Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T17:21:59.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Removing contaminants: a restatement of the value of isolating single compounds for AMS dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2019

Thomas F.G. Higham
Thomas F.G. Higham*
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, Research Laboratory for Archaeology & the History of Art, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK (Email: thomas.higham@rlaha.ox.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 93 , Issue 370 , August 2019 , pp. 1072 - 1075
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becerra-Valdivia, L., Waters, M.R., Stafford, T.W. Jr, Comeskey, D., Devièse, T. & Higham, T.F.G.. 2018. Reassessing the chronology of the archaeological site of Anzick. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 115: 7000–7003. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803624115Google Scholar
Bourrillon, R. et al. 2018. A new Aurignacian engraving from Abri Blanchard, France: implications for understanding Aurignacian graphic expression in Western and Central Europe. Quaternary International 491: 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.09.063Google Scholar
Devièse, T. et al. 2017. Direct dating of Neanderthal remains from the site of Vindija Cave and implications for the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 114: 10606–11. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1709235114Google Scholar
Devièse, T., Comeskey, D., McCullagh, J., Ramsey, C.B. & Higham, T.F.G.. 2018a. New protocol for compound-specific radiocarbon analysis of archaeological bones. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 32: 373–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8047Google Scholar
Devièse, T., Stafford, T.W., Waters, M.R., Wathen, C., Comeskey, D., Becerra-Valdivia, L. & Higham, T.F.G.. 2018b. Increasing accuracy for the radiocarbon dating of sites occupied by the first Americans. Quaternary Science Reviews 198: 171–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.08.023Google Scholar
Devièse, T. et al. 2019. Compound-specific radiocarbon dating and mitochondrial DNA analysis of the Pleistocene hominin from Salkhit Mongolia. Nature Communications 10: 274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08018-8Google Scholar
Dinnis, R., Bessudnov, A., Reynolds, N., Devièse, T., Pate, A., Sablin, M., Sinitsyn, A. & Higham, T.F.G.. 2018. New data for the Early Upper Paleolithic of Kostenki (Russia). Journal of Human Evolution 127: 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.012Google Scholar
Higham, T.F.G. 2011. European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: problems with previous dates and some remedies. Antiquity 85: 235–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00067570Google Scholar
Kosintsev, P. et al. 2019. Evolution and extinction of the giant rhinoceros Elasmotherium sibiricum sheds light on Late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3: 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0722-0Google Scholar
Krause, J. et al. 2007. Neanderthals in Central Asia and Siberia, Nature 449: 902–904. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06193Google Scholar
Kuzmin, Y.V. 2019. The older, the better? On the radiocarbon dating of Upper Palaeolithic burials in Northern Eurasia and beyond. Antiquity 93: 1061–71. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.158Google Scholar
Marom, A. et al. 2012. Single amino acid radiocarbon dating of Upper Palaeolithic modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 6878–81. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116328109Google Scholar
Marom, A., McCullagh, J.S.O., Higham, T.F.G. & Hedges, R.E.M.. 2013. Hydroxyproline dating: experiments on the 14C analysis of contaminated and low-collagen bones. Radiocarbon 55: 698–708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200057854Google Scholar
McColl, H. et al. 2018. The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia. Science 361: 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat3628Google Scholar
Moreno-Mayar, J. et al. 2018. Early human dispersals within the Americas. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2621Google Scholar
Nalawade-Chavan, S., McCullagh, J. & Hedges, R.. 2013. New hydroxyproline radiocarbon dates from Sungir, Russia, confirm early Mid Upper Palaeolithic burials in Eurasia. PLoS ONE 9: e76896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076896Google Scholar
Reynolds, N., Dinnis, R., Bessudnov, A.A., Devièse, T. & Higham, T.F.G.. 2017. The Kostënki 18 child burial and the cultural and funerary landscape of Mid Upper Palaeolithic European Russia. Antiquity 91:1435–50. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.150Google Scholar
Sikora, M. et al. 2017. Ancient genomes show social and reproductive behavior of early Upper Paleolithic foragers. Science 358: 659–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao1807Google Scholar