Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:44:50.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological Fingerprinting and Fremont Figurines

Reuniting the Iconic Pilling Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Bonnie L. Pitblado
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, 455 W Lindsey, Room 521, Norman, OK 73019 (bonnie.pitblado@ou.edu)
Molly Boeka Cannon
Affiliation:
Anthropology Program, Utah State University, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 (molly.cannon@usu.edu)
Megan Bloxham
Affiliation:
Anthropology Program, Utah State University, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 (meg.blox@gmail.com)
Joel Janetski
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 (joel_janetski@byu.edu)
J.M. Adovasio
Affiliation:
Mercyhurst Archaeological Institute, Mercyhurst University, Erie, PA 16546 (jadovasio@mercyhurst.edu)
Kathleen R. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 (garnetofeden@gmail.com)
Stephen T. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 (stephen_nelson@byu.edu)

Abstract

After the anonymous 2011 return of a long-missing Pilling Fremont figurine, a multi-disciplinary research team conducted “fingerprint” analyses in an effort to match it to 10 mates with intact provenance. The Pilling figurines, crafted 1,000 years ago and cached in a remote sandstone niche in eastern Utah, are the most significant find of Fremont portable art ever documented because they occurred in situ and are unparalleled in detail and completeness. Most of the other 400-plus known Fremont figurines derive from secondary contexts, limiting inferences archaeologists might otherwise draw in domains ranging from Fremont exchange to inter- and intra-cultural ideology. Basketry-imprint analysis, scanning electron microscopy, and portable X-ray fluorescence suggest that the returned specimen is the original Pilling. After a 40-year absence, it is now permanently curated with the rest of the collection at the Prehistoric Museum, USU Eastern, in Price, Utah, and can contribute to research of a rare artifact class. The techniques reported can also be applied to finds of fragmentary Fremont figurines in secondary contexts to assess relationships among specimens and sites. Most broadly, the successful application of nondestructive pXRF may inspire confidence in scientists studying rare and delicate specimens traditionally profiled using destructive methods such as INAA.

Después de que en 2011 se regresara de manera anónima una figurilla Pilling Fremont que había desaparecido hacía mucho tiempo, un equipo de investigación multidisciplinario realizó un análisis de “huellas dactilares” para averiguar su relación con diez ejemplos similares de procedencia conocida. Las figurillas Pilling, elaboradas hace 1000 años y guardadas en una caja depositada en un nicho de piedra arenisca en la zona este del estado de Utah, representan el hallazgo más significativo de arte portable Fremont que se haya documentado porque se encontraron in situ y son incomparables en su detalle. El resto de las más de 400 figuras Fremont que se conocen se han encontrado en contextos secundarios, limitando las inferencias que los arqueólogos pudieran elaborar en torno a distintos temas que van desde el intercambio de los Fremont hasta la ideología inter o intra-cultural. El análisis de improntas de cestería, la microscopía del microscopio electrónico de barrido y el analizador de rayos X portátil (pXRF) sugieren que la figurilla devuelta es un Pilling original. A 40 años de su desaparición, se ha integrado al resto de la colección que se encuentra bajo la curaduría permanente del Prehistoric Museum, USU Eastern, en Price, Utah, proporcionando información en torno a esta clase de artefactos raros. Las técnicas reportadas también pueden utilizarse en fragmentos de figurillas Fremont procedentes de contextos secundarios para evaluar sus relaciones con otros ejemplos y sitios. En lo general, el uso exitoso de la técnica no destructiva pXRF podría inspirar confianza en aquellos científicos que estudian especímenes raros y delicados con métodos destructivos como AIAN.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Allen, Marti L., and Munsey, Michelle R. 2002 In Search of Function: The Pectol-Lee Cradle Board. In Relics Revisited: New Perspectives on an Early Twentieth-Century Collection Popular Series 3, edited by Allen, M. L., pp. 5596. Brigham Young University Museum of Peoples and Cultures, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Adovasio, James M. 1977 Basketry Technology: A Guide to Identification and Analysis. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Barlow, K.R. 2012 Pilling Figurine Site Context: The Pilling Family Picnic. Paper presented at the 33rd Biennial Meeting of the Great Basin Anthropological Conference, Stateline, Nevada.Google Scholar
Civici, N. 2007 Analysis of Illyrian Terracotta Figurines of Aphrodite and Other Ceramic Objects Using EDXRF Spectrometry. X-Ray Spectrometry 36:9298.Google Scholar
Janetski, Joel C. 2012 Fremont Figurines: Style, Context, and Meaning. Paper presented at the 33rd Biennial Meeting of the Great Basin Anthropological Conference, Stateline, Nevada.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Keith R., and Montgomery, Jackie A. 1983 Utah Department of Transportation State Route-31 Hunting Canyon Project: Archaeological Excavations at Sites 42EM2109 and 42EM2095, Emery County, Utah. Report on file at Abajo Archaeology, Bluff, Utah.Google Scholar
Morgenstein, Maury, and Redmount, Carol A. 2005 Using Portable Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) Analysis for On-Site Study of Ceramic Sherds at El Hibeh, Egypt. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(11):16131623.Google Scholar
Morss, Noell 1954 Clay Figurines of the American Southwest. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 49. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Glenna 2012 Babies and Cradles: A Comparison of Figurines in the Great Basin, Southwest and West Mexico. In An Archaeological Legacy: Essays in Honor of Ray T. Matheny, edited by Janetski, J. C. and Nielsen, G., pp. 145164. Brigham Young University Occasional Paper 18, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
Smith, Gary 1980 Utah's Rock Art: Wilderness Louvre. National Geographic 175(1):97117.Google Scholar