Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- 8 Networked Expertise, Relational Agency, and Collective Creativity
- 9 Relational Agency and the Development of Tools in Service Networks
- 10 Creating a System of Distributed Expertise: The Oxford Education Deanery Narrative
- 11 Common Knowledge: The Missing Link in Hybrid Value Chains?
- 12 The Relational Agency Framework as a Tool for Supporting the Establishment, Maintenance, and Development of Multidisciplinary Networks of Professionals
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
11 - Common Knowledge: The Missing Link in Hybrid Value Chains?
from Part Two - Working Relationally in Networks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Edited by
Book contents
- Working Relationally In and Across Practices
- Working Relationally in and across Practices
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- 1 Revealing Relational Work
- Part One Working Relationally in the Professions
- Part Two Working Relationally in Networks
- 8 Networked Expertise, Relational Agency, and Collective Creativity
- 9 Relational Agency and the Development of Tools in Service Networks
- 10 Creating a System of Distributed Expertise: The Oxford Education Deanery Narrative
- 11 Common Knowledge: The Missing Link in Hybrid Value Chains?
- 12 The Relational Agency Framework as a Tool for Supporting the Establishment, Maintenance, and Development of Multidisciplinary Networks of Professionals
- Part Three Working Relationally in Research
- Epilogue
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Working Relationally in and across PracticesA Cultural-Historical Approach to Collaboration, pp. 191 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.Google Scholar
Baur, D. & Palazzo, G. (2011). The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2010). Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2011). Building common knowledge at boundaries between professional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, (50), 33–39.Google Scholar
Edwards, A. (2012). The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 22–32.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. & Gold, S. (2014). Resources and governance in “base of the pyramid”-partnerships: Assessing collaborations between businesses and non-business actors. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1321–1333.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Karamchandani, A., Kubzansky, M. & Lalwani, N. (2011). Is the bottom of the pyramid really for you? Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 107–111.Google Scholar
London, T., Sheth, S. & Hart, S. (2014). A Roadmap for the Base of the Pyramid Domain: Reenergizing for the Next Decade. Ann Arbor: William Davison Institute, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Luscher, L. & Lewis, M. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
Mair, J. & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: a case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.Google Scholar
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
Margolis, J. D. & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves company: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2007). The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win through Integrative Thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.Google Scholar
Poole, M. S. & Van de Ven, A. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 14, 562–578.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Delhi: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Purnell, L. S. & Freeman, R. E. (2012). Stakeholder theory, fact/value dichotomy, and the normative core: how Wall Street stops the ethics conversation. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simanis, E., Hart, S. & Duke, D. (2008). The base of the pyramid protocol: beyond ‘basic needs’ business strategies. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 3(1), 57–84.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.Google Scholar
Smith, W., Besharov, M., Wessels, A. & Chertok, M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11, 463–478.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K. & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W. & Tushman, M. (2011). Organizational sustainability: organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In Cameron, K. & Spreitzer, G. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 798–810). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K. & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.Google Scholar
Sundaramurthy, C. & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, P., Phillips, N. & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: a multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.Google Scholar