Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:01:12.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Geographical variation in terrestrial nitrogen budgets across Europe

from Part III - Nitrogen flows and fate at multiple spatial scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2011

Wim de Vries
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Adrian Leip
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Gert Jan Reinds
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre Alterra
Johannes Kros
Affiliation:
Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre
Jan Peter Lesschen
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Alexander F. Bouwman
Affiliation:
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Bruna Grizzetti
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Fayçal Bouraoui
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
Affiliation:
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Peter Bergamaschi
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Wilfried Winiwarter
Affiliation:
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Mark A. Sutton
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Clare M. Howard
Affiliation:
NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, UK
Jan Willem Erisman
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Gilles Billen
Affiliation:
CNRS and University of Paris VI
Albert Bleeker
Affiliation:
Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands
Peringe Grennfelt
Affiliation:
Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL)
Hans van Grinsven
Affiliation:
PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Bruna Grizzetti
Affiliation:
European Commission Joint Research Centre
Get access

Summary

Executive summary

Nature of the problem

  • Nitrogen (N) budgets of agricultural systems give important information for assessing the impact of N inputs on the environment, and identify levers for action.

Approaches

  • N budgets of agro-ecosystems in the 27 EU countries are established for the year 2000, considering N inputs by fertiliser application, manure excretion, atmospheric deposition and crop fixation, and N outputs by plant uptake, gaseous emissions, mineralisation, leaching and runoff.

  • Country N budgets for agro-ecosystems are based on the models INTEGRATOR, IDEAg, MITERRA and IMAGE. Fine geographic distribution is depicted with the former two models, which have higher spatial resolution. INTEGRATOR is the only available model for calculating non-agricultural terrestrial N budgets systems.

Key findings/state of knowledge

  • For EU-27, the models estimate a comparable total N input in European agriculture, i.e. 23.3–25.7 Mton N yr−1, but N uptake varies largely from 11.3–15.4 Mton N yr−1, leading to total N surpluses varying from 10.4–13.2 Mton N yr−1. Despite this variation, the overall difference at EU-27 is small for the emissions of NH3 (2.8–3.1 Mton N yr−1) and N2O (0.33–0.43 Mton N yr−1) but estimates vary largely at a regional scale. The estimated sum of N leaching and runoff at EU-27 is roughly equal to the sum of NH3, N2O and NOx emissions to the atmosphere, but estimates vary by a factor two, from 2.7 to 6.3 Mton N yr−1.

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
The European Nitrogen Assessment
Sources, Effects and Policy Perspectives
, pp. 317 - 344
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcamo, J. (ed.) (1994). IMAGE 2.0. Integrated modeling of global climate change. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 76, 1–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamaschi, P. (ed.) (2007). Atmospheric Monitoring and Inverse Modelling for Verification of National and EU Bottom-up GHG Inventories – report of the workshop ‘Atmospheric Monitoring and Inverse Modelling for Verification of National and EU Bottom-up GHG Inventories’ under the mandate of Climate Change Committee Working Group I, Casa Don Guanella, Ispra, Italy (08–09 March 2007). European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability.Google Scholar
Billen, G., Silvestre, M., Grizzetti, B. et al. (2011). Nitrogen flows from European regional water sheds to coastal marine waters. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloemerts, M. and Vries, W. (2009). Relationships between Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Natural Ecosystems and Environmental Factors. Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bouraoui, F. and Aloe, A. (2007). European Agrochemicals Geospatial Loss Estimator: Model Development and Application, EUR Report 22690 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Bouraoui, F., Grizzetti, B. and Aloe, A. (2009). Nutrient Discharge from River to Seas for Year 2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Bouwman, A. F., Drecht, G. and Hoek, K. W. (2005). Nitrogen surface balances in intensive agricultural production systems in different world regions for the period 1970–2030. Pedosphere, 15, 137–155.Google Scholar
Britz, W. (ed.) (2005). CAPRI Modelling System Documentation. Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact Analysis: “Development of a Regionalised EU-wide Operational Model to Assess the Impact of Current Common Agricultural Policy on Farming Sustainability”. J05/30/2004 – Deliverable 1, Bonn.
Britz, W., Heckelei, T. and Kempen, M. (2005). Description of the CAPRI Modeling System, final report of the CAPRI-DynaSpat Project. Institute for Food and Resource Econommics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Britz, W. and Leip, A. (2009a). Development of marginal emission factors for N losses from agricultural soils with the DNDC-CAPRI meta-model. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 133, 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britz, W. and Leip, A. (2009b). Development of marginal emission factors for N losses from agricultural soils with the DNDC-CAPRI meta-model. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 133, 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Kahl, M., Mykhayliv, L.et al. (2009). A European-wide inventory of soil NO emissions using the biogeochemical models DNDC/Forest-DNDC. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 1392–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Nemitz, E., Zaehle, S.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to the European greenhouse balance. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camargo, J. A. and Alonso, A. (2006). Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environment International, 32, 831–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cape, J. N., Eerden, L. J., Sheppard, L. J., Leith, I. D. and Sutton, M. A. (2009). Evidence for changing the critical level for ammonia. Environmental Pollution, 157, 1033–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,CAPRI (2010). http://www.ilr1.uni-bonn.de/agpo/rsrch/capri/capri_e.htm
Vries, W., Reinds, G. J., Gundersen, P. and Sterba, H. (2006). The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration in European forests and forest soils. Global Change Biology, 12, 1151–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, W., Kros, J., Voogd, J. C.et al. (2009). Comparing Predictions of Nitrogen and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Response to Changes in Live stock, Land Cover and Land Management Using Models at a National, European and Global Scale. AlterraWageningen UR, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Vries, W., Kros, J., Reinds, G. J., Wieggers, R., Velthof, G., Oudendag, D., Oenema, O., Nabuurs, G. J., Schelhaas, M. J., Perez Soba, M., Rienks, W., Winter, W., Akker, J., Bakker, M., Verburg, P., Eickhout, B. and Bouman, L. (2010). INTEGRATOR: A Modelling Tool for European-wide Assessments of Nitrogen and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Response to Changes in Land Cover, Land Management and Climate – Calculation Procedures, Application Methodology and Examples of Scenario Results. Alterra, Wageningen. Alterra Report (in preparation).Google Scholar
Vries, W., Leip, A., Reinds, G. J.et al. (2011). Comparison of land nitrogen budgets for European agriculture by various modeling approaches. Environmental Pollution (in press).Google ScholarPubMed
Dise, N. B., Ashmore, M., Belyazid, S.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial biodiversity. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,EC (2007). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC Concerning the Protection of Waters against Pollution Caused by Nitrates from Agricultural Sources for the Period 2000–2003. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.Google Scholar
,EDGAR (2010). http://www.mnp.nl/edgar/model/v32ft2000edgar/
,EEA (2005). Agriculture and Environment in EU15: The IRENA Indicator Report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
,EEA (2008). Annual European Community Greenhouse Gas inventory 1990–2006 and Inventory Report 2008, Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
,EEA (2010). http://www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/more-eu-member-states-to-miss-2010-air-pollutant-limits/nec-status-preliminary-results-2008-data.pdf
,EMEP (2009). Status Report 1/09 Transboundary Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe in 2007. Joint MSC-W & CCC and CEIP Report, Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway. (available through www.emep.int).Google Scholar
,EMEP (2010a). http://www.emep.int
,EMEP (2010b). http://www.ceip.at/
,GAINS (2010) http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/apd/gains/EU/index.login?logout=1
Gilliland, A. B., Dennis, R. L., Roselle, S. J. and Pierce, T. E. (2003). Seasonal NH3 emission estimates for the eastern united states based on ammonium wet concentrations and an inverse modeling method. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 4477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., Marsily, G. and Bidoglio, G. (2005). A statistical method for source apportionment of riverine nitrogen loads. Journal of Hydrology, 304, 302–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F. and Aloe, A. (2007). Spatialised European Nutrient Balance. Report EUR 22692 EN.
Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F. and Marsily, G. (2008). Assessing nitrogen pressures on European surface water. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 22, GB4023, doi:10.1029/2007GB003085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., Billen, G.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European water quality. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, A. I., Michalak, A. M., Bruhwiler, L. M.et al. (2006). Inverse modeling estimates of the global nitrous oxide surface flux from 1998–2001. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20, GB1008, doi: 10.1029/2004GB002443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höglund-Isaksson, L. and Mechler, R. (2005). The GAINS Model for Greenhouse Gases, Version 1.0: Methane (CH4), Interim Report IR-05–54. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Huang, J., Golombek, A., Prinn, R.et al. (2008). Estimation of regional emissions of nitrous oxide from 1997 to 2005 using multinetwork measurements, a chemical transport model, and an inverse method. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, doi:10.1029/2007JD009381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,IMAGE (2010), http://www.mnp.nl/en/themasites/image/ index.html
,IPCC (1997). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. UK Meteorological Office, Bracknell, UK.Google Scholar
,IPCC (2001). Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Published for the IPCC by the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.Google Scholar
,IPCC (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston, ed. H. Simon et al. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.Google Scholar
,IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kesik, M., Ambus, P., Baritz, R.et al. (2005). Inventories of N2O and NO emissions from European forest soils. Biogeosciences, 2, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konovalov, I. B., Beekmann, M., Richter, A., Burrows, J. P. and Hilboll, A. (2010). Multi-annual changes of NOx emissions in megacity regions: nonlinear trend analysis of satellite measurement based estimates. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 10, 10925–10968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leemans, R., Kreileman, E., Zuidema, G.et al. (1998). The IMAGE User Support System: Global Change Scenarios from IMAGE 2.1. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Leip, A., Marchi, G., Koeble, R.et al. (2008). Linking an economic model for European agriculture with a mechanistic model to estimate nitrogen and carbon losses from arable soils in Europe. Biogeosciences, 5, 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leip, A., Weiss, F. and Britz, W. (2009). Agri-environmental nitrogen indicators for EU27. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Integrated Assessment of Agriculture and Sustainable Development: Setting the Agenda for Science and Policy (AgSAP 2009), Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, 10–12 March 2009, ed. Ittersum, M. K., Wolf, J. and Laar, H. H.. Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 184–185.Google Scholar
Leip, A., Achermann, B., Billen, G.et al. (2011a). Integrating nitrogen fluxes at the European scale. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leip, A., Britz, W., Weiss, F. and Vries, W. (2011b). Farm, land, and soil nitrogen budgets for agriculture in Europe. Environmental Pollution (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Aber, J., Stange, F., Butterbach-Bahl, K. and Papen, H. (2000). A process oriented model of N2O and NO emissions from forest soils: I. Model development. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, 4369–4384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, A. J., Ryall, D. B., Derwent, R. G., Simmonds, P. G. and O'Doherty, S. (2003). Estimating European emissions of ozone-depleting and greenhouse gases using observations and a modeling back-attribution technique. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 4405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messager, C., Schmidt, M., Ramonet, M.et al. (2008). Ten years of CO2, CH4, CO and N2O fluxes over Western Europe inferred from atmospheric measurements at Mace Head, Ireland. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 8, 1191–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,MNP (2006). Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change: An Overview of IMAGE 2.4. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Moldanová, J., Grennfelt, P., Jonsson, Å. et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European air quality. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mosier, A., Kroeze, C., Nevison, C.et al. (1998). Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle (OECD/IPCC/IEA phase II development of IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventory methodology). Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 52, 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeteson, J. J. (2000). Nitrogen and phosphorus management on Dutch dairy farms: legislation and strategies to meet the regulations. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 566–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,OECD (2001). Environmental Indicators for Agriculture, Volume 3, Methods and Results. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.Google Scholar
,OECD (2007). Environmental Indicators for Agriculture, Volume 4, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.Google Scholar
,OECD (2010). http://stats.oecd.org/wbos/Index.aspx/datasetcode= ENVPERFINDIC_TAD_2008 and http://www.oecd.org/document/56/0,3343,en_2649_33793_40374392_1_1_1_1,00.html
Oenema, O., Boers, P. C. M., Eerdt, M. M.et al. (1998). Leaching of nitrate from agriculture to groundwater: the effect of policies and measures in the Netherlands. Environmental Pollution, 102, 471–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O., Kros, H. and Vries, W. (2003). Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies. European Journal of Agronomy, 20, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oenema, O., Oudendag, D. and Velthof, G. L. (2007). Nutrient losses from manure management in the European Union. Livestock Science, 112, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlandi, S. and Goot, E. (2003). Technical Description of Interpolation and Processing of Meteorological Data in CGMS, European Commission, DG JRC, Agrifish. Unit, http://mars.jrc.it/mars/content/download/640/4574/file/GridWeather.docGoogle Scholar
,OSPARCOM (1994). OSPARCOM Guidelines for Calculating Mineral Balances. Working Group on Nutrients, NUT 94/8/1-E, Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Prinn, R., Cunnold, D., Rasmussen, R.et al. (1990). Atmospheric emissions and trends of nitrous oxide deduced from 10 years of ALE-GAGE data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95, 18369–18385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryall, D. B., Derwent, R. G., Manning, A. J., Simmonds, P. G. and O'Doherty, S. (2001). Estimating source regions of European emissions of trace gases from observations at Mace Head. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2507–2523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D., Winiwarter, W., Börjesson, G.et al. (1999). Inventorying emissions from nature in Europe. Journal of Geophysical Research, 104, 8113–8152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D., Fagerli, H., Jonson, J. E.et al. (2003). Transboundary Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground Level Ozone in Europe PART I. Unified EMEP Model Description. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Simpson, D., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Fagerli, H.et al. (2006). Deposition and emissions of reactive nitrogen over European forests: a modelling study. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 5712–5726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, D., Aas, W., Bartnicki, J.et al. (2011). Atmospheric transport and deposition of nitrogen in Europe. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,UNFCCC (2010). www.unfccc.int
,UNFCC/IPCC (2010). http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/items/4146.php
Aardenne, J. A. (2002). Uncertainties in emission inventories. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
Velde, M., Bouraoui, F. and Aloe, A. (2009). Pan-European regional-scale modelling of water and N efficiencies of rapeseed cultivation for biodiesel production. Global Change Biology, 15, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthof, G., Oudendag, D. and Oenema, O. (2007). Development and Application of the Integrated Nitrogen Model MITERRA-EUROPE: Alterra report 1663.1. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Velthof, G. L., Oudendag, D. A. and Witzke, H. P. (2009). Integrated assessment of nitrogen emission losses from agriculture in EU-27 using MITERRA-EUROPE. Journal of Environmental Quality, 38, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velthof, G., Barot, S., Bloem, J.et al. (2011). Nitrogen as a threat to European soil quality. In: The European Nitrogen Assessment, ed. Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W.et al., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vieno, M., Dore, A. J., Wind, P.et al. (2009). Application of the EMEP Unified Model to the UK with a horizontal resolution of 5 × 5 km2 Atmospheric Ammonia. In: Detecting Emissions Changes and Environmental Impacts, ed. M. A. Sutton, S. Reis and Baker, S. M., Springer, New York, pp. 367–372.Google Scholar
Winiwarter, W. (2005). The GAINS Model for Greenhouse Gases – Version 1.0: Nitrous Oxide (N2O). IIASA Interim Report IR-05–55, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
Witzke, H. P. and Oenema, O. (2007). Assessment of Most Promising Measures Task 3 Service Contract “Integrated Measures in Agriculture to Reduce Ammonia Emissions”. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×