Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T13:07:19.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of clinical and linguistic indices of deviance in the verbal discourse of schizophrenics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Lynne M. Sanders*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts
Jane Adams*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts
Helen Tager-Flusberg*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts
Martha E. Shenton*
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Michael Coleman*
Affiliation:
McLean Hospital
*
Address for correspondence Jane Adams, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125-3393
Address for correspondence Jane Adams, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125-3393
Address for correspondence Jane Adams, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125-3393
Address for correspondence Jane Adams, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125-3393
Address for correspondence Jane Adams, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 100 Morrissey Boulevard, Boston, MA 02125-3393

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare clinical and psycholinguistic approaches to the measurement of verbal behavior according to their ability to discriminate schizophrenic (n = 11) from manic-depressive (n = 11) and normal control (n = 11) subjects. Language samples were obtained during Rorschach testing and analyzed using a clinical measure, the Thought Disorder Index (TDI), and a battery of linguistic measures. Five linguistic categories were examined: productivity, repetition, dysfluency, cohesiveness, and syntactic complexity. On the clinical measure, schizophrenic subjects had high thought disorder scores. On the linguistic measures, the speech of schizophrenics differed significantly from the other two groups in productivity and in the number of clearly referenced elements, a measure of cohesion. This measure of cohesion was positively correlated with TDI scores. The findings are discussed in terms of the benefits of using more objective and quantitative measurements in research on thought disorganization in schizophrenia.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association, Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Andreason, N. C. (1979a). Thought, language, and communication disorders. I. Clinical assessment, definition of terms, and evaluation of their reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 13151321.Google Scholar
Andreason, N. C. (1979b). Thought, language, and communication disorders. II. Diagnostic significance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 13251330.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 7, 235261.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). Schizophrenia, language, and reality. American Psychologist, 28, 395403.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. D. (1976). Sensitivity to syntactic structure: Good versus poor premorbid schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85 (1), 4150.Google Scholar
Docherty, N., Schnur, M., & Harvey, P. D. (1988). Reference performance and positive and negative thought disorder: A follow-up study of manics and schizophrenics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 437442.Google Scholar
Fraser, W. I., King, K. M., Thomas, P., & Kendell, R. E. (1986). The diagnosis of schizophrenia by language analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 275278.Google Scholar
Gerver, D. (1967). Linguistic rules and the perception and recall of speech by schizophrenic patients. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 204211.Google Scholar
Grove, W. M., & Andreasen, N. C. (1985). Language and thinking in psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 2632.Google Scholar
Harrow, M. & Prosen, M. (1979). Schizophrenic thought disorders: Bizarre associations and intermingling. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 293296.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. (1983). Speech competence in manic and schizophrenic psychoses: The association between clinically rated thought disorder and cohesion and reference performance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 368377.Google Scholar
Harvey, P., Weintraub, S., & Neale, J. M. (1982). Speech competence of children vulnerable to psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 373388.Google Scholar
Holzman, P. S., Shenton, M. E., & Solovay, M. R. (1986). Quality of thought disorder in differential diagnosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12, 360371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, M. H., & Holzman, P. S. (1979). Assessing schizophrenic thinking. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lewinsohn, P. M., & Elwood, D. L. (1961). The role of contextual constraint in the learning of language samples in schizophrenia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 133, 7981.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1990). The Child Language Data Exchange System: An update. Journal of Child Language, 17, 457472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maher, B. (1972). The language of schizophrenia: A review and interpretation. British Journalof Psychiatry, 120, 317.Google Scholar
Manschreck, T. C., Maher, B. A., & Ader, D. N. (1981). Formal thought disorder, the type-token ratio, and disturbed voluntary motor movement in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 715.Google Scholar
Manschreck, T. C., Maher, B. A., Hoover, T. M., & Ames, D. (1984). The type-token ratio in schizophrenic disorders: Clinical and research value. Psychological Medicine, 14, 151157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manschreck, T. C., Maher, B. A., Hoover, T. M., & Ames, D. (1985). Repetition in schizophrenic speech. Language and Speech, 28, 255268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morice, R. D., & Ingram, J. C. L. (1982). Language analysis in schizophrenia: Diagnostic implications. A ustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 11.Google Scholar
Morice, R. D., & Ingram, J. C. L. (1983). Language complexity and age of onset of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 9, 233242.Google Scholar
Morice, R., & McNicol, D. (1985). The comprehension and production of complex syntax in schizophrenia. Cortex, 21, 567580.Google Scholar
Ragin, A. B., & Oltmanns, T. F. (1986). Lexical cohesion and formal thought disorder during and after psychotic episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 181183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ragin, A. B., & Oltmanns, T. F. (1987). Communicability and thought disorder in schizophrenics and other diagnostic groups: A follow-up study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 494500.Google Scholar
Ragin, A. B., Pogue-Geile, M., Oltmanns, T. F. (1989). Poverty of speech in schizophrenia and depression during in-patient and post-hospital periods. British Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 5257.Google Scholar
Rappaport, D., Gill, M. M., & Schafer, R. (1968). Diagnostic psychological testing. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Rochester, S. R., & Martin, J. R. (1979). Crazy talk: A study of the discourse of schizophrenic speakers. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. (1982). Is there a schizophrenic language? Behavioral Brain Science, 5, 579626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solovay, M. R., Shenton, M. E., Gasperetti, C., Coleman, M., Kestnbaum, E., Tyler-Carpenter, J., & Holzman, P. S. (1986). Scoring manual for the Thought Disorder Index. Schizophrenia Bullentin, 12, 483496.Google ScholarPubMed
Solovay, M. R., Shenton, M. E., & Holzman, P. S. (1987). Comparative studies of thought disorders: I. Mania and schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 1320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed