Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T01:05:54.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Chimpanzees plan their tool use

from Part I - Cognition of tool use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

By
Richard W. Byrne ,
Crickette M. Sanz  and
David B. Morgan
Edited by
Crickette M. Sanz ,
Josep Call  and
Christophe Boesch
Richard W. Byrne
Affiliation:
Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish Primate Research Group, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews
Crickette M. Sanz
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Washington University
David B. Morgan
Affiliation:
Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo
Crickette M. Sanz
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Josep Call
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Christophe Boesch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

To a cognitive psychologist, chimpanzee tool use is exciting because of the opportunity it brings to examine how apes deal with a range of challenging situations that in humans would invoke planning. By planning it is meant a special kind of problem solving in which an appropriate course of action for the immediate or distant future is worked out by means of mental computation with brain representations of past or present situations (Miller et al., 1960). These include: a working representation of the current situation that presents a problem; episodic memories of specific past instances and events; and semantic knowledge about how things work or how people behave.

Because a tool is not itself a goal-object, but has meaning and functionality only in regard to achieving a goal, problem solving with tools often makes more of the planning process “visible” than is normally the case (Seed & Byrne, 2010). Because a tool often must be selected to meet specific criteria in order to work, or – more telling still – may have to be made from specific raw materials in a particular way, getting an appropriate tool becomes an extra stage in the planning process. Thus, to approach a cognitive understanding of animal planning, studying tool use is by no means the only approach, but it is certainly a good one. Historically, however, understanding cognition has not been the major driving force in the study of tool use in great apes in primatology: that stemmed instead from anthropology, a subject with a very different agenda.

Type
Chapter
Information
Tool Use in Animals
Cognition and Ecology
 , pp. 48 - 64
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billen, J. & Morgan, E. D. (1998). Pheromone communication in social insects: sources and secretions. In Vander Meer, R. K., Breed, M. D., Espelie, K. E. & Winston, M. L. (eds.) Pheromone Communication in Social Insects: Ants, Wasps, Bees, and Termites (pp. 3–33). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. & Boesch, H. (1984). Mental map in wild chimpanzees: an analysis of hammer transports for nut cracking. Primates, 25, 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1961). Behaviour. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (1975). Memory in complex tasks. Doctoral thesis, Cambridge University.
Byrne, R. W. (1977). Planning meals: problem-solving on a real data-base. Cognition, 5, 287–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (1983). Protocol analysis in problem-solving. In Evans, J. S. B. T. (ed.) Thinking and Reasoning: Psychological Approaches (pp. 227–249). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (1994). The evolution of intelligence. In Slater, P. J. B. & Halliday, T. R. (eds.) Behaviour and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (1998). The early evolution of creative thinking: evidence from monkeys and apes. In Mithen, S. (ed.) Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory (pp. 110–124). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. (2003). Imitation as behaviour parsing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 358, 529–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, R. W. & Bates, L. A. (2006). Why are animals cognitive?Current Biology, 16, R445–R448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caro, T. M. & Hauser, M. D. (1992). Is there teaching in non-human animals?Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csibra, G. & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 148–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. (1976). Hierarchical organisation: a candidate principle for ethology. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A. (eds.) Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Franks, N. R. & Richardson, T. (2006). Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature, 439, 153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, J. & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic Science, 4, 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, J., Ervin, F. R. & Koelling, R. A. (1966). Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 5, 121–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskins, S. (2006). Cultural perspectives on infant–caregiver interaction. In Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C. (eds.) Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (pp. 279–298). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (1964). Tool-using and aimed throwing in a community of free-living chimpanzees. Nature, 201, 1264–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (1993). Imitation, culture, and cognition. Animal Behaviour, 46, 999–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. M. & Ray, E. D. (2000). What is the significance of imitation in animals?Advances in the Study of Behavior, 29, 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppitt, W. J. E. & Laland, K. N. (2008). Social processes influencing learning in animals: a review of the evidence. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 38, 105–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, W. (1925). The Mentality of Apes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behaviour. In Jeffress, L. A. (ed.) Cerebral Mechanisms in Behaviour: The Hixon Symposium (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Macphail, E. M. (1985). Vertebrate intelligence: the null hypothesis. In Weiskrantz, L. (ed.) Animal Intelligence (pp. 37–50). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Macphail, E. M. (1998). The Evolution of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W. C. (1974). Tool use by wild chimpanzees feeding on driver ants. Journal of Human Evolution, 3, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrew, W. C., Tutin, C. E. G. & Baldwin, P. J. (1979). Chimpanzees, tools, and termites: cross cultural comparison of Senegal, Tanzania, and Rio Muni. Man, 14, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. & Pribram, K. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulcahy, N. J. & Call, J. (2006). Apes save tools for future use. Science, 312, 1038–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C. & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychological Review, 65, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osvath, M. & Osvath, H. (2008). Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and orangutan (Pongo abelii) forethought: self-control and pre-experience in the face of future tool use. Animal Cognition, 11, 661–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, S. T. & Gibson, K. R. (1977). Object manipulation, tool use, and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes. Journal of Human Evolution, 6, 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prestwich, G. D. (1984). Defense mechanisms of termites. Annual Review of Entomology, 29, 201–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raby, C. R., Alexis, D. A., Dickinson, A. & Clayton, N. S. (2007). Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature, 445, 919–921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raihani, N. J. & Ridley, A. R. (2008). Experimental evidence for teaching in wild pied babblers. Animal Behaviour, 75, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C. & Morgan, D. (2009a). Complexity of chimpanzee tool using behaviors. In Lonsdorf, E. V., Ross, S. R. & Matsuzawa, T. (eds.) The Mind of the Chimpanzee: Ecological and Experimental Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sanz, C. M. & Morgan, D. B. (2009b). Flexible and persistent tool-using strategies in honey-gathering by wild chimpanzees. International Journal of Primatology, 30, 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., Morgan, D. & Gulick, S. (2004). New insights into chimpanzees, tools and termites from the Congo Basin. American Naturalist, 164, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanz, C., Call, J. & Morgan, D. (2009). Design complexity in termite-fishing tools of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Biology Letters, 5, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C., Schöning, C. & Morgan, D. (2010). Chimpanzees prey on army ants with specialized tool set. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 1–8.Google Scholar
Seed, A. M. & Byrne, R. W. (2010). Animal tool use. Current Biology, 20, R1032–R1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shumaker, R. W., Walkup, K. R. & Beck, B. B. (2011). Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stoinski, T. S., Wrate, J. L., Ure, N. & Whiten, A. (2001). Imitative learning by captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in a simulated food-processing task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. (1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 133–167.Google ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T., Corballis, M. C. & Collier-Baker, E. (2009). How great is great ape foresight?Animal Cognition, 12, 751–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, A. & McAuliffe, K. (2006). Teaching in wild meerkats. Science, 313, 227–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. & Call, J. (1997). Primate Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uehara, S. (1982). Seasonal changes in the techniques employed by wild chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania, to feed on termites (Pseudacanthotermes spiniger). Folia Primatologica, 37, 44–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. (2005). The second inheritance system of chimpanzees and humans. Nature, 437, 52–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiten, A., Custance, D. M., Gomez, J.-C., Teixidor, P. & Bard, K. A. (1996). Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A., Spiteri, A., Horner, V., et al. (2007). Transmission of multiple traditions within and between chimpanzee groups. Current Biology, 17, 1038–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynn, T. (1993). Layers of thinking in tool behavior. In Gibson, K. R. & Ingold, T. (eds.) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution (pp. 389–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wynn, T. G. (2002). Archaeology and cognitive evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 389–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamakoshi, G. (1998). Dietary responses to fruit scarcity of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea: possible implications for ecological importance of tool use. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 106, 283–295.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Chimpanzees plan their tool use
    • By Richard W. Byrne, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish Primate Research Group, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, Crickette M. Sanz, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, David B. Morgan, Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo
  • Edited by Crickette M. Sanz, Washington University, St Louis, Josep Call, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany, Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
  • Book: Tool Use in Animals
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894800.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Chimpanzees plan their tool use
    • By Richard W. Byrne, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish Primate Research Group, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, Crickette M. Sanz, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, David B. Morgan, Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo
  • Edited by Crickette M. Sanz, Washington University, St Louis, Josep Call, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany, Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
  • Book: Tool Use in Animals
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894800.004
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Chimpanzees plan their tool use
    • By Richard W. Byrne, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution and Scottish Primate Research Group, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St. Andrews, Crickette M. Sanz, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, David B. Morgan, Lester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo
  • Edited by Crickette M. Sanz, Washington University, St Louis, Josep Call, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany, Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
  • Book: Tool Use in Animals
  • Online publication: 05 March 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894800.004
Available formats
×