Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T06:04:54.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Confucian Meritocracy for Contemporary China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Daniel A. Bell
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, Beijing
Chenyang Li
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Confucian moral and political thought concentrates on the cultivation of virtue (xiushen) by individuals and the rule of virtue (dezhi) in government. It emphasizes that every individual learn the virtues (such as xiao, ren, yi, zhi, xin, zhong, and he) by observing rituals (li) (i.e., a series of familial and social norms, ceremonies and patterns) affirmed by the tradition. In this tradition, only virtuous individuals deserve to be selected as rulers, and they will rule the people through rituals as well as other virtuous means, using coercion or punishment only as a last resort. In the Confucian view, rulers, as individuals, should strive to become outstanding exemplars of the good life for the people to follow. Government must be appropriately institutionalized to formulate proper policies and conduct suitable administrations to promote people's well-being. Accordingly, although the Confucian view of government can fit into the formal definition of political meritocracy that this book generally adopts – namely, a government by those with above-average ability or virtue along with a selection mechanism designed to choose them – it also goes deeply beyond it. A good Confucian polity inevitably involves substantive Confucian moral and political norms that provide specific guidance as to how rulers should rule. Without engaging such norms, it is impossible to offer an adequate account of Confucian meritocracy, because they are at least needed to inform what “merit” is precisely for a Confucian meritocracy. Such norms, for this book's concern with sorting out various political arrangements for legitimate legislature and governance, are also needed to distinguish the Confucian form of meritocracy from other forms, such as liberal meritocracy, because they are undeniably different.

Type
Chapter
Information
The East Asian Challenge for Democracy
Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective
, pp. 88 - 115
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ruiping, Fan, Reconstructionist Confucianism: Rethinking Morality after the West (Dordrecht: Springer, 2010)Google Scholar
Skorupski, , Ethical Explorations [Oxford University Press, 1999]Google Scholar
Rosalind, Hursthouse, “Normative Virtue Ethics,” in Roger, Crisp (ed.), How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), pp. 19–36Google Scholar
Christian, Swanton, Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 228–31Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph, “A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights for Contemporary China,” in Bauer, J. R. and Bell, D. (Eds.), East Asian Challenge for Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 212–37Google Scholar
Jeremy, Waldron, Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 376–7Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), p. 191.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will, “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality,” Ethics, vol. 99 (1989), p. 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tianjian, Shi and Jie, Lu, “The Shadow of Confucianism,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 21 (2010), pp. 125–6Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel, Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), pp. 162–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Anna J., “Origins of the Financial Market Crisis of 2008,” Cato Journal, vol. 29 (2009), p. 23Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice [Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971], p. 432)Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen, Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990], pp. 271–2)Google Scholar
Jiang, , A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Past Can Shape Its Political Future, eds. Bell, Daniel and Fan, Ruiping, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Fan, Ruiping, “Jiang Qing on Equality,” in Fan, (ed.), 2011, pp. 55–73
Fukuyama, Francis, America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), p. 20Google Scholar
Ventura, Stephanie J., “Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States,” NCHS Data Brief, vol. 18 (2009), pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Zuozhuan, Xuangong Year 4, in Zuozhuan (The Ch'un Ts'ew with the Tso Chuan), James, Legge, trans. (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1970), pp. 296–7Google Scholar
Confucian Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean, James, Legge, trans. (New York: Dover Publications, 1971)
Mencius, , The Works of Mencius, James, Legge, trans. (New York: Dover Publications, 1970)Google Scholar
Nivison, D. S., “‘Virtue’ in Bone and Bronze,” in The Ways of Confucianism (Chicago: Open Court, 1996), pp. 17–30.Google Scholar
Zang, Kehe, Chinese Language and Confucian Thought (zhongguo wenzi yu rujia sixiang) (Nanning: Guangxi Education Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Han Shi Wai Zhuan, Yanyuan, Lai (ed.), (Taibei: Taiwan Shangwu, 1972)
Liji, Tangong B, in Li Chi: The Book of Rites, James, Legge, trans. (New York: University Books, 1967), V.I, pp. 190–1.Google Scholar
De Bary, Wm. T. et al. (eds.), Sources of Chinese Tradition, vol. I (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), pp. 218–23.
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy VI.1 (March 2007)
Henry, Frankfurt, “Equality and Respect,” in Necessity, Volition, and Love (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 146–54.Google Scholar
Chenyang, Li, “Where Does Confucian Virtuous Leadership Stand?Philosophy East & West, vol. 59 (2009), p. 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×