Political Meritocracy and Meritorious Rule

Joseph Chan

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139814850.003

1 - Political Meritocracy and Meritorious Rule

A Confucian Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Joseph Chan

Edited by

Daniel A. Bell and

Chenyang Li

Show author details

Daniel A. Bell: Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, Beijing
Chenyang Li: Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Book contents

Get access

Summary

POLITICAL MERITOCRACY AND MERITORIOUS RULE

“Political meritocracy” is defined in this volume as “the idea that a political system should aim to select and promote leaders with superior ability and virtue.” Political meritocracy is thus different from democracy, which selects officials according to the votes of citizens; it is also different from monarchy, which selects rulers according to the principle of heredity. Political meritocracy is not equivalent to “meritorious rule” or “meritorious governance.” The former is primarily a selection principle and mechanism, and the latter is a quality of government or governance. “Meritorious rule” or “governance” refers to the fact that those in power are in fact of merit and do govern effectively.

It is important to distinguish between political meritocracy and meritorious rule in the context of a debate on the pros and cons of meritocracy. Meritocracy, one might argue, does not guarantee the selection of the meritorious – selection mechanisms may be imperfect or faulty and fail to assess the appropriate merit or prevent abuse in the selection process. Meritocracy also does not guarantee meritorious governance, for the meritocratically selected may not govern effectively. In addition, under certain favorable conditions, nonmeritocratic systems such as monarchy and democracy might achieve meritorious governance to a considerable extent.

Type: Chapter
Information: The East Asian Challenge for Democracy
Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective
, pp. 31 - 54

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814850.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mencius: A Bilingual Edition. Translated by Lau, D.C. (Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2003)

Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. 3 vols. Translated by Knoblock, John (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988–94)

Legge, JamesThe Chinese Classics: With a Translation, Critical and Exegetical Notes, Prolegomena and Copious Indexes in Five Volumes (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1960)Google Scholar

Liji zhengyi, annotated by Xuan, Zheng and Yingda, Kong (Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe), vol. 2 (2008), p. 878

Liji jijie, compiled by Xidan, Sun (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju), vol. 2 (1989), pp. 582–4

Pines, Yuri, Envisioning Eternal Empire: Chinese Political Thought of the Warring States Era (Hawaii: Hawaii University Press, 2009), p. 81Google Scholar

Yongjun, Yang, Shanrang Zhengzhi Yanjiu [A Political Study of Abdication] (Beijing: Xueyuanchubanshe, 2005), p. 86Google Scholar

Guangde, Sun, Zhongguo Zhengzhi Sixiang Zhuanti Yanjiuji [Collections of the Study of Chinese Political Thought] (Taipei: Laureate Book, 1999), pp. 3–10Google Scholar

Pines, Yuri, The Everlasting Empire: The Political Culture of Ancient China an Its Imperial Legacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012), p. 66Google Scholar

Huang, Ray, 1587: A Year of No Significance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), pp. 9–12Google Scholar

Chan, Joseph, Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times (Princeton: Princeton University Press, forthcoming, 2013)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ssu-yu, Teng and Fairbank, John K., China's Response to the West: A Documentary Survey, 1839–1923 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954), p. 140Google Scholar

Ying-shih, Yu, “The Idea of Democracy and the Twilight of the Elite Culture in Modern China,” in Bontekoe, Ron and Stepaniants, Marietta, eds., Justice and Democracy: Cross-cultural Perspectives (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1997), p. 201Google Scholar

Besley, Timothy, “Political Selection,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19 (2005), p. 44CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane, “A ‘Selection Model’ of Political Representation,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 17 (2000), pp. 369–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Frey, Bruno S., “A Constitution for Knaves Crowds Out Civic Virtues,” The Economic Journal, vol. 107 (1997), p. 1049CrossRef Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis, Democracy and Disagreement (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996), p. 12Google Scholar

Caplan, Bryan, The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Brennan, Jason, The Ethics of Voting (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Randolph Lucas, John, Democracy and Participation (Harmondsworth and Baltimore: Penguin, 1976), p. 200Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel A., Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel A., “Toward Meritocratic Rule in China? A Response to Professors Dallmayr, Li, and Tan,” Philosophy East and West, vol. 59 (2009), p. 556Google Scholar

Chenyang, Li, “Where Does Confucian Virtuous Leadership Stand?” Philosophy East and West, vol. 59 (2009), pp. 531–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Sor-hoon, Tan, “Beyond Elitism: A Community Ideal for a Modern East Asia,” Philosophy East and West, vol. 59 (2009), pp. 537–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Huang, Chichung, The Analects of Confucius (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel (American sociologist 1919–2011), “The Old War,” The New Republic, August 23 and 30, 1993, pp. 20–1

Estlund, David M., Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - Political Meritocracy and Meritorious Rule

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive