Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T16:21:26.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - A Concept for Sustainability Transition Assessment (STA): A Dynamic Systems Perspective Informed by Resilience Thinking

from Part I - Theoretical Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2020

By
Thorsten Schilling ,
Susan Mühlemeier ,
Romano Wyss  and
Claudia R. Binder
Edited by
Claudia R. Binder ,
Romano Wyss  and
Emanuele Massaro
Claudia R. Binder
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Romano Wyss
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Emanuele Massaro
Affiliation:
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Get access

Summary

Sustainability as a key principle that guides the development of our societies requires fundamental transitions if we are to attain a more liveable planet. Concomitantly, the question of how to assess sustainability not only with respect to specific system states, but also regarding transition processes as a whole, has gained greater importance. In this chapter, we propose to extend established sustainability assessment practices with an approach informed by resilience thinking. In particular, we apply a systemic angle to develop three analytical perspectives which focus on the progress, the stability, as well as the adaptability of transition processes. These perspectives make it possible to reflect on the history, current state, and (potential) future development of the system in transition. We illustrate how these analytical perspectives can complement existing sustainability assessment approaches with regard to the description, interpretation, and evaluation of the transition process.

Keywords

resiliencetransitionsustainabilitysystemdynamicsassessment
Type
Chapter
Information
Sustainability Assessment of Urban Systems , pp. 123 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalbers, C. B. E. M., & Sehested, K. (2018). Critical upscaling: How citizens’ initiatives can contribute to a transition in governance and quality of urban greenspace. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.005.Google Scholar
Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782.Google Scholar
Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, C. R, Hutter, M., Pang, M., & Webb, R. (2020a). “System science and sustainability assessment. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–64.Google Scholar
Binder, C. R., Mühlemeier, S., & Wyss, R. (2017). An indicator-based approach for analyzing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part I: Theoretical and conceptual considerations. Energies, 10(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CASS, P. (1997). Research on sustainability and global change: Visions in science policy by Swiss researchers. ProClim: Forum for Climate and Global Change and Swiss Academy of Sciences, Bern.Google Scholar
Cowell, M. M. (2013). Bounce back or move on: Regional resilience and economic development planning. Cities, 30, 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cretney, R., & Bond, S. (2014). “Bouncing back” to capitalism? Grass-roots autonomous activism in shaping discourses of resilience and transformation following disaster. Resilience, 2(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2013.872449.Google Scholar
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., & Coenen, L. (2012). Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 991–998.Google Scholar
Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (Republished). Ecology and Society, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09088-210444.Google Scholar
Foxon, T. J. (2002). Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’ as a barrier to sustainable innovation. Imperial College Centre for Policy and Technology Working Paper.Google Scholar
Foxon, T. J. (2011). A coevolutionary framework for analysing a transition to a sustainable low carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2258–2267.Google Scholar
Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). The politics of participatory sustainability assessments: An analysis of power. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–122.Google Scholar
Gallopín, G. (2003). A Systems Approach to Sustainability and Sustainable Development. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., Tyfield, D., & Urry, J. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. (2016). Sustainability Assessment: Applications and Opportunities. Oxon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. B. (2006). Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24(3), 170–182.Google Scholar
Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.Google Scholar
Halla, P., & Binder, C.R. (2020). Sustainability Assessment: Introduction and Framework. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems. Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–29.Google Scholar
Hashemian, B., Massaro, E., Bojic, I., Arias, J. M., Sobolevsky, S., & Ratti, C. (2017). Socioeconomic characterization of regions through the lens of individual financial transactions. PloS one, 12(11), e0187031.Google Scholar
Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500107134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. M. (2017). Systemic Decision Making: Fundamentals for Understanding Problems and Messes (2nd ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2013). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment:interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8(2), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. (2001). Sustainability Science. Science, 292(5517), 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386.Google Scholar
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469709.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D. (2014). To transition! Governance panarchy in the new transformation. https://drift.eur.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/To_Transition-Loorbach-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luederitz, C., Abson, D. J., Audet, R., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Many pathways toward sustainability: Not conflict but co-learning between transition narratives. Sustainability Science, 12(3), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0414-0.Google Scholar
Luthe, T., & Wyss, R. (2015). Introducing adaptive waves as a concept to inform mental models of resilience. Sustainability Science, 10(4), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0316-6.Google Scholar
Luthe, T., & Wyss, R. (2016). Resilience to climate change in a cross-scale tourism governance context: a combined quantitative-qualitative network analysis. Ecology and Society, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08234-210127.Google Scholar
Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change: Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003.Google Scholar
Massaro, E., Ganin, A., Perra, N., Linkov, I., & Vespignani, A. (2018). Resilience management during large-scale epidemic outbreaks. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.Google Scholar
Meinherz, F., Fritz, L., & Schneider, F. (2020). How Values Play into Sustainability Assessments: Challenges and a Possible Way Forward. In Binder, C. R., Massaro, E, & Wyss, R (eds.), Sustainability Assessment in Urban Systems.Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Mühlemeier, S., Binder, C. R., & Wyss, R. (2017). ‘It’s an endurance race’: An indicator-based resilience analysis of the energy transition in the Allgäu Region, Bavaria. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(S1), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlemeier, S., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2018). Ein indikatorengestützter Ansatz zur Resilienzanalyse von Energiesystemen in Transition. In Karidi, M, Schneider, M, & Gutwald, R, Resilienz. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19222-8_15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nair, S., & Howlett, M. (2016). From robustness to resilience: Avoiding policy traps in the long term. Sustainability Science, 11(6), 909–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0387-z.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (2005, November 12). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton and New York: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203023846-11.Google Scholar
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.Google Scholar
Pintér, L., Hardi, P., Martinuzzi, A., & Hall, J. (2012). Bellagio STAMP: Principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecological Indicators, 17, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, J., Bond, A., Hugé, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62(Supplement C), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002.Google Scholar
Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2015). A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 119, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, T., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2018). The resilience of sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 10(12), 4593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124593.Google Scholar
Sinclair, K., Rawluk, A., Kumar, S., & Curtis, A. (2017). Ways forward for resilience thinking: Lessons from the field for those exploring social-ecological systems in agriculture and natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09705-220421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2). www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/inline.html.Google Scholar
Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., et al. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 40(7), 762–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2004.09.009.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., Binder, C., & Scholz, R. W. (2006). Functions of scenarios in transition processes. Futures, 38(7), 740–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.003.Google Scholar
Wiese, F. (2016). Resilience thinking as an interdisciplinary guiding principle for energy system transitions. Resources, 5(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources5040030.Google Scholar
Wyss, R., Mühlemeier, S., & Binder, C. R. (2018). An indicator-based approach for analysing the resilience of transitions for energy regions. Part II: Empirical application to the case of Weiz-Gleisdorf, Austria. Energies, 11(9), 2263. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11092263.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×