Book contents
- Obstetric Interventions
- Obstetric Interventions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Animations
- Contributors
- Preface
- Classification of Evidence Levels
- Section 1 Anatomy
- Section 2 Normal Labor and Delivery
- Chapter 2 Normal Labor and Delivery
- Section 3 Pathology of Labor and Labor and Delivery
- Section 4 Ethics of Obstetrical Interventions
- Index
- References
Chapter 2 - Normal Labor and Delivery
from Section 2 - Normal Labor and Delivery
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2017
Book contents
- Obstetric Interventions
- Obstetric Interventions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Animations
- Contributors
- Preface
- Classification of Evidence Levels
- Section 1 Anatomy
- Section 2 Normal Labor and Delivery
- Chapter 2 Normal Labor and Delivery
- Section 3 Pathology of Labor and Labor and Delivery
- Section 4 Ethics of Obstetrical Interventions
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Obstetric Interventions , pp. 19 - 78Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Cunningham, F, Leveno, K, Bloom, S, et al. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.Google Scholar
Fraser, DM, Cooper, MA. Myles’ textbook for midwives. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2003.Google Scholar
Hals, E, Olan, P, Pirhonen, T, et al. A multicentre interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(4):901–8.Google Scholar
Heineman, MJ, Evers, JLH, Massuger, LFAG, Steegers, EAP. Obstetrie en Gynaecologie. De voortplanting van de mens. 7th edn. Amsterdam: Reed Business, 2012.Google Scholar
Holmer, AJM. Leerboek der verloskunde. Bussum: Van Dishoeck, Van Holkema & Warendorf NV, 1967.Google Scholar
Kloosterman, GJ. De Voortplanting Van De Mens. Leerboek voor obstetrie en gynaecologie. Weesp: Centen, 1985.Google Scholar
Leidraad bij de studie der obstetrie en gynaecologie in drie delen. Deel I en III. Excerpta lectionum.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s Health. Intrapartum care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Clinical Guideline. 2009. http://www.guidance.nice.org.uk/CG55.Google Scholar
Dudenhausen, JW. Praktische Geburtshilfe mit geburtshilflichen Operationen. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuwer, P, Bruinse, H, Franx, A. Proactive support of labor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stables, D, Rankin, J. Physiology in childbearing with anatomy and related biosciences. London: Baillière Tindall, 2005.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization, Maternal and Newborn Health/Safe Motherhood Unit, 1996.Google Scholar
Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland. Perinatale zorg in Nederland: Jaarboeken 2003–2012. Utrecht: PRN, 2014. http://www.perinatreg.nlGoogle Scholar
Aasheim, V, Nilsen, ABV, Lukasse, M, Reinar, LM. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12:CD006672.Google Scholar
Laine, K, Skjeldestad, FE, Sandvik, L, et al. Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001649.Google Scholar
Ponkey, SE, Cohen, AP, Heffner, LJ, Lieberman, E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101(5 Pt 1):915–20.Google Scholar
Wereldgezondheidsorganisatie. Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage and retained placenta. Geneva: WHO, 2012.Google Scholar
Gülmezoglu, AM, Lumbiganon, P, Landoulsi, S, et al. Active management of the third stage of labour with and without controlled cord traction: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1721–7.Google Scholar
Jangsten, E, Mattsson, LA, Lyckestam, I, et al. A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2011;118:362–9.Google Scholar
Hofmeyr, GJ, Abdel-Aleem, H, Abdel-Aleem, MA. Uterine massage for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD006431.Google Scholar
Begley, CM, Gyte, GM, Devane, D, et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD007412.Google Scholar
McDonald, SJ, Middleton, P, Dowswell, T, Morris, PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD004074.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London: RCOG, 2007.Google Scholar
Kalis, V, Laine, K, de Leeuw, JW, et al. Classification of episiotomy: towards standardization of terminology. BJOG. 2012;119:522–6.Google Scholar
Carroli, G, Mignini, L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K, Viswanathan, M, Palmieri, R, et al. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2141–8.Google Scholar
Beckmann, MM, Garrett, AJ. Antenatal perineal massage for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD005123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005123.pub2Google Scholar
Gupta, JK, Hofmeyr, GJ, Shehmar, M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:CD002006. doi:1002/14652858.CD002002.pub3.Google Scholar
Graham, ID, Carroli, G, Davies, C, et al. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth. 2005;32:219–23.Google Scholar
Stichting Perinatal Registratie Nederland. Perinatale zorg in Nederland 2012. Utrecht: PRN, 2013.Google Scholar
Christiaens, W, Nieuwenhuijze, MJ, de Vries, R. Trends in medicalisation of childbirth in Flanders and the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013;29:e1–8.Google Scholar
Räisänen, S, Vehlviläinen-Julkunen, K, Gissler, M, Heinonen, S. Hospital based lateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates: a retrospective population based register study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):347.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Feb 28.Google Scholar
Eogan, M, Daly, L, O’Connell, PR, et al. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? BJOG. 2006;113:190–4.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, JW, de Wit, C, Kuijken, JP, et al. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. BJOG. 2008;115:104–8.Google Scholar
Kalis, V, Stepan, J Jr, Horak, M, et al. Definitions of mediolateral episiotomy in Europe. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;100(2):188–9.Google Scholar
Verspyck, E, Sentilhes, L, Roman, H, et al. Episiotomy techniques. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2006;35:1540–51.Google Scholar
van Dillen, J, Spaans, M, van Keijsteren, W, et al. A prospective multicenter audit of labor-room episiotomy and anal sphincter injury assessment in the Netherlands. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010;108:97–100.Google Scholar
Kalis, V, Karbanova, J, Horak, M, et al. The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;103:5–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sultan, AH, Thakar, R. Lower genital track and anal sphincter trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16:99–115.Google Scholar
Andrews, V, Sultan, A, Thakar, R, et al. Risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth. 2006;33:117–22.Google Scholar
Baksu, B, Davas, I, Akyol, A, et al. Effect of timing of episiotomy repair on peripartum blood loss. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;65:169–73.Google Scholar
Kettle, C, Fenner, D. Repair of episiotomy, first and second degree tears. In: Sultan, AH. Perineal and anal sphincter trauma. Springer: London, 2008, pp. 20–32.Google Scholar
Kettle, C, Hills, R, Jones, P, et al. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2217–23.Google Scholar
Kettle, C, Hills, RK, Ismail, KMK. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(4):CD000947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000947.pub2.Google Scholar
Sartore, A, de Seta, F, Maso, G, et al. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:669–73.Google Scholar
Shorten, A, Donsante, J, Shorten, B. Birth position, accoucheur, and perineal outcomes: informing women about choices for vaginal birth. Birth. 2002;29:18–27.Google Scholar
Brito, LG, Ferreira, CH, Duarte, G, Noguera AA, Marcolin AC. Antepartum use of Epi-No birth trainer for preventing perineal trauma: systematic review. In Urogynecol J. 2015;10:1429–36.Google Scholar