Abdous, M., Camaera, M. M. & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76–95.Google Scholar

Abeysekera, L. & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Abuhamdeh, S. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2012). Attentional involvement and intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 257–267.Google Scholar

ACTFL. (2013). Program standards for the preparation of foreign language teachers (2013). Alexandria, VA: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL).Google Scholar

Al-Emran, M., Elsherif, H. M. & Shaalan, K. (2016). Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 93–102.Google Scholar

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V. & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412.Google Scholar

Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. (1987). Computer-assisted language learning. Prospects, 17(3), 417–429.Google Scholar

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (abridged ed.). New York: Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Appel, C. & Mullen, T. (2002). A new tool for teachers and researchers involved in e-mail tandem language learning. ReCALL, 14(2), 195–208.Google Scholar

Bailey, K. M. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In Richards, J. C. & Nunan, D. (eds.), Second language teacher education. (pp. 215–225). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Baker, F. B. & Kim, S.-H. (2017). The basics of item response theory using R. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Kurtines, W. M. & Gewirtz, J. L. (eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.Google Scholar

Barrette, C. (2001). Students’ preparedness and training for CALL. CALICO Journal, 19(1), 5–36.Google Scholar

Barson, J. & Debski, R. (1996). Calling back CALL: Technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency, and goal-oriented activity. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 49–68). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar

Bax, S. (2003). CALL: Past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.Google Scholar

Beauvois, D. H. (1995). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25(5), 455–464.Google Scholar

Beck, J., Czerniak, C. H. & Lumpe, A. (2000). An exploratory study of teachers’ beliefs regarding the implementation of constructivism in their classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), 323–343.Google Scholar

Beeres-Scheenstra, R., Ohnsorg, C., Candreia, C., Heinzmann, S., Castellanos, S., de Min, N. & Linder, T. E. (2017). Single-center study investigating foreign language acquisition at school in children, adolescents, and young adults with uni- or bilateral cochlear implants in the Swiss German population. Otology & Neurotology, 38(6), 833–838.Google Scholar

Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E. & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682.Google Scholar

Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and research autonomy (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Benson, P., Chappell, P. & Yates, L. (2018). A day in the life: Mapping international students’ language learning environments in multilingual Sydney. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 20–32.Google Scholar

Benson, P. & Voller, P. (eds.). (2013). Autonomy and independence in language learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Berger, P. (2017). Beyond plain except or sheer resistance: A typology of university instructors’ attitudes to students’ media use in class. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 410–417.Google Scholar

Blaj-Ward, L. (2017). Language learning and use in English-medium higher education. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on Spanish L2 interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136.Google Scholar

Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129–142.Google Scholar

Blin, F. (2016). Towards an “ecological” CALL theory: Theoretical perspectives and their instantiation in CALL research and practice. In Farr, F. & Murray, L. (eds.), Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 39–54). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. (1954). The thought processes of students in discussion. In French, S. J. (ed.), Accent on teaching: Experiments in general education (pp. 23–46). New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Blyth, A. (2015). Social media ethics in English language teaching. The JALT CALL Journal, 11(2), 165–176.Google Scholar

Bodsworth, H. & Goodyear, V. A. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to using digital technologies in the Cooperative Learning model in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(6), 563–579.Google Scholar

Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Boonbrahm, S., Kaewrat, C. & Boonbrahm, P. (2015). Using augmented reality technology in assisting English learning for primary school students. In Zaphiris, P. & Ioannou, A. (eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. LCT 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9192. (pp. 24–32). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A. & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six‐campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111.Google Scholar

Bower, M. & Sturman, D. (2015). What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers & Education, 88, 343–353.Google Scholar

Bradley, L., Lindström, N. B. & Hashemi, S. S. (2017). Integration and language learning of newly arrived migrants using mobile technology. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2017(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Brand, M. (2017). Theoretical models of the development and maintenance of Internet addiction. In Montag, C. & Reuter, M. (eds.), Internet addiction: Neuroscientific approaches and therapeutical implications including smartphone addition (2nd ed.) (pp. 19–34). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Brantley-Dias, L. & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: Is the construct “just right”? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128.Google Scholar

Breakwell, G. M. & Rose, D. (2006). Theory, method and research design. In Breakwell, G. M., G., Hammond, S. M, Fife-Schaw, C. & Smith, J. A. (eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 2–23). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Brown, A. & Green, T. (2003). Showing up to class in pajamas (or less!): The fantasies and realities of on-line professional development courses for teachers. The Clearing House, 76(3), 148–151.Google Scholar

Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar

Browne, C. & Culligan, B. (2008). Combining technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3–16.Google Scholar

Buckingham, D. (2007). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Burden, K. & Kearney, M. (2018). Designing an educator toolkit for the mobile learning age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(2), 88–99.Google Scholar

Burnell, K. & Kuther, T. L. (2016). Predictors of mobile phone and social networking site dependency in adulthood. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(10), 621–627.Google Scholar

Burns, T. R. & deVillé, P. (2007). Dynamic systems theory. In Bryant, C. D. & Peck, D. L. (eds.), Handbook of 21st century sociology (pp. 569–582). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Burston, J. (2003). Proving it works. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 219–226.Google Scholar

Burston, J. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–255.Google Scholar

Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.Google Scholar

Busse, V. & Walter, C. (2013). Foreign language learning motivation in higher education: A longitudinal study of motivational changes and their causes. The Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 435–456.Google Scholar

Çakmak, F. & Erçetin, G. (2018). Effects of gloss type on text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24–47.Google Scholar

Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Callon, M., Law, J. & Rip, A. (eds.), Mapping of the dynamics of science and technology (pp. 19–34). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Canals, L. & Al-Rawashdeh, A. (2019). Teacher training and teachers’ attitudes towards educational technology in the deployment of online English language courses in Jordan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 639–664.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89.Google Scholar

Carr, N. (2011). What the internet is doing to our brains: The shallows. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Casper, M. (1994). Reframing and grounding nonhuman agency: What makes a fetus an agent? American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 839–856.Google Scholar

Castells, M., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Qiu, J. L. & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Cavus, C. & Ibrahim, D. (2009). M-Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78–91.Google Scholar

Chalhoub-Deville, M. & Deville, C. (1999). Computer adaptive testing in second language contexts. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 273–299.Google Scholar

Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.Google Scholar

Chapelle, C. (1989). Using intelligent computer-assisted language learning. Computers and the Humanities, 23(1), 59–70.Google Scholar

Chen, C.-H., Liu, G.-Z. & Hwang, G.-J. (2015). Interaction between gaming and multistage guiding strategies on students’ field trip mobile learning performance and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1032–1050.Google Scholar

Chen, C.-M. & Chung, C.-J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–645.Google Scholar

Chen, C.-M. & Li, Y.-L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, (4), 341–364.Google Scholar

Chen, I.-J. & Chang, C.-C. (2011). Content presentation modes in mobile language listening tasks: English proficiency as a moderator. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 451–470.Google Scholar

Chen, X.-B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 20–36.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Carger, C. L. & Smith, T. J. (2017). Mobile-assisted narrative writing practice for young English language learners from a funds of knowledge approach. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 28–41.Google Scholar

Cheng, S., Hwang, W.-Y., Wu, S., Shadiev, R. & Xie, C. (2010). A mobile device and online system with contextual familiarity and its effects on English learning on campus. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 93–109.Google Scholar

Chik, A. (2020). Humorous interaction, language learning, and social media. World Englishes, 39, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12443.Google Scholar

Chik, A. & Breidbach, S. (2014). “Facebook me” within a global community of learners of English: Technologizing learner autonomy. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 100–118). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9–16.Google Scholar

Chun, D., Kern, R. & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning, The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 64–80.Google Scholar

Churchill, D. (2013). Conceptual model design and learning uses. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(1), 54–67.Google Scholar

Churchill, D., Fox, B. & King, M. (2016). Framework for designing mobile learning environments. In Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chu, T. K. F. & Fox, B. (eds.), Mobile learning design: Theories and application (pp. 3–26). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. A. (2005). CALL from the margins: Effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL, 17(1), 18–31.Google Scholar

Collot, M. & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In Herring, S. (ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 12–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Colpaert, J. (2006). Toward an ontological approach in goal-oriented language courseware design and its implications for technology-independent content structuring. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(2–3), 109–127.Google Scholar

Colpaert, J. (2010). Elicitation of learners’ personal goals as design concepts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 259–274.Google Scholar

Conole, G. & Paredes, P .P. (2018). An analysis of adult language learning in informal settings and the role of mobile learning. In Yu, S., Ally, M. & Tsinakos, A. (eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education (pp. 45–57). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Cook, V. (2016). Second language learning and language teaching (5th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Coombe, C. & Davidson, P. (2015). Constructing questionnaires. In Brown, J. D. & Coombe, C. (eds.), Research in language teaching and learning (pp. 217–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Introduction: Multiliteracies; The beginnings of an idea. In Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3–8). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cortese, C. G. (2005). Learning through teaching. Management Learning, 36(1), 87–115.Google Scholar

Cortese, C., Pupovac, S. & Xu, L. (2019). Applying open-book-open-web assessment in postgraduate accounting subject: Flipping test. In Zhang, Y. A. & Cristol, D. (eds.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning (2nd ed) (pp. 93–108). Singapore: Springer Nature.Google Scholar

Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Berge, Z. L. & Muilenberg, L. Y. (eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3–14). Florence, KY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crompton, H. (2016). The theory of context-aware ubiquitous learning and the affordances of this approach for geometry learners. In Churchill, D., Lu, J., Chu, T. K. F. & Fox, B. (eds.), Mobile learning design: Theories and application (pp. 303–314). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Crompton, H. & Traxler, J. (2018). Introduction. In Crompton, H. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning and higher education: Challenges in context (pp. 1–7). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890–1990. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Cuban, L. (2002). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cuban, L. & Jandrić, P. (2015). The dubious promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns and future challenges. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(3–4), 425–439.Google Scholar

Cui, Y. & Bull, S. (2005). Context and learner modelling for the mobile foreign language learner. System, 33(2), 353–367.Google Scholar

Cummings, J., Sturm, M. & Avram, A. (2020). Language teaching and settlement for newcomers in the digital age. Migration and Language Education, 1(1). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.29140/ile.v1n1.261.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. (1998). e-Lective language learning: Design of a computer-assisted text-based ESL/EFL learning system. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 18–21.Google Scholar

Cziko, G. A. & Park, S. (2003). Review of Internet audio communication for second language learning: A comparative review of six programs. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 15–27.Google Scholar

Darrach, B. (1970). Meet Shaky, the first electronic person. LIFE Magazine, 69(21), 58B–68B.Google Scholar

Dashti, F. A. & Aldashti, A. A. (2015). EFL college students’ attitudes towards mobile learning. International Education Studies, 8(8), 13–20.Google Scholar

Davazdahemami, B., Hammer, B. & Soror, A. (2016). Addiction to mobile phone or addiction through mobile phone? In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). (pp. 1467–1476). New York: IEEE.Google Scholar

Davies, A. & Elder, C. (eds.). (2004). The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.Google Scholar

de la Fuente, M. J. (2014). Learners' attention to input during focus on form listening tasks: The role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733710.Google Scholar

de la Guía, E., Lopez Camacho, V., Orozco-Barbosa, L., Brea Luján, V. M., Penichet, V. M. R. & Lozano Pérez, M. (2016). Introducing IoT and wearable technologies into task-based language learning for young children. IEEE Transitions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 366–378.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Moller, A. C. (2007). The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In Dweck, C. S. & Elliot, A. J. (eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 579–592). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (eds.). (2009). Handbook of self-determination. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Delcker, J., Honal, A. & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Mobile device usage in higher education. In Sampson, D., Ifenthaler, D., Spector, J. M. & Isaías, P. (eds.), Digital technologies: Sustainable innovations for improving teaching and learning (pp. 45–56). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Demouy, V., Jones, A., Kan, Q., Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Eardley, A. (2016). Why and how do distance learners use mobile devices for language learning? The EuroCALL Review, 24(1), 10–24.Google Scholar

Dewan, P. (2019). Reading in the age of continuous partial attention: Retail-inspired ideas for academic libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(3), 177–187.Google Scholar

Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J.O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar

Dikkers, S. M. (2014) The future of mobile media for learning. In Miller, C. & Doering, A. (eds.), The new landscape of mobile learning: Redesigning education in an app-based world (pp. 103–119). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching & learning motivation. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Dörynei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Conceptualizing learner characteristics in a complex, dynamic world. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z. (eds.), Complexity theory and language: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 79–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. & Kubanyiova, M. (2014). Motivating learners, motivating teachers: Building vision in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D. & Henry, A. (eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., Muir, C. & Henry, A. (2016). Motivational currents in language learning: Frameworks for focused intervention. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., Muir, C. & Ibrahim, Z. (2014). Energising language learning by creating intense emotional pathways. In Lasagabaster, D., Doiz, A. & Sierra, J. M. (eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 9–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching & learning motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. (1987). Relating second-language theory to CALL research and application. In Smith, W. F. (ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation (pp. 133–167). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co.Google Scholar

Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embedded interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ducate, L. & Lomicka, L. (2013). Going mobile: Language learning with an iPod Touch in intermediate French and German classes. Foreign Language Annals, 46(3), 445–468.Google Scholar

Dudeney, G., Hockly, N. & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies. Harlow, Essex: Pearson.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. (2012). Second language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. B. (eds.), The handbook of language socialization (pp. 564–586). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Duman, G., Orhon, G. & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216.Google Scholar

Dunkel, P. A. (1987). Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and computer-assisted language learning CALL): Past dilemmas and future prospects for audible CALL. The Modern Language Journal, 71(3), 250–260.Google Scholar

Dunn, J. (2017, March 3). People are holding onto their smartphones longer. Business Insider. Retrieved from www.businessinsider.com/how-long-people-wait-to-upgrade-phones-chart-2017-3.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L. & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Egbert, J. (2005). Conducting research on CALL. In Egbert, J. & Petrie, G. M. (eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 3–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Eilertsen, T. V. & Valdermo, O. (2000). Open-book assessment: A contribution to improved learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 91–103.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1990). Researching classroom language learning. In Brumfit, C. & Mitchell, R. (eds.), Research in the language classroom (pp. 54–70). London: Modern English Publications.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research & language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N. & Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

El Shaban, A. & Egbert, J. (2018). Diffusing education technology: A model for language teacher professional development in CALL. System, 78, 234–244.Google Scholar

Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5). Retrieved from www.iste.org/jrte/33/5/ertmer.html.Google Scholar

Ertmer, P. A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.Google Scholar

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E. & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59, 423–435.Google Scholar

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 454–459.Google Scholar

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.Google Scholar

Fageeh, A. I. (2015). EFL student and faculty perceptions of and attitudes towards online testing in the medium of Blackboard: Promises and challenges. The JALT CALL Journal, 11(1), 41–62.Google Scholar

Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.Google Scholar

Farazmand, A. (2016). Studying crisis and emergency management using global cases of best and worst practices. In Farazmand, A. (ed.), Global cases in best and worst practice in crisis and emergency management (pp. 1–15). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Fazzi, F. & Lasagabaster, D. (2020). Learning beyond the classroom: Students’ attitudes towards the integration of CLIL and museum-based pedagogies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1714630.Google Scholar

Felix, U. (2005). What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness? ReCALL, 17(2), 269–288.Google Scholar

Fellner, T. & Apple, M. (2006). Developing writing fluency and lexical complexity with blogs. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(1), 15–26.Google Scholar

Feng, Y. & Webb, S. (2019). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening and viewing: Which mode of input is the most effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000494.Google Scholar

Fenwick, T. & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems? System, 38(2), 272–279.Google Scholar

Fife-Schaw, C. (2006). Questionnaire design. In Breakwell, G. M., Hammond, G. S. M., Fife-Schaw, C. & Smith, J. A. (eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 210–231). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar

Fischer, R. (2012). Diversity in learner usage patterns. In Stockwell, G. (ed.), Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice (pp. 14–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fisher, L., Evans, M. J. & Esch, E. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Promoting learner autonomy and intercultural understanding at secondary level. Language Learning Journal, 30(1), 50–58.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, D., Hattie, J. & Hughes, P. (1985). Computer applications in Australian classrooms. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Retrieved October 3, 2017 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED314020.pdf.Google Scholar

Flanigan, A. & Kiewra, K. (2018). What college instructors can do about cyber-slacking. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 585–597.Google Scholar

Følstad, A. & Taylor, C. (2020). Conversational repair in chatbots for customer service: The effect of expressing uncertainty and suggesting alternatives. In Følstad, A., Araujo, R., Papadopoulos, S., Law, E. L.-C., Granmo, O. C., Luger, E. & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (eds.). Chatbot Research and Design Third International Workshop, CONVERSATIONS 2019, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, November 19–20, 2019, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 201–214). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Fornara, F. & Lomicka, L. (2019). Using visual social media in language learning to investigage the role of social presence. CALICO Journal, 36(3), 184–203.Google Scholar

Freeth, M., Foulsham, T. & Kingstone, A. (2013) What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PLoS ONE 8(1), e53286. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053286.Google Scholar

Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers and Education, 50, 906–914.Google Scholar

Friedman, D. A. (2008). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In Mackey, A. & Gass, S. M. (eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 180–200). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Friedman, T. L. (2006, July 5). The age of interruption. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2006/07/05/opinion/05friedman.html.Google Scholar

Friðriksdóttir, K. (2018). The impact of different modalities on student retention and overall engagement patterns in open online courses, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 53–71.Google Scholar

Fryer, L. K. & Carpenter, R. (2006). Bots as language learning tools. Language, Learning & Technology, 10(3), 8–14.Google Scholar

Fryer, L. K., Nakao, K. & Thompson, A. (2019). Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279–289.Google Scholar

Gabe, G. (2019, July 2). Google’s core algorithm updates and the power of user studies: How real feedback from real people can help site owners surface website quality problems (and more). G-Squared Interactive. Retrieved from www.gsqi.com/marketing-blog/google-core-ranking-updates-user-studies/.Google Scholar

Galletly, J. E., Butcher, C. W. & Lim How, J. (1989). In Cameron, K. (ed.), Computer assisted language learning: Program structure and principles (pp. 81–100). Oxford: Intellect Limited.Google Scholar

Galluch, P. S., Long, C., Bratton, T., Gee, M. & Groeber, M. (2009). Losing the battle: Student and instructor perspectives on attention loss in the classroom. In Rogers, C. F. (ed.), Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (pp. 45–50). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Galperin, H. (2016). How to connect to the other half: Evidence and policy insights from household surveys in South America (ed.), The shifting geopolitics of Internet access: From broadband and Net neutrality to zero-rating (pp. 5–36). London: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Gan, J. & Zhong, L. (2016). Empirical research on the influencing factors of mobile foreign language learning based on UTAUT model. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 13(10), 7526–7532.Google Scholar

García, O. & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

García Botero, G., Botero Restrepo, M. A., Chang, Z. & Questier, F. (2019): Complementing in-class language learning with voluntary out-of-class MALL: Does training in self-regulation and scaffolding make a difference? Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650780.Google Scholar

García-Peñalvo, F. J. & Alier Forment, M. (2014). Learning management system: Evolving from silos to structures. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 143–145.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. In Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. (eds.), Attitudes and motivation in second language learning (pp. 119–216). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C. & MacIntyre, P. D. (1991). An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1), 57–72.Google Scholar

Garrett, P. B. & Baquedano-López, P. (2002). Language socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 339–361.Google Scholar

Garrison, D. & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gartner. (2016). Gartner hype cycle. Retrieved from www.gartner.com/technology/research/methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp.Google Scholar

Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (2009). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gaved, M., Jones, A., Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Scanlon, E. (2012). A citizen-centred approach to education in the smart city: Incidental language learning for supporting the inclusion of recent migrants. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3(4), 50–64.Google Scholar

George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2004). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ghorbani, N. & Ebadi, S. (2019). Exploring learners’ grammatical development in mobile assisted language learning, Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1704599.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (2015). The ecological approach to visual perception (Classic Edition). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Gillwald, A. (2017). Beyond access: Addressing digital inequality in Africa. In Centre for International Governance (ed.), The shifting geopolitics of Internet access: From broadband and Net neutrality to zero-rating (pp. 37–54). London: Chatham House.Google Scholar

Glover, I. & Rodger, H. (2018). The death of “mobile learning.” In Crompton, H. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning and higher education: Challenges in context (pp. 82–91). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). From memory palaces to spacing algorithms: Approaches to second-language vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 4–11.Google Scholar

Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9–19.Google Scholar

Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Chasing the butterfly effect: Informal language learning online as a complex system. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 8–27.Google Scholar

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gregg, K. (2010). Review article: Shallow draughts; Larsen-Freeman and Cameron on complexity. Second Language Research, 26(4), 549–560.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, J., Cardoso, W. & Collins, L. (2017). Teacher perspectives on the integration of mobile-assisted language learning. In Borthwick, K., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL in a climate of change: Adapting to turbulent global conditions; Short papers from EuroCALL 2017 (pp. 135–139). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.702.Google Scholar

Grin, J., Rotmans, J. & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long-term transformative change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gromik, N. A. (2012). Cell phone video recording feature as a language learning tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 58(1), 223–230.Google Scholar

GSMA Intelligence. (2019). Definitive data and analysis for the mobile industry. Retrieved from www.gsmaintelligence.com/.Google Scholar

Gu, J. (2016). Understanding self-directed learning in the context of mobile Web 2.0: Case study with workplace learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 306–316.Google Scholar

Gu, X., Gu, F. & Laffey, J. M. (2011). Designing a mobile system for lifelong learning on the move. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 204–215.Google Scholar

Gunawardena, C. N., Palalas, A., Berezin, N., Legere, C., Kramer, G. & Amo-Kwao, G. (2016). Negotiating cultural spaces in an international mobile and blended learning project. In Dyson, L. E., Ng, W. & Fergusson, J. (eds.), Mobile learning futures: Sustaining quality research and practice in mobile learning (pp. 83–94). Sydney: The University of Technology, Sydney.Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D. & Barr, R. (eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 3, pp. 403–322). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685.Google Scholar

Hafner, C. A. & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86.Google Scholar

Halmdienst, N., Radhuber, M. & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2019). Attitudes of elderly Austrians towards new technologies: Communication and entertainment versus health and support use. European Journal of Ageing, 16, 513–523.Google Scholar

Han, Y. J. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for EFL autonomy. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1), 98–102.Google Scholar

Hanna, D. E., Brown, G., Dede, C., Olcott, D., Poley, J., Schmidt, K. & Tallman, J. (2000). Higher education in an era of digital competition: Choices and challenges. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Hanson, B. G. (1995). General systems theory: Beginning with wholes. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Hauck, M. & Kurek, M. (2017). Digital literacies in teacher preparation. In Thorne, S. & May, S. (eds.), Language, education and technology, Encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed.) (pp. 275–288). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Heift, T. & Caws, C. (2014). Constructing a data-driven learning tool with recycled learning data. Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 76–89.Google Scholar

Heijne-Penninga, M., Kuks, J. B. M., Schonrock-Adema, J., Snijders, T. A. B. & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2008). Open-book tests to complement assessment-programmes: Analysis of open and closed-book tests. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 263–273.Google Scholar

Heo, H., Lim, K. Y. & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392.Google Scholar

Higgins, J. & Johns, T. (1984). Computers in language learning. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Hiver, P. & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.Google Scholar

Hoffman, R. (1994). Powerful, personal: Electronic mail and the L2 writing process. ReCALL, 6(2), 53–62.Google Scholar

Hohenberger, A. & Peltzer-Karpf, A. (2009). Language learning from the perspective of nonlinear dynamic systems. Linguistics, 47(2), 481–511.Google Scholar

Hois, J., Theofanou-Fuelbier, D. & Junk, A. J. (2019). How to achieve explainability and transparency in human AI interaction. In Stephanidis, C. (ed.), HCI International 2019 – Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 1033 (pp. 177–183). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Holden, C. & Sykes, J. (2011). Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 1(2), 1–18.Google Scholar

Holec, H. (1981). Foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Holliday, A. (2003). Social autonomy: Addressing the dangers of culturism in TESOL. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives (pp. 110–128). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K.-H. & Lin, P.-H. (2019). The effects of intrinsic cognitive load and gameplay interest on flow experience reflecting performance progress in a Chinese remote association game. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614068.Google Scholar

Hong, J. S., Han, D. H., Kim, Y. I., Bae, S. J., Kim, S. M. & Renshaw, P. (2017). English language education on-line game and brain connectivity. ReCALL, 29(1), 3–21.Google Scholar

Hsieh, W.-M. & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Taiwanese high school teachers’ conceptions of mobile learning. Computers & Education, 115, 82–95.Google Scholar

Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J. & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327–336.Google Scholar

Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: A cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197–213.Google Scholar

Hsu, L. (2016). Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1287–1297.Google Scholar

Hu, Z. & McGrath, I. (2011). Innovation in higher education in China: Are teachers ready to integrate ICT in English language teaching? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 41–59.Google Scholar

Huang, C. S. J., Yang, S. J. H., Chiang, T. H. C. & Su, A. Y. S. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263–276.Google Scholar

Huang, L.-L. & Lin, C.-C. (2011). EFL learners’ reading on mobile phones. The JALT CALL Journal, 7(1), 61–78.Google Scholar

Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C. & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In Fotos, S. & Browne, C. (eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45–68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2005). A review of subject characteristics in CALL research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 351–368.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2008). Twenty-five years of theory in the CALICO Journal. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 387–399.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2009). Developing CALL theory: A new frontier. In Thomas, M. (ed.). New frontiers in CALL: Negotiating diversity (pp. 1–6). Nagoya: JALT CALL SIG.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.2.163-178.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2020). Levering technology to integrate informal language learning within classroom settings. In Dressman, M. & Sadler, R. W. (eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 405–419). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2006). The scope of CALL education. In Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 2–20). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In Farr, F. & Murray, L. (eds.), Routledge handbook of language learning and technology (pp. 24–38). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Hui, C. H. & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. & Teasley, S. D. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (p. 283–307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L. & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473.Google Scholar

Hwang, G. J. & Wu, P.-H. (2014). Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2), 83–95.Google Scholar

Hwang, W.-Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z.-H., Shadiev, R. & Chen, S.-Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639–657.Google Scholar

Im, I., Hong, S. & Kang, M. S. (2011). An international comparison of technology adoption testing the UTAUT model. Information & Management, 48(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Imlah, W. G. & du Boulay, J. B. H. (1985). Robust natural language parsing in computer-assisted instruction. System, 13(2), 137–147.Google Scholar

Isikoglu, N., Basturk, R. & Karaca, F. (2009). Assessing in-service teachers’ instructional beliefs about student-centered education: A Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 350–356.Google Scholar

Israel, M. & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J. & Luokkanen., T. (2007). Structuring and Regulating Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 71–79.Google Scholar

Jitpaisarnwattana, N., Reinders, H. & Darasawang, P. (2019). Language MOOCs: An expanding field. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 1(1), 21–32.Google Scholar

Karlström, P. & Lundin, E. (2013). CALL in the zone of proximal development: Novelty effects and teacher guidance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(5), 412–429.Google Scholar

Kassem, M. A. M. (2018). The effect of a suggested in-service teacher training program based on mall applications on developing EFL students’ vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 250–260.Google Scholar

Kaufman, D. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 303–319.Google Scholar

Kawahara, H. (2010). Student authentication for course credit in distance learning. Journal of Multimedia Education Research, 7(1), S57–S63.Google Scholar

Kawahara, H., Nogimori, M., Matsumoto, S. (2015). Maximizing study hours with cloud-based and mobile-based e-learning. In Ally, M. & Khan, B. H. (eds.), International handbook of e-learning, Volume 2: Implementation and case studies (pp. 211–221). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kearney, M., Burke, P. F. & Schuck, S. (2019). The iPAC scale: A survey to measure distinctive mobile pedagogies. TechTrends, 63, 751–764.Google Scholar

Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K. & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14406.Google Scholar

Kemp, J. & Smellie, D. (1994). Planning, producing, and using instructional technologies (7th ed.). New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar

Kennedy, C. & Levy, M. (2008). L’italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners’ language learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 315–330.Google Scholar

Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitudes toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 173–188.Google Scholar

Kessler, G. & Hubbard, P. (2017). Language teacher education and technology. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 278–292). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Khamparia, A. & Pandey, B. (2020). Association of learning styles with different e-learning problems: A systematic review and classification. Education and Information Technology, 25, 1303–1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10028-y.Google Scholar

Kiernan, P. J. & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell phones in task-based learning: Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(1), 71–84.Google Scholar

Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D.-J. & Seo, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 52–73.Google Scholar

Kim, G. (2017). Effects of mobile-assisted pre-listening activities and listening strategy training on EFL students’ listening comprehension skill and strategy use. Secondary English Education, 10(4), 47–70.Google Scholar

Kim, H. (2013). What to consider for effective mobile-assisted language learning: Design implications from an empirical analysis. In Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning: Proceedings of the WorldCALL 2013 Conference (pp. 138–140). Ulster, UK: University of Ulster. Retrieved from http://arts.ulster.ac.uk/worldcall2013/userfiles/file/shortpapers.pdf.Google Scholar

Kim, H. & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31–57.Google Scholar

Kim, H.-S. (2011). Effects of SMS text messaging on vocabulary learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 159–180.Google Scholar

Kim, N.-Y. (2017). A study on different types of speech acts in voice-chat between EFL students and a chatbot. Studies in English Education, 22(3), 81–109.Google Scholar

Kim, N.-Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligency chatbots for improving English grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46.Google Scholar

Kim, S.-K. & Lim, K. (2010). A case study on the effects of microblogging as a learning activity to enhance ESL students’ cultural knowledge and motivation to write in English. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 13(3), 155–174.Google Scholar

Kitade, K. (2006). The negotiation model in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC): Negotiation in task-based email exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 319–348.Google Scholar

Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material and nonhuman agency: An introduction. In Knappett, C. & Malafouris, L. (eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. ix–xix). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Koenraad, T. (2019). Pedagogical frameworks and principles for mobile (language) learning to support related teacher education. In Meunier, F., Van de Vyver, J., Bradley, L. & Thouesney, S. (eds.), CALL and complexity: Short papers from EUROCALL 2019 (pp. 229–235). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.38.1014.Google Scholar

Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H. & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: Developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(2), 169–187.Google Scholar

Koole, M. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In Ally, M. (ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education & training (pp. 25–47). Athabasca: AU Press.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2002). Introduction. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 1–30). London: Continnum.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2015). Applied linguistics: A theory of the practice. Applied Linguistics, 36(4), 454–465.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kress, G. & Pachler, N. (2007). Thinking about the “m” in m-learning. In Pachler, N. (ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 7–32). London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Krug, S. (2014). Don’t make me think revisited: A common sense approach to web and mobile usability (3rd ed.). San Francisco: New Riders.Google Scholar

Kuhn, G., Teszka, R., Tenaw, N. & Kingstone, A. (2016). Don’t be fooled! Attentional responses to social cues in a face-to-face and video magic trick reveals greater top-down control for overt than covert attention. Cognition, 146, 136–142.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning. In Chapelle, C. (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3701–3709). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). Language as a bridge connecting formal and informal learning through mobile devices. In Wong, L.-H. & Specht, M. (eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 281–294). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2016). Personalization of language learning through mobile technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A., Gaved, M., Paletta, L., Scanlon, E., Jones, A. & Brasher, A. (2015). Mobile incidental learning to support the inclusion of recent immigrants. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal, 7(2), 9–21.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Lee, H. (2020). Mobile collaboration for language learning and cultural learning. In Dressman, M. & Sadler, R. W. (eds.), The handbook of informal language learning (pp. 169–180). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A., Lee, H. & Norris, L. (2017). Mobile learning revolution: Implications for language pedagogy. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 217–233). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile teaching and learning. In Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Traxler, J. (eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 25–44). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207–218.Google Scholar

Kurek, M. & Hauck, M. (2014). Closing the digital divide: A framework for multiliteracy training. In Pettes Guikema, J. & Williams, L. (eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education: Research, perspectives, and best practice (pp. 119–140). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277–290.Google Scholar

Lai, C. (2019). Technology and learner autonomy: An argument in favour of the nexus between formal and informal learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 52–58.Google Scholar

Lai, C. & Morrison, B. (2013). Towards an agenda for learner preparation in technology-enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 154–162.Google Scholar

Lai, C., Shum, M. & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: The effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40–60.Google Scholar

Lai, C., Wang, Q., Li, X. & Hu, X. (2016). The influence of individual espoused cultural values on self-directed use of technology for language learning beyond the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 676–688.Google Scholar

Lai, C. & Zheng, D. (2018). Self-directed use of mobile devices for language learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 30(3), 299–318.Google Scholar

Lamb, M. (2017). The motivational dimension of language teaching. Language Teaching, 50(3), 301–346.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 78, 418–420.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (1995). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 108–124.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 46(4), 713–749.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Ten “lessons” from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D. & Henry, A. (eds.), Motivation dynamics in language learning (pp. 11–19). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In Ortega, L. & Han, Z. (eds.), Complexity theory and language: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Lauricella, S. & Kay, R. H. (2010). Assessing laptop use in higher education classrooms: The laptop effectiveness scale (LES). Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 151–163.Google Scholar

Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar

Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: Framing research questions. In Pachler, N. (ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153–176). London: WLE Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1995). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity: Social ordering and social theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Lawrence, G. (2014). The role of teachers and their beliefs in implementing technology-mediated language learning: Implications for teacher development and research. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 59–75.Google Scholar

Leakey, J. (2011). Evaluating computer-assisted language learning: An integrated approach to effectiveness research in CALL. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Lee, H., Hampel, R. & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2019). Gesture in speaking tasks beyond the classroom: An exploration of the multimodal negotiation of meaning via Skype videoconferencing on mobile devices. System, 81, 26–38.Google Scholar

Lee, S.-Y., Lo, Y.-H.G. & Chin, T.-C. (2019). Practicing multiliteracies to enhance EFL learners’ meaning making process and language development: A multimodal problem-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614959.Google Scholar

Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.Google Scholar

Leis, A. (2014). Encouraging autonomy through the use of a social networking system. The JALT CALL Journal, 10(1), 69–80.Google Scholar

Lejonberg, E., Elstad, E. & Christophersen, K. A. (2018). Teaching evaluation: Antecedents of teachers’ perceived usefulness of follow-up sessions and perceived stress related to the evaluation process. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 281–296.Google Scholar

Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A. & Kallinkos, J. (eds.), Materiality and organising: Social interaction in a technical world (pp. 25–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leung, C. & Scarino, A. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of goals and outcomes in language/s education. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (S1), 81–95.Google Scholar

Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, M. (2002). CALL by design: Discourse, products and processes. ReCALL, 14(1), 58–84.Google Scholar

Levy, M. & Hubbard, P. (2005). Why call CALL CALL? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 143–149.Google Scholar

Levy, M. & Steel, C. (2015). Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, 27(2), 177–196.Google Scholar

Levy, M. & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Lewis, T. (2014). Exploring the social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 3–11). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Li, J. (2018). Digital affordances on WeChat: Learning Chinese as a second language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 27–52.Google Scholar

Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.Google Scholar

Li, Z. & Hegelheimer, V. (2013). Mobile-assisted grammar exercises: Effects on self-editing in L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 135–156.Google Scholar

Liaw, S.-S., Hatela, M. & Huang, H.-M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454.Google Scholar

Lin, C.-C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48–59.Google Scholar

Lin, C.-C., Lin, V., Liu, G.-Z., Kou, X., Kulikova, A. & Lin, W. (2019). Mobile-assisted reading development: A review from the Activity Theory perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1594919.Google Scholar

Lin, C.-C. & Yu, Y.-C. (2017). Effects of presentation modes on mobile-assisted vocabulary learning and cognitive load. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 528–542.Google Scholar

Lin, J.-J. & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919.Google Scholar

Lindberg, J. O., Olofsson, A. D. & Fransson, G. (2016). Contrasting views: Student and teacher perceptions on ICT in education. The proceedings of the International Conference on Information Communication Technologies in Education 2016 (pp. 1–10).Google Scholar

Lisenbee, P. S. (2016). Generation gap between students’ needs and teachers’ use of technology in classrooms. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 17(3), 99–123.Google Scholar

Little, D., Dam, L. & Legenhausen, L. (2017). Language learner autonomy: Theory, practice and research. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Liu, H., Lin, C.-S. & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 745–765.Google Scholar

Liu, M., Navarrete, C. C. & Wivagg, J. (2014). Powering up: Insights from distinguished mobile and ubiquitous learning projects across the world. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 115–126.Google Scholar

Liu, P.-H. E. & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1–E4.Google Scholar

Liu, P.-L. & Chen, C.-J. (2015). Learning English through actions: A study of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 158–171.Google Scholar

Liu, S.-H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56, 1012–1022.Google Scholar

Liu, T.-Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515–527.Google Scholar

Liu, T.-Y. & Chu, Y. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630–643.Google Scholar

Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H. & Chu, Y. L. (2010). QR code and augmented reality-supported mobile English learning system. In Jiang, X., Ma, M. Y. & Chen, C. W. (eds.), Mobile multimedia processing. WMMP 2008. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 37–52). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. & Gu, X. (2019). Media multitasking, attention, and comprehension: A deep investigation into fragmented reading. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 67–87.Google Scholar

Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R. & Kim, K. M. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311.Google Scholar

Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 379, 259–278.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126.Google Scholar

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lorenz, E. N. (1972, December). Predictability: Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? Paper presented at the 139th meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, December 29, 1972, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://eaps4.mit.edu/research/Lorenz/Butterfly_1972.pdf.Google Scholar

Lotherington, H. & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in L2 settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–246.Google Scholar

Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525.Google Scholar

Luckin, R. (2010). Re-designing learning contexts: Technology-rich, learner-centred ecologies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lyddon, P. A. (2016). Mobile-assisted language learning and language learning autonomy. In Papadima-Sophocleous, S., Bradley, L. & Thouësny, S. (eds.), CALL communities and culture: Short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 302–306). Research-publishing.net https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.579.Google Scholar

Lyngs, U., Lukoff, K., Slovak, P., Binns, R., Slack, A., Inzlicht, M., Van Kleek, M. & Shadbolt, N. (2019). Self-control in cyberspace: Applying dual systems theory to a review of digital self-control tools. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’19) (pp. 1–18). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300361.Google Scholar

MacKay, J. (2019, March 21). Screen time stats 2019: Here’s how much you use your phone during the workday. Rescuetime:blog. Retrieved from https://blog.rescuetime.com/screen-time-stats-2018/.Google Scholar

Maier, J. R. A. & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance based design: A relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), 13–27.Google Scholar

Marín Juarros, V., Salinas Ibáñez, J. & de Benito Crosetti, B. (2014). Research results of two personal learning environments experiments in a higher education institution. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 205–220.Google Scholar

Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001 (89), 25–34.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 135–145.Google Scholar

Martín-Monje, E. & Bárcena, E. (eds.). (2014). Language MOOCs: Providing learning, transcending boundaries. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In Mayer, R. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCoy, B. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase 2: Student classroom use of digital devices the non-class related purposes. Faculty publications, College of journalism and miscommunication, 90. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub/90.Google Scholar

McGroarty, M. (2001). Situating second language motivation. In Dörnyei, Z. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report #23) (pp. 69–91). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar

McPherson, M. S. & Bacow, L. S. (2015). Online higher education: Beyond the hype cycle. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 135–154.Google Scholar

Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39, 427–436.Google Scholar

Merriam, S. & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Mideros, D. & Carter, B. (2014). Meeting the autonomy challenge in an advanced Spanish listening class. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 60–80). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mills, K. A. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, special, material and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Mindog, E. (2016). Apps and EFL: A case study on the use of smartphone apps to learn English by four Japanese students. The JALT CALL Journal, 12(1), 3–22.Google Scholar

Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E. & James, T. (2002). Preservice teachers’ educational beliefs and their perception of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116–127.Google Scholar

Miralpeix, I. & Muñoz, C. (2018). Receptive vocabulary size and its relationship to EFL language skills. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 56(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Milman, N. B. (2020, March 30). This is emergency remote teaching, not just online teaching. Education Week. Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2020/03/30/this-is-emergency-remote-teaching-not-just.html.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. & Newman, M. (2002). Complex systems theory and evolution. In Pagel, M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of evolution (pp. 1–5). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R., Myles, F. & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moghari, M. H. & Marandi, S. S. (2017). Triumph through texting: Restoring learners’ interest in grammar. ReCALL, 29(3), 357–372.Google Scholar

Mok, C. H. (2012). Facebook and learning: Students’ perspectives on a course. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 2(3), 131–143.Google Scholar

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M. & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Morrow, K. (1981). Principles of communicative methodology. In Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. (eds.), Communication in the classroom (pp. 59–66). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar

Murphy, L. (2014). Autonomy, social interaction, and community: A distant language learning perspective. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 119–134). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Murray, G. (2014). Exploring the social dimensions of autonomy in language learning. In Murray, G. (ed.), Social dimensions of autonomy in language learning (pp. 37–59). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar