Acloque, Paul 1982. “Histoire des Expériences pour la Mise en Évidence du Mouvement de la Terre,” Cahiers d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences 4 (new series): 1–141.
Aiton, Eric J. 1969. “Kepler’s Second Law of Planetary Motion,” Isis 60: 75–90.
Aiton, Eric J. 1972. The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motion. New York: Elsevier.
Aiton, Eric J. 1973. “Infinitesimals and the Area Law,” in Fritz Krafft, Karl Meyer, and Bernhard Sticker (eds.), Internationales Kepler-Symposium, Weil der Stadt 1971. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg.
Aiton, Eric J. 1981. “Celestial Spheres and Circles,” History of Science 19: 75–114.
Amico, Giovanni Battista 1536. De Motibus Corporum Coelestium Iuxta Principia Peripatetica Sine Eccentricis et Epicyclis. Venice: Ioanne Patavino et Venturino Roffinello.
Anderson, Wallace E. 1976. “Cartesian Motion,” in Peter K. Machamer and Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 200–23.
Aristotle 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Barbour, Julian B. 2001. The Discovery of Dynamics: A Study from a Machian Point of View of the Discovery and the Structure of Dynamical Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barker, Peter 1999. “Copernicus and the Critics of Ptolemy,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 30: 343–58.
Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R. 1994. “Distance and Velocity in Kepler’s Astronomy,” Annals of Science 51: 59–73.
Barker, Peter, and Goldstein, Bernard R. 2001. “Theological Foundations of Kepler’s Astronomy,” Osiris 16: 88–113.
Beeckman, Isaac 1939–1953. Journal Tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634, edited by Cornelis De Waard. 4 vols. Le Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.
Bennett, Jim A. 1975. “Hooke and Wren and the System of the World: Some Points Towards An Historical Account,” British Journal for the History of Science 8: 32–61.
Birch, Thomas 1756. The History of the Royal Society of London for Improving of Natural Knowledge. 4 vols. London: A. Millar.
Blackwell, Richard J. 1966. “Descartes’ Laws of Motion,” Isis 57: 220–34.
Blackwell, Richard J., and Huygens, Christiaan 1977. “Christiaan Huygens’ The Motion of Colliding Bodies,” Isis 68: 574–97.
Blair, Ann 2008. “Natural Philosophy,” in Katherine Park and Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365–406.
Boner, Patrick J. 2006. “Kepler’s Living Cosmology: Bridging the Celestial and Terrestrial Realms,” Centaurus 48: 32–39.
Boner, Patrick J. 2008. “Life in the Liquid Fields: Kepler, Tycho and Gilbert on the Nature of the Heavens and Earth,” History of Science 46: 275–97.
Bos, Henk 1981. “On the Representation of Curves in Descartes’ Géométrie,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 24: 295–338.
Bos, Henk 2001. Redefining Geometrical Exactness: Descartes’ Transformation of the Early Modern Concept of Construction. New York: Springer.
Bowen, Alan C. 2002. “Simplicius and the Early History of Greek Planetary Theory,” Perspectives on Science 10: 155–67.
Bowen, Alan C. 2007. “The Demarcation of Physical Theory and Astronomy by Geminus and Ptolemy,” Perspectives on Science 15: 327–58.
Brackenridge, J. Bruce, and Nauenberg, Michael 2002. “Curvature in Newton’s Dynamics,” in I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–137.
Brigandt, Ingo 2010. “The Epistemic Goal of a Concept: Accounting for the Rationality of Semantic Change and Variation,” Synthese 177: 19–40.
Brown, Harvey R. 2005. Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burtt, Edwin A. 1954. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Butterfield, Herbert 1957. The Origins of Modern Science. London: G. Bell.
Büttner, Jochen 2008. “Big Wheel Keep on Turning,” Galilaeana 5: 33–62.
Camerota, Michele, and Helbing, Mario 2000. “Galileo and Pisan Aristotelianism: Galileo’s ‘De Motu Antiquiora’ and the Quaestiones de Motu Elementorum of the Pisan Professors,” Early Science and Medicine 5: 319–65.
Carnap, Rudolf 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4: 20–40.
Caspar, Max 1959. Kepler, translated by C. Doris Hellman. London: Abelard-Schuman.
Chang, Hasok 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen-Morris, Raz 2001. “Optics, Imagination, and the Construction of Scientific Observation in Kepler’s New Science,” Monist 84: 453–86.
Clagett, Marshall 1959. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Clarke, Desmond M. 1996. “The Concept of Vis in Part III of the Principia,” in Jean-Robert Armogathe and Giulia Belgioioso (eds.), Descartes: Principia Philosophiae (1644–1994). Naples: Vivarum, pp. 321–39.
Clavelin, Maurice 1983. “Conceptual and Technical Aspects of the Galilean Geometrization of the Motion of Heavy Bodies,” in William R. Shea (ed.), Nature Mathematized. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 23–50.
Cohen, I. Bernard 1999. A Guide to Newton’s Principia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Copernicus, Nicolaus 1543. De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium, Libri VI. Nuremburg: Iohannes Petreus.
Copernicus, Nicolaus 1976. On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, translated by A. M. Duncan. London: David and Charles.
Copernicus, Nicolaus 1978. On the Revolutions, translated by Edward Rosen, edited by Jerzy Dobrzycki. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Copernicus, Nicolaus 2002. On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, translated by Charles Glen Wallis, edited by Stephen Hawking. Philadelphia: Running Press.
Costabel, Pierre 1966. “Varignon, Lamy, et le Parallélogramme des Forces,” Archive Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 19: 103–24.
Davidson, Donald 1967. “Causal Relations,” Journal of Philosophy 64: 691–703.
Davis, A. E. L. 1992. “Kepler’s ‘Distance Law’ – Myth Not Reality,” Centaurus 35: 103–20.
Davis, A. E. L. 2003. “The Mathematics of the Area Law: Kepler’s Successful Proof in Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae (1621),” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57: 355–93.
De Gandt, François 1995. Force and Geometry in Newton’s Principia, translated by Curtis Wilson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
De Risi, Vincenzo 2007. Geometry and Monadology: Leibniz’s Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
Dear, Peter 1995. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dear, Peter 1998. “Method and the Study of Nature,” in Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147–77.
Descartes, René 1897–1913. Oeuvres de Descartes, edited by Charles Adam and Paul Tannery. 13 vols. Paris: Léopold Cerf.
Descartes, René 1983. Principles of Philosophy, translated by Valentine Rodger Miller and Reese P. Miller. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Descartes, René 1985–1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, edited and translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes, René 1998. The World and Other Writings, translated by Stephen Gaukroger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Descartes, René 2001. Discourse on Method, Optics, Geometry, and Meteorology, translated by Paul J. Olscamp. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Di Bono, Mario 1995. “Copernicus, Amico, Fracastoro and Ṭūsῑ’s Device: Observations on the Use and Transmission of a Model,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 26: 133–54.
Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture, translated by C. Dikshoorn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
DiSalle, Robert 1995. “Spacetime Theory as Physical Geometry,” Erkenntnis 42: 317–37.
DiSalle, Robert 2006. Understanding Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Domski, Mary 2009. “The Intelligibility of Motion and Construction: Descartes’ Early Mathematics and Metaphysics, 1619–1637,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40: 119–30.
Donahue, William H. 2008. “Astronomy,” in Katherine Park and Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 562–95.
Drake, Stillman 1970. Galileo Studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Drake, Stillman 1978. Galileo at Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Drake, Stillman 1986. “Reexamining Galileo’s Dialogue,” in William A. Wallace (ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 155–78.
Drake, Stillman 1999. Essays on Galileo and the History and Philosophy of Science, edited by Noel M. Swerdlow and Trevor Harvey Levere. 3 vols. Vol. 2. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Drake, Stillman, and Drabkin, I. E. 1969. Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Dreyer, J. L. E. 1953. A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler. New York: Dover.
Dugas, René 1941. “Sur l’Origine du Théorème de Coriolis,” Revue Scientifique Illustrée (Revue Rose) 79: 267–70.
Dugas, René 1988. A History of Mechanics, translated by J. R. Maddox. New York: Dover Publications.
Duhem, Pierre 1913. Études sur Léonard de Vinci III: Les Précurseurs Parisiens de Galilée. Paris: Hermann.
Duhem, Pierre 1969. To Save the Phenomena, an Essay on the Idea of Physical Theory from Plato to Galileo, translated by Edmund Doland and Chaninah Maschler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Earman, John 1989. World Enough and Space-Time. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Epicurus 1987. “Letter to Herodotus,” in A. A. Long and D. N. Sedley (eds.), The Hellenistic Philosophers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feldhay, Rivka 1995. “Producing Sunspots on an Iron Pan,” in Henry Krips, J. E. McGuire, and Trevor Melia (eds.), Science, Reason, and Rhetoric. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 119–44.
Feldhay, Rivka 1998. “The Use and Abuse of Mathematical Entities,” in Peter Machamer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–145.
Ferguson, Kitty 2002. Tycho and Kepler: The Unlikely Partnership that Forever Changed Our Understanding of the Heavens. New York: Walker and Company.
Field, J. V. 1988. Kepler’s Geometrical Cosmology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 1980. Galileo and the Art of Reasoning. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 2001. “Aspects of the Controversy about Galileo’s Trial (from Descartes to John Paul II),” in José Montesinos and Carlos Solís (eds.), Largo Campo di Filosofare: Eurosymposium Galileo 2001. La Orotava, Tenerife: Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, pp. 491–512.
Fracastoro, Girolamo 1584. “Homocentricorum, sive de Stellis,” in Hieronymi Fracastorii Veronensis Opera Omnia. Venetiis: Apud Juntas, pp. 1–48.
Franklin, Allan 1976. The Principle of Inertia in the Middle Ages. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.
Fredette, Raymond 2001. “Galileo’s De Motu Antiquiora: Notes for a Reappraisal,” in José Montesinos and Carlos Solís (eds.), Largo Campo di Filosofare: Eurosymposium Galileo 2001. La Orotava, Tenerife: Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia, pp. 165–81.
Freudenthal, Gad 1983. “Theory of Matter and Cosmology in William Gilbert’s De magnete,” Isis 74: 22–37.
Friedman, Michael 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Friedman, Michael 1999. “Geometry, Convention, and the Relativized A Priori: Reichenbach, Schlick, and Carnap,” in Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–70.
Friedman, Michael 2001. Dynamics of Reason. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Friedman, Michael 2008. “Descartes and Galileo: Copernicanism and the Metaphysical Foundations of Physics,” in Janet Broughton and John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 69–83.
Furley, David J. 1976. “Aristotle and the Atomists on Motion in a Void,” in Peter K. Machamer and Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 83–100.
Gabbey, Alan 1971. “Force and Inertia in Seventeenth-Century Dynamics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2: 1–67.
Gal, Ofer 2002. Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the Compounding of the Celestial Motions of the Planets. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gal, Ofer 2005. “The Invention of Celestial Mechanics,” Early Science and Medicine 10: 529–34.
Gal, Ofer, and Chen-Morris, Raz 2005. “The Archaeology of the Inverse Square Law: (1) Metaphysical Images and Mathematical Practices,” History of Science 43: 391–414.
Gal, Ofer, and Chen-Morris, Raz 2012. “Nature’s Drawing: Motion as Mathematical Order in Kepler and Galileo,” Synthese 185: 429–66.
Galilei, Galileo 1890–1909. Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, edited by A. Favaro. 20 vols. Florence: Barbèra.
Galilei, Galileo 1957. Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, translated by Stillman Drake. New York: Doubleday.
Galilei, Galileo 1960a. “On Mechanics,” in I. E. Drabkin and Stillman Drake (eds.), On Motion, and On Mechanics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 133–86.
Galilei, Galileo 1960b. “On Motion,” in I. E. Drabkin and Stillman Drake (eds.), On Motion and On Mechanics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 13–114.
Galilei, Galileo 1967. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, translated by Stillman Drake. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Galilei, Galileo 1989. Two New Sciences, translated by Stillman Drake. Toronto: Wall and Emerson.
Galilei, Galileo 1997. Galileo on the World Systems, edited and translated by Maurice A. Finocchiaro. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Galilei, Galileo, and Scheiner, Christoph 2010. On Sunspots, edited and translated by Eileen Reeves and Albert Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galuzzi, Massimo 1980. “Il Problema delle Tangenti nella ‘Géométrie’ di Descartes,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 22: 36–51.
Garber, Daniel 1992a. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garber, Daniel 1992b. “Descartes’ Physics,” in John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 286–334.
Garber, Daniel 2001. Descartes Embodied. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garber, Daniel 2008. “Physics and Foundations,” in Katherine Park and Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–69.
Gaukroger, Stephen 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gaukroger, Stephen 2002. Descartes’ System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gaukroger, Stephen 2006. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210–1685. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, William 1600. De Magnete, Magneticisque Corporibus, et de Magno Magnete Tellure, Physiologia Nova. London: Peter Short.
Gilbert, William 1651. De Mundo Nostro Sublunari Philosophia Nova. Amstelodami: Ludovicum Elzevirium.
Gilbert, William 1958. De Magnete, translated by P. Fleury Mottelay. New York: Dover Publications.
Gingerich, Owen 1975. “‘Crisis’ Versus Aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution,” Vistas in Astronomy 17: 85–95.
Gingerich, Owen 1992. “Johannes Kepler and the Rudolphine Tables,” in The Great Copernicus Chase. Cambridge, MA: Sky Publishing, pp. 123–31.
Gingerich, Owen 2003. “The Galileo Sunspot Controversy: Proof and Persuasion,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 34: 77–78.
Gingerich, Owen 2004. The Book Nobody Read: Chasing the Revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus. New York: Walker and Company.
Gingerich, Owen 2013. “Galileo’s Copernican Conversion,” in John W. Hessler and Daniel De Simone (eds.), Galileo: Starry Messenger. Delray Beach, FL: Levenger, pp. 146–52.
Gingerich, Owen, and Van Helden, Albert 2011. “How Galileo Constructed the Moons of Jupiter,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 42: 259–64.
Giusti, Enrico 1998. “Elements for the Relative Chronology of Galilei’s De Motu Antiquiora,” Nuncius 13: 427–61.
Goldstein, Bernard R. 1967. “The Arabic Version of Ptolemy’s Planetary Hypotheses,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 57: 3–55.
Goldstein, Bernard R. 2002. “Copernicus and the Origin of his Heliocentric System,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 33: 219–35.
Goldstein, Bernard R., and Bowen, Alan C. 1983. “A New View of Early Greek Astronomy,” Isis 74: 330–40.
Goldstein, Bernard R., and Hon, Giora 2005. “Kepler’s Move from Orbs to Orbits: Documenting a Revolutionary Scientific Concept,” Perspectives on Science 13: 74–111.
Grant, Edward 1978. “Cosmology,” in David C. Lindberg (ed.), Science in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 265–302.
Grant, Edward 1981. Much Ado About Nothing: Theories of Space and Vacuum from the Middle Ages to the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grosholz, Emily R. 1986. “A Case Study in the Application of Mathematics to Physics: Descartes’ Principles of Philosophy, Part II,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986: 116–24.
Grosholz, Emily R. 1988. “Geometry, Time and Force in the Diagrams of Descartes, Galileo, Torricelli and Newton,” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988: 237–48.
Grosholz, Emily R. 2007. Representation and Productive Ambiguity in Mathematics and the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guicciardini, Niccolò 2005. “Reconsidering the Hooke–Newton Debate on Gravitation: Recent Results,” Early Science and Medicine 10: 510–17.
Hahm, David E. 1976. “Weight and Lightness in Aristotle and His Predecessors,” in Peter K. Machamer and Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 56–82.
Hall, A. Rupert 1965. “Galileo and the Science of Motion,” British Journal for the History of Science 2: 185–99.
Hall, A. Rupert 1966. “Mechanics and the Royal Society, 1668–70,” British Journal for the History of Science 3: 24–38.
Hamm, Elizabeth Anne 2011. Ptolemy’s Planetary Theory: An English Translation of Book One, Part A of the Planetary Hypotheses with Introduction and Commentary. PhD Thesis, Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Harrison, John 1978. The Library of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hattab, Helen 2007. “Concurrence or Divergence? Reconciling Descartes’s Physics with his Metaphysics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45: 49–78.
Heilbron, J. L. 1979. Electricity in the 17th and 18th Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heilbron, J. L. 2012. “Robert Westman on Galileo and Related Matters,” Perspectives on Science 20: 379–88.
Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.
Henry, John 2001. “Animism and Empiricism: Copernican Physics and the Origin of William Gilbert’s Experimental Method,” Journal of the History of Ideas 62: 99–119.
Herivel, John 1965. The Background to Newton’s Principia: A Study of Newton’s Dynamical Researches in the Years 1664–84. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hesse, Mary B. 1960. “Gilbert and the Historians (II),” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11: 130–42.
Hooper, Wallace 1998. “Inertial Problems in Galileo’s Preinertial Framework,” in Peter Machamer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 146–74.
Huggett, Nick (ed.) 1999. Space from Zeno to Einstein: Classic Readings with a Contemporary Commentary. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Huggett, Nick 2012. “What did Newton mean by ‘Absolute Motion’?” in Andrew Janiak and Eric Schliesser (eds.), Interpreting Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 196–218.
Humphreys, Paul W. 1989. “Scientific Explanation: The Causes, Some of the Causes, and Nothing But the Causes,” in Philip Kitcher and Wesley C. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 283–306.
Huygens, Christiaan 1888–1950. Oeuvres Complètes. 22 vols. La Haye: M. Nijhoff.
Jammer, Max 1954. Concepts of Space. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Janiak, Andrew 2008. Newton as Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jardine, Nicholas 1976. “Galileo’s Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7: 277–318.
Jardine, Nicholas 1979. “The Forging of Modern Realism: Clavius and Kepler Against the Sceptics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10: 141–73.
Jardine, Nicholas 1984. The Birth of History and Philosophy of Science: Kepler’s A Defence of Tycho Against Ursus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joy, Lynn S. 2008. “Scientific Explanation from Formal Causes to Laws of Nature,” in Katherine Park and Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–105.
Kant, Immanuel 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, Suzanne 1965. The De Mundo of William Gilbert. Amsterdam: Menno Hertzberger and Company.
Kepler, Johannes 1604. Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena Quibus Astronomiae Pars Optica Traditur. Frankfurt: Apud Claudium Marnium et Haeredes Ioannis Aubrii.
Kepler, Johannes 1937–. Johannes Kepler Gesammelte Werke, edited by Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Kepler, Johannes 1981. Mysterium Cosmographicum: The Secret of the Universe, translated by A. M. Duncan. New York: Abaris.
Kepler, Johannes 1992. New Astronomy, translated by William H. Donahue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kepler, Johannes 1995. Epitome of Copernican Astronomy and Harmonies of the World, translated by Charles Glenn Wallis. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.
Kepler, Johannes 2000. Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo & Optical Part of Astronomy, translated by William H. Donahue. Santa Fe, NM: Green Lion Press.
Kitcher, Philip 1978. “Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change,” The Philosophical Review 87: 519–47.
Koestler, Arthur 1968. The Sleepwalkers. New York: Macmillan.
Koyré, Alexandre 1955. “A Documentary History of the Problem of Fall From Kepler to Newton,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 45: 329–95.
Koyré, Alexandre 1957. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Koyré, Alexandre 1965. Newtonian Studies. London: Chapman and Hall.
Koyré, Alexandre 1966. Études Galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.
Koyré, Alexandre 1967. “Giambattista Benedetti, Critic of Aristotle,” in Ernan McMullin (ed.), Galileo: Man of Science. New York–London: Basic Books, pp. 98–117.
Koyré, Alexandre 1973. The Astronomical Revolution: Copernicus, Kepler, Borelli, translated by R. E. W. Maddison. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kozhamthadam, Job 1994. The Discovery of Kepler’s Laws. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1957. The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lange, Marc 2011. “Why Do Forces Add Vectorially? A Forgotten Controversy in the Foundations of Classical Mechanics,” American Journal of Physics 79: 380–88.
Lenoir, Timothy 1979. “Descartes and the Geometrization of Thought: The Methodological Background of Descartes’ Géométrie,” Historia Mathematica 6: 355–79.
Levin, Michael E. 1976. “The Extensionality of Causation and Causal-Explanatory Contexts,” Philosophy of Science 43: 266–77.
Lindberg, David C. 1976. Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lindberg, David C. 1986. “The Genesis of Kepler’s Theory of Light: Light Metaphysics from Plotinus to Kepler,” Osiris 2: 4–42.
Lohne, Johannes 1960. “Hooke Versus Newton: An Analysis of the Documents in the Case on Free Fall and Planetary Motion,” Centaurus 7: 6–52.
Lucretius 1987. “De Rerum Natura,” in A. A. Long and D. N. Sedley (eds.), The Hellenistic Philosophers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Machamer, Peter K. 1978. “Aristotle on Natural Place and Natural Motion,” Isis 69: 377–87.
Machamer, Peter K. 1995. “Comment: A New Way of Seeing Galileo’s Sunspots (and New Ways to Talk Too),” in Henry Krips, J. E. McGuire, and Trevor Melia (eds.), Science, Reason, and Rhetoric. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 145–52.
Machamer, Peter K., and McGuire, J. E. 2009. Descartes’s Changing Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mahoney, Michael S. 1973. The Mathematical Career of Pierre de Fermat (1601–1665). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Maier, Anneliese 1982. On the Threshold of Exact Science, translated by Steven D. Sargent. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Mancosu, Paolo 1996. Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mancosu, Paolo 2008. “Descartes and Mathematics,” in Janet Broughton and John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 103–23.
Manders, Kenneth 2006. “Algebra in Roth, Faulhaber, and Descartes,” Historia Mathematica 33: 184–209.
Martens, Rhonda 2000. Kepler’s Philosophy and the New Astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Maull, Nancey L. 1980. “Cartesian Optics and the Geometrization of Nature,” in Stephen Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics. Sussex: Harvester Press, pp. 253–73.
McGuire, J. E. 1983. “Space, Geometrical Objects and Infinity: Newton and Descartes on Extension,” in William R. Shea (ed.), Nature Mathematized. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, pp. 69–112.
McLaughlin, Peter 2000. “Force, Determination and Impact,” in Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton (eds.), Descartes’ Natural Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 81–112.
McMullin, Ernan 1967. “Introduction: Galileo, Man of Science,” in Ernan McMullin (ed.), Galileo, Man of Science. New York: Basic Books, pp. 1–51.
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni 2005. “Who Is Afraid of Centrifugal Force?” Early Science and Medicine 10: 535–43.
Meli, Domenico Bertoloni 2008. “Mechanics,” in Katherine Park and Lorraine Daston (eds.), The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 3: Early Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 632–72.
Miller, David Marshall 2008. “O Male Factum: Rectilinearity and Kepler’s Discovery of the Ellipse,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 39: 43–63.
Miller, David Marshall 2011a. “Friedman, Galileo, and Reciprocal Iteration,” Philosophy of Science 78: 1293–305.
Miller, David Marshall 2011b. “The History and Philosophy of Science History,” in Seymour Mauskopf and Tad Schmaltz (eds.), Integrating History and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 29–48.
Moody, Ernest A. 1951. “Galileo and Avempace: The Dynamics of the Leaning Tower Experiment,” Journal of the History of Ideas 12: 163–93, 375–422.
Moody, Ernest A. 1966. “Galileo and his Precursors,” in Carlo L. Golino (ed.), Galileo Reappraised. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 23–43.
Murdoch, John E., and Sylla, Edith D. 1978. “The Science of Motion,” in David C. Lindberg (ed.), Science in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 206–64.
Murschel, Andrea 1995. “The Structure and Function of Ptolemy’s Physical Hypotheses of Planetary Motion,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 26: 33–61.
Nadler, Steven 1998. “Doctrines of Explanation in Late Scholasticism and in the Mechanical Philosophy,” in Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 513–52.
Nauenberg, Michael 1994. “Hooke, Orbital Motion, and Newton’s Principia,” American Journal of Physics 62: 331–50.
Nauenberg, Michael 2005. “Hooke’s and Newton’s Contributions to the Early Development of Orbital Dynamics and the Theory of Universal Gravitation,” Early Science and Medicine 10: 518–28.
Naylor, R. H. 1980. “Galileo’s Theory of Projectile Motion,” Isis 71: 550–70.
Nerlich, Graham 1976. The Shape of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nerlich, Graham 1994. What Spacetime Explains: Metaphysical Essays on Space and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neugebauer, O. 1957. The Exact Sciences in Antiquity. Providence: Brown University Press.
Newton, Isaac 1687. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. London: Joseph Streater.
Newton, Isaac 1962. “De Gravitatione et Aequipondio Fluidorum,” in A. Rupert Hall and Marie Boas Hall (eds.), Unpublished Scientific Papers of Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton, Isaac 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, translated by I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Osler, Margaret J. 2008. “Descartes’s Optics: Light, the Eye, and Visual Perception,” in Janet Broughton and John Carriero (eds.), A Companion to Descartes. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 124–41.
Panofsky, Erwin 1956. “Galileo as a Critic of the Arts: Aesthetic Attitude and Scientific Thought,” Isis 47: 3–15.
Pav, Peter Anton 1966. “Gassendi’s Statement of the Principle of Inertia,” Isis 57: 24–34.
Pedersen, Olaf 1978. “Astronomy,” in David C. Lindberg (ed.), Science in the Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 303–37.
Persson, Anders O. 2005. “The Coriolis Effect: Four Centuries of Conflict between Common Sense and Mathematics, Part I: A History to 1885,” History of Meteorology 2: 1–24.
Plato 1997. Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Poincaré, Henri 1905. Science and Hypothesis. London: Walter Scott.
Ptolemy, Claudius 1984. The Almagest, translated by G. J. Toomer. New York: Springer.
Pugliese, Patri J. 1989. “Robert Hooke and the Dynamics of Motion in a Curved Path,” in Michael Hunter and Simon Schaffer (eds.), Robert Hooke: New Studies. Woodbridge, Suffolk: The Boydell Press, pp. 181–206.
Putnam, Hilary 1962. “The Analytic and the Synthetic,” in Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 358–97.
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.
Rabouin, David 2010. “What Descartes Knew of Mathematics in 1628,” Historia Mathematica 37: 428–59.
Reichenbach, Hans 1920. Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori. Berlin: Springer.
Reichenbach, Hans 1958. Philosophy of Space and Time, translated by Maria Reichenbach and John Freund. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
Renn, Jürgen 2004. “Proofs and Paradoxes: Free Fall and Projectile Motion in Galileo’s Physics,” in Peter Damerow, Gideon Freudenthal, Peter McLaughlin, and Jürgen Renn (eds.), Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics. New York: Springer, pp. 135–278.
Ribe, Neil M. 1997. “Cartesian Optics and the Mastery of Nature,” Isis 88: 42–61.
Roberval, Gilles Personne de 1693. Divers Ouvrages de M. de Roberval. Paris: Academie Royale.
Rohault, Jacques 1671. Traité de Physique. Paris: Denys Thierry.
Rosen, Edward 1937. “The Commentariolus of Copernicus,” Osiris 3: 123–41.
Roux, Sophie 2006. “Découvrir le Principe d’Inertie,” in Sarah Carvallo and Sophie Roux (eds.), Du Nouveau dans les Sciences. Grenoble: Université Pierre Mendès France, pp. 449–512.
Ruffner, J. A. 1971. “The Curved and the Straight: Cometary Theory from Kepler to Hevelius,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 2: 178–94.
Sabra, A. I. 1981. Theories of Light from Descartes to Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sabra, A. I. 1984. “The Andalusian Revolt against Ptolemaic Astronomy: Averroes and al-Biṭrūjī,” in Everett Mendelsohn (ed.), Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–54.
Salmon, Wesley C. 1989. “Four Decades of Scientific Explanation,” in Philip Kitcher and Wesley C. Salmon (eds.), Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–219.
Sasaki, Chikara 2003. Descartes’s Mathematical Thought. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schmaltz, Tad M. 2008. Descartes on Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schuster, John 2000. “Descartes Opticien: The Construction fo the Law of Refraction and the Manufacture of Its Physical Rationales, 1618–29,” in Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, and John Sutton (eds.), Descartes’ Natural Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 258–312.
Scriven, Michael 1988. “Explanation, Predictions, and Laws,” in Joseph C. Pitt (ed.), Theories of Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–74.
Shank, Michael H. 1998. “Regiomontanus and Homocentric Astronomy,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 39: 157–66.
Shapere, Dudley 1964. “The Causal Efficacy of Space,” Philosophy of Science 31: 111–21.
Shapere, Dudley 1974. Galileo: A Philosophical Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shea, William R. 1972. Galileo’s Intellectual Revolution. New York: Science History Publications.
Shea, William R. 1991. The Magic of Numbers and Motion. Canton, MA: Science History Publications.
Shea, William R. 1996. “The Difficult Path to Inertia: the Cartesian Step,” in Jean-Robert Armogathe and Giulia Belgioioso (eds.), Descartes: Principia Philosophiae (1644–1944). Naples: Vivarum, pp. 451–70.
Skinner, Quentin 1988. “A Reply to My Critics,” in James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 235–59.
Sklar, Lawrence 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Slowik, Edward 1999a. “Descartes and Circular Inertia,” Modern Schoolman 77: 1–11.
Slowik, Edward 1999b. “Descartes, Spacetime, and Relational Motion,” Philosophy of Science 66: 117–39.
Slowik, Edward 2002. Cartesian Spacetime: Descartes’ Physics and the Relational Theory of Space and Motion. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Smith, A. Mark 1987. “Descartes’s Theory of Light and Refraction: A Discourse on Method,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 77: 1–92.
Stein, Howard 1967. “Newtonian Space-Time,” Texas Quarterly 10: 174–200.
Stephenson, Bruce 1994. Kepler’s Physical Astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stevin, Simon 1586. De Beghinselen der Weeghconst. Leiden.
Stevin, Simon 1955. The Principal Works of Simon Stevin, edited by Ernst Crone, E. J. Dijksterhuis, R. J. Forbes, M. G. J. Minnaert, and A. Pannekoek. Amsterdam: C. V. Swets and Zeitlinger.
Suter, Rufus 1952. “A Biographical Sketch of Dr. William Gilbert of Colchester,” Osiris 10: 368–84.
Swerdlow, Noel M. 1973. “The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’s Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117: 423–512.
Swerdlow, Noel M. 1999. “Regiomontanus’s Concentric-Sphere Models for the Sun and Moon,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 30: 1–23.
Swerdlow, Noel M. 2004. “An Essay on Thomas Kuhn’s First Scientific Revolution, ‘The Copernican Revolution’,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 148: 64–120.
Swerdlow, Noel M. 2012. “Copernicus and Astrology, with an Appendix of Translations of Primary Sources,” Perspectives on Science 20: 353–78.
Swerdlow, Noel M., and Neugebauer, O, 1984. Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus. New York: Springer.
Tabarroni, Giorgio 1983. “Giovanni Battista Guglielmini e la Prima Verifica Sperimentale della Rotazione Terrestre (1790),” Angelicum 60: 462–86.
Toulmin, Stephen, and Goodfield, June 1961. The Fabric of the Heavens: The Development of Astronomy and Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turnbull, H. W. (ed.) 1960. The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Vol. II (1676–1687). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Society.
Van Dyck, Maarten 2006. “Gravitating Towards Stability: Guidobaldo’s Aristotelian-Archimedean Synthesis,” History of Science 44: 373–407.
Van Fraassen, Bas C. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vilain, Christiane 2008. “Circular and Rectilinear Motion in the Mechanica and in the Sixteenth Century,” in Walter Roy Laird and Sophie Roux (eds.), Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 149–72.
Voelkel, James R. 2001. The Composition of Kepler’s Astronomia Nova. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wallace, William A. 1967. “The Concept of Motion in the Sixteenth Century,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 41: 184–95.
Wallace, William A. 1968. “The Enigma of Domingo de Soto: Uniformiter difformis and Falling Bodies in Late Medieval Physics,” Isis 59: 384–401.
Wallace, William A. 1981. Prelude to Galileo: Essays on Medieval and Sixteenth-Century Sources of Galileo’s Thought. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Wallace, William A. 1988. “Randall Redivivus: Galileo and the Paduan Aristotelians,” Journal of the History of Ideas 49: 133–49.
Wallace, William A. 1990. “The Dating and Significance of Galileo’s Pisan Manuscripts,” in Trevor Harvey Levere and William R. Shea (eds.), Nature, Experiment, and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–50.
Wallace, William A. 1998. “Galileo’s Pisan Studies in Science and Philosophy,” in Peter Machamer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–52.
Wallis, John 1670–1671. Mechanica, sive De Motu, Tractatus Geometricus. London: Gulielmi Godbid.
Weisheipl, James A. 1967. “Galileo and His Precursors,” in Ernan McMullin (ed.), Galileo: Man of Science. New York–London: Basic Books, pp. 85–97.
Westfall, Richard S. 1966. “The Problem of Force in Galileo’s Physics,” in Carlo L. Golino (ed.), Galileo Reappraised. Berkeley: Univerisity of California Press, pp. 67–95.
Westfall, Richard S. 1971. Force in Newton’s Physics: The Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Macdonald.
Westfall, Richard S. 1972. “Circular Motion in Seventeenth-Century Mechanics,” Isis 63: 184–89.
Westfall, Richard S. 1977. The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westfall, Richard S. 1980. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westman, Robert S. 1975. “The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus, and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory,” Isis 66: 164–93.
Westman, Robert S. 1980. “The Astronomer’s Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study,” History of Science 18: 105–47.
Westman, Robert S. 2011. The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whiteside, D. T. 1970. “Before the Principia: The Maturing of Newton’s Thoughts on Dynamical Astronomy, 1664–1684,” Journal for the History of Astronomy 1: 5–19.
Wilson, Curtis 1968. “Kepler’s Derivation of the Elliptical Path,” Isis 59: 4–25.
Woodward, James 1993. “A Theory of Singular Causal Explanation,” in David-Hillel Ruben (ed.), Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–74.
Yavetz, Ido 1998. “On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 52: 221–78.
Zilsel, Edgar 1940. “Copernicus and Mechanics,” Journal of the History of Ideas 1: 113–18.
Zilsel, Edgar 1941. “The Origins of William Gilbert’s Scientific Method,” Journal of the History of Ideas 2: 1–32.
