Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T12:07:30.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

J. S. Maloy
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Democratic Statecraft
Political Realism and Popular Power
, pp. 213 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G. J. D. 1982. Plutarch’s Political Thought. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. 2008. Machiavelli’s Shadow: The Rise and Fall of Karl Rove. New York: Modern Times.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 1996. “Observations on Plato’s Thrasymachus: The Case for Pleonexia.” Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W., & Runia, D. T.. Leiden: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. 2003. William Bradford’s Books. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Anglo, S. 2005. Machiavelli, the First Century: Studies in Enthusiasm, Hostility, and Irrelevance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 2005. The Cardinal Virtues, trans. Regan, R. J.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Argersinger, P. H. 1980. “A Place on the Ballot: Fusion Politics and Anti-Fusion Laws.” American Historical Review 85: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argersinger, P. H. 2002. “Taubeneck’s Laws: Third Parties in American Politics in the Late Nineteenth Century.” American Nineteenth Century History 3.2: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. Complete Works, ed. Barnes, J.. 2 vols. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ashley, J. M. 1895. “Should the Supreme Court Be Reorganized?Arena 14: 221–7.Google Scholar
Babbitt, S. M. 1985. “Oresme’s Livre de Politiques and the France of Charles V.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 75: 1–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, G. 2004. “Reason of State and English Parliaments.” History of Political Thought 25: 620–41.Google Scholar
Bawcutt, N. W. 2004. “The ‘Myth of Gentillet’ Reconsidered: An Aspect of Elizabethan Machiavellianism.” Modern Language Review 99: 863–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. 2002. “Is There a Sophistic Ethics?Ancient Philosophy 22: 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierce, A. 1946. Collected Writings, ed. Fadiman, C.. New York: Citadel.Google Scholar
Bierce, A. 1999 (1911). The Devil’s Dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bierce, A. 2000. The Fall of the Republic; and, Other Political Satires, eds. Joshi, S. T. & Schultz, D. E.. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Botero, G. 1956. The Reason of State, trans. Waley, P. J. & Waley, D. P.. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bovey, J. 1642. The Atheisticall Politition; or, A Breife Discourse Concerning Ni. Machiavell. London.Google Scholar
Boynton, R., dir. 2006. Our Brand Is Crisis. Port Washington, N.Y.: Koch Lorber.Google Scholar
Brown, A. 2010. The Return of Lucretius to Renaissance Florence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruni, L. 2001. History of the Florentine People, trans. Hankins, J.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, W. H. 1920. The Pastor of the Pilgrims: A Biography of John Robinson. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Howe.Google Scholar
Charron, P. 1971 (1612). Of Wisdome, trans. Lennard, S.. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1927. Tusculan Disputations, trans. King, J. E.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1928. De Legibus, trans. Keyes, C. W.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1947. De Officiis, trans. Miller, W.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1949. De Inventione, trans. Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, M. T. 1954. Rhetorica ad Herennium, trans. Caplan, H.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, W. 1894. “The Election of Senators and the President by Popular Vote.” Arena 10: 453–61.Google Scholar
Colegrove, K. 1920. “New England Town Mandates.” Publications of the Colonial Society of Massachusetts 21: 411–49.Google Scholar
Colish, M. L. 1978. “Cicero’s De Officiis and Machiavelli’s Prince.” Sixteenth Century Journal 9: 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, V. 1997. “Machiavelli and the Rhetorica ad Herennium: Deliberative Rhetoric in The Prince.” Sixteenth Century Journal 28: 1109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, V. 2010. “Rhetoric and Ethics in Machiavelli.” The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, ed. Najemy, J. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craiutu, A. 2012. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croce, B., & Caramelle, S., eds. 1930. Politici e Moralisti del Seicento. Bari: G. Laterza.
Dacres, E., ed. 1636. Machiavels Discourses upon the First Decade of T. Livius. London: T. Paine.
Dacres, E. ed. 1640. Nicholas Machiavel’s Prince. London: R. Bishop.
Darrow, C. S. 1893. “Realism in Literature and Art.” Arena (no. 49): 98–113.Google Scholar
Dauber, N. 2011. “Anti-Machiavellism as Constitutionalism: Hermann Conring’s Commentary on Machiavelli’s Prince.” History of European Ideas 37: 102–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. C. 1993. “Against Formality: One Aspect of the English Revolution.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 3 (6th ser.): 265–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, F. B. 1907. Early Private Libraries in New England. Worcester, Mass.: Davis.Google Scholar
Dexter, H. M. 1889. “Elder Brewster’s Library.” Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society 25: 37–85.Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes. 1925. Lives of the Philosophers, trans. Hicks, R. D.. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, M. A. 1895. Biography of James G. Blaine. Norwich, Conn.: H. Bill.Google Scholar
Donaldson, P. S. 1988. Machiavelli and Mystery of State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, H. 2002. “Reason of State and the Crisis of Political Aristotelianism.” History of European Ideas 28: 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbabin, J. 1982. “The Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle’s Politics.” Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. Kretzmann, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., ed. 1976. Letters from New England: The Massachusetts Bay Colony, 1629–38. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Erasmus, D. 1997. The Education of a Christian Prince, trans. Cheshire, N. M. & Heath, M. J., ed. Jardine, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Euripides, . 1994. Medea, trans. Kovacs, D.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evrigenis, I. D. 2008. Fear of Enemies and Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, I. D., & Somos, M.. 2011. “Wrestling with Machiavelli.” History of European Ideas 37: 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferster, J. 1996. Fictions of Advice: The Literature and Politics of Counsel in Late Medieval England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, D. D. 1892. “The Primary, the Pivot of Reform.” Forum (October): 189–93.Google Scholar
Finley, J. H. 1942. Thucydides. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, D. H. 2008. Champlain’s Dream. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Flower, B. O. 1894. “Crucial Moments in National Life.” Arena 10: 260–2.Google Scholar
Flower, B. O. 1896. “Four Epochs in the History of Our Republic.” Arena (no. 84): 928–36.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fontana, B. 2008. Montaigne’s Politics: Authority and Governance in the Essais. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Forde, S. 1989. The Ambition to Rule: Alcibiades and the Politics of Imperialism in Thucydides. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Forsdyke, S. 2005. Exile, Ostracism, and Democracy: The Politics of Expulsion in Ancient Greece. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 2004. What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan.Google Scholar
French, B. M. 1965. Mark Twain and the Gilded Age. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Gallman, R. E. 2000. “Economic Growth and Structural Change in the Long Nineteenth Century.” The Cambridge Economic History of the United States: The Long Nineteenth Century, eds. Engerman, S. L. & Gallman, R. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garraty, J. A., & Carnes, M. C., eds. 1999. American National Biography. 24 vols. New York: Oxford University Press.
Garrisson, J. 1995. A History of Sixteenth-Century France, 1483–1598: Renaissance, Reformation, and Rebellion, trans. Rex, R.. New York: St. Martin’s.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garsten, B. 2006. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentillet, I. 1974 (1576). Discours contre Machiavel, eds. D’Andrea, A. & Stewart, P. D.. Florence: Casalini.Google Scholar
Gentles, I. 1992. The New Model Army in England, Ireland, and Scotland, 1645–53. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
George, D. 2000. “Plutarch, Insurrection, and Dearth in Coriolanus.” Shakespeare and Narrative, ed. Holland, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
George, H. 1955 (1880). Progress and Poverty. New York: Schalkenbach Foundation.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. 2001. History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, R. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, R. 2010. Politics and the Imagination. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. 1938. Machiavelli’s Prince and Its Forerunners. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, L. 1976. Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, A. 1991. “Humanism and Political Theory.” The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gribble, D. 1999. Alcibiades and Athens: A Study in Literary Presentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., & Thompson, D., eds. 1987. The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni: Selected Texts. Binghamton, N.Y.: Renaissance Society of America.
Guicciardini, F. 1965. Selected Writings, trans. Grayson, M., ed. Grayson, C.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guicciardini, F. 1969. The History of Italy, trans. Alexander, S.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W. 1969. Politics and the Public Interest in the Seventeenth Century. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. The Sophists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F.. 1999. “Democratic Disagreement.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, S.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, H. L. 1994. V.L. Parrington: Through the Avenue of Art. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, J. 1996. “Humanism and the Origins of Modern Political Thought.” The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Kraye, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1999. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. B. M. 1928. Henry Clay Frick, the Man. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E.. 2001. “Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be.” American Political Science Review 95: 145–53.Google Scholar
Hightower, J. 1997. There’s Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Hinton, R. J. 1895. “The New Politics.” Arena 11: 216–26.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1995. Three Discourses, eds. Reynolds, N. B. & Saxonhouse, A. W.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holt, M. P. 2005. The French Wars of Religion, 1562–1629. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, T. 1860 (1638). “Letter to Governor Winthrop.” Collections of the Connecticut Historical Society 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Hooker, T. 1972 (1648). A Survey of the Summe of Church-Discipline. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Howard, M. W. 1895. The American Plutocracy. New York: Holland.Google Scholar
Humins, J. H. 1987. “Squanto and Massasoit: A Struggle for Power.” New England Quarterly 60: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, T., ed. 1865 (1769). A Collection of Original Papers Relative to the History of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay. Albany, N.Y.: Prince Society.
Ijsewijn, J. 1988. “Humanism in the Low Countries.” Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, vol. 2, ed. Rabil, A.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jodziewicz, T. W. 1988. “A Stranger in the Land: Gershom Bulkeley of Connecticut.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 78: 1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joffe, R., dir. 1986. The Mission. Screenplay by R. Bolt. Burbank, Calif.: Warner Bros.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. J. 1995. “From Rhetoric to Realism: The Sophistic Foundation of Realist Theory.” Ph.D. thesis, American University, Washington, D.C.
Josephson, M. 1938. The Politicos, 1865–96. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Kahn, V. 1994. Machiavellian Rhetoric, from the Counter-Reformation to Milton. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, V. 2010. “Machiavelli’s Afterlife and Reputation to the Eighteenth Century.” The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, ed. Najemy, J. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karsten, P. 1978. Patriot-Heroes in England and America: Political Symbolism and Changing Values over Three Centuries. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Keys, M. M. 2006. Aquinas, Aristotle, and the Promise of the Common Good. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knecht, R. J. 2000. The French Civil Wars, 1562–98. Harlow, U.K.: Longman.Google Scholar
Kraye, J., ed. 1997. Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Texts. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kraye, J. ed. 2002. “Ficino in the Firing Line: A Renaissance Neo-Platonist and His Critics.” Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy, eds. Allen, M. J. B. & Rees, V.. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Kristeller, P. O. 1956. Studies in Renaissance Thought and Letters. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lactantius, . 2003. Divine Institutes, trans. Bowen, A. & Garnsey, P.. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Lanza, L. 1994. “Aspetti della Ricezione della Politica Aristotelica nel XIII Secolo: Pietro d’Alvernia.” Studi Medievali 35: 643–94.Google Scholar
Lanza, L. 2002. “I Commenti Medievali alla Politica e la Riflessione sullo Stato in Francia (Secoli XIII–XIV).” The Philosophical Commentary in the Latin West, 13th–15th Centuries, eds. Fioravanti, G., Leonardi, C., & Perfetti, S.. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. 2006. Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong and How We the People Can Correct It. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsius, J. 1970 (1594). Sixe Bookes of Politickes or Civil Doctrine, trans. Jones, W.. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
Livy, . 1919. Ab Urbe Condita, trans. Foster, B. O.. Cambridge, Mass.: Loeb Classics.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C. A. 1912. Henry Demarest Lloyd, 1847–1903. 2 vols. New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Lloyd, H. D. 1894. Wealth against Commonwealth. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lloyd, H. D. 1896. “The Populists at St. Louis.” Review of Reviews 14: 298–303.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, N. 1965. Chief Works and Others, ed. Gilbert, A.. 3 vols. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Macune, C. 1891. The Alliance, the Sub-Treasury Plan, Politics. Washington, D.C.: National Economist.Google Scholar
Maloy, J. S. 2008. The Colonial American Origins of Modern Democratic Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloy, J. S. 2011. “The First Machiavellian Moment in America.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 450–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, J. P. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, A. 2006. The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrade, A. S., Kilcullen, J., & Kempshall, M. S., eds. 2001. The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McMath, R. C. 1982. “The Movement Culture of Populism Reconsidered: Cultural Origins of the Farmers’ Alliance of Texas, 1879–86.” Southwestern Agriculture, Pre-Columbian to Modern, eds. Dethloff, H. C. & May, I. M.. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
Means, D. M. 1894. The Boss: An Essay upon the Art of Governing American Cities. New York: G.H. Richmond.Google Scholar
Menand, L. 2002. The Metaphysical Club. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R. 2011. Populist Cartoons: An Illustrated History of the Third-Party Movement in the 1890s. Kirksville, Mo.: Truman State University Press.Google Scholar
Monfasani, J. 1976. George of Trebizond. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Monfasani, J. 1988. “Humanism and Rhetoric.” Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms, and Legacy, vol. 3, ed. Rabil, A.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
de Montaigne, M. 1958. The Complete Works, ed. & trans. Frame, D. M.. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. S. 1968 (1891). History of the Wheel and the Alliance; and, The Impending Revolution. 3rd ed. New York: B. Franklin.Google Scholar
Morison, S. E. 1956. The Intellectual Life of Colonial New England. 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Morrill, J. S. 2008. “How Oliver Cromwell Thought.” Liberty, Authority, Formality: Political Ideas and Culture, 1600–1900, eds. Morrow, J. & Scott, J.. Exeter, U.K.: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Mosse, G. L. 1957. The Holy Pretence: Christianity and Reason of State from William Perkins to John Winthrop. New York: H. Fertig.Google Scholar
Mott, F. L. 1957. A History of American Magazines, 1885–1905. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. 1974. Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nederman, C. J. 1998. “The Mirror Crack’d: The Speculum Principum as Political and Social Criticism in the Late Middle Ages.” European Legacy 3: 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nederman, C. J. 2007. “Giving Thrasymachus His Due: The Political Argument of Republic I and Its Reception.” Polis 24: 26–42.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. 2009. “Shakespeare and the Best State of a Commonwealth.” Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought, eds. Armitage, D., Condren, C., & Fitzmaurice, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OECD. 2011. Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Oestreich, G. 1982. Neo-Stoicism and the Early Modern State, trans. McLintock, D., eds. Oestreich, B. & Koenigsberger, H. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overmyer, D. 1897. “The Future of the Democratic Party.” Arena (no. 94): 302–17.Google Scholar
Overton, R. 1646. Vox Plebis. London.Google Scholar
Pade, M. 2007. The Reception of Plutarch’s Lives in Fifteenth-Century Italy. 2 vols. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
Parrington, V. L. 1930. The Beginnings of Critical Realism in America, 1860–1920. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Parrish, J. M. 2007. Paradoxes of Political Ethics: From Dirty Hands to the Invisible Hand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, A. M. 1989. Shakespeare and the Popular Voice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Peffer, W. A. 1898. “The Passing of the People’s Party.” North American Review 166: 12–23.Google Scholar
Peffer, W. A. 1992. Populism: Its Rise and Fall, ed. Argersinger, P. H.. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pennoyer, S. 1891. “The New Political Party.” North American Review 153: 220–6.Google Scholar
Petrina, A. 2009. Machiavelli in the British Isles. Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Piehler, H. R. 1979. “Henry Vincent: Kansas Populist and Radical-Reform Journalist.” Kansas History 2: 14–25.Google Scholar
Plato, . 1997. Complete Works, eds. Cooper, J. M. & Hutchinson, D. S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Plutarch, . 1914. Lives, trans. Perrin, B.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pollack, N., ed. 1967. The Populist Mind. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Postel, C. 2007. The Populist Vision. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powderly, T. V. 1892. “Government Ownership of Railways.” Arena (no. 37): 58–63.Google Scholar
Procacci, G. 1965. Studi sulla Fortuna del Machiavelli. Rome: Istituto Storico.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. 1999. “Minimalist Theory of Democracy: A Defence.” Democracy’s Value, eds. Shapiro, I. & Hacker-Cordon, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rahe, P. A. 2007. “In the Shadow of Lucretius: The Epicurean Foundations of Machiavelli’s Political Thought.” History of Political Thought 28: 30–55.Google Scholar
Rees, V. 2002. “Ficino’s Advice to Princes.” Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy, eds. Allen, M. J. B. & Rees, V.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1988. Philosopher-Kings. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Renna, T. 1978. “Aristotle and the French Monarchy, 1260–1303.” Viator 9: 309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, E. F. 1958. The Renaissance Idea of Wisdom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, E. W. 2011. Democracy beyond Athens: Popular Government in the Classical Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. 1625. A Just and Necessary Apologie of Certain Christians. N.p.
Robinson, J. 1851. Works, ed. Ashton, R.. 3 vols. London: J. Snow.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. R. 1897. “Freedom and Its Opportunities.” Arena (no. 96): 577–89.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1998. Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2002. “A Paideia for the Ruler: Plutarch’s Dream of Collaboration between Philosopher and Ruler.” Sage and Emperor: Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals, and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 A.D.), eds. Stadter, P. A. & Van der Stockt, L.. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, N. 1991. “Italian Political Thought, 1450–1530.” The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Runciman, S. 1958. The Sicilian Vespers: A History of the Mediterranean World in the Later Thirteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, N. 1981. “Squanto, the Last Patuxet.” Struggle and Survival in Colonial America, eds. Sweet, D. G. & Nash, G. B.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sargent, M. L. 1988. “The Conservative Covenant: The Rise of the Mayflower Compact in American Myth.” New England Quarterly 61: 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Schaffner, F., 1964. The Best Man. Screenplay by Vidal, G.. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.Google Scholar
Schellhase, K. C. 1976. Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlatter, R., ed. 1975. Hobbes’s Thucydides. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1988. Algernon Sidney and the English Republic, 1623–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus. 1994. Outlines of Scepticism, trans. Annas, J. & Barnes, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. 1997. The Riverside Shakespeare, ed. Evans, G. B. 2 vols. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. 1999. “Enough of Deliberation, Politics Is about Interests and Power.” Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, S.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. 2005. The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, A., ed. 1998. The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Sherman, C. R. 1995. Imaging Aristotle: Verbal and Visual Representation in Fourteenth-Century France. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shurtleff, N. B., ed. 1854. Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay. 5 vols. Boston: W. White.
Siemsen, T. 1987. “Thrasymachus’ Challenge.” History of Political Thought 8: 1–19.Google Scholar
Sol, T. 2005. Fallait-il Tuer César? L’Argumentation Politique de Dante à Machiavel. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Soll, J. 2005. Publishing the Prince: History, Reading, and the Birth of Political Criticism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streater, J. 1653. A Glympse of That Jewel: Judicial, Just, Preserving Liberty. London: G. Calvert.Google Scholar
Summers, M. W. 2004. Party Games: Getting, Keeping, and Using Power in the Gilded Age. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tacitus, C. 1937. The Histories; and, The Annals, trans. Moore, C. H. & Jackson, J.. 4 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taubeneck, H. E. 1897. “The Concentration of Wealth, Its Causes and Results.” Arena (no. 95): 452–69.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. S. 1892. “Danger Ahead.” Arena (no. 27): 286–96.Google Scholar
Terry, B. S. 1895. “The Commonwealth and Protectorate.” Dial 18: 234–6.Google Scholar
Thoreau, H. D. 1996. Political Writings, ed. Rosenblum, N. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thucydides, . 1928. History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. Smith, C. F.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tinkler, J. F. 1988. “Praise and Advice: Rhetorical Approaches in More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s Prince.” Sixteenth Century Journal 19: 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toste, M. 2007. “Virtue and the City: The Virtues of the Ruler and the Citizen in the Medieval Reception of the Politics.” Princely Virtues in the Middle Ages, 1200–1500, eds. Bejczy, I. P. & Nederman, C. J.. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, R. 2000. “Hobbes and Tacitus.” Hobbes and History, eds. Rogers, G. A. J. & Sorell, T.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 2002. “Flathman’s Hobbes.” Skepticism, Individuality, and Freedom: The Reluctant Liberalism of Richard Flathman, eds. Honig, B. & Mapel, D. R.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 2004. “The Utopianism of Leviathan.” Leviathan after 350 Years, eds. Sorell, T. & Foisneau, L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 2006. “Hobbes and Democracy.” Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, eds. Brett, A. & Tully, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tuttle, J. H. 1910. The Libraries of the Mathers. Worcester, Mass.: Davis.Google Scholar
Twain, M. 1972 (1873). The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today, ed. French, B. M.. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
von Vacano, D. A. 2007. The Art of Power. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Walker, L. J., ed. 1950. The Discourses of Niccolo Machiavelli. 2 vols. London: Routledge & K. Paul.
Wall, R. E. 1972. Massachusetts Bay: The Crucial Decade, 1640–50. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R., ed. 2000. The First Philosophers: The Pre-Socratics and Sophists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waterfield, R. 2009. Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Watson, T. E. 1892. “The Negro Question in the South.” Arena (no. 35): 540–50.Google Scholar
Watson, T. E. 1896. “Populism in the South.” Independent 48: 1–3.Google Scholar
Watson, T. E. 1975 (1892). The People’s Party Campaign Book, 1892. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. B. 1892. A Call to Action. Des Moines: Iowa Printing.Google Scholar
Westin, A. F. 1953. “The Supreme Court, the Populist Movement, and the Campaign of 1896.” Journal of Politics 15: 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, G. 1982. “The Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle’s Ethics.” Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, ed. Kretzmann, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wildman, J. 1645. Englands Miserie and Remedie. London.Google Scholar
Will, T. E. 1894. “Political Corruption: How Best Oppose?Arena 10: 845–60.Google Scholar
Williams, S. J. 2003. The Secret of Secrets: The Scholarly Career of a Pseudo-Aristotelian Text in the Latin Middle Ages. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, E. W., ed. 1916. Platforms of Political Parties in Texas. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Winthrop, J. 1867. Life and Letters, ed. Winthrop, R. C.. 2 vols. Boston: Ticknor & Fields.Google Scholar
Winthrop, J. 1972. The History of New England, 1630–49, ed. Savage, J.. 2 vols. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
Wolin, S. S. 1996. “Fugitive Democracy.” Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, S.. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1999. “Rhetoric and Relativism: Protagoras and Gorgias.” The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Long, A. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wootton, D., ed. 1986. Divine Right and Democracy. London: Penguin.
Worden, B. 1990. “Milton’s Republicanism and the Tyranny of Heaven.” Machiavelli and Republicanism, eds. Bock, G., Skinner, Q., & Viroli, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worden, B. 1995. “Wit in a Roundhead: The Dilemma of Marchamont Nedham.” Political Culture and Cultural Politics in Early Modern England, eds. Asmussen, S. D. & Kishlansky, M. A.. Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Worden, B. 2001. “The Levellers in History and Memory, ca. 1660–1960.” The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers, and the English State, ed. Mendle, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worden, B. 2007. Literature and Politics in Cromwellian England: John Milton, Andrew Marvell, Marchamont Nedham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, H. P. 1914. History of the Class of 1868, Yale College. New Haven, Conn.: Tuttle, Morehouse, & Taylor.Google Scholar
Wright, T. G. 1920. Literary Culture in Early New England, 1620–1730. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Xenophon, . 1953. Memorabilia, trans. Marchant, E. C.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yack, B. 1993. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice, and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zevon, C. 2007. I’ll Sleep When I’m Dead: The Dirty Life and Times of Warren Zevon. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • J. S. Maloy, Oklahoma State University
  • Book: Democratic Statecraft
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026697.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • J. S. Maloy, Oklahoma State University
  • Book: Democratic Statecraft
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026697.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • J. S. Maloy, Oklahoma State University
  • Book: Democratic Statecraft
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139026697.008
Available formats
×