Classification of psychiatric disorders and their principal treatments

Peter Tyrer; Kenneth R. Silk

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511544392.002

1 - Classification of psychiatric disorders and their principal treatments

from Part I - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 May 2010

Peter Tyrer and

Kenneth R. Silk

Edited by

Peter Tyrer and

Kenneth R. Silk

Show author details

Peter Tyrer: Affiliation:
Imperial College London Claybrook Centre Charing Cross Campus London UK
Kenneth R. Silk: Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor, MI USA
Peter Tyrer: Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London
Kenneth R. Silk: Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A kind of thought compulsion, a logical and aesthetic necessity, insists that we seek for well-defined, self-contained, clinical entities; but unfortunately our subjective need is no proof of the reality of which we desire.

(Hoche, 1910)

Despite many proposed candidates, not one laboratory marker has been found to be specific in identifying any of the DSM-defined syndromes. Epidemiologic and clinical studies have shown extremely high rates of comorbidity among the disorders, undermining the hypothesis that the syndromes represent distinct etiologies. Furthermore, epidemiologic studies have shown a high degree of short-term diagnostic instability for many disorders. With regard to treatment, lack of treatment specificity is the rule rather than the exception.

(Kupfer et al., 2002, p. xvii)

Introduction

Why, you may well ask, has a book about treatment found it necessary to begin with a section on diagnosis? Since the introduction of DSM–III (American Psychiatric Association, 1980), diagnosis has seemed to become the ‘holy grail’ of psychiatry. Yet currently, diagnosis is in the doghouse, as the quotations above, spanning nearly a hundred years, illustrate. But, even though we despair at regular intervals, we continue to want a nice clean system that allows psychiatric patients to be pigeon-holed by clever clinicians who then have both an explanation of a disorder and its solution. For the hope has always been that if a specific diagnosis is made correctly, that the proper and best treatment will follow almost automatically.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Textbook of Effective Treatments in Psychiatry , pp. 3 - 15

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511544392.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1952). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Mental Disorders, 1st edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

American Psychiatric Association (1968). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Blashfield, R. K. & Fuller, A. K. (1996). Predicting the DSM-V. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 184, 4–7.Google Scholar

Carroll, B. J., Feinberg, M., Greden, J. F.et al. (1981). A specific laboratory test for the diagnosis of melancholia. Standardization, validation, and clinical utility. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 15–22.Google Scholar

Cicchetti, D. V. & Sparrow, S. S. (1981). Developing criteria for the rating of specific items in a given inventory. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127–37.Google Scholar

Davenport, Y. B., Ebert, M. H., Adland, M. L. & Goodwin, F. K. (1977). Couples group therapy as an adjunct to lithium maintenance of the manic patient. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 47, 495–502.Google Scholar

Davidson, K. (2000). Cognitive Therapy for Personality Disorders: a Guide for Clinicians. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Feinstein, A. R. (1970). The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 23, 455–68.CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank, E., Swartz, H. A. & Kupfer, D. J. (2000). Interpersonal and social rhythm therapy: managing the chaos of bipolar disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 48, 593–604.Google Scholar

Frank, E., Prien, R. F., Jarrett, R. B.et al. (1991). Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder – remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 851–5.Google Scholar

Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.Google Scholar

Hoche, A. (1910). Die Melancholiefrage. Zeitschrift für die Gesellschaft für Nervenheilkunde und Psychiatrie, 21, 193–203.Google Scholar

Jacobson, E. (1971). Depression: Comparative Studies of Normal, Neurotic, and Psychotic Conditions. New York: International Universities Press.

Kendell, R. & Jablensky, A. (2003). Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 4–12.Google Scholar

Kessing, L. V. (2004). Severity of depressive episodes according to ICD–10: prediction of risk of relapse and suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 153–6.Google Scholar

Klein, D. F. & Fink, M. (1962). Psychiatric reaction patterns to imipramine. American Journal of Psychiatry, 119, 432–8.Google Scholar

Klein, D. F. (1964). Delineation of two drug-responsive anxiety syndromes. Psychopharmacologia, 5, 397–408.Google Scholar

Kuhn, R. (1958). The treatment of depressive states with G22355 (imipramine hydrochloride). American Journal of Psychiatry, 115, 459–64.Google Scholar

Kupfer, D., First, M. B. & Regier, D. E. (2002). Introduction. In A Research Agenda for DSM-V, pp. xv–xxiii. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

Sachs, G. S., Thase, M. E., Otto, M. W.et al. (2003). Rationale, design, and methods of the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder (STEP-BD). Biological Psychiatry, 53, 1028–42.Google Scholar

Shorter, E. & Tyrer, P. (2003). The separation of anxiety and depressive disorders: blind alley in psychopharmacology and the classification of disease. British Medical Journal, 327, 158–60.Google Scholar

Tyrer, P. & Davidson, K. (2000). Cognitive therapy in personality disorders. In Review of Psychiatry: personality disorders, ed. Gabbard, G. O. & Gunderson, J.. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

Tyrer, P. & Steinberg, D. (2005). Models for Mental Disorder: Conceptual Models in Psychiatry, 4th edn. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

World Health Organization (1975). International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. Geneva: World Health Organization.

World Health Organization (1978). International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. Ann Arbor, MI: Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S. & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema Therapy: A Practitioner's Guide. New York: The Guilford Press.

Book contents

1 - Classification of psychiatric disorders and their principal treatments

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive