Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
18 - Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
from Section 2 - Quality management of the ICU
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016
Book contents
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide
- Quality Management in Intensive Care
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section 1 Quality management of patient care
- Section 2 Quality management of the ICU
- 12 Tools to improve patient safety and adverse events
- 13 Clinical data management
- 14 Electronic ICU management systems
- 15 ICU staff
- 16 Severity scoring, improved care?
- 17 Implementation of evidence-based practice
- 18 Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice
- 19 Teambuilding
- 20 Conflict management in the intensive care unit
- 21 From polio to hospital-wide care
- 22 Patient and family satisfaction
- 23 Follow-up after intensive care
- 24 In situsmall-scale simulation
- Section 3 Quality management on the national (and international) level
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quality Management in Intensive CareA Practical Guide, pp. 142 - 151Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Sanchez, J, Barach, P. High reliability organizations and surgical microsystems: re-engineering surgical care. Surgical Clinics of North America, 2012; DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.005.Google Scholar
Rothschild, JM, Landrigan, CP, Cronin, JW, et al. The Critical Care Safety Study: the incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(8): 1694–1700.Google Scholar
Valentin, A, Capuzzo, M, Guidet, B, et al. Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32(10): 1591–1598.Google Scholar
Urbach, DR, Govindarajan, A, Saskin, R, et al. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. NEJM. 2014; 370: 1029–1038.Google Scholar
Glasby, J. Hospital Discharge: Integrating Health and Social Care. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
Hesselink, G, Vernooij-Dassen, M, Barach, P,et al. Organizational culture: an important context for addressing and improving hospital to community patient discharge. Medical Care, 2012; doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827632ec.Google Scholar
Mohr, J, Batalden, P, Barach, P. Integrating patient safety into the clinical microsystem. Qual Saf Healthc. 2004; 13: 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, JB. Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Nelson, E, Batalden, P, Huber, T, et al. Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002; 28: 472–493.Google ScholarPubMed
Eccles, M, Grimshaw, J, Walker, A, et al. Changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidem 2005; 58(2): 107–112.Google Scholar
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Behaviour Change at Population, Community and Individual Levels. London: National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007. www.nice.org.uk/PH006 (accessed 29 May 2015).Google Scholar
Lilford, R, Chilton, PJ, Hemming, K, Brown, C, Girling, A, Barach, P. Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points. BMJ 2010; 341: c4413.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T, Robert, G, Bate, P, et al. Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review. Oxford: Blackwell BMJ Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Grol, R, Wensing, M, Eccles, M, eds. Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice. Oxford: Elsevier, 2004.Google Scholar
van Bokhoven, MA, Kok, G, van der Weijden, T. Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach. Qual Saf Healthc. 2003; 12: 215–220.Google Scholar
Hesselink, G, Zegers, M, Vernooij-Dassen, M, et al. Improving patient discharge and reducing hospital readmissions by using Intervention Mapping. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 389.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D. The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct and disaster. Annu Rev Sociol 1999; 25: 271–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, DE, Anand, V. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Res Organ Behav. 2003; 25: 1–52.Google Scholar
Langley, G, Nolan, T, Provost, L, eds. The Improvement Guide, second edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by