Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T12:47:40.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Next steps toward understanding interpersonal emotion dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2018

Ashley K. Randall
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Dominik Schoebi
Affiliation:
Université de Fribourg, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides a summary about of what is and is not known about interpersonal emotion dynamics. It draws heavily from the other chapters in the book, focusing on integrating themes and gaps in the literature that emerge when considering the other chapters. Open theoretical questions are highlighted, anomalies and contradictions in the empirical results are noted, and methodological limitations and potential solutions are pointed out.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babiloni, F., & Astolfi, L. (2014). Social neuroscience and hyperscanning techniques: past, present and future. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 7693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.07.006Google Scholar
Beauchaine, T. (2001). Vagal tone, development, and Gray's motivational theory: toward an integrated model of autonomic nervous system functioning in psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 183214.Google Scholar
Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2012). The construction of emotion in interactions, relationships, and cultures. Emotion Review, 4(3), 221–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912439765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, E. A., Gross, J. J., & Barnard, K. (2014). Testing the effects of suppression and reappraisal on emotional concordance using a multivariate multilevel model. Biological Psychology, 98, 618.Google Scholar
Butler, E. A., & Randall, A. K. (2013). Emotional coregulation in close relationships. Emotion Review, 5, 202–10.Google Scholar
Butner, J. E., Berg, C. A., Baucom, B. R., & Wiebe, D. J. (2014). Modeling Coordination in multiple simultaneous latent change scores. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(6), 554–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.934321Google Scholar
Chow, S., Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2007). An unscented Kalman filter approach to the estimation of nonlinear dynamical systems models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(2), 283321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, S., Hamaker, E. L., Fujita, F., & Boker, S. M. (2009). Representing time-varying cyclic dynamics using multiple-subject state-space models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 683716.Google Scholar
Coviello, L., Sohn, Y., Kramer, A. D. I., et al. (2014). Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PLoS ONE, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090315Google Scholar
Ferrer, E., & Steele, J. S. (2012). Dynamic systems analysis of affective processes in dyadic interactions using differential equations. In Hancock, G. R. & Harring, J. R. (Eds.), Advances in Longitudinal Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 111–34). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Ferrer, E., & Steele, J. S. (2014). Differential equations for evaluating theoretical models of dyadic interactions. In Molenaar, P. C. M., Newell, K. M., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Systems Theory and Methodology (pp. 345–68). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hamaker, E. L., & Grasman, R. P. (2012). Regime switching state-space models applied to psychological processes: handling missing data and making inferences. Psychometrika, 77(2), 400–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11336-012-9254-8Google Scholar
Hubbard, J. A., Parker, E. H., Ramsden, S. R., et al. (2004). The relations among observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children's anger. Social Development, 13(1), 1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijzerman, H., Heine, E. C., Nagel, S. K., & Pronk, T. M. (2017). Modernizing relationship therapy through social thermoregulation theory: evidence, hypotheses, and explorations. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00635Google Scholar
Lodewyckx, T., Tuerlinckx, F., Kuppens, P., Allen, N. B., & Sheeber, L. (2010). A hierarchical state space approach to affective dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 6883.Google Scholar
Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 292300.Google Scholar
Mesquita, B., & Boiger, M. (2014). Emotions in context: a sociodynamic model of emotions. Emotion Review, 6(4), 298302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534480Google Scholar
Moscovitch, D. A., Suvak, M. K., & Hofmann, S. G. (2010). Emotional response patterns during social threat in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder and non-anxious controls. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 785–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.013Google Scholar
Reeck, C., Ames, D. R., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). The social regulation of emotion: an integrative, cross-disciplinary model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 4763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.003Google Scholar
Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Co-regulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: an integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–67.Google Scholar
Timmons, A. C., Margolin, G., & Saxbe, D. (2015). Physiological linkage in couples and its implications for individual and interpersonal functioning: a literature review. Journal of Family Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, M., & Chow, S. (2010). Using state-space model with regime switching to represent the dynamics of facial electromyography (EMG) data. Psychometrika, 75(4), 744–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11336-010-9176-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×