Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T01:33:36.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Reality of Group Agents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Philip Pettit
Affiliation:
Princeton University University Center for Human Values
C. Mantzavinos
Affiliation:
Witten/Herdecke University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Human beings form many sorts of groups but only some of those groups are candidates for the name of agent. These are groups that operate in a manner that parallels the way that individual agents behave. They purport to endorse purposes, to form representations and to act for the satisfaction of those purposes according to those representations. And, building on those purported capacities, they make commitments and incur obligations, they rely on the commitments of others and claim rights against them. As candidates for group agents of this kind we might cite the partnership or the corporation, the church or the political party, the university or the state.

But are such entities truly agents? Or are they mere simulacra of agents? Do they replicate the agency of individual human beings? Or do they merely simulate it? That is the question I address in this chapter.

The chapter is in three sections. In the first section I set out the requirements that systems of any kind must fulfill if they are to count as agents. In the second I look at the way in which individuals might seek, on the basis of shared intention, to form a group agent. And then in the final section I show how the sort of entity they construct in that way can meet the requirements given and count as a genuine agent.

Type
Chapter
Information
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice
, pp. 67 - 91
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, N. 1981. “Psychologism and behaviorism,” Philosophical Review 90: 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. 1999. Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1979. Brainstorms. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1991. “Real patterns,” Journal of Philosophy 88: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, F. and List, C. (2007). “Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation,” Social Choice and Welfare, 29: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. 2001. “Collective preferences, obligations, and rational choice,” Economics and Philosophy 17: 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1994. Leviathan. Curley, E. (ed.) Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. 1988. “Functionalism and broad content,” Mind 97: 381–400; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit, and M. Smith, 2004. Mind, Morality and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. 1990a. “In defence of folk psychology,” Philosophical Studies 57: 7–30; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit, and M. Smith, 2004. Mind, Morality and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. 1990b. “Program explanation: A general perspective,” Analysis 50: 107–17; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit, and M. Smith, 2004. Mind, Morality and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. and Pettit, P. 1992. “In defence of explanatory ecumenism,” Economics and Philosophy 8; reprinted in F. Jackson, P. Pettit, and M. Smith, 2004. Mind, Morality and Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, L. A. and Sager, L. G. 1993. “The one and the many: Adjudication in collegial courts,” California Law Review 81: 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. 2004. “A model of path-dependence in decisions over multiple propositions,” American Political Science Review 98: 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. 2006. “The discursive dilemma and public reason,” Ethics 116: 362–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P. 2002. “Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result,” Economics and Philosophy 18: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, C. and Pettit, P. 2006. “Group agency and supervenience,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 4: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. 1960. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, S. 2001. Social Action: A Teleological Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, M. and Hees, M. (2006). “Logical constraints on judgment aggregation,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 35: 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. 1993. The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. Paperback edition 1996. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2001a. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Cambridge, New York, NY: Polity and Oxford Unive rsity Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2001b. “Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma,” Philosophical Issues supplement to Nous 11: 268–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. 2003. “Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma, and Republican Theory.” In Fishkin, J. and Laslett, P. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society Vol 7: Debating Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–162.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2007a. “Rationality, reasoning and group agency,” Dialectica 61: 495–519.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2007b. “Responsibility incorporated,” Ethics 117: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, P. and Schweikard, D. 2006. “Joint action and group agency,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36: 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1973. The Social Contract and Discourses. London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Rovane, C. 1997. The Bounds of Agency: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, D. 2002. “Organizations as true believers,” Journal of Social Philosophy 33: 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, R. 1995. The Importance of Us. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Reality of Group Agents
    • By Philip Pettit, Princeton University University Center for Human Values
  • Edited by C. Mantzavinos, Witten/Herdecke University
  • Book: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Reality of Group Agents
    • By Philip Pettit, Princeton University University Center for Human Values
  • Edited by C. Mantzavinos, Witten/Herdecke University
  • Book: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Reality of Group Agents
    • By Philip Pettit, Princeton University University Center for Human Values
  • Edited by C. Mantzavinos, Witten/Herdecke University
  • Book: Philosophy of the Social Sciences
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812880.007
Available formats
×