Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Brain mechanisms
- Development
- 7 Editor's introduction: Methods in the developmental study of madness
- 8 Developmental psychopathology: From attribution toward information
- Comments on Sheldon H. White's chapter
- 9 A paradoxical partnership: Some historical and contemporary referents linking adult schizophreniform disorder and resilient children under stress
- 10 A look at the evolution of developmental models of schizophrenia
- 11 Developmental theory: Lessons from the study of risk and psychopathology
- 12 The return of the ancients: On temperament and development
- Thinking
- Genetics
- Response and reflections
- Author index
- Subject index
10 - A look at the evolution of developmental models of schizophrenia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Brain mechanisms
- Development
- 7 Editor's introduction: Methods in the developmental study of madness
- 8 Developmental psychopathology: From attribution toward information
- Comments on Sheldon H. White's chapter
- 9 A paradoxical partnership: Some historical and contemporary referents linking adult schizophreniform disorder and resilient children under stress
- 10 A look at the evolution of developmental models of schizophrenia
- 11 Developmental theory: Lessons from the study of risk and psychopathology
- 12 The return of the ancients: On temperament and development
- Thinking
- Genetics
- Response and reflections
- Author index
- Subject index
Summary
The roots of many current models of the development of schizophrenia can be traced to the theory advanced by Meehl in 1962. In this symposium volume, dedicated to Philip Holzman – whose own work and insights have illuminated our present understanding of schizophrenia so greatly and who attributes his turning toward research in that disorder to his reading the 1962 paper (Holzman, 1990) – it seems especially fitting, therefore, to begin my reflections on some of the features of contemporary developmental models with a look back at their most influential source, Meehl's original model. This is not to say that his model is not still up-to-date and important. Meehl (1989, 1990) has continued to update it and to make alterations as appropriate, based on new information. My task here, though, is to point out some of the conceptual changes and additions that have evolved in thinking about modelling schizophrenia's development, in light of accumulating research findings over the past two or three decades.
Summary of Meehl's model
Only a brief reminder about the essential elements of Meehl's model is in order here, as the theory, with its causal chains leading to the symptoms of schizophrenia, has been summarized many times (e.g., Gottesman and Shields, 1972, 1982; Meehl, 1972a, 1972b, 1989, 1990; Gottesman, 1991).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- PsychopathologyThe Evolving Science of Mental Disorder, pp. 229 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1996
- 2
- Cited by