Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T21:49:56.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Sixteen - Lacunes

from Types of Stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2022

Louis R. Caplan
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre
Aishwarya Aggarwal
Affiliation:
John F. Kennedy Medical Center
Get access

Summary

Jean-Martin Charcot (1825–1893) is generally acclaimed as the father of modern clinical neurology. Charcot rose within the ranks of the Paris Hospital systems, and in 1872 was appointed professor of pathological anatomy at the University of Paris. He worked and taught at the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital for 33 years. His reputation as a teacher and lecturer drew students and colleagues from all over Europe. He established a neurology clinic at Salpêtrière, the first of its kind in Europe. Charcot mostly focused on clinical symptoms and signs and neurological phenomenology. His writings did not contain material about cerebrovascular disease [1]. Charcot established neurology as an important medical discipline in Europe and throughout the world. One of his most well-known and influential successors in the chair of neurology in Paris was Pierre Marie, a principal figure in bringing lacunar infarction to the attention of the medical community at the turn of the twentieth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Stories of Stroke
Key Individuals and the Evolution of Ideas
, pp. 119 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

Charcot, JM, Goetz, CG. Charcot, the clinician: The Tuesday lessons: Excerpts from nine case presentations on general neurology delivered at the Salpêtrière Hospital in 1887–88. In Charcot, JM. Lectures on the Diseases of the Nervous System. Trans. George Sigerson. London: Sydenham Society, 1877.Google Scholar
Ferrand, J. Essai sur l’hemiplegie des vieillards: les lacunes de desintegration cerebrale. Thesis, University of Paris, 1902.Google Scholar
Marie, P. Des foyers lacunaires de désintégration et des différents autres états cavitaires du cerveau. Revue de Médeciné (Paris) 1901;21:281298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Hauw, J-J. The history of lacunes. In Donnan, G, Norrving, B, Bamford, J Bogousslavsky, J (eds.), Lacunar and Other Subcortical Infarcts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 315.Google Scholar
Dechambre, A. Mémoire sur la curabilité du ramollissement cérérebral. Gaz. Méd. Paris 1838;6:305314.Google Scholar
Durand-Fardel, M. Memoire sur une alteration particuliere de la substance cérébrale. Gaz. Méd. Paris 1842;10:2326, 33–38.Google Scholar
Durand-Fardel, M. Traite des ramollisements du cerveau. Paris: Bailliere, 1843.Google Scholar
Fisher, CM. Lacunes, small deep cerebral infarcts. Neurology 1965;15:774784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, CM. The vascular lesion in lacunae. Transactions of the American Neurological Association 1965;90:243245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Fisher, CM, Caplan, LR. Basilar artery branch occlusion: A cause of pontine infarction. Neurology 1971; 21:900905.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Caplan, LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: A neglected, understudied and underused concept. Neurology 1989;39:12461250.Google Scholar
Clinical syndromes are discussed in Chapter 26 and are reported in Fisher, CM. Pure motor hemiplegia of vascular origin. Arch. Neurol. 1965;13:3044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Poirier, J, Derouesné, C. Le concept de lacune cérébrale de 1838 à nos jours. Rev. Neurol. (Paris) 1985;141:317.Google Scholar
Poirier, J, Derouesné, C. Cerebral lacunae: A proposed new classification (letter). Clin. Neuropathol. 1984;3:266.Google Scholar
Besson, G. Les infarctus lacunaires, evaluation clinque et par l’imagerie par resonance magnetique. Thesis, University of Grenoble, 1989.Google Scholar
Fisher, CM. Lacunar infarcts – A review. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 1991;1:311320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
Wardlaw, JM, Smith, EE, Biessels, GJ, Cordonnier, C, Fazekas, F, Frayne, R, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:822838.Google Scholar
Loos, CMJ, Makin, SDJ, Staals, J, Dennis, MS, van Oostenbrugge, RJ, Wardlaw, JM. Long-term morphological changes of symptomatic lacunar infarcts and surrounding white matter on structural magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2018;49(5):11831188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binswanger, O. Die abgrenzung der allgemeinen progressiven paralyse. Klin. Wochenschr. 1894;49:11031105; 1895;50:1137–1139; 1895;52:1180–1186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Alzheimer, A. Die Seelenstorungen auf arteriosklerotischer grundlage. Z. Psych. 1902;59:695711.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Nissl, F. Zur kasuistic der artenoskleriotischen demenz. ein fall von sogenannten “encephalitis subcorticalis.” Z. Neurol. Psychiatr. 1920;19:438443.Google Scholar
Olszewski, J. Subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy. Review of the literature on the so-called Binswanger’s disease and presentation of two cases. World Neurol. 1962;3:359375.Google Scholar
Caplan, LR, Schoene, WC. Clinical features of subcortical arteriosclerotic encephalopathy (Binswanger disease). Neurology 1978;28:12061215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, LR. Binswanger’s disease revisited. Neurology 1995;45:626633.Google Scholar
Tournier-Lasserve, E, Joutel, A, Melki, J, et al. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy maps to chromosome 19q12. Nat. Genet. 1993;3:256259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Yanagawa, S, Ito, N, Arima, K, Ikeda, S. Cerebral autosomal recessive arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Neurology 2002;58:817820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, GA, Sullivan, N, Esiri, NM. White matter damage is associated with matrix metalloproteinases in vascular dementia. Stroke 2001;32:11621168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Regenhardt, RW, Das, AS, Lo, EH, Caplan, LR. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of lacunar stroke: A review. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(10):12731281.Google Scholar
Caplan, LR. Microbleeds. Circulation 2015;132:479480.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×