Book contents
- The Political Philosophy of Refuge
- The Political Philosophy of Refuge
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Differentiating Refugees
- Chapter 2 The State’s Right to Exclude Asylum-Seekers and (Some) Refugees
- Chapter 3 Asylum, Speech, and Tragedy
- Chapter 4 Border Rescue
- Chapter 5 Selecting Refugees
- Chapter 6 Refugees and the Right to Remain
- Chapter 7 The Duties of Refugees
- Chapter 8 Is Return the Preferred Solution to Refugee Crises?
- Chapter 9 Refugees and the Right to Return
- Chapter 10 Refugees, Rescue, and Choice
- Chapter 11 Philosophical Foundations for Complementary Protection
- Chapter 12 The Ethics of Sanctuary Policies in Liberal Democratic States
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 10 - Refugees, Rescue, and Choice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 November 2019
- The Political Philosophy of Refuge
- The Political Philosophy of Refuge
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Differentiating Refugees
- Chapter 2 The State’s Right to Exclude Asylum-Seekers and (Some) Refugees
- Chapter 3 Asylum, Speech, and Tragedy
- Chapter 4 Border Rescue
- Chapter 5 Selecting Refugees
- Chapter 6 Refugees and the Right to Remain
- Chapter 7 The Duties of Refugees
- Chapter 8 Is Return the Preferred Solution to Refugee Crises?
- Chapter 9 Refugees and the Right to Return
- Chapter 10 Refugees, Rescue, and Choice
- Chapter 11 Philosophical Foundations for Complementary Protection
- Chapter 12 The Ethics of Sanctuary Policies in Liberal Democratic States
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Do refugees have a right to choose where in the world to settle? Philosophers working on the ethics of asylum have recently grappled with this question. Some have argued that the legal and institutional recognition of a right on the part of refugees to choose their preferred state of settlement would make it harder for the international community to distribute the refugee burden among member states, thereby making it harder for them to assist as many refugees as possible. Even Joseph Carens, the most prominent defender of open borders, argues that under non-ideal conditions, refugees have a moral right to live somewhere safe, but lack ‘a moral entitlement to choose where that will be’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Political Philosophy of Refuge , pp. 193 - 210Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
- 1
- Cited by