Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T06:29:54.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Analysis of Fatigue Damage in Copper

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Roy G. Baggerly
Affiliation:
The Boeing Company Seattle, Washington
Regis M. N. Pelloux
Affiliation:
The Boeing Company Seattle, Washington
William F. Flanagan
Affiliation:
General Motors Research Laboratories Warren, Michigan
Get access

Abstract

A Warren-Averbach1-4 X-ray line profile analysis was applied to broadened X-ray diffraction peaks from copper deformed in fatigue. The copper specimens were fatigued by four-point bending at peak-strain amplitudes between 0.00105 and 0.00442 in./in., and measurements were made at various fractions of the total fatigue life. The analysis results in an estimation of (a) an average coherently diffracting domain size normal to the diffracting planes and (b) an rms strain distribution function where the strain normal to the diffracting planes is averaged over a given distance at all points in the diffracting crystals and expressed as a function of averaging distance.

Prior to fatigue cycling, the annealed copper exhibited extinction, which reduced the integrated intensity from the low-angle reflections. After fatigue cycling, the integrated intensity increased with increasing strain amplitude of fatigue. The integrated intensities and the rms strains were established during the first few percent of the fatigue life and were found to increase with fatigue strain amplitude. The measured strains were larger in the <100> direction than in the <111> direction, but the absolute values were small. On the basis of transmission electron microscopy of thin foils, these results may be explained by assuming the strains are due to the presence of numerous dislocation dipoles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Warren, B. E. and Averbach, B. L., “The Effect of Cold-Work Distortion on X-Ray patterns,” J.Appl.Phys. 21: 595, 1950.Google Scholar
2. Warren, B. E. and Averbach, B. L., “The Separation of Cold-Work Distortion and Particle Size Broadening in X-Ray Patterns,” J. Appl. Phys. 23: 497, 1952.Google Scholar
3. Warren, B. E. and Averbach, B. L., “The Separation of Stacking Fault Broadening in Cold-Worked Metals,” J. Appl. Phys. 23: 1059, 1952.Google Scholar
4. Warren, B. E., “X-Ray Studies of Deformed Metals,” B. Chalmers and R, King (eds.), Progress in Metal Physics, Vol. 8, Pergamon Press, New York, 1959, p. 147.Google Scholar
5. Moll, S. H., “X-Ray Studies During Fatigue,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, 1959.Google Scholar
6. Hartmann, R. J. and Macherauch, E., “Die Veranderung von Rontgeninterferenzer, Hysterese und Oberflachenbild bei ein-und wechselsinniger Beanspreechung von Messing, Nichel und Stahl,” Z. Metatl. 54: 197, 1963.Google Scholar
7. Cohen, J. B., Diffraction Methods in Materials Science, The MacMillan Co., New York, 1966, p. 315.Google Scholar
8. Thompson, N. and Wadsworth, N. J., “Metal Fatigue,” Adv. Phys. 7: 72, 1958.Google Scholar
9. Avery, D. H. and Eackofen, W. A., “Fatigue Hardening in Alloys of Low Stacking Fault Energy,” Acta Met. 11: 653, 1963.Google Scholar
10. Robertson, J. A. and Grosskreutz, J. C., “Fatigue of Copper-Zinc Alloys at 1000K,” Acta Met. 11: 795, 1963.Google Scholar
11. Pelloux, R. M. N., “The Dislocation Distribution in Face Centered Cubic Metals After Fatigue,” Boeing Scientific Research Laboratory Document Dl-82-0304, 1963.Google Scholar
12. Segall, R. L., Partridge, P. G., and Hirsch, P. B., “The Dislocation Distribution in Face-Centered Cubic Metals After Fatigue,” Phil. Mag. 6: 1493, 1961.Google Scholar
13. Grosskreutz, J. C. and Shaw, G. G., “Dislocation Rearrangement in Fatigue-Hardened Aluminum During Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy,” Phil. Mag. 9: 961, 1964.Google Scholar
14. Lawley, A., Meakin, J. D. and Snowden, K. V., “Direct Study of Dislocations in Metals by Transmission Electron Microscopy—Fatigue Deformation,” Aerospace Research Laboratories, Document 65-11, 1965.Google Scholar
15. Segall, R. L., “Lattice Defects in Fatigued Metals,” G. Thomas and J. Washburn (eds.), Electron Microscopy and Strength of Crystals, Interscience Pub., New York, 1963, p, 515.Google Scholar
16. Stokes, A. R., “A Numerical Fourier-Analysis Method for the Correction of Widths and Shapes of Lines on X-Ray Powder Photographs,” Proc. Phys. Soc. 61: 382, 1948.Google Scholar
17. Lang, A. R., “Extinction in X-Ray Diffraction Patterns of Powders,” Proc. Phys. Soc, (London) B66: 1003, 1953.Google Scholar
18. Williamson, G. K. and Smallman, R. E., “X-Ray Extinction and the Effect of Cold Work on Integrated Intensities,” Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) B68: 577, 1955.Google Scholar
19. Chandrasekhar, S., “Extinction in X-Ray Crystallography,” Adv. Phys. 9: 363, 1960.Google Scholar
20. Pratt, J. E., “Dislocation Substructure in Strain Cycled Copper,” Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Report No. 652, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1965.Google Scholar
21. Wood, W. and Segall, R. L., “Annealed Metals Under Alternating Plastic Strain,” Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) 242A: 180, 1957.Google Scholar
22. Wadsworth, N. J., “Work Hardening of Copper Crystals Under Cyclic Straining,” Acta Met, 11: 663, 1963.Google Scholar
23. Feltner, C. E., “A Debris Mechanism of Cyclic Strain Hardening for fee Metals,” Phil. Mag. 12: 1229, 1965.Google Scholar