Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T22:55:13.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Boundaries of integration or exclusion? Migration, mobility, and state sovereignty on the southern frontier to 1700

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Brian J. Boeck
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Recent surveys of Russia's emergence as an empire have asserted that Russians recognized no clear-cut boundaries between the Rus' metropole and the other territories affiliated with Rossiia, the empire. But was this in fact true? The evolution of Russia's southern boundaries in the seventeenth century is a story of exclusion rather than integration. Before the Russian state would attempt to annex the Don region, it first enacted, then enforced, a high degree of separation between itself and the Don. The sum of various seventeenth-century measures contributed to a demarcated and patrolled cordon sanitaire between Russia's underprivileged ethnic core and privileged Cossack frontier.

This chapter will argue that an imperial boundary – a system of earthen and wooden fortifications called the Belgorod line – made a transformative impact on both Russia and the Don region. The Muscovite state moved from a system of open frontiers to a patrolled infrastructure that demarcated the limits of Rus' and gave tangible expression to territorial sovereignty. It also inadvertently inaugurated a new era in the settlement history of the Don region: long-distance migration by isolated individuals or small groups gave way to inter-regional migration on a much wider scale. In order to assert and empirically enforce its sovereignty claims in the south, the state began to utilize its new boundary infrastructure not simply to prevent Tatar raids, but also to regulate the migration of its serfs and subjects into territories beyond its jurisdiction in the Don steppe frontier.

Type
Chapter
Information
Imperial Boundaries
Cossack Communities and Empire-Building in the Age of Peter the Great
, pp. 54 - 67
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lieven, Dominic, Empire: The Russian Empire and Its Rivals (New Haven, 2000), pp. 226, 229Google Scholar
Hosking, Geoffrey, Russia: People and Empire 1552–1914 (Cambridge, Mass., 1997), p. 40Google Scholar
Rieber, Alfred, “Persistent Factors in Russian Foreign Policy: An Interpretive Essay,” in Ragsdale, Hugh, ed., Imperial Russian Foreign Policy (Cambridge, 1993), p. 330Google Scholar
Pipes, Richard, Russia Under the Old Regime (New York, 1974), p. 79Google Scholar
Sunderland, Willard, Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe (Ithaca, N.Y., 2004), pp. 22–25Google Scholar
Khodarkovsky, Michael, Russia's Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800 (Bloomington, Ind., 2002), pp. 48–50Google Scholar
Shaw, Denis B., “Southern Frontiers of Muscovy, 1550–1700,” in Bater, J. H. and French, R. A., eds., Studies in Russian Historical Geography (London: Academic International Press 1983), vol. I, pp. 118–39Google Scholar
Davies, Brian L., State Power and Community in Early Modern Russia: The Case of Kozlov, 1635–1649 (New York, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotoshikhin, G. K., O Rossii v tsarstvovanie Alekseia Mikhailovicha (Saint Petersburg, 1906), p. 135Google Scholar
Kuts, O. Iu., “K voprosu o vydache beglykh iz donskogo kazach'ego soobshchestva,” Klio, zhurnal dlia uchenykh 8, no. 2 (1999), 188–193Google Scholar
Vtorov, N. and Aleksandrov-Dol'nik, K., Drevniia gramoty i drugie pis'mennye pamiatniki, kasaiushchiesia Voronezhskoi gubernii i chastiiu Azova (Voronezh, 1851–53), vol. I, p. 128Google Scholar
Torpey, John, The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State (Cambridge, 2000), p. 9Google Scholar
Kuts, O. Iu., “O sviaziakh naseleniia iuzhnorusskikh gorodov s donskimi kazakami,” Ocherki feodal'noi Rossii 4 (Moscow, 2000), 132–57Google Scholar
Hellie, Richard, Enserfment and Military Change in Muscovy (Chicago, 1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Man'kov, A. G., Razvitie krepostnogo prava v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XVII veka (Moscow, 1962), pp. 248–323Google Scholar
Druzhinin, V. G., Popytka Moskovskago pravitel'stva uvelichit' chislo kazakov na Donu v seredine XVII-go veka (Saint Petersburg, 1911)Google Scholar
Akty sobrannye v bibliotekakh i arkhivakh Rossiiskoi imperii III (Saint Petersburg: 1836), p. 143
Zagorovskii, V. P., Belgorodskaia cherta (Voronezh, 1969)Google Scholar
Stevens, Carol Belkin, Soldiers on the Steppe: Army Reform and Social Change in Early Modern Russia (DeKalb, Ill., 1995)Google Scholar
Vazhinskii, V. M., Zemlevladenie i skladyvanie obshchiny odnodvortsov v XVII veke (po materialam iuzhnykh uezdov Rossii) (Voronezh, 1974), pp. 58–59Google Scholar
Davies, Brian L., “The Recovery of Fugitive Peasants from Muscovy's Southern Frontier: The Case of Kozlov 1636–40,” in Russian History 19: 1–4, (1992), 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, N. I., ed., Dvorianstvo i krepostnoi stroi v Rossii XVI–XVII vv. (Moscow, 1975), p. 342
Novosel'skii, A. A., “Otdatochnye knigi beglykh kak istochnik dlia izucheniia narodnoi kolonizatsii na Rusi v XVII v.,” in Trudy istoriko-arkhivnogo instituta 2 (Moscow, 1946), 127–52Google Scholar
Lattimore, Owen, Inner Asian Frontiers of China (New York, 1940), p. 243Google Scholar
Boeck, B., Shifting Boundaries on the Don Steppe Frontier: Cossacks, Empires and Nomads to 1739 (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 2002), pp. 583–86Google Scholar
Druzhinin, V. G., Raskol na Donu v kontse XVII veka (Saint Petersburg, 1889), p. 13Google Scholar
Riabov, S. I., Donskaia zemlia v XVII veke (Volgograd, 1992), pp. 50–62Google Scholar
Chaev, N. S., ed., Bulavinskoe vosstanie (1707–1708 gg) (Moscow, 1934), p. 122
Lattimore, Owen, Inner Asian Frontiers of China (New York, 1940), p. 240Google Scholar
Meinig, D. W., The Shaping of America: A Geographical Perspective on 500 Years of History (New Haven, 1986), pp. 284–87Google Scholar
Novosel'skii, A. A., Issledovaniia po istorii epokhi feodalizma (Moscow, 1994)Google Scholar
Glaz'ev, V. N., Vlast' i obshchestvo na iuge Rossii v XVII veke (Voronezh, 2001)Google Scholar
Torke, Hans-Joachim, Die staatsbedingte Gesellschaft im Moskauer Reich (Leiden, 1974)Google Scholar
Pule, M., Materialy dlia istorii Voronezhskoi i sosednikh gubernii (Voronezh, 1861), 378Google Scholar
Veinberg, L. B., Materialy po istorii Voronezhskoi i sosednikh gubernii (Voronezh, 1885), 681Google Scholar
Fischer, Peter A., Martin, Reiner, and Straubhaar, Thomas, “Should I stay or Should I go?” in Hammar, Tomas, ed., International Migration, Immobility and Development: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Oxford, 1997), p. 83Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter, Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees (Berkeley, 1989), pp. 8, 61–63, 78–81, 93–100Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter, “State Formation and National Identity in the Catalan Borderlands during the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries,” in Wilson, Thomas M. and Donnan, Hastings, eds., Border Identities: Nation and State at International Frontiers (Cambridge, 1998), pp. 40, 45, 48–50Google Scholar
Kristof, Ladis K. D., “The Nature of Frontiers and Boundaries,” in Blij, Harm J., ed., Systematic Political Geography, 2nd edn. (New York, 1973), p. 137Google Scholar
Trudy Donskago voiskovago statisticheskago komiteta (Novocherkassk, 1867), vol. I, p. 58
Slavery in Russia 1470–1724 (Chicago, 1982), pp. 584–85
Campbell, Mavis C., The Maroons of Jamaica 1655–1796 (Granby, Mass., 1988), p. 2Google Scholar
Novosel'skii, A. A., “Kollektivnye dvorianskie chelobitnye,” in Dvorianstvo i krepostnoi stroi v Rossii XVI-XVII vv. (Moscow, 1975), pp. 303–43Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×