Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T14:18:59.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of floor type on lameness and hoof health of dairy origin bulls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

V. S. Murphy ,
D. E. Lowe ,
F. O. Lively  and
A. W. Gordon
V. S. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK School of Biological Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
D. E. Lowe
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK
F. O. Lively
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Large Park, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, UK
A. W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, 18a Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
*
†E-mail: vthompson10@qub.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of using different floor types to accommodate growing and finishing beef cattle on lameness. In all, 80 dairy origin bulls were blocked according to live weight and breed into 20 groups, and randomly allocated within groups to one of four treatments. The floor types studied were fully slatted flooring throughout the entire experimental period (CS); fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips throughout the entire experimental period (RS); fully slatted flooring during the growing period and then moved to a solid floor covered with straw bedding during the finishing period (CS-S) and fully slatted flooring during the growing period and then moved to fully slatted flooring covered with rubber strips during the finishing period (CS-RS). The total duration of the study was 204 days. The first 101 days was defined as the growing period, with the remainder of the study defined as the finishing period. During the growing period, there was a tendency for bulls accommodated on CS to have a higher locomotion score compared with those accommodated on RS (P=0.059). However, floor type had no significant effect on locomotion score during the finishing period. There was also no significant effect of floor type on digital dermatitis during both the growing or finishing period. Floor type had no significant effect on swelling at the leg joints at the end of the finishing period. Bulls accommodated on RS had the least probability of bruised soles during both the growing and finishing period (P<0.01). Growing bulls accommodated on CS had significantly greater front heel height net growth compared with those accommodated on RS (P<0.05). However, bulls accommodated on RS had a tendency to have greater front toe net growth compared with those accommodated on CS (P=0.087). Finishing bulls accommodated on CS-RS had the greatest front toe net growth (P<0.001). Heel height net growth was greatest in bulls accommodated on CS-S (P<0.001). Floor type had no significant effect on mean maximum hoof temperature during the growing period. Finishing bulls accommodated on CS-S had a significantly lower mean maximum hoof temperature compared with those accommodated on any other floor type (P<0.001). The study concluded that rubber flooring is a suitable alternative to fully slatted flooring, reducing the prevalence of bruised soles. Despite greater toe net growth in bulls accommodated on rubber flooring, there was no effect of floor type on locomotion score, suggesting that increased toe net growth does not adversely affect walking ability. In addition, although mean maximum hoof temperature was lowest in bulls accommodated on straw bedding, there was no evidence to suggest this is indicative of improved hoof health.

Keywords

bullsflooringhoof healthlamenessrubber strips
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 2382 - 2390
Copyright
© Crown Copyright. Published by Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. Technical information. Retrieved on 17 January 2017 from https://dairy.ahdb.org.uk/technical-information/animal-health-welfare/lameness/common-problems/sole-bruising/#.WInAKVJDTct.Google Scholar
Ahrens, F, Platz, S, Link, C, Mahling, M, Meyer, HHD and Erhard, MH 2011. Changes in hoof health and animal hygiene in a dairy herd after covering concrete slatted floor with slatted rubber mats: a case study. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2341–2350.Google Scholar
Alban, L, Agger, JF and Lawson, LG 1996. Lameness in tied Danish dairy cattle: the possible influence of housing systems, management, milk yield, and prior incidents of lameness. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 29, 135–149.Google Scholar
Alsaaod, M and Büscher, W 2012. Detection of hoof lesions using digital infrared thermography in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 735–742.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C 1989. Sole bruising as an indication of laminitis. World Congress of Buiatrics, 15th World Buiatrics Congress, Spain, pp. 1072–1076.Google Scholar
Boyle, LA, Mee, JF and Kiernan, PJ 2007. The effect of rubber versus concrete passageways in cubical housing on claw health and reproduction of pluriparous dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 106, 1–12.Google Scholar
Brscic, M, Ricci, R, Prevedello, P, Lonardi, C, De Nardi, R, Contiero, B, Gottardo, F and Cozzi, G 2015. Synthetic rubber surface as an alternative to concrete to improve welfare and performance of finishing beef cattle reared on fully slatted flooring. Animal 9, 1386–1392.Google Scholar
Bruijnis, MRN, Beerda, B, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2012. Assessing the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle by a modelling approach. Animal 6, 962–970.Google Scholar
Bruijnis, MRN, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2010. Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2419–2432.Google Scholar
Cozzi, G, Tessitore, E, Contiero, B, Ricci, R, Gottardo, F and Brscic, M 2013. Alternative solutions to the concrete fully-slatted floor for the housing of finishing beef cattle: effects on growth performance, health of the locomotor system and behaviour. The Veterinary Journal 197, 211–215.Google Scholar
Döpfer, D, Koopmans, A, Meijer, FA, Szakáll, I, Schukken, YH, Klee, W, Bosma, RB, Cornelisse, JL, van Asten, AJAM and ter Huurne, AAHM 1997. Histological and bacteriological evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to spirochaetes and Campylobacter faecalis . The Veterinary Record 140, 620–623.Google Scholar
Flower, FC and Weary, DM 2006. Effect of hoof pathologies on subjective assessments of dairy cow gait. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 139–146.Google Scholar
Farm Quality Assurance Scheme (FQAS) 2014. The product standard and rules of the Northern Ireland beef and lamb quality assurance scheme. FQAS, Lisburn, Northern Ireland. Retrieved on 7 November 2016 from http://www.nifcc.co.uk/filestore/documents/publications/FQAS_Standard_and_Rules_April_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Franck, A and De Belie, N 2006. Concrete floor-bovine claw contact pressures related to floor roughness and deformation of the claw. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2952–2964.Google Scholar
Graunke, KL, Telezhenko, E, Hessle, A, Bergsten, C and Loberg, JM 2011. Does rubber flooring improve welfare and production in growing bulls in fully slatted floor pens? Animal Welfare 20, 173–183.Google Scholar
Greenough, PR and Vermunt, JJ 1994. In search of an epidemiologic approach to investigating bovine lameness problems. In Eighth International Symposium on Disorders of the Ruminant Digit, 27–30 June 1994, Banff, Canada, pp. 186–196.Google Scholar
Gregory, N, Craggs, L, Hobson, N and Krogh, C 2006. Softening of cattle hoof soles and swelling of heel horn by environmental agents. Food and Chemical Toxicology 44, 1223–1227.Google Scholar
Keane, MP, McGee, M, O’Riordan, EG, Kelly, AK and Earley, B 2015. Effect of floor type on hoof lesions, dirt scores, immune response and production of beef bulls. Livestock science 180, 220–225.Google Scholar
Kremer, PV, Nueske, S, Scholz, AM and Foerster, M 2007. Comparison of claw health and milk yield in dairy cows on elastic or concrete flooring. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4603–4611.Google Scholar
Livesey, CT and Fleming, FL 1984. Nutritional influences on laminitis, sole ulcer and bruised sole in Friesian cows. The Veterinary Record 114, 510–512.Google Scholar
Lowe, DE, Steen, RWJ and Beattie, VE 2001. Preferences of housed finishing beef cattle for different floor types. Animal Welfare 10, 395–404.Google Scholar
Mouttotou, N, Hatchell, FM and Green, LE 1999. Foot lesions in finishing pigs and their associations with the type of floor. Veterinary Record 144, 629–632.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, KA, Cripps, PJ, Downham, DY and Murray, RD 2003. Subjective and objective assessment of pain and discomfort due to lameness in dairy cattle. Animal Welfare 12, 605–610.Google Scholar
Palmer, MA, Donnelly, RF, Garland, MJ, Majithiya, R and O’Connell, NE 2013. The effect of slurry on skin permeability to methylene blue dye in dairy cows with or without a history of digital dermatitis. Animal 7, 1731–1737.Google Scholar
Payne, RW, Harding, SA, Murray, DA, Soutar, DM, Baird, DB, Glaser, AI, Channing, IC, Welham, SJ, Gilmour, AR, Thompson, R and Webster, R 2015. The guide to GenStat Release 12, part 2: statistics. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.Google Scholar
Pérez-Cabal, MA and Charfeddine, N 2016. Short communication: Association of foot and leg conformation and body weight with claw disorders in Spanish Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 9104–9108.Google Scholar
Platz, S, Ahrens, F, Bahrs, E, Nüske, S and Erhard, MH 2007a. Association between floor type and behaviour, skin lesions, and claw dimensions in group housed fattening bulls. Preventative Veterinary Medicine 80, 209–221.Google Scholar
Platz, S, Ahrens, F, Bendel, J, Meyer, HHD and Erhard, MH 2007b. What happens with cow behaviour when replacing concrete slatted floor by rubber coating: a case study. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 999–1004.Google Scholar
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) 2013. RSPCA welfare standards for beef cattle. Retrieved on 16 December 2016 from https://science.rspca.org.uk/sciencegroup/farmanimals/standards/beefcattle.Google Scholar
Schulze Westerath, H, Gygax, L, Mayer, C and Wechsler, B 2007. Leg lesions and cleanliness of finishing bulls kept in housing systems with different lying area surfaces. The Veterinary Journal 174, 77–85.Google Scholar
Shearer, JK and van Amstel, SR 2003. Managing lameness for improved cow comfort and performance. In Proceedings of the 6th Western Dairy Management Conference, 12–14 March 2003, Reno, NV, USA, pp. 167–178.Google Scholar
Somers, JGCJ, Schouten, WGP, Frankena, K, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN and Metz, JHM 2005. Development of claw traits and claw lesions in dairy cows kept on different floor systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 110–120.Google Scholar
Stokes, JE, Leach, KA, Main, DCJ and Whay, HR 2012. An investigation into the use of infrared thermography (IRT) as a rapid diagnostic tool for foot lesions in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Journal 193, 674–678.Google Scholar
Telezhenko, E, Lidfors, L and Bergsten, C 2007. Dairy cow preferences for soft or hard flooring when standing or walking. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3716–3724.Google Scholar
Thomsen, PT, Hansen, I, Martin, HL and Kudahl, AB 2017. Sole haemorrhages in Danish bull calves: prevalence and risk factors. The Veterinary Journal 224, 44–45.Google Scholar
van der Tol, PPJ, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Back, W, Braam, CR and Weijs, WA 2002. The pressure distribution under the bovine claw during square standing on a flat substrate. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1476–1481.Google Scholar
van der Tol, PPJ, Metz, JHM, Noordhuizen-Stassen, EN, Back, W, Braam, CR and Weijs, WA 2005. Frictional forces required for unrestrained locomotion in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 615–624.Google Scholar
Vermunt, JJ and Greenough, PR 1995a. Lesions associated with subclinical laminitis of the claws of dairy calves in two management systems. British Veterinary Journal 151, 391.Google Scholar
Vermunt, JJ and Greenough, PR 1995b. Structural characteristics of the bovine claw: horn growth and wear, horn hardness and claw conformation. British Veterinary Journal 151, 157.Google Scholar