Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T04:55:16.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-feeding behavior changes induced by a first and a secondgeneration of domestication or selection for growth in the European sea bass,Dicentrarchus labrax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Sandie Millot ,
Samuel Péan ,
Béatrice Chatain  and
Marie-Laure Bégout
Sandie Millot*
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Place Gaby Coll, BP 7, 17137 L’Houmeau, France
Samuel Péan
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Place Gaby Coll, BP 7, 17137 L’Houmeau, France
Béatrice Chatain
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Station expérimentale d’aquaculture, chemin de Maguelone, 34250 Palavas-les-Flots, France
Marie-Laure Bégout
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Place Gaby Coll, BP 7, 17137 L’Houmeau, France
*
a Corresponding author:sandiemillot@yahoo.fr
Get access

Abstract

Among the strategies that can be used to improve fish welfare in a rearing environment,domestication and/or selective breeding was proposed to minimize fish responsiveness tohusbandry practices. To verify this hypothesis on a recently domesticated species, the seabass Dicentrarchus labrax, two experiments were realized, each using twopopulations differing according to their level of domestication or selection. For thefirst experiment, we used one population produced from wild parents (Wild;initial body mass: 106  ±  3 g), and one population from parents selected forgrowth for one generation (Selected 1; initial body mass: 129  ±  4 g).For the second experiment, we used one population produced from parents domesticated fortwo generations (Domesticated; initial body mass: 72  ±  3 g), and oneproduced from parents selected for growth for two generations (Selected 2;initial body mass: 89  ±  4 g). The first experiment was carried out over 112days with 240 fish (60 fish per tank, 120 fish per population), and the second one over 84days with 200 fish (50 fish per tank, 100 fish per population). Two variables,self-feeding behavior and growth performance, were measured over the time of theexperiments. After a control period, the fish were submitted twice, at three-weekintervals, to an acute stress treatment consisting of draining the tank and leaving thefish out of water for one minute. Both self-feeding behavior and growth performance werealtered by the acute stress treatment. During the first post-stress period, theDomesticated and Selected (1 and2) groups showed more pronounced post-stress exposure responses thanthe Wild fish: they modified their feeding rhythm, their feed intake, andtheir growth rate. During the second post-stress period, feeding rhythm was still affected(being more diurnal with a well defined peak), but the feed intake and growth rate resultsshowed that the Domesticated and Wild groups seemed lessaffected than the Selected (1 and 2)populations, which continued to express a high post-stress response.

According to these results, it can be concluded that: (1) an application of two acutestress treatments, at three-week intervals, modified fish feeding behavior and growthperformance; (2) the domestication process seemed to improve fish adaptation abilities tothis kind of stress; and (3) the process of selection for growth led to a final, bettergrowth, but did not seem to improve fish acute stress tolerance.

Keywords

Feed intakeFeeding rhythmSpecific growth rateAdaptation capacitiesFish welfare
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 53 - 61
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashley, P.L., 2007, Fish welfare: current issues in aquaculture. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 104, 199–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balm P.H.M., 1997, Immune-endocrine interactions. In: Iwana G., Pickering A., Sumpter J., Schreck C. (Eds.), Fish Stress and Health in Aquaculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–222.
Barton, B.A., 2002, Stress in fishes: a diversity of responses with particular reference to changes in circulating corticosteroids. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 517–525. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, B.A., Schreck, C.B., 1987, Metabolic cost of acute physical stress in juvenile steelhead. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 116, 257–263. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, B.A., Schreck, C.B., Barton, L.D., 1987, Effects of chronic cortisol administration and daily acute stress on growth, physiological conditions, and stress responses in juvenile rainbow trout. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2, 173–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D.M., 1988, The concept of stress and welfare. Rec. Méd. Vét. 164, 715–721. Google Scholar
Chatain B., 1994, Estimation et amélioration des performances zootechniques de l’élevage larvaire de Dicentrarchus labrax et de Sparus auratus. Thèse Dr. Etat, Univ. Aix-Marseille II.
Conte, F.S., 2004, Stress and the welfare of cultured fish. Appl. Anim. Beh. Sci. 86, 205–223. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras-Sanchez, W.M., Schreck, C.B., Fitzpatrick, M.S., Pereira, C.B., 1998, Effects of stress on the reproductive performance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Biol. Reprod. 58, 439–447. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covès, D., Beauchaud, M., Attia, J., Dutto, G., Bouchut, C., Bégout Anras, M.-L., 2006, Long-term monitoring of individual fish triggering activity on a self-feeding system: an example using European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture 253, 385–392. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnélie P., 1975, Théorie et méthodes statistiques. In: Applications agronomiques, Vol. 2. Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux.
Dupont-Nivet, M., Vandeputte, M., Vergnet, A., Merdy, O., Haffray, P., Chavanne, H., Chatain, B., 2008, Heritabilities and GxE interactions for growth in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) using a marker-based pedigree. Aquaculture 275, 81–87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarsdottir, I.E., Nilssen, K.J., Iversen, M., 2000, Effects of rearing stress on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) antibody response to a non-pathogenic antigen. Aquac. Res. 31, 923–930. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farbridge, K.J., Leatherland, J.F., 1992, Plasma growth hormone levels in fed and fasted rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykis) are decreased following handling stress. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 10, 67–73. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntingford, F.A., Adams, C., Braithwaite, V.A., Kadri, S., Pottinger, T.G., Sandoe, P., Turnbull, J.F., 2006, Current issues in fish welfare. J. Fish Biol. 68, 332–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntingford F.A., Kadri S., 2008, Welfare and fish. In: Branson E.J. (Ed.), Fish welfare. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
Jobling M., 1994, Fish Bioenergetics. Chapman and Hall, London.
Liebert, A.M., Schreck, C.B., 2006, Effects of acute stress on osmoregulation, feed intake, IGF-1, and cortisol in yearling steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during seawater adaptation. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 148, 195–202. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazeaud, M.M., Mazeaud, F., Donaldson, E.M., 1977, Primary and secondary effects of stress in fish: some new data with a general review. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 106, 201–212. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J.C., Siegel, P.B., 1983, A review of genetical and physiological effects of selection in meat-type poultry. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 51, 87–94. Google Scholar
Mambrini, M., Sanchez, M.-P., Chevassus, B., Labbé, L., Quillet, E., Boujard, T., 2004, Selection for growth increases feed intake and affects feeding behaviour of brown trout. Livest. Prod. Sci. 88, 85–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, M.I., 1998, Behavioural induced maternal stress in a fish influences progeny quality by a hormonal mechanism. Ecology 79, 1873–1883. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, M.I., 1999, Experimental test of the effect of maternal hormones on larval quality of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 118, 412–422. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormick, S.D., Shrimpton, J.M., Carey, J.B., O’Dea, M.F., Sloan, K.E., Moriyama, S., Björnsson, B.T., 1998, Repeated acute stress reduces growth rate of Atlantic salmon parr and alters plasma levels of growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I and cortisol. Aquaculture 168, 221–235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesa, M.G., 1994, Effects of multiple acute stressors on the predator avoidance ability and physiology of juvenile chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 123, 786–793. 2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millot, S., Bégout, M.-L., Person-Le Ruyet, J., Breuil, G., Di-Poï, C., Fievet, J., Pineau, P., Roué, M., Sévère, A., 2008. Feed demand behavior in sea bass juveniles: effects on individual specific growth rate variation and health (inter-individual and inter-group variation). Aquaculture 274, 87–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millot, S., Bégout, M.L., 2009, Individual fish rhythm directs group feeding: a case study with sea bass juveniles (Dicentrarchus labrax) under self-demand feeding conditions. Aquat. Liv. Resour. 22, 363–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millot, S., Péan, S., Leguay, D., Vergnet, A., Chatain, B., Bégout, M.L., 2010, Evaluation of behavioral changes induced by a first step of domestication or selection for growth in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax): a self-feeding approach under repeated acute stress. Aquaculture 306, 211–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olla, B.L., Davis, M.W., Schreck, C.B., 1995, Stress-induced impairment of predator evasion and non-predator mortality in Pacific salmon. Aquac. Res. 26, 393–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankhurst N.W., Van der Kraak G., 1997, Effects of stress on reproduction and growth. In: Iwana, G., Pickering, A., Sumpter, J., Schreck, C. (Eds.) Fish Stress and Health in Aquaculture Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 73–94.
Parker, N.C., 1984, Chronobiologic approach to aquaculture. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 113, 545–552. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A.D., 1992, Rainbow trout husbandry-management of the stress response. Aquaculture 100, 125–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A.D., Stewart, A., 1984, Acclimation of the interregnal tissue of the brown trout Salmo trutta L., to chronic crowding stress. J. Fish Biol. 24, 731–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A.D., Pottinger, T.G., Christie, P., 1982, Recovery of the brown trout, Salmo trutta L., from acute handling stress: a time-course study. J. Fish Biol. 20, 229–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A.D., Pottinger, T.G., Sumpter, J.P., Carragher, J.F., Le Bail, P.Y., 1991, Effects of acute and chronic stress on the levels of circulating growth hormone in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Gen. Comp. Endocr. 83, 86–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottinger, T.G., 2003, The selection of trout for high and low responsiveness to stress: progress and prospects. Trout News, CEFAS 36, 14–16. Google Scholar
Pottinger T.G., Pickering A.D., 1997, Genetic basis to the stress response: selective breeding for stress-tolerant fish. In: Iwana G., Pickering A., Sumpter J., Schreck C. (Eds.), Fish Stress and Health in Aquaculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 171–193.
Price, E.O., 1984, Behavioural aspects of animal domestication. Quart. Rev. Biol. 59, 1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreck, C.B., Contreras-Sanchez, W., Fitzpatrick, M.S., 2001, Effects of stress on fish reproduction, gamete quality, and progeny. Aquaculture 197, 3–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spieler, R.E., 1977, Diel and seasonal changes in response to stimuli: a plague and a promise for mariculture. J. World Maricult. Soc. 8, 865–873. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeputte, M., Dupont-Nivet, M., Haffray, P., Chavanne, H., Cenadelli, S., Parati, K., Vidal, M.-O., Vergent, A., Chatain, B., 2009, Response to domestication and selection for growth in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in separate and mixed tanks. Aquaculture 286, 20–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedemeyer G.A., Barton B.A., McLeay D.J., 1990, Stress and acclimation. In: Schreck C.B., Moyle PB (Eds.), Methods for Fish Biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 451–489.
Wendelaar Bonga, S.E., 1997, The stress response in fish. Physiol. Rev. 77, 591–625. Google Scholar