No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The President Will See Whom Now? Presidential Engagement with Organized Interests
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2022
Abstract
Though presidents often criticize organized interests, presidents also expend considerable effort engaging them. Using original elite interviews, a survey of lobbyists, and administrative data, I consider how this engagement manifests, why presidents engage interests, and with which interests presidents engage. Unlike in other institutions, presidents exercise substantial control over engagement with interests, and they engage to mobilize interests’ institutional resources in service of their goals. To optimize mobilization, presidents focus engagement on well-resourced interests and interests who share presidents’ preferences. Pairing over seven million White House visitor log entries from two administrations with lobbying and campaign finance records, I demonstrate that presidential engagement is informed by interests’ electoral and policy resources and partisan alignment, though these characteristics’ substantive effects are modest. My findings highlight coalition building with interests as an underappreciated source of presidential power and elucidate the degree to which presidents amplify the political voice of well-resourced and copartisan interests.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association
References
Austen-Smith, David, and Wright, John. 1994. “Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, Larsen-Price, Heather, Leech, Beth, and Rutledge, Paul. 2011. “Congressional and Presidential Effects on the Demand for Lobbying.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank, Berry, Jeffrey, Hojnacki, Marie, Leech, Beth, and Kimball, David. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, Matthew. 2010. Pushing the Agenda: Presidential Leadership in US Lawmaking, 1953–2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Arthur. 1908. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon, and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Heath. 2014. Lobbying the New President: Interests in Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey. 2012. “Interest Groups and Presidential Approval.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 42 (3): 431–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew. 1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.” Journal of Politics 48 (2): 370–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosson, Jesse, Furnas, Alexander, and Lorenz, Geoffrey. 2020. “Polarized Pluralism: Organizational Preferences and Biases in the American Pressure System.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash, and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1132–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James, and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2015. Who Governs? Presidents, Public Opinion, and Manipulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George. 2000. “Building Coalitions.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 47–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew, and Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2013. “Presidential Position Taking and the Puzzle of Representation.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, Daniel. 2009. Presidential Party Building: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush: Dwight D. Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John, and Newman, Brian. 2016. “The Presidency and Political Equality.” Congress & the Presidency 43 (3): 352–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, Matt, Mahmood, Zuhaib, and Isaac, William. 2021. “Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Unequal Class Influence in American Policy.” Journal of Politics 83 (4): 1706–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeder, Simon, and Yackee, Susan. 2015. “Influence and the Administrative Process: Lobbying the US President’s Office of Management and Budget.” American Political Science Review 109 (3): 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard, and Deardorff, Alan. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, Michael, and Kalkan, Kerem. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, Thomas. 2004. “By Invitation Only: Controlling Interest Group Access to the Oval Office.” American Review of Politics 25 (3): 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William, and Moe, Terry. 2016. Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Government—and Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence, and Skocpol, Theda. 2012. Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalla, Joshua, and Broockman, David. 2016. “Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (3): 545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinane, Christina. 2021. “Control without Confirmation: The Politics of Vacancies in Presidential Appointments.” American Political Science Review 115 (2): 599–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, George. 2009. “Organizational Complexity and Coordination Dilemmas in US Executive Politics.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (1): 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas, and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. The Particularistic President: Executive Branch Politics and Political Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Martha, and Grossman, Michael. 1984. “The Presidency and Interest Groups.” In The Presidency and the Political System, ed. Nelson, Michael, 282–312. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Light, Paul. 1999. The President’s Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Clinton. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, Burdett A. 2009. “Connecting Interest Groups to the Presidency.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, eds.Edwards, George and Howell, William, 403–24. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowande, Kenneth, and Rogowski, Jon C.. 2021. “Presidential Unilateral Power.” Annual Review of Political Science 24:21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milkis, Sidney, and Tichenor, Daniel. 2019. Rivalry and Reform: Presidents, Social Movements, and the Transformation of American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David Ryan. 2021. “Empirical Approaches to the Study of Access.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 10 (3): 286–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David Ryan. 2022a. “On Whose Door to Knock? Organized Interests’ Strategic Pursuit of Access to Members of Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47 (1): 157–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David Ryan. 2022b. “Replication Data for: The President Will See Whom Now? Presidential Engagement with Organized Interests.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VYVNFR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Mark. 1992. “The Presidency and Organized Interests: White House Patterns of Interest Group Liaison.” American Political Science Review 86 (3): 612–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Mark. 2008. “Still a Government of Chums: Bush, Business, and Organized Interests.” In The Bush, George W. Legacy, eds. Campbell, Colin, Rockman, Bert, and Rudalevige, Andrew, 288–324. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Pika, Joseph. 2009. “The White House Office of Public Liaison.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 39 (3): 549–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Paul, and Nesmith, Bruce. 2005. “Who Serves Special Interests? The President, Congress, and Interest Groups.” In The Interest Group Connection, eds. Herrnson, Paul, Shaiko, Ronald, and Wilcox, Clyde, 298–318. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1981. “US Congressman as Enterprise.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6 (4): 559–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaiko, Ronald. 1998. “Interest Group Mobilization from the White House and the Hill.” In Interest Group Politics, eds. Cigler, Allan and Loomis, Burdett, 255–81. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph, Keele, Luke, and Park, David. 2007. “A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data.” Political Analysis 15 (2):165–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Terry. 1988. “Headcounts, Expectations, and Presidential Coalitions in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (3): 567–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenpas, Kathryn. 2005. “Lobbying the Executive Branch: Outside-In and Inside-Out.” In The Interest Group Connection, eds. Herrnson, Paul, Shaiko, Ronald, and Wilcox, Clyde, 249–57. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Tripathi, Micky, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James. 2002. “Are PAC Contributions and Lobbying Linked? New Evidence from the 1995 Lobby Disclosure Act.” Business and Politics 4 (2): 131–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller supplementary material
Miller supplementary material
PDF
2.9 MB
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.