Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T09:41:16.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Offstage Dynamics and the Virtual Public Sphere in Cheek by Jowl’s Live Stream of Measure for Measure (2015)

from Part III - ‘Invisible’ Technology and ‘Liveness’ in Digital Theatre Broadcasting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2020

Pascale Aebischer
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

It is a more gendered form of technologically intensified bias that concerns me in this final chapter, which examines Thomas Bowles’ live performance capture of Cheek by Jowl’s Russian touring production of Measure for Measure in 2015. More strikingly yet than Lough’s activation of the offstage dynamic in the disorienting camerawork for Hamlet’s first appearance in the 2016 RSC Live cinema broadcast, Bowles’ live stream of Measure for Measure systematically ‘framed’ Isabella’s character and the ethical standpoint she represented by keeping her, at key moments, in the liminal offstage space just outside the frame of the image. That, in turn, triggered modes of spectatorial engagement with the broadcast and with other viewers that reveal the extent to which audiences of online streams, as computer users, are prone to combine watching with interacting and can, through the cognitive prompts offered by the broadcast, be provoked into the critical modes of response which we have repeatedly seen arise from ‘eccentric’ viewpoints and obstructed sightlines. In the broadcast of Measure, we can track a shift from response-ability in the theatre to the ability of remote viewers to engage with one another and with the producers of a broadcast in dynamic online communities and to respond to the broadcast’s formal features via social media. While it would be a fallacy to suggest that the majority of these responses are critical engagements, I argue that at least some of the online responses to this particular broadcast reveal the extent to which it triggered the audience dynamics associated with both the platea and the offstage, producing ‘activist’ modes of participation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×