Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:41:20.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - How to Compare the Performance of VET Systems in Skill Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

Heike Solga
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Martin Baethge
Affiliation:
President Institute for Sociological Research (SOFI), Göttingen, Germany
Frank Achtenhagen
Affiliation:
Professor of Vocational Education University of Göttingen, Germany
Lena Arends
Affiliation:
Researcher Institute for Sociological Research (SOFI), Göttingen, Germany
Karl Ulrich Mayer
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS IN VET

The political and economic benefits of an international large-scale assessment of vocational education and training (VET) are obvious. Due to the increasing internationalization of economic exchange relationships in goods and in labor markets, as well as to economical, political, and social standardization in Europe – under the condition of increasing knowledge intensity in working processes – educational systems have changed. In particular, vocational educational systems have gained importance for providing competences relating to occupational mobility and independent lifestyle of young people, as well as international competitiveness and innovativeness of enterprises. The European Commission (2005, p. 9) has put forward the ambitious economic and social goal of becoming “the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world.” Therefore, improved participation in education and the labor market is playing a crucial role in reaching these goals.

The practical implications of the problems of competence measurement are reflected in the ongoing progress toward the development of a standardized European Qualifications Framework (EQF). In Europe, the ministers for VET in thirty-two countries have accepted the Maastricht Communiqué, endorsed in December 2004, consisting of an agreement for the development of an overall EQF and a European Credit Transfer System for VET (ECVET). The aim of the EQF is to provide a common set of reference levels as an integration of an ECVET and the European Credit Transfer System in higher education (Commission of the European Communities, 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Skill Formation
Interdisciplinary and Cross-National Perspectives
, pp. 230 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achtenhagen, F. (2004). Curriculum development as modelling of complex reality. In Seel, N. M. & Dijkstra, S. (Eds.), Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design (pp. 193–210). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Achtenhagen, F., & Grubb, W. N. (2001). Vocational and occupational education: Pedagogical complexity, institutional diversity. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed., pp. 604–639). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Achtenhagen, F., in cooperation with Nijhof, J. W. & Raffe, D.. (1995). Feasibility Study: Research Scope for Vocational Education in the Framework of COST Social Sciences. European Commission, Directorate-General Science, Research and Development, COST Technical Committee Social Sciences, Vol. 3. Brussels: ECSC-EC-EAEC.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, R., & Olsson, A.-K. (1999). Fields of Education and Training. Brussels: Eurostat. Appendix A3: Commission of the European Communities, pp. 18–20.Google Scholar
Baethge, M., Buss, K. P., & Lanfer, C. (2003). Konzeptionelle Grundlagen für einen Nationalen Bildungsbericht – Berufliche Bildung und Weiterbildung/Lebenslanges Lernen. Bonn, Germany: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
Baumert, J., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W. Stanat., Tillmann, K.-J. & Weiß, M. (2001). PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumert, J., & Schümer, G. (2001). Familiäre Lebensverhältnisse, Bildungsbeteiligung und Kompetenzwettbewerb im internationalen Vergleich. In Baumert, J., Artelt, C., Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., Prenzel, M., Schiefele, U., Schneider, W.; Tillmann, K. J. & Weiß, M. (Eds.), PISA 2000: Die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich (pp. 159–202). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biemans, H., Nieuwenhuis, L., Poell, R., Mulder, R., & Wesselink, R. (2005, April). Competence-based VET in the Netherlands: Background and pitfalls. bw@ (online journal), (7), 1–14. Available at: www.bwpat.de/7eu/biemans_eqf_en.pdf.
Commission of the European Communities. (2005). Commission Staff Working Document: Towards a European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/2010/doc/consultation_eqf_en.pdf.
Descy, P., & Tessaring, M. (2002). Kompetenz für die Zukunft – Ausbildung und Lernen in Europa: Zweiter Bericht zur Berufsbildungsforschung in Europa: Synthesebericht. Reihe Cedefop reference series. Bd. 5 Luxembourg: Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union.Google Scholar
Ellström, P.-E. (1997). The many meanings of occupational competence and qualification. In Nijhof, W. J. & Streumer, J. N. (Eds.), Key Qualifications in Work and Education (pp. 39–50). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2005). Auf dem Weg zu einem Europäischen Qualifikationsrahmen für Lebenslanges Lernen. Brussels: Kommission der Europäischen Gemeinschaften.
Heikkinen, A. (2001). Ist eine stärkere Berücksichtigung der historischen und kulturellen Dimension in der Vergleichenden Berufsbildungsforschung erforderlich? In Cedefop/DIPF (Eds.), Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung in Europa. Ansätze, Politikbezüge und Innovationstransfer (pp. 118–134). Thessaloniki: CEDEFOP/DIPF.Google Scholar
Jeanneret, P. R., Borman, W. C., Kubisiak, U. C., & Hanson, M. A. (2002). Generalized work activities. In Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., & Fleishman, E. A. (Eds.), An Occupational Information System for the 21st Century: The Development of O*NET (pp. 105–125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kanning, U. P. (2003). Diagnostik sozialer Kompetenzen. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kunter, M., & Stanat, P. (2002). PISA 2000 – Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung. Available at: www.kmk.org/schul/pisa/Datensaetze/Gesamt-Druckversion.pdf.Google Scholar
Lassnigg, L. (2000). Steuerung, Vernetzung und Professionalisierung in der Berufsausbildung. Wien, Germany: Institut für Höhere Studien. Available at: www.lebenslangeslernen.at/downloads/IHS_SteuerungBerufsausbildung_1100.pdf.Google Scholar
Lisbon-to-Copenhagen-to-Maastrich Consortium Partners. (2004). Achieving the Lisbon Goal: The Contribution of VET – Final Report to the European Commission. Available at: http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/policies/2010/studies/maastricht_en.pdf.
Norris, N. (1991). The trouble with competence. Cambridge Journal of Education, 21, 1–11.Google Scholar
Oates, T. (2004). The role of outcome-based national qualifications in the development of an effective vocational education and training system: The case of England and Wales. Policy Futures in Education, 2, 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2003). Education at a Glance. Paris: Author.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (2000). The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Scheerens, J. (1990). School effectiveness research and the development of process indicators of school functioning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The Foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Straka, G. A. (2003). Zertifizierung non-formell und informell erworbener beruflicher Kompetenzen. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Toolsema, B. (2004). Werken met competenties: Naar een instrument voor de identificatie van competenties. Enschede, The Netherlands: Universiteit Twente.Google Scholar
Weinert, F. E. (1999). Concepts of Competence. München, Germany: Max Plank Institut. Available at: www.statsitik.admin.ch/stat_ch/ber15/deseco/weinert_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Winterton, J., Delamare-Le, Deist F., & Stringfellow, E. (2005). Typology of Knowledge, Skills and Competences: Clarification of the Concept Prototype. Thessaloniki, Greece: Cedefop.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×