Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
2 - Physics and Foundations
from Part I - The New Nature
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: The Age of the New
- Part I The New Nature
- 2 Physics and Foundations
- 3 Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature
- 4 The Meanings of Experience
- 5 Proof and Persuasion
- Part II Personae and Sites of Natural Knowledge
- Part III Dividing the Study of Nature
- Part IV Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
- Index
- References
Summary
In our times, the domain of the physical sciences is reasonably well defined. Although, at its edges, the less empirically grounded parts of the physical sciences may merge into philosophical speculation, it is no compliment to a scientist to characterize his or her work as “philosophical.” In this respect, we have moved a considerable distance from the early modern period. For many European thinkers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, an account of the world around them was radically incomplete without a larger background picture in which to embed it, a picture that often included elements such as the basic categories of existence and the relation of the natural world to God. Many shared the sense of the interconnectedness of knowledge and felt the need for what might be called a foundation for the science that treats the natural world.
The project did not have precise boundaries, nor is it easy to characterize what it is that we are talking about when we are talking about the foundations of our understanding of the physical world. In many ways, the enterprise of providing foundations for a view of the physical sciences was shaped by two traditions, the Aristotelian tradition in philosophy and the Christian tradition in theology. As I shall argue in more detail, the Aristotelian tradition was a common element in the intellectual background of every serious thinker of the period and provided a model for what a properly grounded science should look like. Even for many of those who would reject the Aristotelian tradition in favor of other ancient traditions (such as atomism or Hermeticism) or other views of the world not obviously connected with ancient philosophical traditions, the Aristotelian tradition was hard to escape.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 19 - 69Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
“Descartes and the Late Scholastics on the ‘Order of the Sciences’,” in Conversations with Aristotle, ed. and (London: Ashgate, 1999).Google Scholar
“Descartes and the Scotists,” chap. 2 of his Descartes and the Last Scholastics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Le Mercure françois; ou, la suitte de l’histoire de la paix, 25 vols. (Paris: Iean and Estienne Richer, 1612–.Google Scholar
The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed., 2 vols. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634, ed. , 4 vols. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1939–53).Google Scholar
“The Teaching of Natural Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Paris: The Case of Jean Cécile Frey,” History of Universities, 12 (1993).Google Scholar
The Works of Robert Boyle, ed. and , 14 vols. (London: Pickering and Chatto, 1999–2000), 5.Google Scholar
“Les atomes et le vide dans les collèges de plein-exercice en France de 1640–1730,” in Gassendi et l’Europe, ed. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1997).Google Scholar
Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France (1620–1680) (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1934)Google Scholar
Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins, Descartes to Kant (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969)Google Scholar
The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science: A Historical and Critical Essay (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1932)Google Scholar
Physiologia Epicuro-Gassendo-Charltoniana (London: Printed by T. Newcomb for T. Heath, 1654).Google Scholar
Elements, Principles, and Corpuscles: A Study of Atomism and Chemistry in the Seventeenth Century (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L’expérience barométrique: ses antécédents et ses explications (Thouars [Deux-Sèvres]: Imprimerie Nouvelle, 1936).Google Scholar
Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Science and Education in the Seventeenth Century (New York: Science History Publications, 1970)Google Scholar
The Chemical Philosophy: Paracelsian Science and Medicine in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, 2 vols. (New York: Science History Publications, 1977), vol. 1, chap. 1Google Scholar
, Man and Nature in the Renaissance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), chap 2Google Scholar
Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
, Dialogo sopra i due massimi sistemi del mondo (1632), in Opere di Galileo Galilei, ed. (Florence: Barbèra, 1890–1910), 7Google Scholar
, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems – Ptolemaic and Copernican, trans. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar
, Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze (Leiden, 1638), in Operedi Galileo Galilei, 8Google Scholar
, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, ed. and trans. , , , and , 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984–91).Google Scholar
The Mechanization of the World Picture, trans. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961)Google Scholar
The Foundations of Newton s Alchemy; or, “The hunting of the greene lyon “ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
in Two New Sciences: Including Centers of Gravity & Force of Percussion (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Medieval Cosmology: Theories of Infinity, Place, Time, Void, and the Plurality of Worlds, ed. and trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), chaps. 5–6, 9–10.Google Scholar
The Scientific Reinterpretation of Form (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984), chaps. 3–4.Google Scholar
“Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646–1671),” in Problems of Cartesianism, ed. , , and (Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
“Leibniz and the Foundations of Physics: The Middle Years,” in The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz, ed. and (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985).Google Scholar
“Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy”, in The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
“Mind, Body, and the Laws of Nature in Descartes and Leibniz,” in , Descartes Embodied (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
, Opera omnia, 6 vols. (Lyon: Laurentius Anisson and Ioan. Baptista Devenet, 1658), 1.Google Scholar
Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Cardano’s Cosmos: The Worlds and Works of a Renaissance Astrologer (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Much Ado about Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), chap. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200–1687 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pt. 2.Google Scholar
ed., A Source Book in Medieval Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
, “The Condemnation of 1277, God’s Absolute Power, and Physical Thought in the Late Middle Ages,” Viator, 10 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666–1803 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971)Google Scholar
“Helmontiana,” Academiae analectica, Koninklijke Academie, Klasse der Wetenschappen, 45 (1983)Google Scholar
“Metaphysics and the New Science,” in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Leviathan; or, The matter, forme, & power of a commen-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill (London: Andrew Crooke, 1651), chap. 46.Google Scholar
Establishing the New Science: The Experience of the Early Royal Society (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Oeuvres complètes, ed. , , , and , 22 vols. (The Hague: Société Hollandaise des Sciences and Martinus Nijhoff, 1888–1950), 16Google Scholar
Preliminary Discourse to the Encyclopedia of Diderot, trans. and (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Joachim Jungius’ Experimente und Gedanken zur Begründung der Chemie als Wissenschaft (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1968)Google Scholar
Epitome astronomiae copernicanae, in , Gesammelte Werke, ed. and , 20 vols. to date (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1937–), 7Google Scholar
Epitome of Copernican Astronomy IV, in Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler (Great Books of the Western World), ed. , 54 vols. (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952), 16.Google Scholar
“Harmony and Cosmos: Mathematics Serving a Teleological Understanding of the World,” Physis, 32 (1995).Google Scholar
Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in Scientific Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1968)Google Scholar
“The Myth of Renaissance Atheism and the French Tradition of Free Thought,” Journal of the History of Philosophy,” 6 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
“The Clock Metaphor and Hypotheses: The Impact of Descartes on English Methodological Thought, 1650–1670,” in his Science and Hypothesis (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Correspondance Leibniz-Clarke, ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1957)Google Scholar
and , The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
The Battle of the Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655–1715 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Aristotle, Galileo, and ‘Mixed Sciences’,” in Reinterpreting Galileo, ed. (Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, in four books, 3.6 (London: Printed by Eliz. Holt for Thomas Basset, 1690).Google Scholar
, ed., Ratio atque institutio studiorum… (Rome: Institutum Historicum Societatis Iesu, 1986).Google Scholar
“Galileo’s Machines, His Mathematics, and His Experiments,” in The Cambridge Companion to Galileo, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On the Threshold of Exact Science (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982), chap. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Aspects de l’alchimie dans les classifications des sciences et des arts au XVIIe siècle,” in Aspects de la tradition alchimique au XVIIe siècle, ed. (Paris: S.É.H.A., and Milan: ARCHÉ, 1998).Google Scholar
On Descartes’ Metaphysical Prism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), chap. 1.Google Scholar
“Galileo’s Theory of Indivisibles: Revolution or Compromise,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 27 (1976).Google Scholar
Gassendi, Pascal et la querelle du vide (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton on Matter and Activity (Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press, 1978), chap. 3.Google Scholar
“The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism,” in The Rise of Modern Philosophy, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemical Pharmacy Enters the University: Johannes Hartmann and the Didactic Care of Chymiatria in the Early Seventeenth Century (Madison, Wis.: American Institute of the History of Pharmacy, 1991)Google Scholar
The Alchemical World of the German Court: Occult Philosophy and Chemical Medicine in the Circle of Moritz of Hessen, 1572–1632 (Sudhoffs Archiv, Beihefte 29) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1991).Google ScholarPubMed
, Enchiridion metaphysicum (London: Printed by James Flesher for W. Morden, 1671), chap. 8.Google Scholar
An Antidote Against Atheism, appendix, chap. 7, in his A Collection of Several Philosophical Writings of Dr Henry More… (London: Printed by James Flesher for W. Morden, 1662)Google Scholar
Causation in Early Modern Philosophy, ed. (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Gehennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey, an American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994), chap. 3.Google Scholar
and , “Alchemy vs. Chemistry: The Etymological Origins of a Historiographic Mistake,” Early Science and Medicine, 3 (1998).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De gravitatione…, published in Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, revised by , 2 vols. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1934), 1.Google Scholar
Opticks; or, A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections & Colours of Light (New York: Dover, 1952).Google Scholar
Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, ed. and , 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972), 1Google Scholar
“Baptizing Epicurean Atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the Immortality of the Soul,” in Religion, Science, and Worldview, ed. and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
The Hermetic and Alchemical Writings of Paracelsus, ed. , 2 vols. (Berkeley: Shambhala, 1976)Google Scholar
Provincial Letters, Pensées, Scientific Treatises, trans. (Great Books of the Western World), ed. , 54 vols. (Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1952), 33.Google Scholar
Le libertinage érudit dans la première moitié du XVIIe siècle (Paris: Boivin, 1943; Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1983).Google Scholar
and , eds., Alchemie: Lexikon einer hermetischen Wissenschaft (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1998).Google Scholar
The Aspiring Adept: Robert Boyle and His Alchemical Quest (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
“Bacon’s Speculative Philosophy,” in The Cambridge Companion to Bacon, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
“The Textbook Tradition in Natural Philosophy, 1600–1650,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 30 (1969).Google Scholar
Les travaux de Gassendi sur Epicure et sur l’atomisme, 1619–1658 (Paris: J. Vrin, 1944).Google Scholar
“Descartes Atomiste?” in Atomismo e continuo nel XVII secolo, ed. and (Naples: Vivarium, 2000).Google Scholar
“Experimental Arguments For and Against a Void: The Sixteenth-Century Arguments,” Isis, 58 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle and the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
The Business of Alchemy: Science and Culture in the Holy Roman Empire (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton, 1666–1966, ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1970).Google Scholar
The Music of the Heavens: Kepler’s Harmonic Astronomy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procedures and Metaphysics: A Study of the Philosophy of Mathematical-Physical Science in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1936)Google Scholar
A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage, and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Commentaria una cum quaestionibus in octo libros de physica auscultatione (Venice: Apud Iuntas, 1589).Google Scholar
Descartes in Germania: La ricezione del cartesianesimo nella facoltà filosoficà e medica di Duisberg (1652–1703), (Milan: Franco Angeli, 1992)Google Scholar
“The Institutional Setting,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. and , 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 1.Google Scholar
Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Isaac Beeckman (1588–1637) en de Mechanisering van het Wereldbeeld (with a summary in English) (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1983).Google Scholar
Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesianism (1637–1650) (Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series) (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
“Traditional Natural Philosophy,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. , , and with (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
“Newton and the Hermetic Tradition,” in Science, Medicine, and Society in the Renaissance, ed. , 2 vols. (New York: Science History Publications, 1972), 2.Google Scholar
The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanisms (New York: John Wiley, 1971)Google Scholar
“Kepler’s Theory of Hypotheses and the ‘Realist Dilemma’,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 3 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Nature, Art, and Psyche: Jung, Pauli, and the Kepler-Fludd polemic,” in Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renaissance, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Die philosophischen Schriften, ed. , 7 vols. (Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1875–90), 3Google Scholar
Mathematische Schriften, ed. , 7 vols. (Berlin and Halle: A. Asher et comp. and H. W. Schmidt, 1849–63), 6Google Scholar
Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, ed. [before 1945, Preussische] (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1923–).Google Scholar
“Essence and Existence,” in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
The French Academies of the Sixteenth Century (London: Routledge, 1988; orig. publ. 1947), chap. 12Google Scholar
The Rosicrucian Enlightenment (London: Ark Paperbacks [Routledge and Kegan Paul], 1986; orig. publ. 1972).Google Scholar
Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).Google Scholar
- 9
- Cited by