Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T22:27:13.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scratch the surface: Histopathology of foot-pad dermatitis in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J Stracke ,
D Klotz ,
P Wohlsein ,
S Döhring ,
N Volkmann ,
N Kemper  and
B Spindler
J Stracke*
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany
D Klotz
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany
P Wohlsein
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany
S Döhring
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Am Krümpel 31, 49090 Osnabrück, Germany
N Volkmann
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany
N Kemper
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany
B Spindler
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Hygiene, Animal Welfare and Farm Animal Behaviour, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence: jenny.stracke@tiho-hannover.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Foot-pad dermatitis (FPD) is an important indicator of animal welfare in turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). The present study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of a commonly used five-point visual score (VC), assessing FPD based on lesion size by implementing histopathological analysis. In 100 turkey feet (20 per scale scored by the VC), the size of both the foot-pad and the alteration were measured. Subsequently, a histopathological analysis was performed, examining the occurrence and severity grade of different parameters. The study addressed three main goals: (i) examining the reliability of the scoring system concerning the evaluated size of FPD; (ii) assessing histopathological parameters to analyse patterns, reflecting the categories of the scoring system; and (iii) finding threshold values to avoid the occurrence of ulcerations. The study found good observer reliabilities for the VC, but measuring the relative size of alterations resulted in divergent values according to the original specifications With regard to the histopathological parameters, no clear patterns were found in the respective VC scoring levels. However, ulcerations revealed a significant effect on the size of the alteration, showing a greater grade of severity with increasing lesion size. Regarding the occurrence of ulcerations, optimum threshold values could be identified even in very small lesions. This study helps contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of FPD. It also raises the question as to whether, in light of animal welfare concerns, threshold values of visual systems should be adjusted to avoid ulcerations, considering the outcome of our histopathological assessment.

Keywords

animal welfarefoot-pad dermatitisFPDhistopathologyscoring systemsturkeys
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 419 - 432
Copyright
© 2020 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B and Berg, C 2001 Monitoring animal welfare on com-mercial broiler farms in Sweden. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science 51(30): 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923135Google Scholar
Allain, V, Huonnic, D, Rouina, M and Michel, V 2013 Prevalence of skin lesions in turkeys at slaughter. British Poultry Science 54(1): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.764397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allain, V, Mirabito, L, Arnould, C, Colas, M, Le Bouquin, S, Lupo, C and Michel, V 2009 Skin lesions in broiler chickens measured at the slaughterhouse: Relationships between lesions and between their prevalence and rearing factors. British Poultry Science 50: 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903110901CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axelrod, V, Schwarzkopf, DS, Gilaie-Dotan, S and Rees, G 2017 Perceptual similarity and the neural correlates of geometri-cal illusions in human brain structure. Scientific Reports 7(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39968CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, CC 1998 Foot-pad dermatitis in broilers and turkeys. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae Veterinaria, Volume 36: 26–27Google Scholar
Bergmann, S, Ziegler, N, Bartels, T, Hübel, J, Schumacher, C, Rauch, E, Brandl, S, Bender, A, Casalicchio, G, Krautwald-Junghanns, ME and Erhard, MH 2013 Prevalence and severity of foot pad alterations in German turkey poults during the early rearing phase. Poultry Science 92(5): 1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J, Guillermo, T and Escobar, J 2016 Identification of bio-markers for footpad dermatitis development and wound healing. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 6: 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, S, Hansen, G, McLean, P, Bond, P Jr, Wakeman, W, Meadows, R and Buda, S 2002 Pododermatitis in turkeys. Avian Diseases 46(4): 1038–1044. https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[1038:PIT]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Da Costa, MJ, Grimes, JL, Oviedo-Rondón, EO, Barasch, I, Evans, C, Dalmagro, M and Nixon, J 2014 Footpad dermatitis severity on turkey flocks and correlations with locomotion, litter conditions, and body weight at market age. Applied Poultry Research 23: 268–279. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinev, I 2009 Clinical and morphological investigations on the prevalence of lameness associated with femoral head necrosis in broilers. British Poultry Science 50: 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660902942783CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekstrand, C, Algers, B and Svedberg, J 1997 Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 31: 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01145-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Wahab, AA, Beineke, A, Beyerbach, M, Visscher, CF and Kamphues, J 2011 Effects of floor heating and litter quality on the development and severity of foot pad dermatitis in young turkeys. Avian Diseases 55(3): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1637/9684-021011-Reg.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Convention for the Protection of Animals kept for Farming Purposes 1976 https://www.coe.int/en/web/con-ventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/087Google Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) 2009 Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. http://www.fawc.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Freedberg, IM 1993 Keratin: a journey of three decades. The Journal of Dermatology 20(6): 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.1993.tb01293.xGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, DB 2002 Corns and calluses resulting from mechani-cal hyperkeratosis. American Family Physician 65(11): 2277Google Scholar
Gentle, MJ, Tilston, V and McKeegan, DEF 2001 Mechanothermal nociceptors in the scaly skin of the chicken leg. Neuroscience 106: 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00318-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
German Animal Welfare Act 2006 Amended and promulgated on May 18th, 2006, last changed on June 19th, 2020. Tierschutzgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 18 Mai 2006 (BGBl I S 1206,1313), das zuletzt durch Artikel 101 des Gesetzes vom 19 Juni 2020(BGBl I S 1626) geändert worden ist. https://www.gesetze-im-inter-net.de/tierschg/BJNR012770972.htmlGoogle Scholar
German Order on the Protection of Animals and the Keeping of Production Animals 2006 Amended and promulgat-ed on August 22nd, 2006, last changed on June 30th, 2017. Verordnung zum Schutz landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere und anderer zur Erzeugung tierischer Produkte gehaltener Tiere bei ihrer Haltung; Tierschutz–Nutztierhaltungsverordnung (TierSchNutztV) in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 22 August 2006 (BGBI I S 2043), die durch Artikel 1 der Verordnung vom 30 Juni 2017 (BGBI I S 94) geändert worden ist. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tier-schnutztv/BJNR275800001.htmlGoogle Scholar
Greene, JA, McCracken, RM and Evans, RT 1985 A contact dermatitis of broilers: clinical and pathological findings. Avian Pathology 14: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458508436205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Große Beilage, E, Meyer, D, Hewicker-Trautwein, M, Hartmann, M and Kreienbrock, L 2019 Schulterulzera bei Sauen – Entwicklung eines Klassifizierungsschemas für die tier-schutzfachliche Bewertung am lebenden Tier. Proceedings of the 25th Internationale DVG-Fachtagung zum Thema Tierschutz und 1 Internationale Fachtagung zum Thema Ethologie und Tierhaltung pp 133–138. 14-16 March 2019, Munich, Germany. Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft EV DVG-Fachgruppe Tierschutz: Gießen, Germany. [Title translation: Shoulder ulcers in sows. Development of a classification scheme for animal welfa-re assessment in live animals]Google Scholar
Hargis, AM and Ginn, PE 2009 Haut. In: McGavin, MD and Zachary, JF (eds) Pathologie der Haustiere pp 991–1132. Elsevier GmbH: Munich, Germany. [Title translation: Pet pathology]Google Scholar
Hashmi, F, Nester, C, Wright, C, Newton, V and Lam, S 2015 Characterising the biophysical properties of normal and hyperkeratotic foot skin. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 8(1): 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-015-0092-7Google ScholarPubMed
Haslam, SM, Knowles, TG, Brown, SN, Wilkins, LJ, Kestin, SC, Warriss, PD and Nicol, CJ 2007 Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. British Poultry Science 48: 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701371341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, AF and Krippendorff, K 2007 Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measure 1: 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitmann, S, Stracke, J, Petersen, H, Spindler, B and Kemper, N 2018 First approach validating a scoring system for foot-pad dermatitis in broiler chickens developed for application in practice. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 154: 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.03.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hocking, PM, Harkness, A, Veldkamp, T and Vinco, LJ 2017 Do foot pad scores measure turkey welfare? Proceedings of the 11th Turkey Science and Production Conference pp 20–23. 9-10 March 2017, Chester, UKGoogle Scholar
Hocking, PM, Mayne, RK, Else, RW, French, NA and Gatcliffe, J 2008 Standard European footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in turkey processing plants. World Poultry Science Journal 64: 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, PM and Wu, K 2013 Traditional and commercial turkeys show similar susceptibility to foot pad dermatitis and behavioural evidence of pain. British Poultry Science 54: 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.781265Google ScholarPubMed
Implementary Rules of the Lower Saxonian Ministry of Nutrition 2015 Agriculture and consumer protection for §20 (4; 5). Latest Edition: 31 July 2015, from the German Order on the Protection of Animals and the Keeping of Production Animals (2006). http://www.ndsvoris.de/jportal/portal/t/ji3/page/bsvorisprod.psml;jsessionid=8F93DE217C1A385FC1EBBE0F60477.jp27?pid=Dokumentanzeige&showdoccase=1&js_peid=Trefferliste&documentnumber=1&numberofresults=1&fromdoctodoc=yes&doc.id=VVND-VVND000035929#focuspointGoogle Scholar
Ison, SH, Clutton, RE, Di Giminiani, P and Rutherford, K 2016 A review of pain assessment in pigs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 3: 108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2016.00108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katiyar, AK, Vegad, JL and Awadhiya, RP 1992 Pathology of inflammatory-reparative response in punched wounds of the chicken skin. Avian Pathology 21(3): 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459208418865CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klambeck, L, Stracke, J, Spindler, B, Klotz, D, Wohlsein, P, Schoen, HG, Kaufmann, F, Kemper, K and Andersson, R 2019 First approach to validate a scoring system to assess foot-pad dermatitis in Pekin ducks. European Poultry Science 83. https://www.european-poultry-science.com/First-approach-to-validate-a-scoring-system-to-assess-footpad-dermatitis-in-Pekin-ducks,QUlEPTYwODMzOTMmTUlEPTE2MTAxNA.htmlGoogle Scholar
Krautwald-Junghanns, ME, Ellerich, R, Mitterer-Istyagin, H, Ludewig, M, Fehlhaber, K, Schuster, E, Berk, J, Petermann, S and Bartels, T 2011 Examinations on the prevalence of foot-pad lesions and breast skin lesions in British United Turkeys Big 6 fattening turkeys in Germany. Part I: Prevalence of footpad lesions. Poultry Science 90(3): 555–560. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K 2011 Computing Krippendorff's alpha-reliability. http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43Google Scholar
Kyvsgaard, NC, Jensen, HB, Ambrosen, T and Toft, N 2013 Temporal changes and risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in Danish broilers. Poultry Science 92: 26–32. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landis, JR and Koch, GG 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Louton, H, Piller, A, Bergmann, S, Erhard, M, Stracke, J, Spindler, B, Kemper, N, Schmidt, P, Schade, B, Boehm, B, Kappe, E, Bachmeier, J and Schwarzer, A 2020 Histologically validated scoring system for the assessment of hock burn in broilers. Avian Pathology 49(3): 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2020.1712328CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, VP, Nielsen, LR, Oliveira, ARS and Christensen, JP 2017 Evaluation of the Danish footpad lesion surveillance in con-ventional and organic broilers: Misclassification of scoring. Poultry Science 96: 2018–2028. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martland, MF 1984 Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododer-matitis, leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening turkeys. Avian Pathology 13: 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458408418528Google ScholarPubMed
Martland, MF 1985 Ulcerative dermatitis in broiler chickens: The effects of wet litter. Avian Pathology 14: 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079458508436237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martrenchar, A, Boilletot, E, Huonnic, D and Pol, F 2002 Risk factors for foot-pad dermatitis in chicken and turkey broilers in France. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 52: 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(01)00259-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauldin, EA and Peters-Kennedy, J 2015 Integumentary system. In: Maxie, G (ed) Jubb, Kennedy and Palmer's Pathology of Domestic Animals, 6th Edition, Volume 1 pp 509–736. Elsevier: St Louis, Missouri, US. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-5317-7.00006-0Google Scholar
Mayne, RK 2005 A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of footpad dermatitis in growing turkeys and broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200458Google Scholar
Mayne, RK, Else, RW and Hocking, PM 2007a High litter moisture alone is sufficient to cause footpad dermatitis in growing turkeys. British Poultry Science 48: 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701573045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayne, RK, Else, RW and Hocking, PM 2007b High dietary concentrations of biotin did not prevent foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys and external scores were poor indicators of histopathological lesions. British Poultry Science 48(3): 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701370509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGavin, MD and Zachary, JF 2006 Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease. Elsevier Health Sciences: University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USGoogle Scholar
McKeegan, D 2010 Foot pad dermatitis and hock burn in broilers: Risk factors, aetiology and welfare consequences. Research Project Final Report, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, UK. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=14546Google Scholar
Meagher, RK 2009 Observer ratings: validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 119:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, V, Prampart, E, Mirabito, L, Allain, V, Arnould, C, Huonnic, D, Le Bouquin, S and Albaric, O 2012 Histologically validated footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in chicken processing plants. British Poultry Science 53: 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.695336CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Parameters for Voluntary Agreements for the Keeping of Turkeys 2013 German designation: Bundeseinheitliche Eckwerte für eine freiwillige Vereinbarung zur Haltung von Mastputen, Verband Deutscher Putenerzeuger. https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/_Tiere/Tierschutz/ZDG-Eckwerte-Haltung-Mastputen.htmlGoogle Scholar
Packialakshmi, B, Rath, NC, Huff, WE and Huff, GE 2015 Poultry femoral head separation and necrosis: A review. Avian Diseases 59:349–354. https://doi.org/10.1637/11082-040715-Review.1Google ScholarPubMed
Piller, A, Bergmann, S, Schwarzer, A, Erhard, M, Stracke, J, Spindler, B, Kemper, N, Schmidt, P, Bachmeier, J, Schade, B, Boehm, B, Kappe, E and Louton, H 2020 Validation of his-tological and visual scoring systems for foot-pad dermatitis in broiler chicken. Animal Welfare 29: 185–196. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.29.2.185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, DG 2012 The impact of legislation and assurance schemes on alternative systems for poultry. In: Sandilands, V and Hocking, PM (eds) Alternative Systems for Poultry: Health, Welfare and Productivity pp 23–53. CABI: Oxon, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845938246.0023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council 2018 Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Directive 2007/43/EC and its influence on the welfare of chickens kept for meat production, as well as the development of welfare indicators. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32007L0043Google Scholar
Shepherd, EM and Fairchild, BD 2010 Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science 89: 2043–2051. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00770CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swets, KA 1988 Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240: 1285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/sci-ence.3287615Google ScholarPubMed
Toppel, K, Spindler, B, Kaufmann, F, Gauly, M, Kemper, N and Andersson, R 2019 Foot pad health as part of on-farm-mon-itoring in turkey flocks. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 6: 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Harn, J and de Jong, I 2017 Validation of Meyn Footpad Inspection System. Wageningen Livestock Research Report 1044 B. https://doi.org/10.18174/423304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Ulzen, NR, Semin, GR, Oudejans, RR and Beek, PJ 2008 Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion. Psychological Research 72(3): 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-007-0114-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber Wyneken, C, Sinclair, A, Veldkamp, T, Vinco, LJ and Hocking, PM 2015 Footpad dermatitis and pain assessment in turkey poults using analgesia and objective gait analysis. British Poultry Science 56: 522–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007 1668.2015.1077203Google ScholarPubMed
Wohlsein, P, Baumgärtner, W and Hewicker-Trautwein, M 2015 Haut. In: Baumgärtner, W and Gruber, AD (eds) Spezielle Pathologie für die Tiermedizin pp 342–349. Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1055/b-003-125811. [Title translation: Special pathology for veterinary medicine]Google Scholar
Wyers, M, Cherel, Y and Plassiart, G 1991 Late clinical expression of lameness related to associated osteomyelitis and tibial dyschondroplasia in male breeding turkeys. Avian Diseases 35:408–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youden, WJ 1950 Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3(1): 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::AID-CNCR2820030106>3.0.CO;2-3Google ScholarPubMed
Youssef, IM, Beineke, A, Rohn, K and Kamphues, J 2011 Effects of high dietary levels of soybean meal and its constituents (potassium, oligosaccharides) on foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys housed on dry and wet litter. Archives of Animal Nutrition 65(2): 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2010.533548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed