be discussed; both are related to the word peritus, meaning skilled or experienced. Besides these terms and their vernacular cognates, another related Latin term, periculum (“trial” or “test”), began to be used in the late sixteenth century to designate the deliberate carrying out of an experiment (periculum facere), initially in the mathematical sciences. By the end of the seventeenth century, the construal of experience as “experiment” in this sense had acquired a wide and influential currency.
At the start of the sixteenth century, scholastic versions of Aristotelian natural philosophy dominated the approach to knowledge of nature that informed the official curricula of the universities (see the following chapters in this volume: Blair, Chapter 17; Garber, Chapter 2); Aristotle’s writings stress repeatedly the importance of sense experience in the creation of reliable knowledge of the world. Nonetheless, during the seventeenth century, many of the proponents of what came to be called by some (rather obscurely) “the new science” criticized the earlier orthodoxy of what Aristotelian natural philosophy (or “physics”) had become on the grounds that it paid insufficient attention to the lessons of experience. For example, Francis Bacon (1561–1626) wrote in his New Organon of 1620 that Aristotle “did not properly consult experience… after making his decisions arbitrarily, he parades experience around, distorted to suit his opinions, a captive.”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 106 - 131Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
and , “Per una ricerca su experimentum-experimenta: Riflessione epistemologica e tradizione medica (secolo XIII–XV),” in Presenza del lessico greco e latino nelle lingue contemporanee, ed. and (Macerata: Università degli Studi di Macerata, 1990).Google Scholar
, Fits, Passions, and Paroxysms: Physics, Method, and Chemistry and Newton’s Theories of Colored Bodies and Fits of Easy Reflection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
, , and , eds., The Medical Renaissance of the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
, The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Science: A Historical and Critical Essay (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday [Anchor Books], 1954)Google Scholar
, The New Organon, 1.8, ed. and trans. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Legem impone subactis: Studi su filosofia e scienza dei Gesuiti in Italia, 1540–1632 (Rome: Bulzoni, 1992), chap. 1.Google Scholar
, Forme di esperienza e rivoluzione scientifica (Bibliotheca di Nuncius, Studi e testi IX) (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1992)Google Scholar
, Lectiones mathematicae (1683), reprinted in The Mathematical Works of Isaac Barrow, D.D., ed. (Cambridge, 1860; facsimile repr., Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1973).Google Scholar
, “Newton’s 1672 Optical Controversies: A Study in the Grammar of Scientific Dissent,” in The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy, ed. (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1974).Google Scholar
, “The Value of Facts in Boyle’s Experimental Philosophy,” History of Science, 38 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Social Status of Italian Mathematicians, 1450–1600,” History of Science, 27 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), chap. 4.Google Scholar
, Promoting Experimental Learning: Experiment and the Royal Society, 1660–1727 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar
, Lexicon Philosophicum (Leeuwarden, 1713; facsimile repr. Düsseldorf: Stern-Verlag Janssen, 1967).Google Scholar
, “In sphaeram Ioannis de Sacro Bosco commentarius,” in , Opera mathematica, 5 vols. in 4 (Mainz: A. Hierat for R. Eltz, 1611–12)Google Scholar
, The Newtonian Revolution: With Illustrations of the Transformation of Scientific Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), chap. 3.Google Scholar
, “The New Philosophy and Medicine in Seventeenth Century England,” in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, “The Cutting Edge of a Revolution? Medicine and Natural History Near the Shores of the North Sea,” in Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen, and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
, “On the Origins of the Phrase Nihil est in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu,” Journal of the History of Medicine, 25 (1970).Google Scholar
and , Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York: Zone Books, 1998), esp. chap. 5Google Scholar
, “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity,” Annals of Scholarship, 8 (1991).Google Scholar
, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
, The Mathematicall Preface to the Elements of Geometrie of Euclide of Megara, intro. (1570; facsimile repr. New York: Science History Publications, 1975).Google Scholar
Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
, “Classical Empiricism,” in The Methodological Heritage of Newton, ed. and (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970)Google Scholar
, Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
, William Harvey’s Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Discourses and Demonstrations Concerning Two New Sciences, trans. (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar
, “Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and the Essays,” in Essays on the Philosophy and Science of René Descartes, ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
, “Experiment, Community, and the Constitution of Nature in the Seventeenth Century,” Perspectives on Science, 3 (1995)Google Scholar
, Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), chap. 2Google Scholar
, “Ways to Interpret the Terms ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Aristotelianism’ in Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy,” History of Science, 25 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Newton and the Method of Analysis,” in Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. , 5 vols. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971), chap. 1.Google Scholar
, The Monster in the Machine: Magic, Medicine, and the Marvelous in the Time of the Scientific Revolution (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Instruments and the Imagination (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, “A Second Essay to Jean Riolan,” in , The Circulation of the Blood and Other Writings, trans. (London: Dent/Everyman’s Library, 1963).Google Scholar
, Physics at the Royal Society During Newton’s Presidency (Los Angeles: William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1983)Google Scholar
, Eighteenth-Century Chemistry as an Investigative Enterprise (Berkeley: Office for History of Science and Technology, University of California at Berkeley, 1989)Google Scholar
, “Epistemology of the Sciences,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. , , and with (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
, The Experimenters: A Study of the Accademia del Cimento (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
, “A Documentary History of the Problem of Fall from Kepler to Newton: De motu gravium naturaliter cadentium in hypothesi terrae motae,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s. 45 (1955), pt. 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
, The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Crystallization of a New Narrative Form in Experimental Reports (1660–1690): Experimental Evidence as a Transaction Between Philosophical Knowledge and Aristocratic Power,” Science in Context, 7 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, La formation de la pratique scientifique: Le discours de l’expérience en France et en Angleterre (1630–1820) (Paris: Éditions de la Découverte, 1996), chap. 1.Google Scholar
, “The Two Faces of Linnaeus,” in Linnaeus: The Man and His Work, ed. (Canton, Mass.: Science History Publications, 1994).Google Scholar
“Experiment in Early Greek Philosophy and Medicine,” in , Methods and Problems in Greek Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979), chap. 2.Google Scholar
, Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
, “Art, Nature, and Experiment among some Aristotelian Alchemists,” in Texts and Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Science: Studies on the Occasion of John E. Murdoch’s Seventieth Birthday, ed. and (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997).Google Scholar
, The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton, Vol. I: The Optical Lectures, 1670–72, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
, In quatuor libros Meteorologicorum Aristotelis commentaria (Rome: Francisco Corbeletti, 1646).Google Scholar
Andreas Vesalius of Brussels, 1514–1564 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Paracelsus: An Introduction to Philosophical Medicine in the Era of the Renaissance, 2nd rev. ed. (Basel: Karger, 1982)Google Scholar
, “Wrestling with Proteus: Francis Bacon and the ‘Torture’ of Nature,” Isis, 90 (1999).Google Scholar
, A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), esp. chaps. 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
“The History of Science and the Renaissance Science of History,” in Science, Culture, and Popular Belief in Renaissance Europe, ed. , , and (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
, The Understanding of the Fossil Past: Paleontology and Evolution Theory, 1850–1910 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
, ed., Opticae thesaurus: Alhazeni arabis libri septem, nunc primum editi… (Basel: per Episcopios, 1572).Google Scholar
, Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958)Google Scholar
, ed., Ratio atque institutio studiorum Societatis Jesu: L’ordinamento scolastico dei collegi dei Gesuiti (Milan: Feltrinelli, 1979).Google Scholar
, “Glass Works: Newton’s Prisms and the Uses of Experiment,” in The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences, ed. , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar
, “Experience and Experiment: A Comparison of Zabarella’s View with Galileo’s in De motu,” Studies in the Renaissance, 16 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “William Harvey and Renaissance Aristotelianism: A Consideration of the Praefatio to De generatione animalium (1651),” in Humanismus und Medizin, ed. and (Weinheim: Acta Humaniora, 1984).Google Scholar
, Aristotle in the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “An Evolutionary Taxonomy of Eighteenth-Century Newtonianisms,” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 7 (1978).Google Scholar
and , Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985), chap. 2Google Scholar
, “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology,” Social Studies of Science, 14 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A Social History of Truth: Gentility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
, “The Gradual Acceptance of Newton’s Theory of Light and Color, 1672–1727,” Perspectives on Science: Historical, Philosophical, Social, 4 (1996).Google Scholar
, A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, “Vesalius and Human Diversity in De humani corporis fabrica,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 57 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Clock and the Mirror: Girolamo Cardano and Renaissance Medicine (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997), chap. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
, “John Locke, John Ray, and the Problem of the Natural System,” Journal of the History of Biology, 5 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage, and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, The Problem of Certainty in English Thought, 1630–1690 (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Seven Liberal Arts in the Middle Ages (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
, “Albertus Magnus on Suppositional Necessity in the Natural Sciences,” in Albertus Magnus and the Sciences: Commemorative Essays 1980 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1980), ed. Google Scholar
, Galileo and His Sources: The Heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Galileo, the Jesuits, and the Medieval Aristotle (Aldershot: Variorum, 1991), chap. 9.Google Scholar
“William Harvey and the ‘Way of the Anatomists’,” History of Science, 21 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Epistemology and Learned Medicine in Early Modern England,” in Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Paracelsus: Speculative Theory and the Crisis of the Early Reformation (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997).Google Scholar
“The Hermetic Tradition in Renaissance Science,” in , Collected Essays, vol. 3, Ideas and Ideals in the North European Renaissance (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984).Google Scholar
- 31
- Cited by