Book contents
- Global Change and Future Earth
- Special Publications of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics Series
- Global Change and Future Earth: The Geoscience Perspective
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Future Earth and Planetary Issues
- Part II Future Earth and Geodetic Issues
- Part III Future Earth and the Earth’s Fluid Environment
- 7 Future Earth and the Cryosphere
- 8 Geographical Research and Future Earth
- 9 Water Security: Integrating Lessons Learned for Water Quality, Quantity and Sustainability
- 10 Decadal Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Interaction in North Atlantic and Global Warming Hiatus
- 11 Sea Level Rise and Future Earth
- 12 Ocean Circulation: Knowns and Unknowns
- Part IV Future Earth and Regions
- Part V Future Earth and Urban Environments
- Part VI Future Earth and Food Security
- Part VII Future Earth and Risk, Safety and Security
- Part VIII Climate Change and Global Change
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
9 - Water Security: Integrating Lessons Learned for Water Quality, Quantity and Sustainability
from Part III - Future Earth and the Earth’s Fluid Environment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2018
Book contents
- Global Change and Future Earth
- Special Publications of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics Series
- Global Change and Future Earth: The Geoscience Perspective
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I Future Earth and Planetary Issues
- Part II Future Earth and Geodetic Issues
- Part III Future Earth and the Earth’s Fluid Environment
- 7 Future Earth and the Cryosphere
- 8 Geographical Research and Future Earth
- 9 Water Security: Integrating Lessons Learned for Water Quality, Quantity and Sustainability
- 10 Decadal Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Interaction in North Atlantic and Global Warming Hiatus
- 11 Sea Level Rise and Future Earth
- 12 Ocean Circulation: Knowns and Unknowns
- Part IV Future Earth and Regions
- Part V Future Earth and Urban Environments
- Part VI Future Earth and Food Security
- Part VII Future Earth and Risk, Safety and Security
- Part VIII Climate Change and Global Change
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Change and Future EarthThe Geoscience Perspective, pp. 121 - 130Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Azevedo, L. B., van Zelm, R., Leuven, R. S., Hendriks, A. J. and Huijbregts, M. A. (2015). Combined ecological risks of nitrogen and phosphorus in European freshwaters. Environmental Pollution, 200, 85–92.Google Scholar
Beer, T. (2003). Environmental risk and sustainability. In Risk Science and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht pp. 39–61.Google Scholar
German Advisory Council on the Environment (2015) NITROGEN: Strategies for resolving an urgent environmental problem. German Advisory Council on the Environment (SRU).Google Scholar
German Advisory Council on the Environment. (2015). Biodiversity and human health need ambitious reduction commitments: A German perspective on the new draft NEC Directive with regards to ammonia and nitrogen oxides. Partial translation of the Special Report “Nitrogen: Strategies for resolving an urgent environmental problem”. German Advisory Council on the Environment (SRU).Google Scholar
Erisman, J. W., Sutton, M. A., Galloway, J., Klimont, Z. and Winiwarter, W. (2008). How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience, 1(10), 636–639.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2014). Water Framework Directive. Official Journal of the European Union, Commission Directive 2014/101/EU, Amending Directive 2000/60/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32014L0101.Google Scholar
European Environment Agency. (2012). European waters-current status and future challenges, Synthesis. ISSN 1725–9177, EEA Report No 9/2012.Google Scholar
Faustman, E. M. and Omenn, G. S. (2013) Risk assessment. In Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 8th Edition, Klaassen, C. (ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., Kappel, C. V., Micheli, F., D’agrosa, C., Bruno, J. F., Casey, K. S., Ebert, C., Fox, H. E. and Fujita, R. (2008). A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 319(5865), 948–952.Google Scholar
IANAS. (2015). Urban Water Challenges in the Americas. A perspective from the Academies of Sciences. Inter-American Network of Academies of Sciences.Google Scholar
IARC. (1987). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Supplement 7. The Agency. International Agency for Research on Cancer.Google Scholar
ICSU. (2014). Future Earth 2025 Vision, Future Earth Research for Global Sustainability, Paris, France. International Council for Science.Google Scholar
Navoni, J. A., De Pietri, D., Garcia, S. and Villaamil Lepori, E. C. (2012). Riesgo sanitario de la población vulnerable expuesta al arsénico en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 31(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Laetz, C. A., Baldwin, D. H., Collier, T. K., Hebert, V., Stark, J. D. and Scholz, N. L. (2009). The synergistic toxicity of pesticide mixtures: implications for risk assessment and the conservation of endangered Pacific salmon. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(3), 348.Google Scholar
López-Doval, J. C., Montagner, C. C., de Alburquerque, A. F., Moschini-Carlos, V., Umbuzeiro, G. and Pompêo, M. (2017). Nutrients, emerging pollutants and pesticides in a tropical urban reservoir: Spatial distributions and risk assessment. Science of The Total Environment, 575, 1307–1324.Google Scholar
McClintock, T. R., Chen, Y., Bundschuh, J., Oliver, J. T., Navoni, J., Olmos, V., Lepori, E. V., Ahsan, H. and Parvez, F. (2012). Arsenic exposure in Latin America: Biomarkers, risk assessments and related health effects. Science of the Total Environment, 429, 76–91.Google Scholar
Meyer, F., Paarmann, D., D’Souza, M., Olson, R., Glass, E. M., Kubal, M., Paczian, T., Rodriguez, A., Stevens, R., Wilke, A. and Wilkening, J. (2008). The metagenomics RAST server–a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC bioinformatics, 9(1), 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, J. A., Cullen, A. C., Wallace, J. C., Smith, M. N. and Faustman, E. M. (2014). Metagenomic frameworks for monitoring antibiotic resistance in aquatic environments. Environmental Health Perspectives (Online), 122(3), 222.Google Scholar
Port, J. A., Wallace, J. C., Griffith, W. C. and Faustman, E. M. (2012). Metagenomic profiling of microbial composition and antibiotic resistance determinants in Puget Sound. PLoS One, 7(10), e48000.Google Scholar
Rusch, D. B., Halpern, A. L., Sutton, G., Heidelberg, K. B., Williamson, S., Yooseph, S., Wu, D., Eisen, J. A., Hoffman, J. M., Remington, K. and Beeson, K. (2007). The Sorcerer II global ocean sampling expedition: Northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol, 5(3), e77.Google Scholar
Schaap, M., Wichink Kruit, R., Hendriks, C., Kranenburg, R., Segers, A., Builtjes, P., Banzhaf, S. and Scheuschner, T. (2014). Ermittlung und Bewertung der Einträge von versauernden und eutrophierenden Luftschadstoffen in terrestrische Ökosysteme. Abschlussbericht zum F&E-Vorhaben: Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau.Google Scholar
Schiesari, L., Waichman, A., Brock, T., Adams, C. and Grillitsch, B. (2013). Pesticide use and biodiversity conservation in the Amazonian agricultural frontier. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 368(1619), 20120378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umbuzeiro, G. D. A., Heringa, M. and Zeiger, E. (2017). In vitro genotoxicity testing: Significance and use in environmental monitoring, in In vitro Environmental Toxicology - Concepts, Application and Assessment, Reifferscheid, G. and Buchinger, S., Editors. Springer International: Cham, Switzerland. p. 59–80.Google Scholar
UNICEF (2015). Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water 2015 Update and MDG Assessments. UNICEF and World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
UNU. (2013). Water Security and the Global Water Agenda- A UN Analytical Brief, UNESCAP, United Nations University, INWEH: Ontario.Google Scholar
Waichman, A. V., Eve, E. and da Silva Nina, N. C. (2007). Do farmers understand the information displayed on pesticide product labels? A key question to reduce pesticides exposure and risk of poisoning in the Brazilian Amazon. Crop Protection, 26(4), 576–583.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. C., Port, J. A., Smith, M. N. and Faustman, E. M. (2017). FARME DB: A functional antibiotic resistance element database. Database, (1).Google Scholar
WHO and Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. (2009). Principles for modelling dose-response for the risk assessment of chemicals (Vol. 239). World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
WHO and IARC. (2007). Smokeless tobacco and some tobacco-specific N-Nitrosamines. Vol 89. World Health Organization and International Agency for Research on Cancer: Geneva.Google Scholar
WHO and UNICEF. (2015). Progress on sanitation and drinking water–2015 update and MDG assessment. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
WHO. (2000). Joint IPCS/OECD Project on the Harmonization of Chemical Hazard/Risk Assessment Terminology (Harmonization Project). World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
WHO. (2011). Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality, 4th Edition. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar