The Role of Transferable Knowledge in Intelligence

Susan M. Barnett; Stephen J. Ceci

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607073.012

11 - The Role of Transferable Knowledge in Intelligence

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 November 2009

Susan M. Barnett and

Stephen J. Ceci

Edited by

Robert J. Sternberg and

Jean E. Pretz

Show author details

Robert J. Sternberg: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jean E. Pretz: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A prerequisite for cognitively complex behavior in a given realm is the possession of a well differentiated yet integrated knowledge base that gets operated on by efficient cognitive processes.

(Ceci, 1996, p. 22)

The transferability of learning is of prime importance in evaluating these educational claims … the transferability of skills is key: If the skills developed by such [educational and training] efforts do not transfer beyond the training context, much of the investment may be considered wasted.

(Barnett & Ceci, 2002)

In the past decade, a new approach to understanding development has been put forward that describes a specific form of interaction between biology and environment, called the “bioecological model” (Ceci, 1996; Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, 1993, 1994). The goal of this chapter is to describe how a bioecological approach informs the study of intellectual development. In doing this, we shall focus on the evidence for the tenet of bioecological theory that is most relevant to intellectual functioning, namely, the knowledge-dependent nature of information processing. Following a description of the evidence for this tenet, we will segue into a discussion of the role of the transferability of knowledge in intellectual competence.

The bioecological approach to development posits a close interplay between knowledge and processing efficiency. What this means in the realm of intellectual competence is that, except for the most basic and dedicated processes (e.g., feature detection), processing efficiency is a function of interaction between genetic potentials for processing and the richness of the knowledge base on which the processes operate.

Type: Chapter
Information: Cognition and Intelligence
Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind
, pp. 208 - 224

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607073.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acredolo, L. P. (1979). Laboratory versus home: The effect of environment on the 9-month-old infant's choice of spatial reference system. Developmental Psychology, 15(6), 666–667CrossRef Google Scholar

Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1, 54–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (1993). The search for a psychology of wisdom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 75–80CrossRef Google Scholar

Barnett, S. M., &Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–637CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barnett, S. M., & Koslowski, B. (2002). Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 237–267CrossRef Google Scholar

Block, N. J., & Dworkin, G. (1976). The IQ controversy: Critical readings. New York: Pantheon Books

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1993). Heredity, environment, and the question “how.” In R. Plomin & G. McClearn (Eds.), Nature nurture & psychology (pp. 313–324). Washington, DC: APACrossRef

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature–nurture in developmental perspective: A bioecological theory. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586CrossRef Google Scholar

Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1147–1156Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. (1993). Some contextual trends in intellectual development. Developmental Review, 13, 403–435CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. (1996). On intelligence: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development (Expanded ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Ceci, S. J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). “Don't forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven”: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development, 56(1), 152–164CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J., Brainerd, C. J., Fitneva, S. A., & Williams, W. M. (2002). Forgetting you remember: representational constraints on monitoring. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. (1986a). A day at the races: IQ, expertise, and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 255–266CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. (1986b). Academic versus non-academic intelligence: An experimental separation. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 119–142). New York: Cambridge University Press

Ceci, S. J., & Ruiz, A. (1992). The role of general intelligence in transfer: A case study. In R. Hoffman (Ed.), The psychology of expertise (pp. 218–230). NY: Springer-Verlag

Charlesworth, W. (1976). Human intelligence as adaptation: An ethological approach. In L. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 147–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Charlesworth, W. (1979). An ethological approach to studying intelligence. Human Development, 22, 212–216CrossRef Google Scholar

Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In Siegler, Robert S. (Ed.). Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Chi, M. T. H., & Ceci, S. J. (1987). Content knowledge: Its restructuring with memory development. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 20, 91–146CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Coltheart, V., & Walsh, P. (1988). Expert Knowledge and Semantic Memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & P. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory, Vol. 2. London: Wiley

Deary, I., J. (1993). Inspection time and WAIS-R IQ subtypes: A confirmatory factor analysis study. Intelligence, 17, 223–236CrossRef Google Scholar

Deary, I., J. (1995). Auditory inspection time and intelligence: What is the causal direction? Developmental Psychology, 31, 237–250CrossRef Google Scholar

Deary, I., J., Caryl, P., Egan, V., & Wight, D. (1989). Visual and auditory inspection time: Their interrelationship and correlation with IQ in high ability subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 525–533CrossRef Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 1–24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Detterman, D. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex

Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved. Psychological Review, 108(2), 346–69CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 113CrossRef Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty. London: Dent

Gettinger, M. (1984). Individual differences in time needed for learning: A review of literature. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 15–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks. New York: Simon & Schuster

Gigerenzer, G., Hell, W., & Blank, H. (1988). Presentation and content: The use of base rates as a continuous variable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 513–525Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 75–111CrossRef Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Halpern, D. F., Hansen, C., & Riefer, D. (1990). Analogies as an aid to understanding and memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 298–305CrossRef Google Scholar

Herrnstein, R. J., Nickerson, R. S., Sanchez, M., & Swets, J. A. (1986). Teaching thinking skills. American Psychologist, 41(11), 1279–1289CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press

Laird, Johnson P. N., Legrenzi, P., & Legrenzi, M. S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 395–400CrossRef Google Scholar

Judd, C. H. (1908). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28–42Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251CrossRef Google Scholar

Keil, F. (1984). Mechanisms in cognitive development and the structure of knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Mechanisms in cognitive development (pp. 81–100). New York: W. H. Freeman

Keil, F. (1985). On the structure-dependent nature of stages of cognitive development. In S. Strauss & I. Levine (Eds.), Stage and structure in children's development (pp. 144–163). New York: Ablex

Logie, R., Wright, R., & Decker, S. (1992). Recognition memory performance and residential burglary. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 109–123CrossRef Google Scholar

Marini, Z., & Case, R. (1989). Parallels in the development of preschoolers' knowledge about their physical and social worlds. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 35, 63–88Google Scholar

Mestre, J. (2002). Transfer of learning: Issues and research agenda. Report of a workshop held March 21–22, 2002, at the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.

Needham, D. R., & Begg, I. M. (1991). Problem-oriented training promotes spontaneous analogical transfer: Memory-oriented training promotes memory for training. Memory and Cognition, 19(6), 543–557CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nisbett, R., Fong, G., Lehman, D., & Cheng, P. (1988). Teaching Reasoning. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Peterson, L. R., Hillner, K., & Saltzman, D. (1962). Time between pairings and short-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 550–551CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reder, L. M., & Klatzky, R. L. (1994). Transfer: Training for performance. In D. Druckman & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Learning, remembering, believing: Enhancing human performance (pp. 25–56). Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Reed, S. K., & Saavedra, N. C. (1986). A comparison of computation, discovery, and graph procedures for improving students' conception of average speed. Cognition and Instruction, 3(1), 31–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Rohrer, D., & Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 511–524CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rovee-Collier, C. (1993). The capacity for long-term memory in infancy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(4), 130–135CrossRef Google Scholar

Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. New York: Cambridge University Press

Spencer, R. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 14(5), 442–449CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 275–290CrossRef Google Scholar

Squire, L. R., & Slater, P. C. (1975). Forgetting in very long term memory as assessed by an improved questionnaire technique. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 50–54Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36(4), 227–245CrossRef Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). Testing common sense. American Psychologist, 50(11), 912–927CrossRef Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., Snook, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901a). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. I. Psychological Review, 8(3), 247–261Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901b). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. II. The estimation of magnitudes. Psychological Review, 8(4), 384–395CrossRef Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901c). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. III. Functions involving attention, observation and discrimination. Psychological Review, 8(6), 553–564CrossRef Google Scholar

Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 436–458CrossRef Google Scholar

Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273–281CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Williams, W. M., Blythe, T., White, N., Li, J., Gardner, H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Practical intelligence for school: Developing metacognitive sources of achievement in adolescence. Developmental Review, 22(2), 162–210CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

11 - The Role of Transferable Knowledge in Intelligence

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive