Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Preface
- I Introduction
- II Setting the scene
- 2 Ugly currents in modern economics
- 3 Modern economics and its critics
- 4 Some nonreasons for nonrealism about economics
- III Economic models and economic reality
- IV The constitution of economic reality
- V The institutions of economics
- Index
- References
2 - Ugly currents in modern economics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on the contributors
- Preface
- I Introduction
- II Setting the scene
- 2 Ugly currents in modern economics
- 3 Modern economics and its critics
- 4 Some nonreasons for nonrealism about economics
- III Economic models and economic reality
- IV The constitution of economic reality
- V The institutions of economics
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The last few years have seen an astonishing series of books and articles with titles like The Decline of Economics (Cassidy 1996), The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought (Heilbroner and Milberg 1996), Against Economics (Kanth 1996), The End of Economics (Perelman 1996), and even The Death of Economics (Omerod 1994). A survey of graduate students in elite American universities by Arjo Klamer and David Colander (1987, 1990) revealed a striking lack of interest among young would-be economists either in the economy or in the literature of economics; success in the economics profession, they shrewdly perceived, came principally to those with a knowledge of mathematical economics and econometrics. The study sparked a chorus of complaints about the nature of economic research and training at top universities in the Western world and led in 1991 to a full-scale report of a Commission on Graduate Education in Economics (1991) sponsored by the American Economic Association. The commission included leading figures in the economics profession and, like all such reports, produced a blend of various views in which, however, one dominant note appeared repeatedly: economics as taught in graduate schools has become increasingly preoccupied with formal technique to the deliberate exclusion of historical and institutional understanding. More recently, John Hey (1997), the Managing Editor of The Economic Journal, the leading economics journal in the UK, looked back over ten years of his editorship and summed up his appraisal of the type of papers that were regularly submitted to the journal:
Many of the submissions do not appear to be written in order to further economic knowledge.[…]
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fact and Fiction in EconomicsModels, Realism and Social Construction, pp. 35 - 56Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2002
References
(1970). The market for “lemons,” quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1954). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events, Economics Journal, 99, 78–96Google Scholar
Backhouse, Roger (1997). Truth and Progress in Economics Knowledge. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Bell, Daniel and Irving Kristol (1994). Crisis in Economic Theory. New York: Basic Books
Bhaskar, Roy (1978). A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press
Bhaskar, Roy (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press
Blaug, Mark (1989). Nicholas Kaldor, 1908–86, in David Greenaway and John R. Presley (eds.), Pioneers of Modern Economics in Britain. London: Macmillan, 77–80CrossRef
Blaug, Mark (1992). Methodology of Economics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–204
Blaug, Mark (1995). Afterword, in Neil De Marchi and Mark Blaug, Appraising Economic Theories. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 509
Blaug, Mark (1997). Competition as an end-state and competition as a process, in Mark Blaug, Not Only an Economist: Recent Essays. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, chapter 6
Boylan, Terence A. and Peter F. O'Gorman (1995). Beyond Rhetoric and Realism in Economics. London: Routledge
Clower, Robert (1995b). Economics as an inductive science, in Robert Clower, Economic Doctrine and Method: Selected Papers of R. W. Clower. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
(1993a). The institutional structure of production, American Economic Review, 82, 229–234Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald (1993b). The institutional structure of production, in Oliver E. Williamson and Sidney E. Winter (eds.), The Native of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–235
Commission on Graduate Education (1991). Report of the Commission on Graduate Education in Economics, The Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1035–1087
Cross, Rodney, (ed.), (1995). The Natural Rate of Unemployment: Reflections on 25 years of the Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapters 3, 5CrossRef
(1997). Imprecise tests and imprecise hypotheses, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44(3), 247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, Gerard (1959). Theory of Value
Dosi, Giovanni, Chris Freeman et al. (1998). Technical Change and Economic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press
Eichner Andrew S. (ed.) (1983). Why Economics is Not Yet a Science? London: Macmillan, 90–125, 205–241
(1989). Games economists play: a noncooperative view, Rand Journal of Economics, 20(1), 113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993). American and European economics and economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). An introduction to applicable game theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 127–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1990). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. London: Polity Press
Habermas, Jurgen (1992). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. London: Polity Press
(1997). Theory appraisal in neoclassical economics, Journal of Economic Methodology, 4(2), 289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbroner, Robert and William Milberg (1996). The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
(1997). The Economic Journal. Report of the Managing Editor, Royal Economic Society Newsletter, January, 3–5Google Scholar
Hicks, John (1939). Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1983). Economics and Evolution. Bringing Life Back Into Economics. London: Polity Press
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1985). Economics and Institutions. A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. London: Polity Press
(1995). Facts and artifacts: calibration and the empirical assessment of real-business-cycle models, Oxford Economics Papers, 47(1), 24–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howitt, Peter (1997). Expectations and uncertainty in contemporary Keynesian models, in G. C. Harcourt and P. A. Riach (eds.), A “Second Edition” of the General Theory, 1. London: Routledge, 239–240
(1972). The irrelevence of equilibrium economics, Economic Journal, 82(4), 1237–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas (1985). Economics without Equilibrium. Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press
Kanth, Rajani (1996). Against Economics. Aldershot: Ash Gate Publishing
and (1987). The making of an economist, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 95–111Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo and David Colander (1990). The Making of an Economist. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
Kurz, Heinz and Neri Salvadori (1997). On critics and protective belts, in Salanti, Andrea and Evnesto Screpanti (eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 232–259
Lawson, Tony (1997). Economics and Reality, London Routledge, 204, 288–289
(1971). Theoretical assumptions and nonobserved facts, American Economic Review, 6(1), 1–7Google Scholar
Lipsey, Richard G. (1979). Can the market economy survive?, in Richard G. Lipsey, Microeconomics, Growth and Political Economy: Essays by Richard G. Lipsey, I. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 367–401
Lucas, Robert E., Jr. and Thomas Sargent (1981). Rational Expectations and Econometric Practice. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press
McCloskey, D. N. (1986). The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press (2nd edn., 1998)
McCloskey, D. N. (1994). Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Malinvaud, Edmond (1997). The proper role of theory, in P. A. G. van Bergeijk et al. (eds.), Economic Science and Practice. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 149–165
(1988). Theory versus empiricism in academic economics: update and comparison, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4), 159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991). Can neoclassical economics underpin the reform of centrally planned economies?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(4), 59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, Gareth D. (1995). Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Boston: Harvard University Press
Omerod, Paul (1994). The Death of Economics. London: Faber
(1994). Endogenous growth theory: intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(1), 55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Michael (1996). The End of Economics. London: Routledge
Robinson, Joan (1933). The Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan
Robinson, Joan (1956). The Accumulation of Capital. London: Macmillan
(1997). Austrian and neoclassical economics: any gains from trade?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan (1994). Exploring the Black Box
Rubinstein, Ariel (1990). Game Theory in Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, IX
Rubinstein, Ariel (1995). John Nash: the master of economic modelling, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 97(1), 9–13CrossRef
Rutherford, Mark (1994). Institutions in Economics. The Old and the New Institutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Ryan, Charles and Andrew Mullineux (1997). The ups and downs of modern business cycle theory, in Brian Snowdon and Howard Vane, Reflections on the Development of Modern Macroeconomics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 141–147
Salanti, Andrea and Ernesto Screpanti (eds.) (1997). Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Scherer, F. Mark and David Ross (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 2nd edn. New York: Harper, 106–110
Screpanti, Ernesto (1997). Afterword: can methodological pluralism be a methodological canon?, in Andrea Salanti and Ernesto Screpanti (eds.), Pluralism in Economics: New Perspectives in History and Methodology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Shepherd, George B. (1995). Rejected. Leading Economists Ponder the Publication Process. Boston: Thomas Horton & Daughters, 53–54
Simon, Herbert A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality, in Spiro Latsis (ed.), Methodological Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Solow, Robert (1992). Growth theory, in David Greenaway et al. (eds.), Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought. London: Routledge, 393–415
Solow, Robert (1997). How did economics get that way and what way did it get?, Daedalus, 126, 39–58
(1991). The scientific illusion in empirical macroeconomics, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93(2), 129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997). The problem of knowledge in economics, Southern Economic Journal, 64(1), 8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, Jan (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Boston: MIT Press
Varian, Hal R. (1990). Intermediate Microeconomics. A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. New York: W. W. Norton
Vromen, Jack (1995). Economic Evolution. An Enquiry into the Foundations of the (New) Institutional Economics. London: RoutledgeCrossRef
(1997). Empirical realism as meta-method: Tony Lawson and neoclassical economics, Ekonomia, 1(2), 39–53Google Scholar
Walker, Donald (1997). Advances in General Equilibrium Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Wiles, Peter and Guy Routh (1984). Economics in Disarray. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
- 36
- Cited by