² P[ekař], J[osef], “Pozdrav” [Greeting], Český časopis historický, Vol. XXIV (1918), p. vii.Google Scholar

³ A good example of such appraisals is Josef, Pfitzner's “Neue Wege der tschechischen Geschichtswissenschaft,” Historische Zeitschrift, Vol. CLIII (1936), pp. 514–537Google Scholar. For a more sympathetic treatment of Czech historiography, see Plaschka, Richard Georg, Von Palacký bis Pekař. Geschichtswissenschaft und Nationalbewusstsein bei den Tseheehen. Mit einem Nachwort von Heinrich Felix Schmid (Graz: Hermann Böhlaus Nachf., 1955)Google Scholar. Czech appraisals of their own historiography will be discussed in a later section of this study.

⁴ Yet they still constitute important contributions to Austrian and Hungarian history, indispensable for any student of the Habsburg monarchy anxious to comprehend the true nature of this multinational aggregate in the full richness of its varied cultures and modes of life. If observers such as Pfitzner deplore this “self-isolation” of Czechoslovak historiography, they must be reminded that it was not only a natural, but also a fairly general, development among the “new nations” of Europe and that it was reciprocated by Austrian and Hungarian historians and librarians, who had substantially reduced their interest—never too great—in the history of these nations following the demise of the monarchy.

⁵ New periodicals devoted to particular topics will be mentioned in the section of the essay dealing with that subject. The new journals and other publications that were of a more general nature included the Práce z vědeckých ústavů filosofické fakulty University Karlovy v Praze [Publications of the Research Institutes of the Philosophical Faculty of Charles University in Prague] (56 vols., Prague, 1922–1949)Google Scholar; Spisy filosofické fakulty Masarykovy university v Brně [Publications of the Philosophical Faculty of Masaryk University in Brno] (44 vols. by 1945, Brno, 1923 —)Google Scholar; Sbornik filosofické fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavě [Journal of the Philosophical Faculty of Komenský University in Bratislava] (8 vols., Bratislava, 1922–1932)Google Scholar; Sbornik Matice slovenskej [Journal of the Matica slovenská] (20 vols., Turčiansky Svätý Martin, 1922–1942)Google Scholar; Bratislava. Časopis Učené společnosti Šafařikovy [Bratislava. Journal of the Šafařik Learned Society] (11 vols., Bratislava, 1927–1937)Google Scholar; Carpatica (2 vols., Prague, 1936–1939)Google Scholar; Dějiny a přitomnost [History and the Present] (2 vols., Prague, 1937–1938)Google Scholar; and Sbornik Narodniho musea v Praze, Odbor A: Historický [Review of the National Museum in Prague, Sect. A: Historical] (Prague, 1938—).Google Scholar

⁶ See Václav, Chaloupecký, “Pozdrav nové svobodě” [Greeting to the New Freedom], český časopis historicky, Vol. XLVII (1946), pp. 1–3Google Scholar; and “Zprávy“ [News], ibid., pp. 321–322. Among the victims of the Nazi regime were the authors of many historical works that will be mentioned later in this essay. They include Josef Matoušek, Bedřich Mendl, Bedřich Jenšovský, Jaroslav Papoušek, Hugo Traub, Josef Fischer, Evžen Stein, Bohumil Baxa, Josef Kudela, Ján Šikura, Vladimír Groh, Vladimír Helfert, Bedřich Václavek, and Arnošt Kraus.

⁷ Historiea slovaca (7 vols., Bratislava, 1940–1949)Google Scholar; Historický sborntk. Časopis historického odboru Matice slovenskej [Historical Review. Journal of the Historical Section of the Matica slovenská] (5 vols., Turčiansky S. Martin, 1943–1947)Google Scholar; Carpatica slovaca (2 vols., Bratislava, 1943–1944).Google Scholar

⁸ Many of these works will be indicated only by subject, author, and year of publication. It is hoped that on the basis of this information a researcher who might be interested in them can obtain complete bibliographic information by consulting the bibliographical guides listed below. Although most of the studies listed in this essay are scholarly studies, I have occasionally included publications written for the general reader, as well as works of “a provisional nature,” especially in cases when they were written by leading historians or dealt with important subjects about which no definitive works had been published.

⁹ Bibliografie české historie [Bibliography of Czech History] (20 vols., Prague: Historický klub, 1904–1951).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Válav, Novotný, České déjepisectvi v prvém desetileti republiky [Czech Historiography during the First Ten Years of the Republic] (Prague: Historicky spolek, 1929).Google Scholar

¹¹ Poslednich padesát let české práce dějepisné. Soubor zpráv Jaroslava Golla o české literatuře htetorické, vydanych v “Revue historique” v letech 1878–1906, a souhrnná zpráva Josefa Šusty za léta 1902–1924 [The Last Fifty Years of Czech Historical Work. A Collection of the Reports of Jaroslav Goll on Czech Historical Literature published in the Revue Historique during the Years 1878–1906, and a Summary Report by Josef Šusta for the Years 1905–1924] (Prague: Historický klub, 1926)Google Scholar; Josef, Šusta, Poslednich deset let české práce dějepisné. Soubor zpráv Josefa Šusty o československé literatuře historické, vydantých v “Revue historique” za Uta 1925–1935 [The Last Ten Years of Czechoslovak Historical Work. A Collection of the Reports of Josef Šusta on Czechoslovak Historical Literature published in Revue Historique during the Years 1925–1935] (Prague: Historický klub, 1937)Google Scholar. Similar reports in German were published by Josef Pfitzner in Jahresberichte für Deutsche Geschichte for the years 1925–1939. The Zeitschrift fur sudentendeutsche Geschichte published such reports for the years 1937–1943.

¹² The annual indexes of the journal also serve as a valuable bibliographical tool. Particularly important is the cumulative index for the first forty years of the journal published by Josef Klik under the title Bibliografie vědecké práce o české minulosti za poslednich čtyřicet let. Rejstřík Českeho časopisu historického 1895–1934 [Bibliography of Scholarly Work on the Czech Past for the Last Forty Years. Index of the Czech Historical Journal, 1895–1934] (Prague: Historický klub, 1935)Google Scholar. In Vol. XLVII of the journal, Klik published a list of books that had appeared in print between 1940 and 1945, when the journal was banned by the Nazi regime: “Nové knihy historické” [New Historical Books], Český časopis historický, Vol. XLVII (1946), pp. 491–514Google Scholar. A similar list of Slovak books and articles from 1938 to 1948 was published by Darina Lehotská in Vol. XLVIII-XLIX of the journal: “Novšia historiografia slovenská” [Recent Slovak Historiography], ibid., Vol. XLVII-XLIX (1947–48), pp. 392–414.

¹³ Bibliografia slovenskej histórie za roky 1939–1941 [Bibliography of Slovak History for the Years 1939–1941], edited by Bokes, František, Jankovič, Vendelin, and Polla, Bello (Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Matica slovenská, 1944)Google Scholar. The first part of this bibliography was originally published in the Historický sbornik of Matica slovenská, Vol. I (1943), pp. 193–244. The second volume, covering the years 1942–1944, was published in 1948, when the project was abandoned. Another volume of the Bibliografie české historie, listing Czech and Slovak works from 1937 to 1941, appeared in 1951, when its publication was also abandoned. Although a new periodical, Bibliografie československé historie [Bibliography of Czechoslovak History] began listing recent Czechoslovak historical works in 1956, it only covered publications from 1955 on. Major historical works published between 1936 and 1945 were also included in a French survey of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences that was intended to be a continuation of Goll and Šusta's bibliography. See 25 ans d'historiographie tchecoslovaque, 1936–1960, edited by Josef Macek, Václav Husa, and Branislav Varsik (Prague: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd, 1960).

¹⁴ Knihopis československých tisků od doby nejetarší ai do konce XVIII. století [Bibliography of Czechoslovak Imprints from the Earliest Time to the End of the Eighteenth Century] (Prague: Komise pro knihopisný soupis československých tisků, 1925 —).Google Scholar

¹⁵ L'udovít Rizner, V., Bibliografia píisomníctva slovenského na spôsob slovníka od najstarších čias do konca r. 1900 [Bibliography of Slovak Literature in the Form of a Dictionary from Earliest Times to the End of the Year 1900] (6 vols., Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Matica slovenská, 1929–1934)Google Scholar. Jáan V. Ormis, who had prepared the work for publication, also published a number of corrections and additions under the title “Doplnky a opravy k Riznerovej Bibliografii” [Additions and Corrections to Rizner's Bibliography], Sbornik Matice slovenskej, 1936, pp. 530–540; 1937, pp. 519–528; 1938, pp. 462–466; 1940, pp. 395–406; 1941, pp. 285–298; and 1942, pp. 240–250; and also in Literárno-historický sbornik, Vol. I (1944), pp. 38–44. These additions did not appear in book form before 1946, when they were published in a work edited by Ján Mišianik.

¹⁶ Jan, Heyer, Přispěvky k soupisu československých vienensií [Contributions to the Inventory of Czechoslovak Vienensia] (Vienna: A. Machat, 1938).Google Scholar

¹⁷ Časopis Archivni školy [Journal of the School of Archival Sciences] (16 vols., Prague, 1932–40). In 1926 the journal received a worthy companion in a periodical that published reports on and materials from the ministry of interior archives, which then housed the most important archival collection in Czechoslovakia, as well as studies based on the materials: Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra [Journal of the Archives of the Ministry of Interior] (13 vols., Prague, 1926–40).

¹⁸ Jaroslav, Prokeš published three such reports: “Organisace archivnictví a archivů v Československu” [The Organization of Archival Work and the Archives in Czechoslovakia], Časopis Archivní školy, Vol. XIII-XIV (1935–1936), pp. 5–38Google Scholar; “Archiv ministerstva vnitra v Praze v letech 1918–1934” [The Archives of the Ministry of Interior in Prague during the Years 1918–1934], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. VIII (1935), pp. 7–65; and “Archiv ministerstva vnitra a vědecké bádání” [The Archives of the Ministry of Interior and Scholarly Research], ibid., Vol. IX (1936), pp. 5–53; and Vol. X (1937), pp. 7–83. Descriptions and inventories of other public archives can be found in Bedřich Jenšovský, “Patrimoniální archiv nejvyššího purkrabství pražského” [Patrimonial Archives of the Highest Burgrave of Prague], Zprávy Českého zemského archivu, Vol. VII (1931), pp. 111–178; Vojtišek, Václav, Archiv hlavního města Prahy [Archives of the Capital City of Prague] (Prague: Melantrich, 1933)Google Scholar; Faust, Ovidius, Archiv města Bratislavy [Municipal Archives of Bratislava], Pt. I (Bratislava: Nákladem města Bratislavy, 1937)Google Scholar; Antonín, Haas, “Archiv Karlovy university v Praze” [Archives of Charles University in Prague], Časopis Archivní školy, Vol. XV–XVI (1937–1938), pp. 1–68Google Scholar; Bartoš, František M., Soupis rukopisů Národního musea v Praze [Inventory of the Manuscripts in the National Museum in Prague] (2 vols., Prague: Melantrich, 1926–1927)Google Scholar; and Mária Opočenská-Jersova, Inventár archívu Slovenského Národného muzea v Turč. S. Martine [Inventory of the Archives of the Slovak National Museum in Turčiansky Svätý Martin], Pt. I: Archívne depôt [Archival Depôt] (Prague: Melantrich, 1938). Václav Letošník has published an inventory of the most valuable records of the Bohemian state—the Bohemian Land Tables: Die böhmische Landtafel. Inventar, Register, Übersichten (Prague: Ministerium des Inneren, 1944).

¹⁹ Antonín, Podlaha, Povšechný katalog arcibiskupského archivu v Praze [General Catalog of the Archiepiscopal Archives in Prague] (Prague: Nakladem vlastnim, 1925)Google Scholar. Podlaha also completed an inventory of the manuscripts in the library of the metropolitan chapter in Prague which he had begun in 1910 in collaboration with Adolf Patera. The work was completed in 1922 by Podlaha alone. See Soupis rukopisů knihovny metropolitni kapitoly pražské [Inventory of the Manuscripts in the Library of the Metropolitan Chapter in Prague] (2 vols., Prague: Česká akademie véd a umění, 1910–22). See also Antonín, Podlaha, Doplňky a opravy k soupisu rukopisů knihovny metropolitní knihovny pražské [Additions and Corrections to the Inventory of Manuscripts in the Library of the Metropolitan Chapter in Prague] (Prague: Metropolitní kapitola, 1928).Google Scholar

²⁰ Adolf, Krejčík (ed.), Příspěvky k soupisu archivů velikých statků [Contributions to the Inventory of the Archives of Large Estates] (Prague: Československá akademie zemědělská, 1929)Google Scholar; Jan, Klepl “Péče o soukromé prameny hospodářských dějin, hospodářské archivy” [The Care of Private Sources for Economic History: Economic Archives], Časopis Archivní školy, Vol. XV-XVI (1937–1938), pp. 123–190Google Scholar; Alexander, Húščava, Archiv zemianskeho rodu z Okoličného [The Archives of the Yoeman Family of Okoličné] (Bratislava: Slovenská akadémia vied a umení, 1943).Google Scholar

²¹ See his articles on “Die Staatsarchive in der Tschechoslowakei,” Prager Rundschau, Vol. VI (1935), pp. 185–202; “Die Landesarchive in der Tschechoslowakei,” ibid., pp. 252–262; and “Die geistlichen, privaten und städtischen Archive in der Tschechoslowakei,” ibid., pp. 355–372. Some of the information in these publications no longer applies to the Czechoslovak archives, since they were completely reorganized in the 1950's. Moreover, the municipal archives of Prague were destroyed by German troops in May, 1945.

²² Jan, Opočenský, “Archivní úmluva republiky československé s republikou rakouskou” [The Archival Treaty of the Czechoslovak Republic with the Austrian Republic], Časopis Archivní školy, Vol. I (1923), pp. 51–141Google Scholar; Karel, Kazbunda, “Možnosti československé historické práce ve vídeňských archivech” [The Opportunities for Czechoslovak Historical Work in Viennese Archives], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXVII (1931), pp. 237–251Google Scholar; and Vol. XXXVIII (1932), pp. 437–488; Josef, Macourek, “Prameny k dějinám československým v archivech a knihovnách sedmihradských” [The Sources for Czechoslovak History in Transylvanian Archives and Libraries], Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, 1924, No. 6Google Scholar; Josef Macourek, “Nové příspěvky k dějinám československým z archivú a knihoven sedmihradských” [New Contributions to Czechoslovak History from Transylvanian Archives and Libraries], ibid., 1926, No. 2; Bedřich, Jenšovský, “Knihovna Barberini a český vyzkum v Římě“ [The Barberini Library and Czech Research in Rome], Zprdvy deskeho zemskeho archivu, Vol. VI (1924), pp. 5–171Google Scholar. Jenšovský, also wrote a volume on the Czechoslovak Institute organized in Rome: Český Ústav historický v R´imě [The Czech Historical Institute in Rome] (Prague: Ministerstvo zahraničních věcí, 1928)Google Scholar. This institute published its own bulletin: Bolletino dell'Istituto storico cecoslovacco in Roma (2 vols., Prague, 1937–46).

²³ Josef, Šusta(ed.), Dějiny lidatva od pravěku k dnešku [History of Mankind from Prehistory to the Present] (6 vols., Prague: Melantrich, 1936–42).Google Scholar

²⁴ Jaroslav, Kosina, llustrované dějiny světové [Illustrated History of the World] (3rd rev'd. ed., 5 vols., Prague: J. R. Vilímek, 1926–1939)Google Scholar. The fourth edition was published in 1940. It should also be noted that Kamil, Krofta briefly outlined Bohemia's relations with Austria in his Čechy a Rakousko v minulosti (1526–1848) [Bohemia and Austria in the Past (1526–1848)] (Prague: Melantrich, 1923)Google Scholar; while Karel Schwarzenberg collected pictorial material relevant to the history of Bohemia under the Habsburgs in his remarkable Obrazy českého státu od r. 1526 do r. 1918 [Images of the Bohemian State from 1526 to 1918] (Prague: Melantrich, 1939).

²⁵ Josef, Macůrek, Dějiny Mad'arů a uherského státu [History of the Magyars and the Hungarian State] (Prague: Melantrich, 1934).Google Scholar

²⁶ Josef, Pekař, Dějiny československé [Czechoslovak History] (Prague: Historický klub, 1921)Google Scholar, the second revised edition of which was published in 1937 and the third in Slovak in 1938. For other textbooks, see Karel, Stloukal, Dějiny československé v hlavních obrysech [Czechoslovak History in Main Outlines] (Prague: Vesmír, 1922)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Malé dějiny ćeskoslovenské [A Short History of Czechoslovakia] (Prague: Matice Česká, 1931)Google Scholar, of which a revised edition was published in 1937; and Otakar, Odložilík, Nástin Československých dějin [An Outline of Czechoslovak History] (Prague: O. Beaufort, 1987Google Scholar). On a less professional level, the same purpose was served by surveys written by Ladislav Horák in 1925 and by Blažzej RáČek in 1929, and by a seven-volume chronicle by František Kulhánek (1923–28).

²⁷ Václav, Novotný (ed.), Dějiny [History]. In Českoslovenaká vlastivěda, Vol. IV and supplement (2 vols., Prague: Sfinx, 1932–33).Google Scholar

²⁸ Josef, Pešek, The Story of Czechoslovakia (Prague: Professors' Printing House and Library, 1930) (originally published in French in 1925)Google Scholar; Hanuš, Jelinek, Etudes tchécoslovaques (Paris: F. Bossard, 1927)Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Prokeš, Histoire tchécoslovaque (Prague: Orbis, 1927)Google Scholar. Among the several editions in foreign languages of the survey written by Kamil Krofta was one in English entitled A Short History of Czechoslovakia (New York: R. M. McBride, 1934).

²⁹ Jaroslav, Prokešs, Základní probléemy Českých dějin [Basic Problems of Czech History] (Prague: F. Svoboda, 1925)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Byli jsme za Rakouska. Ûvahy historické a politické [We have lived under Austria. Historical and Political Contemplations] (Prague: Orbis, 1936)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Nesmrtelný národ. Od Bílé Hory k Palackému [Immortal Nation. From the Battle of White Mountain to Palacký] (Prague: Jan Laichter, 1940)Google Scholar; Jan, Kapras, Bohumil, Němec, and František, Soukup (eds.), Idea československého státu [The Idea of the čzechoslovak State] (2 vols., Prague: Národní rada československá, 1936) (a German edition was published in 1937)Google Scholar. Several collections of biographies also belong in this category. Among them are Jaroslav, Kosina (ed.), Velikáni našich dějin [Great Men of Our History] (Prague: J. R. Vilímek, 1924)Google Scholar; Růhžena, Bednaříková-Turnwaldová, et al. (eds.), Ćeská žena υ dějinách národa [The Czech Woman in the History of Our Nation] (Prague: Novina, 1940)Google Scholar; Karel, Stloukal (ed.), Královny, kněžny a velké ženy ćeské [Bohemian Queens, Princesses, and Great Women] (Prague: J. R. Vilímek, 1940)Google Scholar; and Cyril, Merhout, Děti Českých králů [Children of Bohemian Kings] (Prague: Společnost přátel starožitností, 1938)Google Scholar. See also the flattering survey of Czech contributions to the world edited by Vilém, Mathesius: Co daly naše země Evropě a lidstvu [What Our Lands gave Europe and Mankind] (2 vols., Prague: Evropský literární klub, 1939–1940).Google Scholar

³⁰ Štefan, Janšák, Slovensko v dobe uhorského feudalizmu [Slovakia during the Period of Hungarian Feudalism] (Bratislava: Zemedelské múzeum, 1932)Google Scholar; František, Hrušovský, Slovenské dejiny [Slovak History] (Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Matica slovenská, 1939Google Scholar), of which an abridged German edition was published in 1943.

³¹ Jan, Kapras, Z dějin českého Slezska [From the History of Bohemian Silesia] (Opava: Matice opavská, 1921)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Podkarpatská Rus a Československo [Subcarpathian Russia and Czechoslovakia] (Prague: Svaz národního osvobození, 1935).Google Scholar

³² Práce Slovanského ústavu υ Praze [Publications of the Slavonic Institute in Prague] (23 vols., Prague, 1930–1948)Google Scholar. Works dealing with the Austrian Slavs usually treated a particular subject or period and will be mentioned later in relevant sections of this essay. A general history of the Slavs is Jaroslav, Bidlo's Dějiny Slovanstva [History of the Slavs] (Prague: Vesmír, 1927).Google Scholar

³³ Kamil, Krofta, Národnostní vývoj zemí československých [Nationality Development in the Czechoslovak Lands] (Prague: Orbis, 1934).Google Scholar

³⁴ Albert, Pražák, Slovenská svojskost [Slovak Self-Awareness] (Bratislava: Academia, 1926)Google Scholar; František, Bokes, Slovenský životný priestor υ minulosti a dnes [Slovak Living Space in the Past and Present] (Bratislava: Čas, 1943)Google Scholar (also in German translation in Carpatica slovaca, Vol. I-II [1943–1944], pp. 37–146)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Vývin národného povedomia u Ćechov a Slovákov [The Evolution of a National Consciousness among the Czechs and Slovaks] (Prague: Melantrich, 1935)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Ćeši a Slováci pŕed svým státním sjednocením [The Czechs and Slovaks before their Union into a State] (Prague: Orbis, 1932) (an abridged version was published in Le Monde slave, Vol. X [1933], pp. 321–347)Google Scholar; Albert, Pražák, Ćeši a Slováci. Literárně dějepisné poznámky k československému poměru [Czechs and Slovaks. Literary-Historical Observations on the Czechoslovak Relationship] (Prague: Státní nakladatelství, 1929)Google Scholar; Albert, Pražák, Ćeskoslovenský národ [The Czechoslovak Nation] (Bratislava: Academia, 1925)Google Scholar; Václav, Novotný, Z dějin československých. Úvahy a poznámky [From Czechoslovak History. Reflections and Observations] (Brno: J. Kajš, 1921)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, O úkolech slovenské historiografie [On the Tasks of Slovak Historiography] (Bratislava: Academia, 1924)Google Scholar; Branislav, Varsik, “O jednotnosti československých dejin” [On the Unity of Czechoslovak History], Bratislava, Vol. XI (1937), pp. 3–15Google Scholar; Daniel, Rapant, “Československé dějiny. Problémy a metody” [Czechoslovak History. Problems and Methods], in Od pravěku k dnešku. Sborník prací z dějin československých. K šedesátým narozeninám Josefa Pekaře [From Prehistory to the Present. A Collection of Studies from Czechoslovak History written on the Sixtieth Anniversary of Josef Pekař] (2 vols., Prague: Historický klub, 1930), Vol. II, pp. 531–563.Google Scholar

³⁵ Leopold, Peřich, Slezsko. Přehled národnostního vývoje [Silesia. A Survey of Its National Development] (Prague: Vyšehrad, 1945).Google Scholar

³⁶ Kamil, Krofta, Die Deutschen in Böhmen (Prague: Orbis, 1924)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Das Deutschtum in der tschechoslowakischen Geschichte (Prague: Orbis, 1934) (a second edition was published in 1936)Google Scholar; Emanuel, Rádl, Válka Čechů s Němci [The War of the Czechs with the Germans] (Prague: čin, 1928) (a German edition was also published in 1928).Google Scholar

³⁷ Karel, Kadlec, Dějiny veřejného práva ve střední Evropě [The History of Public Law in Central Europe] (Prague: Všehrd, 1920)Google Scholar. Other editions were brought out in 1921, 1923, and 1930. Similar surveys under the same titles were also published by Miloslav Stieber (1923 and 1931), Bohumil Baxa (1926), and Rudolf Rauscher (1931). Other surveys of legal history include Miloslav, Stieber, Dějiny soukromého práva ve střední Evropě [The History of Private Law in Central Europe] (Prague: Nákladem vlastním, 1923) (a second, enlarged edition was published in 1930)Google Scholar; František, Čáda, Vybrané prameny k právním dějinám středoevropským [Selected Sources on the Legal History of Central Europe] (Brno: Právník, 1931) (a second edition came out in 1935)Google Scholar; and Rudolf, Rauscher, Volební kapitulace a korunovační reversy panovníků, ve státech střední Evropy [Electoral Capitulations and Coronation Responses of the Rulers in the States of Central Europe] (Bratislava:Právnická fakulta University Komenského, 1926).Google Scholar

³⁸ Jan, Kapras, Právní dějiny zemí koruny české [Legal History of the Lands of the Bohemian Crown] (3 vols., Prague: Unie, 1913–1937)Google Scholar; Jan, Kapras, Přehled právních dějin zemí koruny české [Outline of the Legal History of the Lands of the Bohemian Crown] (4th enlarged ed., Prague: Nákladem vlastním, 1930) (a fifth edition came out in 1935)Google Scholar; Bohumil, Baxa, Dějiny práva na území republiky československé [History of Law on the Territory of the Czechoslovak Republic] (Brno: Právník, 1935)Google Scholar; Karel, Kadlec, Přehled ústavních dějin Moravy [Outline of the Constitutional History of Moravia] (Prague: Všehrd, 1926)Google Scholar; Theodor, Saturník, Úvod do ústavnich dějin slovenských [Introduction to Slovak Constitutional History] (Prague: Nákladem vlastním, 1931)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Ćtení o ústavních dějinách slovenských [Lectures on Slovak Constitutional History] (Prague: Historický klub, 1924)Google Scholar; Kamil, Krofta, Stará ústava česká a uherská [The Old Constitution of Bohemia and Hungary] (Prague: Učená společnost Šafaříkova, 1931) (also in Bratislava, Vol. V [1931], pp. 1–82)Google Scholar; Rudolf, Rauscher, Přhled dějin právních pramenů na Slovensku [Outline of the History of Legal Sources in Slovakia] (Brno: Právnik, 1930)Google Scholar. Kamil, Kalousek tried to tackle a controversial issue in Czechoslovak constitutional history in his article, “Jest Československá republika právním pokračovatelem historického státu Českého?” [Is the Czechoslovak Republic a Legal Successor of the Historical State of Bohemia?], Sborník věd právních a státních, Vol. XXXVIII (1938), pp. 77–138Google Scholar. Important contributions to the legal and constitutional history of Czechoslovakia can also be found in Jan, Kapras (ed.), Stát [The State]. Vol. V of Československá vlastivěda (Prague: Sfinx, 1931).Google Scholar

³⁹ Kamil, Krofta, Přehled dějin selskěho stavu v Čechách a na Moravě [Outline of the History of the Peasantry in Bohemia and Moravia] (Prague: Vlastním nákladem, 1919)Google Scholar; Václav, černý, Hospodářská instrukce. Přehled zeměděhkých dějin v době patrimonijního velkostatku v XV.-XIX. století [Economic Directive. A Survey of Agrarian History during the Time of the Large Patrimonial Estates from the Fifteenth to the Nineteenth Centuries] (Prague: československá akademie zemědělská, 1930)Google Scholar; František, Teplý, Příspěvky k dějinám českéhorybnikářství [Contributions to the History of Czech Pisciculture] (Prague: Ministerstvo zemědělství, 1937)Google Scholar; Andrej, Kavuljak, Dejiny lesníctva a drevárstva na Slovensku [The History of Forestry and the Lumber Trade in Slovakia] (Bratislava: Lesnícka a drevárska ústredňa, 1942)Google Scholar. A good collection of material, rather than critical analyses, can be found in Václav, Vilikovskýs Dějiny zemědělského průmyslu v Československu od nejstarších dob až do vypuknutí světově krise hospodářské [The History of the Agricultural Industry in Czechoslovakia from Earliest Times to the Outbreak of the World Economic Crisis] (Prague: Ministerstvo zemědělství, 1936).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Josef, Drachovský (ed.), Práce [Labor]. Vol. VI of Ceskoslovenská vlastivěda (Prague: Sfinx, 1930).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Kamil, Krofta, Listy z náboženských dějin českých [Pages from Czech Religious History] (Prague: Historický klub, 1936)Google Scholar; Josef, Pekař, Z duchovních dějin českých [From Czech Religious History], edited by Klik, Josef (Prague: Melantrich, 1941). A highly polemical commentary on Czech religious history and historiography is Augustin Neumann's collection of essays, Ožehavé kapitoly z českých dějin církevních [Sensitive Chapters from Czech Religious History] (Prague: Vyšehrad, 1937)Google Scholar.

⁴² Medvecký, Karol A., Cirkevné pomery katolickych Slovákov v niekdajšom Uhorsku [The Religious Situation of the Catholic Slovaks in Former Hungary] (Ružomberok: J. Páričko, 1920)Google Scholar; Váiclav, Chaloupecký, “Slovenské dioecese a tak řečená apoštolská práva” [The Slovak Dioceses and the So-Called “Apostolic Rights”], Bratislava, Vol. II (1928), pp. 1–69Google Scholar. Relations between church and state in the Czech lands and Slovakia are also discussed in Vol. V of Československá vlastivěda.

⁴³ Reformační, sborník. Práce z dějin československého života náboženského [Reformation Review. Studies from the History of Czechoslovak Religious Life] (8 vols., Prague, 1920–1941)Google Scholar; Ročenka Společnosti pro dějiny židů v Československé republics—Jahrbuch der Gesellschaft für die Geschichte der Juden in der Tschechoslowakischen Republik (9 vols., Prague, 1929–38).

⁴⁴ Josef, Krái, Československá filosofie [Czechoslovak Philosophy] (Prague: Melantrich, 1937).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Jaroslav, Vlček, Dějiny literatury české [History of Czech Literature] (2nd rev'd. ed., 4 vols., Prague: L. Mazáč, 1931) (a third edition was published in two volumes in 1940)Google Scholar; Jan, Jakubec, Dějiny literatury české [History of Czech Literature] (2nd rev'd. ed., 2 vols., Prague: Jan Laichter, 1929–1934).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Novák, Jan V. and Arne, Novák, Přehledné dějiny české literatury [A Survey History of Czech Literature] (3rd rev'd. and enlarged ed., Olomouc: Promberger, 1922) (a fourth edition came out in 1936–39)Google Scholar. Arne, Novák also published several shorter outlines, including one in German: Die tschechische Literatur (Potsdam: Athenaion, 1932)Google Scholar. Hanuš, Jelínek produced a French survey: Histoire de la littérature tchèque (3 vols., Paris: Sagittaire, 1932–1935).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Jaroslav, Vlček, Dejiny literatúry slovenskej [History of Slovak Literature] (2nd rev'd. ed., Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Matica slovenská, 1923)Google Scholar; Albert, Pražák, Dějiny spisovné slovenštiny po dobu Štúrovu [History of Slovak Literature to the Time of Štúr] (Prague: Gustav Voleský, 1922)Google Scholar; Andrej, Mráz, Die Literatur der Slowaken (Berlin: Volk und Reich, 1942).Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Albert, Pražák and Miloslav, Novotný (eds.), Písemnictví [Literature]. Vol. VII of Československá vlastivěda (Prague: Sfinx, 1933).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Josef, Volf, Dějiny novin a Čechách do r. 1848 [A History of Newspapers in Bohemia to the Year 1848] (Prague: Duch novin, 1930)Google Scholar; Josef, Volf, Dějiny českého knihtisku do roku 1848 [The History of Czech Book Printing before 1848] (Prague: A. Novak, 1926) (a German edition was published in 1928)Google Scholar; čeněk, Zíbrt, Z dějin českého knihtiskařtvi [From the History of Czech Book Printing], edited by Antonín, Dolenský (3rd ed., Mladá Boleslav: Hejda a Zbroj, 1939).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Jan, Máchal, Slovanské literatury [Slavic Literatures] (3 vols., Prague: Národní museum, 1922–1929)Google Scholar; Frank, Wollman, Slovesnost Slovanů [The Literature of the Slavs] (Prague: Vesmír, 1928)Google Scholar. In 1930 Wollman also published a highly-respected study on South Slavic drama.

⁵¹ Jan, Branberger and Zdeněk, Wirth (eds.), Umění [Art]. Vol. VIII of Československá vlastivěda (Prague: Sfinx, 1935).Google Scholar

⁵² Let us mention just the concise, but most complete, work of Jakub, Pavel, Dějiny našeho uměni [The History of Our Art] (Prague: Česká grafická unie, 1939)Google Scholar. A more comprehensive survey of the fine arts in Bohemia was published after 1923 by Vojtěch Birnbaum, Jaromír Pećirka, and Antonín Matéjček, but their history covers only the period up to the beginning of the modern era. This is also true of Vladimir Wagner's and Jan Hofman's surveys of the history of the fine arts in Slovakia, both of which were published in 1930. Wagner again followed the development of Slovak art in a shorter essay published in 1935, while Jozef Cincík published a general history of Slovak graphic art in 1944. Emil Edgar wrote a defense of Czech architecture (1939). František X. Jiřik published a work on Bohemian glassmaking (1934). Zdeněk Wirth edited an album of popular art in Czechoslovakia (1928), and Earel Sourek did the same for popular art in Šlovakia (1938).

⁵³ Otakar, Kádner (ed.), Osvěta [Culture] (Prague: Sfinx, 1931)Google Scholar. The controversies over the reorganization of the University of Prague inspired two new interpretive studies: Václav, Novotný, Universita Karlova v minulosti [Charles University in the Past] (Prague: Rektorát Karlovy university, 1922), of which French and German editions were published in 1923Google Scholar; and Václav, Vaněček, Kapitoly o právních dějinách Karlovy university [Chapters on the Legal History of Charles University] (Prague: Všehrd, 1934).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ The full range of the debate can be ascertained by reading the series of lectures delivered in 1928 by leading historians and other scholars, which was published in a volume entited Naše národní tradice [Our National Traditions] (3 vols., Prague: Svaz národního osvobození, 1928). Several participants in the debate published their own contributions separately. See Emanuel, Rádl, 0 smysl našich dějin. Předpoklady k diskusi o této otázce [Concerning the Sense of Our History. Premises for the Discussion of This Question] (Prague: Čin, 1925)Google Scholar; Josef, Pekař, Smysl českých dějin. 0 nový n´zor na česke dějiny [The Sense of Czech Historý. Concerning a New View of Czech History] (2nd enlarged ed., Prague: Historický klub, 1929) (a German edition was published in 1937)Google Scholar; and Jan, Slavík, Pekaf kontra Masaryk. Ke sporu o smysl českých dějin [Pekar versus Masaryk. A Contribution to the Debate over the Sense of Czech History] (Prague: Čin, 1929).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Václav, Vojtisek, 0 pečetech a erbech mést pražských a jiných českých [Seals and Coats of Arms of Prague and Other Czech Cities] (Prague: Památkový sbor města Prahy, 1928)Google Scholar; Martin, Kolář and August, Sedlácek, Českomoravská heraldika [Heraldry of Bohemia and Moravia] (2 vols., Prague: Česka akademie věd a umění, 1902–1925)Google Scholar. On a less sophisticated level, Josef, Pilnáček attempted to bring together a genealogy of old Moravian families (1930), and Roman Procházka started an encyclopedia of Czechoslovak genealogy (1931) that, however, ended with the first volume. Genealogical studies found their organ in Čaaopis Rodopisné společnosti československé v Praze [Journal of the Czechoslovak Genealogical Society in Prague] (18 vols., Prague, 1930–1946).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ August, Sedláček, Paměti a doklady o staročeských mírách a váhách [Records and Documents of Old Czech Measures and Weights]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 66 (Prague: Česká akademie, 1923). Adolf L. Krejcik published an index for it in 1933.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Josef, Ječný, Vývoj českého mincovnictví [The Development of Czech Mintage] (Plzeň: Umělecko-prumyslové museum, 1929)Google Scholar; Emanuel, Leminger, Královská mincovna v Kutné Hoře [The Royal Mint in Kutná Hora]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 70 (Prague: Česká akademie, 1924)Google Scholar. After 1925 the field was served by a new professional journal: Numismaticky Časopis československý [Czechoslovak Numismatic Journal] (21 vols., Prague, 1925–52).

⁵⁸ Karel, Doskočil(ed.), Listy a listiny z dějin československých [Letters and Charters from Czechoslovak History] (Prague: Státní nakladatelství, 1938).Google Scholar

⁵⁹ The only general surveys that were published—a Czechoslovak military history by František Kurfürst (1937) and a survey of seven hundred years of Czech-English relations by Kamil Kleiner (1942) —are works of amateurs.

⁶⁰ Vojensko-historický sborník [Journal of Military History] (7 vols., Prague, 1931–38).

⁶¹ August, Sedlácek, Hrady, zámky a tvrze království Českého [Castles, Palaces, and Forts of the Bohemian Kingdom] (15 vols., Prague: Šole a Šimáček, 1882–1927) (a second edition was brought out between 1927 and 1937).Google Scholar

⁶² Soupis památek historických a uměleckých v kr´lovství Českém [Survey of Historical and Artistic Monuments in the Bohemian Kingdom] (54 vols., Prague: Česká akademie věd a uměni, 1897–1937).Google Scholar

⁶³ Vlastivěda moravská [History and Geography of Moravia] (61 vols., Brno: Musejní spolek, 1897–1948)Google Scholar; Ladislav, Hosák, Historický místopis země Moravsko-Slezskě [Historical Topography of Moravia-Silesia] (9 vols., Prague: Společnost přátel starožitností, 1933–1938).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Václav, Vojtíšek published two studies on the history of Prague: Z minulosti naší Prahy [From the Past of Our Prague] (Prague: A. B. Černý, 1919)Google Scholar; and O vývoji samosprávy pražsských měst [The Development of Self-Government in Prague] (Prague: Státní tiskárna, 1927)Google Scholar. Václav, Chaloupecký speculated about the significance of Prague in Czech national life in his Praga Caput Regni (Prague: Vlastním nákladem, 1919)Google Scholar; and Zdeněk, Wirth edited a collection of historical images of the city (1932). The history of Prague was also the exclusive subject of an entire periodical: Sborník přispěvků, k dějinám hlavního města Prahy [Collection of Contributions to the History of the Capital City of Prague] (8 vols., Prague, 1930–1938)Google Scholar.

⁶⁵ The most popular ones include František Šujan's new edition of his work on Brno (1928), Josef Dobiáš' history of Pelhřimov (1927–57), Jindřich Vancura's history of Klatovy (1927), Zdeněk Nejedlý's short history of Litomysl (1934), František Perinka's history of Kromě;ríz (1913–48), Václav Mostecký's work on Vodńany (1940), and Josef V. Šimák's history of Houska castle (1930). Emanuel Leminger published a work on artistic trades in Kutná Hora (1926); Jan Kühndel, one on the artisan guilds in Olomouc (1929); Jan Tenora, one on the St. Peter estate in Brno (1934); Jan Hofman, one on the development of Bratislava (1929); and Ján Šikura, one on the Turiec region (1944). František, Roubík surveyed the whole field of local history in his Přehled vývoje vlastivědného popisu Čech [Survey of the Development of the Topographical Description of Bohemia] (Prague: Společnost přátel starozitností, 1940)Google Scholar. Václav, Švambera and Bedřich, Šalamon edited a collection of Czech historical maps: Monumenta cartographica Bohemiae (2 vols. in 6, Prague: Geografický ústav Karlovy university, 1930–1936)Google Scholar. Among the journals dealing with regional history, the most successful was Jihočeský sborník historický [South Bohemian Historical Review] (14 vols., Tábor, 1928–41).

⁶⁶ Václav, Chaloupecký, “Uherská politika Premysla Otakara II.” [The Hungarian Policy of Přemysl Otakar II], in Od pravěku k dnešku. Sborník pracíz dějin českoslovenakých. K šedes´tým narozeninám Josef a Pekaře, Vol. I, pp. 130–188Google Scholar; Josef, Šusta, Dvě knihy českých dějin. Kus stˇedověké historie naśeho kraje [Two Books on Czech History. A Segment of the Medieval History of Our Country] (2 vols., Prague: Česká akademie věd a umění, 1917–1919) (a second edition was published between 1926 and 1935)Google Scholar; V´clav, Novotný, Rozmach české mod za Přemysla II. Otakara (1253–1271) [The Expansion of Czech Power under Premysl Otakar II (1253–1271)]. Vol. I, Pt. 4 of České dějiny (Prague: Jan Laichter, 1937)Google Scholar; Josef, Šusta, Soumrak Přemyslovcu a jejich dědictví [The Twilight of the Přemyslids and Their Heritage]. Vol. II, Pt. 1 of České dějiny (Prague: Jan Laichter, 1935)Google Scholar; Josef, Šusta, Král cizinec [The Alien King]. Vol. II, Pt. 2 of České dějiny (Prague: Jan Laichter, 1939)Google Scholar; Otto, Bauer, Český stát po vymŕeni Přemysloveů za vlády Rudolfa Habsburského, Jindřicha Korutanského, Jana Lucemburského a Karla IV. [The Bohemian State after the Extinction of the Přemyslids during the Reign of Rudolf of Habsburg, Henry of Carinthia, John Luxemburg, and Charles IV] (Prague: J. Elstner, 1941)Google Scholar; Josef, Šusta, “Prvni Habsburkové a Lucemburkové” [The First Habsburgs and Luxemburgs], in Dějiny lidstva od pravěku k dnešku, Vol. IV, pp. 423–520Google Scholar. Bedřich Mendl edited a collection of letters of Queen Kunhuta, a Hungarian wife of Přemysl Otakar II (1928).

⁶⁷ Rudolf, Urbánek, Věk poděbradský [The Age of George of Poděrady]. Vol. III, Pts. 1–3 of Českě dějiny (3 vols., Prague: Jan Laichter, 1915–1930)Google Scholar; Rudolf, Urbánek, Dvě studie o době poděbradské [Two Studies on the Period of George of Podˇbrady]. Vol. XXVII of Spisy filosofické fakulty Masarykovy university v Brně (Brno, 1929)Google Scholar. Two other studies were devoted to the mystery of Ladislaus' death: Gustav, Gellner, “Nemoc Ladislava Pohrobka” [The Illness of Ladislaus the Posthumous], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XL (1934), pp. 237–264 and 473–490Google Scholar; and Rudolf, Urbánek, Konec Ladislava Pohrobka [The Death of Ladislaus the Posthumous]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 67 (Prague, 1924)Google Scholar. Zdeněk Kristen added a fine diplomatic study: Soud dvorský a jeho knihy za krále Ladislava [The Royal Court and its Rolls under King Ladislaus]. Vol. XXIX of Pr´ce z vědeckých ústavů, fUosofické fakulty University Karlovy v Praze (Prague, 1931).

⁶⁸ Václav, Chaloupecký, Staré Slovensko [Old Slovakia]. Vol. III of Spisy filosofické fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavě (Bratislava, 1923)Google Scholar; Ján, Stanislav, K južnej i východnej hranici slovenského 0sídlenia v stredoveku [On the Southern and Eastern Boundaries of Slovak Settlements in the Middle Ages] (Bratislava: Vedecká spoločnosft' pre zahraničných Slovákov, 1944)Google Scholar; Alexander, Húscava, Kolonizácia Liptova do konca 14. storočia [The Colonization of Liptov to the End of the Fourteenth Century]. Vol. VIII, No. 58 of Sborník filosofické fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavé (Bratislava, 1930)Google Scholar; Václav, Mencl, Středověká města na Slovensku [Medieval Towns in Slovakia] (Bratislava: Učená společnost šfaříkova, 1938)Google Scholar; V´clav, Chaloupecký, Dvě studie k dějinám Podkarpatska [Two Studies on the History of Subcarpathia], In Sborník filosofickě fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavě, Vol. III, No. 30 (Bratislava, 1925).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Václav, Chaloupecký and Rudolf, Rauscher (eds.), Kniha žilinská [The Rolls of Žilina] (Bratislava: Učená společnost Šafařikova, 1935)Google Scholar. Chaloupecký, also edited Středověkě listy ze Slovenska [Medieval Letters from Slovakia] (Bratislava: Učená spoleičnost Šafaříkova, 1937)Google Scholar. Václav V´žný provided a dictionary for this collection in 1937. See also Mária, Opočenská, Slovenica uherských liatin v domácim, dvornim a státním arehivu ve Vidni v obdobi let 1243–1490 [Slovenica in Hungarian Charters in the Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv in Vienna for the Period from 1243 to 1490] (Prague: Orbis, 1927)Google Scholar; and Alexander, Húšˇava, Ján Literát a liptovské falzá [Ján Literát and the Liptov Forgeries] (Bratislava: UčSenfá společnost Šafáriková, 1936).Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Branislav, Varsik, Husiti a reformácia na Slovensku do žlinskej synody [The Hussites and the Reformation in Slovakia up to the Time of the Žilina Synod]. In Sborník filosofické fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavě, Vol. VIII, No. 62 (Bratislava, 1932)Google Scholar; Rudolf, Urbánek, K historii doby Jiskrovy na Slovensku a východní Moravě [Contributions to the History of the Era of Jiskra in Slovakia and Eastern Moravia]. In Věstník Královské českě společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 2 (Prague, 1939)Google Scholar; Jozef, Špirko, Husiti, jiskrovci a bratríci v dejinách Spiša (1431–1462) [Hussites, Jiskraites, and Little Brethren in the History of Spiš (1431–1462)] (Levoča: Spišský dejepisný spolok, 1937)Google Scholar. Josef, Macurek wrote about the Hussite groups in Transylvania and Moldavia in his “Husitství v rumunských zemích” [Hussitism in the Romanian Lands], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LII (1927), pp. 1–98.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Guido, Matejko, “Z politického myslenia stredovekých Slovákov” [From the Political Thought of the Medieval Slovaks], Slovenské pohl'ady, Vol. LX (1944), pp. 537–579Google Scholar; Jiří, Rys, Matouš Čák Trenčaneký [Csák Máté of Trencsen]. In Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 1 (Prague, 1927).Google Scholar

⁷² Ján, Stanislav, Kultúra starých Slovákov [The Culture of the Old Slovaks] (Bratislava: Slovenský rozhlas, 1944)Google Scholar. In 1940 and 1941 Vladimír Wagner published two studies on Gothic panel painting in Slovakia. Václav Mencl wrote a work on Slovak medieval architecture in 1937, and František Zagiba published a study on Slovak medieval music in 1943.

⁷³ Jozef, Karpat, Corona regni Hungariae v dobe árpádovskej [The Corona regni Hungariae in the Age of the Árpáds] (Bratislava: Vilímek, 1937)Google Scholar; Rudolf, Urbánek, Vladislav Varnenčík. Skutečnost a legenda [Vladislav of Varna. Reality and Legend] (Prague: Kruh pro studium československých dějin vojenských, 1937)Google Scholar; L'udovít, Knappek, Obsadzovanie uhorských biskupstiev od X. do konca XIV. storočia [The Appointments to Hungarian Bishoprics from the Tenth to the End of the Fourteenth Century] (Bratislava: Právnická fakulta University Komenského, 1934).Google Scholar

⁷⁴ K 400. výročí osudné volby v roce 1526 Ferdinanda Habsburského českým králem [On the Four Hundredth Anniversary of the Fateful Election of Ferdinand Habsburg as King of Bohemia in 1526] (Prague, 1926).Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Jan, Bedřich Novák, Rudolf II. a jeho pád [Rudolf II and his Fall] (Prague: Archiv země české, 1935)Google Scholar; Václav, Líva, Spiknutí Vchynských proti Rudolfovi [The Conspiracy of the Vchynskýs against Rudolf]. In Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 3 (Prague, 1928). Karel Chytil published a study on the crown of Rudolf and its creator (1928).Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Bohumil, Voborník, Královská pravomoc v Čechách v období státu stavovského se zvláštním zřetelem k 16. století [Royal Power in Bohemia during the Period of the Estates State, with Special Regard to the Sixteenth Century] (Bratislava: Právnická fakulta University Komenského, 1931)Google Scholar; Jan, Kapras, Česky stát a centralisace zemí habsburských [The Bohemian State and the Centralization of the Habsburg Lands] (Prague: Merkur, 1918)Google Scholar; Václav, Pešák, “Dějiny královské české komory od roku 1527. I: Začátky organisace královské české komory za Ferdinanda I.” [The History of the Royal Bohemian Chamber since 1527, Pt. I: The Organization of the Royal Bohemian Chamber under Ferdinand I], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. III (1930), pp. 1–399Google Scholar; Václav Pešák, “Studie k dějinám královské české komory” [Studies on the History of the Royal Bohemian Chamber], ibid., Vol. VI (1933), pp. 65–178; Richard, Horna, K dějinám moravských úředníků [On the History of Moravian Officials] (2 vols., Prague: 1922–1923)Google Scholar; František, Roubík, “Královští rychtáři v pražských i jiných českých městech v letech 1547–1783” [Royal Magistrates in Prague and Other Bohemian Cities in the Years 1547–1783]. In Sborník příspěvků k dějinám hlavního města Prahy, Vol. VI (1930), pp. 265–355Google Scholar; František Roubík, “Královští hejtmané v méstech pražských v letech 1547 až 1785” [Royal Captains in the Prague Towns in 1547–1785], ibid., Vol. VII (1933), pp. 121–188; Vladimír, Klecanda, “Přijímání do stavu rytířského v zemích českých a rakouských na počátku novověku” [Admission to the Estate of Knights in the Bohemian and Austrian Lands at the Beginning of the New Era], Časopis Archivní školy, Vol. VI (1928), pp. 1–125.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ František, Čáda (ed.), Zemské zřízeni moravské z roku 1535 spolu s tiskem z roku 1562 nově vydaným [The 1535 Constitution of Moravia, together with the Newly-Issued Edition of 1562], In Historický archiv, Vol. L (Prague: Česká akademie věd a uměni, Class I, 1937)Google Scholar; Julius, Glücklich, Nová redakce zemského zřizení království Českého z posledních let před českým povstáním [New Edition of the Constitution of the Bohemian Kingdom from the Last Years before the Czech Uprising], Vol. XLI of Spisy filosofické fakulty Masarykovy university v Brně (Brno, 1936)Google Scholar; Vladimír, Klecanda, “Obnovení desk zemských po požáru roku 1541” [The Restoration of the Bohemian Land Rolls after the Fire of 1541], Zprávy Zemského archivu království Českého, Vol. V (1918), pp. 191–270Google Scholar; František, Hrubý, Moravské zemské desky z let 1348–1642 [Moravian Land Rolls for the Years 1348–1642] (Brno: Zemský archiv, 1931)Google Scholar; Václav, Letošník, “Registra otevřených listů české kanceláře” [Registers of Patent Letters of the Bohemian Chancery], Casopis Archivni školy, Vol. III (1926), pp. 36–63Google Scholar; and Vol. IV (1926–27), pp. 49–102; Zdeněk Kristen, “Listy posélací a jejich registra v královské kanceláři české až do Bilé Hory” [Missive Letters and Their Registers in the Royal Bohemian Chancery until the Battle of White Mountain], ibid., Vol. V (1927), pp. 1–109; Karel, Stloukal, Česká kancelář dvorská, 1599–1608 [The Bohemian Court Chancery, 1599–1608]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Vol. I, No. 76 (Prague, 1931)Google Scholar. Miloslav, Volf, Novák, Jan B., and Bedřich, Jenšovský also completed the publication of Vols. XI and XV, covering the years 1605 and 1611, of the monumental collection of records and documents relating to the Bohemian diets: Sněmy české” od léta 1526 až po naši dobu [Bohemian Diets from 1526 to Our Time] (Prague: Český zemský archiv, 1877–1955), Vols. I–XI and XV (also in German).Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Jozef, Karpat, Zákonodárna moc v Uhorsku v rokoch 1526–1604 [Legislative Power in Hungary during the Years 1526–1604] (Bratislava: Právnická fakulta Slovenskej univerzity, 1944).Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Josef, Klik, “Národnostní poměry v Čechách od válek husitských do bitvy bělohorské” [Relations between the Nationalities in Bohemia from the Hussite Wars to the Battle of White Mountain], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXVII (1921), pp. 8–62 and 289–352 (an enlarged edition was published in 1922)Google Scholar; Vladimír, Klecanda, “Zakupování cizinců v Čechách bez práva obyvatelského. Příspěvek k dějinám inkolátu pi Obnoveným zřízením zemským (1627)” [Property Purchases by Foreigners in Bohemia who did not have the Right of Domicile. A Contribution to the History of Denizenship before the Revised Constitution of 1627], Časopis Arohivní.školy, Vol. III (1926), pp. 64–119Google Scholar. Josef Resl focused his work on the germanization of Western Bohemia (1928), and Jan Muk traced the germanization process in the single city of Jindfichuv Hradec (1933). Adolf Turek studied the resettlement in Moravia of Croat refugees from Turkish wars (1937), while Váiclav Davídek attempted to explain the national origin of the Valachs in the Duchy of Těšin (Teschen) (1940).

⁸⁰ František, Hrubý, “Z hospodářských převratu českých v stoleti XV. a XVI.” [The Economic Upheavals in Bohemia in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries], Český časopia historický, Vol. XXX (1924), pp. 205–260 and 433–469.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Miloslav, Volf, “Nástin správy Česke berně v době predbělohorské” [A Survey of the Administration of Bohemian Taxes during the Period before the Battle of White Mountain], Sněmy české, Vol. XI, Pt. 2, Fasc. 1, pp. 1–175Google Scholar; Otto, Placht, České daně, 1517–1658 [Bohemian Taxes, 1517–1652] (Prague: Jednota českých matematiku a fysiků, 1924) (also in German)Google Scholar. Václav Pešák's work on the same topic, published in 1937, is limited to the years 1528–1529. In 1929 Emanuela Nohejlová published a study on the new mint in Prague during the years 1537–1618, which also makes a substantial contribution to our knowledge of Bohemian finances.

⁸² František, Teplý, Přispěvky k dějinám českého zemědělství [Contributions to the History of Bohemian Agriculture] (Prague: Ministerstvo zemědělství, 1926)Google Scholar; František, Hrubý, “Selské a panské inventáře v době předbělohorské” [Peasant and Noble Inventories during the Period before the Battle of White Mountain], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXIII (1927), pp. 21–59 and 263–306Google Scholar; Václav, Pešák, “Hospodářství a správa komorních panství v Čechách za Maximiliána II.” [The Management and Administration of the Cameral Estates in Bohemia during the Reign of Maximilian II], Časopis pro dějiny venkova, Vol. XVI (1929), pp. 50–58, 116–134, 195–296, and 279–296Google Scholar. František Vacek examined the conditions of the Czech peasantry during the years 1419–1620 in a detailed study published in several issues of the same journal. See Vols. XIV-XVII (1927–30). In 1940 Václav Pešák published a fine study on the structure of the Smiřický estate in Bohemia from 1609 to 1618. Anna Vavroušková published two volumes, the first in 1935 and the second in 1941, of market rolls (kvaterny trhové) of the Bohemian land rolls, or records of noble land transfers, for the years 1541–1543.

⁸³ Miloslav, Volf, “Boj o solný monopol v Čechách v XVI. a na počátku XVII. stoleti” [The Struggle for Salt Monopoly in Bohemia in the Sixteenth and Beginning of the Seventeenth Century], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXIX (1933), pp. 297–326 and 505–536Google Scholar; František, Roubík, “K vývoji poštovnictví v Čehách v 16. až 18. stoleti” [On the Development of the Postal Services in Bohemia from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century], Sbornik Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. X (1937), pp. 165–305Google Scholar. In 1931 Václav Pešák published a study on the development of Bohemian forestry under Dietrich Schwend, Maximilian II's chief master of the hounds.

⁸⁴ Josef, Matoušek, “Kurie a boj o konsistoř pod obojí za administrátora Rezka” [The Curia and the Struggle for the Utraquist Consistory under Administrator Rezek], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXVII (1931), pp. 16–41 and 252–292Google Scholar; František, Tischer (ed.), Dopisy konsistoře pod obojí z let 1610–1619 [The Letters of the Utraquist Consistory for the Years 1610–1619] (3 vols., Prague: Historický spolek, 1917–1925).Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Ferdinand, Hrejsa, Sborové jednoty bratrské [Church Unions of the Brethren] (Prague: Nákladem autora, 1939) (originally in Reformační sborník, Vol. V–VII [1935–39])Google Scholar. In 1923 Vaclav Novotný and Rudolf Urbánek edited a collection of studies to commemorate the four hundredth anniversary of the birth of Bishop Blahoslav. Otakar Odložilík published a critical edition of Blahoslav's history of the Unity of Brethren in 1928. In 1923 Urbánek published a work in which he traced the attitudes of the Brethren toward higher education before the time when Blahoslav was bishop.

⁸⁶ František, Hrubý, “Luterství a kalvinismus na Moravě před Bílou Horou” [Lutheranism and Calvinism in Moravia before the Battle of White Mountain], Ceský Časopis historický, Vol. XL (1934), pp. 265–309; and Vol. XLI (1935), pp. 1–40 and 237–268Google Scholar; Ferdinand Hrejsa, “Luterství, kalvinismus a podobojí na Moravě před Bílou Horou” [Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Utraquism in Moravia before the Battle of White Mountain], ibid., Vol. XLIV (1938), pp. 296–326 and 474–485; Ferdinand, Hrejsa, “U Salvatora. Z dějin evangelickě církve v Praze (1609–1623)” [At Salvator's. From the History of the Evangelical Church in Prague (1609–1623)], in Sborník k prvnímu desítiletí Husovy fakulty v Praze, 1919–1929 [A Volume in Commemoration of the First Ten Years of the Hus Faculty in Prague, 1919–1929] (Prague: Husova fakulta Karlovy university v Praze, 1930), pp. 99–188Google Scholar; Václav Chaloupecký, Pře kněžská z roku 1562. Příspěvky k náboženské politice Ferdinanda I. v Čechách [The Priests' Quarrel of 1562. Contributions to the Religious Policy of Ferdinand I in Bohemia]. In Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 4 (1925); Otakar, Odložilík, “Jednota bratří Habrovanských” [The Unity of the Brethren of Habrovany], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXIX (1923), pp. 1–70 and 301–357Google Scholar; Jan, Hanák, “Bratří a starší z Hory lilecké” [The Brethren and Elders of Hora Lilecká], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LII (1928), pp. 39–124 and 277–348Google Scholar; František, Hrubý, Die Wiedertäufer in Mähren (Leipzig: M. Heinsius, 1935) (originally in Archiv für Reformations-geschichte, Vols. XXX–XXXII [1933–35])Google Scholar. In 1931 Kamil Krofta published the correspondence of Václav Mitmánek, an outstanding participant in these events, for the years 1533–1553.

⁸⁷ Karel, Stloukal, “Počátky nunciatury v Praze” [The Beginning of the Nunciature in Prague], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXIV (1928), pp. 1–24 and 237–279Google Scholar; Karel, Stloukal, Papežská politika císařský dvůr pražský na předělu XVI. a XVII. věku [Papal Policy and the Imperial Court in Prague at the Turn of the Sixteenth and Beginning of the Seventeenth Century]. Vol. IX of Práce z vědeckých ústavů filosofické fakulty University Karlovy v Praze (Prague, 1925)Google Scholar; Antonín, Škarka, “Ze zápasu nekatolického tisku s protireformací. Literární a tiskařská aféra z r. 1602” [The Struggle of the Non-Catholic Press with the Counterreformation. The Literary and Printing “Affair” of 1602], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XLII (1936), pp. 1–55, 286–322, and 484–520Google Scholar; Stanislav, Zela, Náboženské poměry v Olomouci za biskupa Marka Kuena (1553–1565) [Religious Conditions in Olomouc under Bishop Markus Kuen (1553–1565)] (Olomouc: Nákladem vlastním, 1931)Google Scholar.Vladimír, A. Macourek studied the further developments under Kuen's successor, Bishop Vilém Prusinovský (1565–1572), in a number of articles in Sborník historického kroužku, Vols. XXVIII–XXXI (1927–1930)Google Scholar. Milena Linhartová and Zdeněk Kristen edited several volumes of correspondence of papal nuncios in Prague for the years 1604–1611, which were published in 1932,1937,1940,1944, and 1946.

⁸⁸ Reformné hnutie v arcibiskupstve ostrihomskom do r. 1564 [The Reform Movement in the Archbishopric of Esztergom before 1564] (Bratislava: Únia, 1939)Google Scholar; Mikuláš Olah a jeho doba, 1493–1568 [Miklós Oláh and His Time, 1493–1568] (Bratislava: Vedecké ústavy mesta Bratislavy, 1940).Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Ján, Kvačala, Dejiny reformácie na Slovensku, 1517–1711 [History of the Reformation in Slovakia, 1517–1711] (Liptovský S. Mikuláš: Tranoscius, 1935)Google Scholar; Ján, Slávik, Dejiny zvolenského evanjelického a. v. bratrstva a seniorátu [History of the Evangelical Brotherhood and of the Seniorate of the Augsburg Confession in Zvolen] (Banská Štiavnica: A. Joegers, 1921)Google Scholar; Vendelín, Janovič, Dejiny jezuitov v Banskej Stiavnici [History of the Jesuits in Banská Štiavnica]. Vol. XXXI of Spisy filozofickej fakulty Slovenskej univerzity (Bratislava, 1941)Google Scholar. In 1939 Ján Ďurovič published a study dealing with Slovak religious poetry during the Reformation period. In 1940 he published a study of Slovak evangelical literature during the period when the Evangelicals were still not tolerated.

⁹⁰ Rukovět' k písemnictví humanistickému, zvláště básnickému v Čechách a na Moravě ve století XVI. [Handbook on Humanistic Literature, especially Poetry, in Bohemia and Moravia in the Sixteenth Century], Vol. I (Prague: Česká akademie věd a umění, 1918).Google Scholar

⁹¹ Flora Kleinschnitzová and Lumír Čivrný (pseudonym of Bedřich Václavek) published two such selections in 1931 and 1941, respectively. Zdeněk V. Tobolka traced the beginnings of Czech and Slovak book printing (1930). In 1936 and 1938 Gustav Gellner wrote biographies of Thomas Jordanus of Klausenberg (Cluj) and Mathias Borbonius of Borbenhaym, famous physicians and humanists active at the courts of Vienna and Prague. Miloslav Novotný prepared a new edition of the memoirs of Mikuláš Dačický z Heslova (1940). In 1932 Štefan Krčméry published a study of Slovak poetry of the sixteenth century, and in 1939 A. Dezider Dubay completed a selection of Slovak letters from 1564–1569.

⁹² Josef, Kliment, Orgány zahraničních styků v českém státě před Bílou Horou [The Authorities concerned with Foreign Relations in the Bohemian State before the Battle of White Mountain] (Prague: Nákladem vlastním, 1929)Google Scholar; Josef, Matoušek, Turecká válka v evropské politice v letech 1522–1594 [The Turkish War in European Politics during the Years 1592–1594]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 82 (Prague, 1935)Google Scholar. František Roubík gave the results of his study on the disputes over the boundary between Moravia and Hungary from the sixteenth to the eighteenth century in a book on Czechoslovak historical geography in which he examined old Czech maps (1933). Roubik and Václav Líva also edited the first two volumes, covering the years 1527–1617, of the collection Prameny k československým dějinám vojenským. Regesta fondu Militare Archivu ministerstva vnitra republiky Československé [Sources on Czechoslovak Military History. Regesta on the Military Collection of the Archives of the Ministry of Interior of the Czechoslovak Republic] (2 vols., Prague: Kruh pro studium československých dějin vojenských, 1937–1938).

⁹³ Dozvuky polského bezkráloví z roku 1587. Příspěvek k osvětlení snah rodu habsburského o získání koruny polské v letech 1588–1594 [The Aftermath of the Polish Interregnum of 1587. A Contribution to the Elucidation of the Efforts of the Habsburg Dynasty to obtain the Polish Crown in the Years 1588–1594]. In Vol. XXIV of Práce z vědeckých ústavů filosofické fakulty University Karlovy v Praze (Prague, 1929)Google Scholar; Diplomatické poslání Jana Duckera v Polsku r. 1591. Příspěvek k dějinám snah rodu Habsburského o nabytí koruny polské koncem 16. století [The Diplomatic Mission of Johannes Ducker in Poland in 1591. A Contribution to the History of the Efforts of the Habsburg Dynasty to obtain the Polish Crown at the End of the Sixteenth Century]. In Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 3 (Prague, 1929); Zápas Polska a Habsburků o přístup k Černému moři na sklonku 16. století [The Struggle between Poland and the Habsburgs for Access to the Black Sea at the End of the Sixteenth Century] (Prague: Filosofická fakulta University Karlovy, 1931).

⁹⁴ Josef, Pekař, Bílá Hora. Její příčiny a následky [The Battle of White Mountain. Its Causes and Consequences] (Prague: Vesmir, 1920)Google Scholar; Zdeněk, Nejedlý, Bílá Hora. Habsburg a český národ [The Battle of White Mountain. The Habsburgs and the Czech Nation] (Prague: Mladé proudy, 1920)Google Scholar. A new investigation of the military history of the battle was attempted in an enlarged edition of a collective work, Na Bílé Hoře [On White Mountain] (Prague: A. B. Černý, 1921), the first edition of which had been brought out in 1911. Josef Dobiáš examined, and mostly rejected, earlier views that the failure of the uprising was largely due to treason in his Zrádné proudy v českém povstání [Treasonable Trends in the Bohemian Uprising]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 87 (Prague, 1939). The attitude of the Moravian nobility and the failure of the uprising in Moravia were studied by František, Hrubý: “Moravská šlechta r. 1619” [The Moravian Nobility in 1619], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. XLVI (1922), pp. 107–169Google Scholar; and “Pád českého povstáni na Moravě roku 1620” [The Collapse of the Bohemian Uprising in Moravia in 1620], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXIX (1923), pp. 71–120 and 358–388. Hrubý also edited a collection of documents relating to the Thirty Years' War in Moravia: Moravskékorespondence a akta z let 1620–1636 [Moravian Correspondence and Documents from the Years 1620–1636] (2 vols., Brno: Zemský archiv, 1934–37). Jaroslav, Prokeš published the regesta of the correspondence of the revolutionary government of Bohemia: “Protokol vyšlé korespondence kanceláře českých direktorů z let 1618–1619” [The Protocol of the Missive Correspondence of the Chancery of the Bohemian Directory for the Years 1618–1619], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. VII (1934), pp. 1–188.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Bohdan, Chudoba, Španělé na, Bílé Hoře [The Spaniards on White Mountain] (Prague: Vyšehrad, 1945)Google Scholar; Josef, Macůrek, “České povstání r. 1618 až 1620 a Polsko” [The Bohemian Uprising of 1618–1620 and Poland], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LXI (1937), pp. 1–48, 152–194, and 289–362Google Scholar; Václav, Letošník, “Polsko, dům Rakouský a Albrecht z Valdštejna za pruské války 1626–1629” [Poland, the House of Austria, and Albrecht Wallenstein during the Prussian War, 1626–1629], Časopis Národního musea, Vol. CVIII (1934), pp. 161–185; Vol. CIX (1935), pp. 42–77; Vol. CX (1936), pp. 235–272; and Vol. CXI (1937), pp. 28–74 and 211–247Google Scholar. Ausgustin, Neumann and Jan, Tenora published a number of French accounts of the Bohemian uprising in various issues of Sborník historického kroužku, Vols. XXV–XXXV (1924–1934).Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Jaroslav, Prokeš (ed.), Doba bělohorská a Albrecht z Valdštejna [The Era of the Battle of White Mountain and Albrecht Wallenstein] (Prague: Státní tiskárna, 1934)Google Scholar; Josef, Pekař, Valdšejn, 1680–1634. Dějiny valdštejnského spiknutí [Wallenstein, 1630–1634. A History of the Wallenstein Conspiracy] (2nd rev'd. ed., 2 vols., Prague: Melantrich, 1933–1934) (The first edition was published in 1896. A German edition was brought out in 1936.)Google Scholar; Rudolf, Maršan, Valdštejnovy choroby a jejich vliv na zmar jeho plánů [Wallenstein's Illnesses and Their Influence on the Failure of his Plans] (Jičín: Musejní spolek, 1935)Google Scholar. Josef, Pekař and Zdeněk, Kristen also edited and wrote an interpretation of two contemporary reports on Wallenstein: Odhalení o Valdštejnově zradě a smrti. České znění relací Jaroslava Rašína a Octavia Piccolomini [The Disclosure of Wallenstein's Treason and Death. A Czech Version of the Relations of Jaroslav Rašin and Octavio Piccolomini] (Prague: Historický klub, 1934)Google Scholar. František Roubík described Wallenstein's expedition to Slovakia in 1626 (1935) and traced the fortunes of his chancery and treasury (1929). Emanuela Nohejlová reported on Wallenstein's mintage (1934).

⁹⁷ Otakar, Odložilík sketched a fine portrait of Count Thurn in his Povstalec a emigrant [The Rebel and Emigrant] (London: Čechoslovák, 1944)Google Scholar. František, Hrubý exploited Thurn's papers and the funeral orations devoted to him for two new studies on his life and fortunes: “Zvídeňských papírů Jindřicha Matyáše hraběte z Thurnu” [From the Viennese Papers of Heinrich Mathias Count of Thurn], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXIV (1928), pp. 473–574Google Scholar; and “Pohřební kázání o Jindřichu Matyáši hr. z Thurnu” [Funeral Orations on Heinrich Mathias Count of Thurn], ibid., Vol. XXXVIII (1932), pp. 12–55. Odložilík, and Hrubý, also shared an interest in the Žerotín family. Odložilík wrote about the leader of the Moravian estates in his Karel Starší ze žerotína, 1564–1636 [Karel Starší of Žerotín, 1564–1636] (Prague: Melantrich, 1936)Google Scholar. Hrubý, wrote on Karel's nephew, in a volume entitled Ladislav Velen z Žerotína, vůdce bělohorského odboje na Moravě a český emigrant, 1579–1638 [Ladislav Velen of Žerotín, the Leader of the White Mountain Rebellion in Moravia and Czech Emigrant, 1579–1638] (Prague: Historický klub, 1930)Google Scholar (originally published in Český Časopis historický, Vols. XXXV–XXXVI [1929–30]). Bedřich Mendl discussed the role of the “Winter King” of Bohemia in all these events in his “Fridrich Falcký a české naděje pobělohorské” [Frederick of the Palatinate and Czech Hopes after the Battle of White Mountain], ibid., Vol. XXIV (1918), pp. 77–119.

⁹⁸ Otakar Odložilík wrote on Jan Campanus (1938); Zdeněk Kalista, on Diviš Černín (1929) and Zikmund Myslík z Hyršova (1940); Vojtěch Sokol, on Mikuláš Diviš z Doubravína (1931); František Martínek, on Marshal Johann Goetz (1931); Vlasta Fialová, on Jan Adam z Víckova (1935); Josef Dostál, on Jindřich Straka z Nedabylic (1938); and František Škrdle, on Matouš Ulický (1940). František Hrubý provided many corrections to the conventional image of Jan Sarkander (1939), as portrayed by Jan Tenora and Josef Foltýnovský in 1920.

⁹⁹ Otto, Oliva, Finanční politika v Čechách po Bílé Hoře do kalady roku 1623 [Financial Policy in Bohemia from the Battle of White Mountain to the Currency Devaluation of 1623] (Prague: Český čtenář, 1925)Google Scholar; Václav, Chaloupecký, Čeaká rebelie na Podřipsku. Historie o poddaných a pánech z let 1619–1621 [The Czech Rebellion in the Říp Region. A History of Serfs and Masters during the Years 1619–1621] (Prague: Českomoravské podniky tiskařské a vydavatelské, 1918)Google Scholar; Josef, Dostál, “Poslední boj. Příspěvek k dějinám trčkovských konfiskaci” [The Final Struggle. A Contribution to the History of the Confiscation of Trčka's Property], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. IX (1936), pp. 55–124Google Scholar; František, Hrubý, “Nové dokumenty bělohorské” [New Documents on the Era of the Battle of White Mountain], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXI (1925), pp. 465–532Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Prokeš, “Několik příspěvků k moravským dějinám po bitvě na Bílé Hoře” [Several Contributions to Moravian History after the Battle of White Mountain], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. XLVIII (1924), pp. 63–124Google Scholar. František Teplý published selections from the correspondence of Martin Škvorecký, an official from the Pacov region, which reflect many of these experiences (1930).

¹⁰⁰ Hynek, Kollmann (ed.), Acta sacrae Congregationis de Propaganda fide res gestas Bohemicas illustrantia: Prodromus (2 vols., Prague: Zemský výbor, 1939–1954)Google Scholar; Zdeněk, Kalista, “Cisař Ferdinand III. a papež Innocenc X. v prvých letech pontifikátu” [Emperor Ferdinand III and Pope Innocent X during the First Years of Innocent X's Pontificate], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XXXIII (1927), pp. 548–579; and Vol. XXXIV (1928), pp. 280–321 and 574–612.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ “Studie o Praze pobělohorské” [Studies on Prague after the Battle of White Mountain], Sborník příspěvků k dějinám hlavního města Prahy, Vol. VI (1930), pp. 357–415Google Scholar; and Vol. VII (1933), pp. 1–120; “Národnostní poměry v Praze za třicetileté války” [Nationality Relations in Prague during the Thirty Years' War], Český Časopis historický, Vol. XLIII (1937), pp. 301–322 and 487–519; “Seznamy pražských novoměšt'anů za 1éta 1618–1653” [The Lists of New Citizens of Prague for the Years 1618–1653], Časopis Rodopisné společnosti československé, Vol. VII–VIII (1935–36), pp. 8–36 and 121–158.

¹⁰² Otakar, Odložilík, “Ze zápasů pobělohorské emigrace” [The Struggles of the Emigrants after the Battle of White Mountain], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. XVI (1932), pp. 1–58 and 369–388; and Vol. LVII (1933), pp. 59–157Google Scholar; Otakar, Odožilík, Z korespondence probělohorské emigrace z let 1621–1624 [From the Correspondence of the Emigrants after the Battle of White Mountain during the Years 1621–1624]. In Věstník Kráovské české společnosti nauk, Class 1, No. 2 (Prague, 1932)Google Scholar. Odložilík also wrote a study on the Moravian emigrants Jiří and Jan Veselský (1930). Bohumil Ryba and Jaroslav Prokeš published a new edition of the famous history of Bohemia of Pavel Stránský (1940). Several works were written in 1936 in commemoration of the three hundredth anniversary of the publication of Cithara Sanctorum—an important work of Slovak spiritual poetry written by Jiří Třanovský (Tranoscius), a Czech emigrant pastor active in Slovakia. Among them was Ján Ďurovič's biography of him: Životopis Juraja Tranovského [A Biography of Juraj Tranovský] (Liptovský S. Mikuláš: Tranoscius, 1943). A special periodical was founded in 1930 to trace the fortunes of the emigrants: Sborník Jednoty potomků pobělohorských exulantů-pokoutniků a přátel rodopisu [Journal of the Society of the Descendants of the Emigrants—Vagrants and Friends of Genealogy]. Beginning with Vol. IV (1932), the journal was published under the title of Sborník Jednoty starých českých rodů [Journal of the Society of Old Czech Families] (9 vols., Prague, 1930–38).

¹⁰³ Novák, Jan V. and Josef, Hendrich, Jan Amos Komenský. Jeho život a spisy [Jan Amos Komenský. His Life and Works] (Prague: Dědictví Komenského, 1932)Google Scholar; Ján, Kvačala, Komenský. Jeho osobnost' a jeho sústava vedy pedagogickej [Komenský. His Personality and His System of the Science of Pedagogy] (2nd ed., Turčiansky S. Martin: J. Otto, 1921)Google Scholar (Also in Czech. The first edition was published in Slovak and German in 1914.). Josef, Hendrich also published two separate works on Komenský: Jan Amos Komenský ve světle svých spisů [Jan Amos Komensky in the Light of his Works] (Prague: Družstevní práce, 1941)Google Scholar; and Jana Amosa Komenského snahy vševědné, všeosvětové a všenápravné [Jan Amos Komensky's Efforts to promote General Knowledge, the Enlightenment, and Reform] (Prague: Nákladem vlastním, 1924) (originally published in Pedagogické rozhledy, Vols. XXXIII–XXXIV [1923–24]). Otakar, Odložilík wrote an article on the same subject based on a fragment of a work by Komenský and several pieces of correspondence which he had discovered in London: “Z pansofických studií J. A. Komenského” [J. A. Komenský's Pansophic Studies], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LII (1928), pp. 125–198Google Scholar. In 1941 and 1942 Jiří V. Klíma published two works on Komenský on a more popular level, as did Rudolf J. Vonka in 1940. Kamil, Krofta wrote on Komensky's place in Czech history; J. A. Komenský v našich dějinách [J. A. Komenský in Our History] (Prague: Spolek Komenský, 1930).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Archiv pro bádáni o životě a spisech J. A. Komenského [Archives for Research on the Life and Work of J. A. Komensky] (15 vols., Prague, 1910–40). Discontinued in 1940, the publication of the journal was resumed in 1957 under the title Ada Comeniana. Ján, Kvačala, Novák, Jan V., Stanislav Souček, and others also made an effort to publish all of Komenský's works under the title Veškeré spisy Jana Amose Komenského [The Complete Works of Jan Amos Komenský] (Brno: Ústřední spolek jednot učitelských na Moravě, 1910–1929)Google Scholar. Unfortunately, only eight of the thirty volumes which had been planned were actually published.

¹⁰⁵ Josef, Pekař, České katastry, 1654–1789 [Bohemian Cadasters, 1654–1789] (2nd enlarged ed., Prague: Historický klub, 1932)Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Novotný, Zdanění českých měst podle katastrů z r. 1654–1757 [The Tax Burdens of Bohemian Cities according to the Cadasters of the Years 1654–1757] (Prague: Státni úřad statistický, 1929)Google Scholar; Václav, Pešák, “Obecní dluhy královských, věnných a hornich měst v Čechách, zvláštš Starého města Pražského, po třicetileté válce” [The Public Debts of Royal, Dower, and Mining Cities in Bohemia (especially the Old Town of Prague) after the Battle of White Mountain], Sbornik příspěvků k dějinám hlavního města Prahy, Vol. VII (1933), pp. 1–156Google Scholar; Jan, Klepl, “Královská města česká počátkem 18. století. Reformy hospodářské a správni” [Royal Bohemian Cities at the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century. Economic and Administrative Reforms], Česky Časopis historický, Vol. XXXVIII (1932), pp. 260–284 and 489–521; and Vol. XXXIX (1933), pp. 57–71Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Novotný, “Moravský berní systém v století XVII.” [The Moravian Tax System in the Seventeenth Century], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LVIII (1934), pp. 145–286Google Scholar; Jaroslav Novotný, “Moravský berní system v století XVIII.” [The Moravian Tax System in the Eighteenth Century], ibid., Vol. LIX (1935), pp. 67–141 and 321–325; Josef Fišer, “Lánové visitace na Moravě v 17. století. Kritické poznámky” [Hidage Inspections in Moravia in the Seventeenth Century. Critical Notes], ibid., Vol. LVI (1932), pp. 59–100 and 389–431; and Vol. LVII (1933), pp. 158–179. About the only major work of a political nature that was published between 1918 and 1938 was Richard, Horna's Návrh Obnoveného zřízení zemského pro knízřetství Opavské z r. 1675 [A Proposal for a Renewed Constitution for the Duchy of Opava in 1675] (Bratislava: Učená společnost Šafaříkova, 1938).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Jaroslav, Novotný “Hospodárské poměry na moravském panství novoměstkém v době pobělohorské” [Agricultural Conditions on the Moravian Estate of Nové Město after the Battle of White Mountain], Časopis pro dějiny venkova, Vol. XX (1933), pp. 1–15, 58–67, and 107–121; and Vol. XXI (1934), pp. 3–14, 56–72, and 145–156Google Scholar; František, Teplý, Selské boure [Peasant Rebellions] (Prague: Ministerstvo zemědělství, 1931)Google Scholar. Teplý also wrote a book on the protracted struggle of the Chods of Western Bohemia against their landlords: Chodové ve sporu s Lomikary (1621–1697) [The Quarrel of the Chods with the Lomikars (1621–1697)] (Vyskov: F. Obzina, 1926). František, Roubík published a general history of the Chods and wrote several other works on this subject. Among them are “Dějiny Chodu u Domazlic” [The History of the Chods near Domazlice], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. IV–V (1931), pp. 1–666Google Scholar; Zápas Chodu za svobodu [The Struggle of the Chods for Freedom] (Prague: Spolecnost prátel starozitností, 1937) (a second edition was published in 1939); “Kapitola z chodských dějin (1692–1698)” [A Chapter from the History of the Chods (1692–1698)], Časopis pro dějiny venkova, Vol. XIV (1927), pp. 169–196 and 257–285; and Chodské majestáty [Royal Charters of the Chods] (Prague: J. Hofmann, 1940). FFrantišek, Teplý also wrote a general history of the Králováci, a similar group in southwestern Bohemia, which was published in several articles in Časopis Společnosti přátel starozitnosti československých, Vols. XXXIX–XL (1931–1932)Google Scholar. Josef Nozicka described conditions on the Kumburk estate in central Bohemia (1931), and Václav Černý, those in Starý Plzenec in western Bohemia (1940).

¹⁰⁷ Jan, Muk, Po stopách národního cítění české šlechty pobělohorské [Traces of a National Consciousness among the Bohemian Nobility after the Battle of White Mountain] (Prague: Politický klub československé národní demokracie, 1931)Google Scholar; Antonín, Markus, “Rod knízat ze Schwarzenbergu” [The Prince Schwarzenberg Family], Schwarzenberská ročenka, 1935, pp. 19–96Google Scholar; Karel, Tríska, František Antonín hrabě Šporck [Franz Anton Count Sporck] (Prague: Spolecnost prátel starozitnosti československých, 1938)Google Scholar. Václav Novák wrote on Sporck's economic enterprises (1938).

¹⁰⁸ See especially his Posázavské papírny [The Paper Mills on the Sázava River] (Prague: Archiv pro dějiny průmyslu, obchodu a technické práce, 1936)Google Scholar; and Podkrkonoŝské papírny [Paper Mills in the Krkonose Region]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 89 (Prague, 1940). Zuman also published minor contributions to the history of the paper mills in the Old Town of Prague (1927) and on the Otava River (1933).

¹⁰⁹ Josef, Hanuš, O pobělohorské protireformaci [The Counterreformation after the Battle of White Mountain]. In Sborník filosofické fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavě, Vol. IV, No. 39 (Bratislava, 1926)Google Scholar; Vavřinec, Rabas, Řád kapucínský a jeho působení v Čechách v 17. století [The Capuchin Order and Its Activities in Bohemia during the Seventeenth Century] (Prague, 1937)Google Scholar (originally published in Časopis katolického duchovenstva, Vols. LXXVII–LXXVIII [1936–37]). Jan, Líva wrote an article on one of the most active agents of the Counterreformation in the Czech lands: “Jan Arnošt Platejs z Platenštejna” [Johann Ernest Plateys of Plattenstein], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LIV (1930), pp. 15–78 and 293–336Google Scholar. Josef, V. Simák completed his edition of a crucial source for this subject: Zpovědní seznamy arcidiecése prazské z r. 1671–1725 [Confession Lists of the Archbishopric of Prague for the Years 1671–1725] (3 vols., Prague: Historický spolek, 1909–38)Google Scholar. Jan, Vilikovský wrote a minor study on the Cantus Catholici, a Catholic song book, and its role in the Counter-reformation in Hungary and Slovakia (1935)Google Scholar, and J. Vsevlad Gajdos described the work of a Slovak Franciscan, Ján Abrahámffy (1940).

¹¹⁰ Augustin, Neumann, Prostonárodní nábozenské hnutí dle dokladu konsietoře královéhradecké[Folk Religious Movements according to the Records of the Consistory of Hradec Králové], Vol. I: Doba t. zv. temna do r. 1740 [The Era of So-Called “Darkness” to 1740] (Hradec Králové: Tiskové druzstvo, 1931)Google Scholar; Otakar, Odlozilik, “Bratrí na Slovensku” [The Brethren in Slovakia], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LV (1931), pp. 329–370Google Scholar. Ferdinand, Hrejsa traced the fortunes of Czech Protestants from this time to the twentieth century in his Dějiny české evangelické církve v Praze a ve stredních Čechách v posledních 250 letech [History of the Czech Evangelical Church in Prague and Central Bohemia during the Last Two Hundred and Fifty Years] (Prague: Českobratrská evangelická církev, 1927).Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Jaroslav, Prokes, “Uredni antisemitismus a prazské ghetto v době pobělohorske” [Official Anti-Semitism and the Prague Ghetto during the Period following the Battle of White Mountain], Ročenka Společnosti pro dějiny zidů, Vol. I (1929), pp. 41–224Google Scholar; Jaroslav Prokes, “Soupis prazských zidu z roku 1729” [The 1729 Census of the Prague Jews], ibid., Vol. IV (1932), pp. 309–343; Josef Volf, Z dějin prazských zidovských knihtiskáren v 17. stoleti [The History of Jewish Book Printing in Prague in the Seventeenth Century]. In Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 3 (Prague, 1926). Josef Bergl reported on archival sources for Jewish history in his “Judaica v Archivu ministerstva vnitra” [Judaica in the Archives of the Ministry of Interior], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. VI (1933), pp. 5–64.

¹¹² Vilém, Bitnar, O českém baroku slovesném [Czech Literary Baroque] (Plzeň: Lidová akademie, 1934)Google Scholar; Vilém, Bitnar, Postavy a problémy českého baroku literárního [Personages and Problems of the Czech Literary Baroque] (Prague: G. Francl, 1939)Google Scholar; Josef, Vasica, České literární baroko [Czech Literary Baroque] (Prague: Vyšehrad, 1938)Google Scholar. Vašica and Bitnar also published anthologies of baroque poetry in 1936 and 1940, as did Zdeněk Kalista in 1940. In 1941 Kalista also brought out a volume of baroque plays and a selection of texts from all fields of literature.

¹¹³ Alois Hnilicka drew portraits of leading Czech musicians (1922). Otakar Kamper wrote on music in eighteenth century Prague (1936); Jan Muk, on Adam Michna z Otradovic (1941); and Vladimir Helfert, on František Míča (1925). Václav V. Stech wrote a comprehensive survey of Czech painting and sculpture in the modern period, which was published in 1939–40, and in 1935 completed a work on the baroque sculptors of Prague. Eugen Dostál and Antonín Breitenbacher wrote on the famous archiepiscopal gallery in Olomouc (1925, 1927, 1929); and Cecilie Hálová-Jahodová, on the Kounic gallery in Brno (1939–40). Dostál also published a monograph on the renowned graphist Václav Hollar (1924). Other authors wrote on famous painters: Antonín Matějcek, on Petr Brandl (1935–36); Vladimír Novotný, on Václav V. Reiner (1940, 1942); and Eduard Šafarík, on Johannes Kupezky (1928); Dostál, in cooperation with Josef Šíma, also published a work in French on the baroque architecture of Prague (1926). František Zuman wrote on eighteenth-century Czech filigrees (1932).

¹¹⁴ Zdeněk, Kalista, Úvod do politické ideologie českého baroka [Introduction to Political Ideology during the Bohemian Baroque Era] (Brno: Moravan, 1934)Google Scholar; Augustin, Neumann, Piaristé a český barok [The Piarists and the Bohemian Baroque] (Přerov: Společenská tiskárna, 1933)Google Scholar; Capek, Jan B., Z kulturních dějin českých XVII. a XVIII. století [Czech Cultural History during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries] (Prague: Pokrok, 1940).Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Čechové, kteří tvorili dejiny světa [Czechs who made World History] (Prague: Českomoravský kompas, 1939). Kalista also wrote about the career of Humprecht Jan Cernín z Chudenic (1932) and published Černín's correspondence with his mother, Zuzana Černínová z Harasova (1941), and Emperor Leopold I (1936). Several authors wrote on the Jesuit priest and patriotic historian Bohuslav Balbín. Kamil Erofta evaluated his historical works (1938). Josef Pelikán traced his sources (1936). Olga Květonova-Klímová reported on his contacts with the Czech nobility (1926), and Václav Rynes wrote about his life and work in exile (1940).

¹¹⁶ Ján Oberuč published two works on Matej Bel (1936, 1940). Anton A. Banik wrote on Ján Baltazár Magin (1936); and Rudo Brtáň, on Daniel Sinapius-Horcicka (1940). Branislav Varsík investigated nationality problems at the University of Trnava, which had been founded in 1635 (1938).

¹¹⁷ Rudo, Brtáň, Barokový slavizmus. Porovnávacia Štúdia z dejín slovanskej slovesnosti [Baroque Slavism. A Comparative Study of the History of Slavic Literatures] (Liptovský S. Mikuláš: Tranoscius, 1940)Google Scholar; František, Kurfürst, K česko-ruským stykům koncem XVII. a počátkem století XVIII. [The Contacts between the Czechs and the Russians at the End of the Seventeenth and the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century] (Prague: O. Vaňek, 1936)Google Scholar; Anna, Gašparíková, Povstanie Rákóczyho a Slovania [The Rákóczy Uprising and the Slavs]. In Sborník filosofické fakulty University Komenského v Bratislavě, Vol. VII, No. 55 (Bratislava, 1930)Google Scholar; Bedrich, Swieteczký, Kurucké války na Slovensku [The Kuruc Wars in Slovakia] (Prague: Vojenský archiv, 1928)Google Scholar. Zdeněk Kalista contributed a minor work on Venetian politics and the Hungarian diet in 1662 (1942).

¹¹⁸ Hugo, Traub, Naše politické dějiny v XIX. století [Our Political History in the Nineteenth Century] (Prague: Státní nakladatelství, 1926)Google Scholar (a second edition was published in 1928); Jozef, Skultéty, Sto dvadsat'pät' rokov zo slovenského života, 1790–1914 [One Hundred and Twenty-Five Years of Slovak Life, 1790–1914] (Turciansky S. Martin: Nákladem vlastným, 1920)Google Scholar; Karel, Hoch, Čechy na prahu moderního hospodářstvi [Bohemia on the Threshold of a Modern Economy] (Prague: A. Neubert, 1936)Google Scholar; Benjamin, Jedlićka, Dějiny ceského písemnictvi. Nová doba [History of Czech Literature. The New Era] (Prague: Sfinx, 1931)Google Scholar; František, Frýdecký, Slovensko literární od doby Bernolákovy [Literary Slovakia since the Time of Bernolák] (Moravská Ostrava: A. Perout, 1920)Google Scholar; Stefan, Krčméry, Stopät'desiat' rokov slovenskej literatúry [One Hundred and Fifty Years of Slovak Literature] (2 vols., Turciansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1943)Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Prokeš, “Literatura dějepisná” [Historical Literature], Československá vlastivěda, Vol. X, pp. 254–305Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Werstadt, “Politické dějepisectví devatenáctého století a jeho cestí predstavitelé” [Political Historiography of the Nineteenth Century and Its Czech Representatives], Český casopis historický, Vol. XXVI (1920), pp. 1–93Google Scholar. Alois Hnilicka and Vladimír Helfert wrote a survey of modern Czech music, which was published in 1935–36. In 1941–42 Vojtéch Volavka published a work on Czech painting and sculpture in the nineteenth century. Zdeněk Wirth and Antonín Matějček brought out a history of Czech architecture in 1922, and L. J. Peroutka published a collection of biographies of leading Czech personages in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in 1940–41. Michal Slávik did the same for the Slovaks in 1944.

¹¹⁹ Jaroslav, Goll, Válka o země koruny ceské, 1740–1742 [The Struggle for the Lands of the Bohemian Crown, 1740–1742] (Prague: Česká akademie věd a uměni, 1919)Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Prokes, “Habsburkové a Hohenzollernové v prvním zápase” [The First Struggle between the Habsburgs and the Hohenzollerns], Dějiny lidstva od pravěku k dnešku, Vol. VI, pp. 321–418Google Scholar; Augusta, Jan M., “Napoleon a ceský nacionalismus” [Napoleon and Czech Nationalism], Napoleon. Časopis Spolecnosti Napoleonovy, 1932, pp. 63–125Google Scholar. In 1934 and 1937, respectively, František Kutnar published two minor studies on the attitude of the Bohemian public and of the political authorities in Bohemia towards the French Revolution. The Habsburg monarchy figured prominently in the more general work of Josef, Šusta: Dějiny Evropy v letech 1812–1870 [The History of Europe from 1812 to 1870] (3 vols., Prague: Vesmir, 1922–1923)Google Scholar. The same can be said of Hugo, Traub's Dějiny XIX. století [History of the Nineteenth Century] (Brno: A. Píša, 1921).Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Jaroslav Prokeš, Boj o Haugvicovo “Directorium in publicis et cameralibus” r. 1761 [The Struggle for Haugwitz's “Directorium in publicis et cameralibus” of 1761]. In Věstník Královské ceské spolecnosti nauk, Class I, No. 4 (Prague, 1926); Jaroslav Prokes, Instrukee vydaná r. 1762 pro českou a rakouskou dvorní kancelář [Instruction issued in 1762 to the Bohemian and Austrian Court Chancery]. In Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, Class I, No. 5 (Prague, 1926); František, Roubík, “Pocátky policejního reditelství v Praze” [The Early Years of the Police Directory in Prague], Sborník Archivu ministerstva vnitra, Vol. I (1926), pp. 5–281Google Scholar; Bohuslav, Matous, “Státni konference (1809–1848)” [The State Conference (1809–1848)], Časopis Archivni školy, Vol. XII (1934), pp. 1–62Google Scholar; Vol. XII–XIV (1935–36), pp. 39–120; Jan, Muk, Poslední korunovace ceského krále roku 1836 [The Last Coronation of a Bohemian King in 1836] (Prague: Politický klub československé národní demokracie, 1936)Google Scholar; Jan, Heidler, Čechy a Rakousko v politických brožurách předbřeznových [Bohemia and Austria in Pre-March Political Pamphlets] (Prague: Matice ceská, 1920)Google Scholar. Arnost Kraus published a study on the Theresian school (1932); and František Alois Soukup, one on the Czech minority in the Austrian lands during the nineteenth century (1928).

¹²¹ František, Bednár, Zápas moravských evangelíku, o nábozenskou svobodu v letech 1777–1781. Prameny k dějinám tolerančního patentu [The Struggle of Moravian Evangelics for Religious Freedom during the Years 1777–1781. Sources for the History of the Toleration Patent] (Prague: Královská česká spolecnost nauk, 1931)Google Scholar: Ferdinand, Hrejsa, Toleranční patent. Jeho vznik a vývoj [The Toleration Patent. Its Origins and Development] (Prague: Svaz národního osvobození, 1931)Google Scholar; Josef, Lukásek, K dějinám doby toleranční [History of the Toleration Period] (Prague: Ceskobratrské druzstvo, 1939)Google Scholar; Capek, Jan B., Československá literatura tolerancní, 1781–1861 [Czechoslovak Toleration Literature, 1781–1861] (2 vols., Prague: Čin, 1933)Google Scholar; Václav Zácek, Zahranicní nábozenská propaganda v Čechách v předvečer revoluce 1848 [Foreign Religious Propaganda in Bohemia on the Eve of the Revolution of 1848]. In Rozpravy České akademie věd a umění, Class I, No. 98 (Prague, 1945). In 1930 and 1931 Ferdinand Hrejsa published the biographies of János Végh and János Szalatnay, two Hungarian pastors active in the revival of Czech Protestantism after the Edict of Toleration. In 1927 and 1934 Josef V. Šimák concluded a two-volume collection of documents relating to eighteenth and nineteenth century Czech religious phantasts, which had originally been started by Antonín Rezek. Karel V. Adámek finished his collection of documents on the folk religious movement in eastern Bohemia in 1922. Between 1912 and 1923 Josef Tumpach and Antonín Podlaha published a five-volume bibliography of Czech Catholic literature for the years 1828–1913.

¹²² František, Roubík, “Tri prispěvky k vývoji emancipace Zidu v Čechách” [Three Essays on the Development of Jewish Emancipation in Bohemia], Ročenka Společnosti pro dějiny Zidu, Vol. V (1933), pp. 305–400Google Scholar; František Roubík, “Z dějin Židu v CČechách v devatenáctém století” [The History of the Jews in Bohemia in the Nineteenth Century], ibid., Vol. VII (1935), pp. 291–357. In 1938 Roubík also published a minor study on the origin and early years of the Verein für Verbesserung des israelitischen Kultus in Böhmen, which was founded in Prague in 1832. Václav Žácek wrote on the Austrian government's attitude towards the Jews and on the evolution of Jewish names as a reflection of Jewish efforts toward assimilation (1936), as well as a work on the history of Frankism in the Czech lands (1938).

¹²³ Josef, Kazimour, K dějinám dělení velkostatku v 18. století [The History of the Partition of Estates in the Eighteenth Century] (Prague: Zemědělská rada, 1921)Google Scholar (a second edition came out in 1922). Several other authors wrote on the same subject. Among them were Václav Černý (1924–25 and 1927–28), Václav Novák (1921–22), and Jan Procházka (1925). Jaroslav, Prokeš wrote an article on “Memoriály o hospodářském stavu Čech pred selskou bourí r. 1775” [Memoranda on Economic Conditions in Bohemia before the Peasant Rebellion of 1775], Časopis pro dèjiny venkova, Vol. XI (1924), pp. 37–53 and 110–118; and Vol. XII (1925), pp. 49–57, 111–116, and 158–167Google Scholar. Josef Fiser described the rebellion in Moravia in his “Selské nepokoje na Moravě roku 1775” [Peasant Disturbances in Moravia in 1775], ibid., Vol. XXII (1935), pp. 49–64, 107–127, and 155–171. Moric, Michálek edited a collection of biographies of Czech agrarian leaders and innovators in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries: Zemědělsti buditelé [Agrarian Awakeners] (Prague: Československá akademie zemědělská, 1937)Google Scholar. Josef Kazimour studied the modernization of Czech forestry in his Státní péče o lesy v Čechách v I. 1754–1852 [State Care of Forests in Bohemia between 1754 and 1852], Pt. 1: Do válek napoleonských [To the Napoleonic Wars] (Prague: Československé zemědělskě museum, 1933).

¹²⁴ Jindrich, Šebánek, “Textilní podniky moravských Kouniců” [Textile Enterprises of the Moravian Kounic Family], Časopis Matice moravské, Vol. LV (1931), pp. 95–168 and 418–468; and Vol. LVI (1932), pp. 101–180Google Scholar. Jan Klepl wrote on the origins of the flax industry in the Czech lands (1941); František Zuman, on Czech paper mills in the eighteenth (1931) and the first part of the nineteenth century (1934); and Theodor Zákavec, on the Lanna enterprises (1936). The centenary of the Association for the Advancement of Industry in Bohemia (Jednota k povzbuzeni prumyslu v Čechách) was commemorated in 1934 by a volume, edited by Bedrich Mansfeld, that brought additional information on the industrial development of Bohemia. Industrial education in the Czech lands was traced in a similar book commemorating the centenary of the Industrial School (Prumyslová skola) in Prague in 1937. František Roubík published a history of road building in Bohemia (1938). František Vrt'átko and Alois Adamus wrote on Bohemian railroads (1920, 1936); and Jan Vaněček, on the early development of steam shipping and Josef Ressel's invention of the ship propeller (1938).

¹²⁵ Eduard Šebesta studied the census of 1770 in the old town of Prague (1933). František, Dvorácek published the results of his studies of the census figures in the Czech lands from 1754 to 1921 in a lengthy work published in various issues of Statistický věstník, Vols. V–VII (1924–1926).Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Albert, Prazák, Obrozenské tradice [Revival Traditions] (Prague: Svaz národního osvobození, 1928)Google Scholar; Albert, Pražák, Duch naší obrozenské literatury [The Spirit of Our Revival Literature] (Prague: Pokrok, 1938)Google Scholar; Capek, Jan B., Duch české literatury předbřeznové a predmájové. Ideové proudy a osobnosti, 1825–1858 [The Spirit of Czech Pre-March and Pre-May Literature. Ideological Trends and Personages, 1825–1858] (Prague: Pokrok, 1938)Google Scholar. Antonín Novotntý described the atmosphere in Prague at the end of the eighteenth century in a work published in 1940. František Strejcek wrote about the process of national revival in two provincial cities, Mladá Boleslav (1929) and Jindřichuv Hradec (1930). Arnošt Kraus wrote a work tracing the attitudes of Bohemian Germans to the Czech national revival (1928).

¹²⁷ Jaroslav, Prokes, Pocátky Ceské spolecnosti nauk do konce XVIII. století [The Early Years of the Bohemian Society of Sciences (to the End of the Eighteenth Century)], Vol. I: 1774–1789 (Prague: Královská ceská spolecnost nauk, 1938)Google Scholar; Josef, Hanus, Národní museum a naše obrození [The National Museum and Our Revival] (2 vols., Prague: Zemský výbor, 1921–1923)Google Scholar. Another work on the National Museum was published by František Kop in 1941. The contributions to the development of Czech culture of the National Museum's journal, Časopis Národního musea, were discussed in the 1926 issue of that journal, published in commemoration of the centenary of the founding of the museum. Antonín Grund wrote the history of Matice, česká in his Sto let Matice české, 1831–1931 [One Hundred Years of Matice ceská, 1831–1931] (Prague: Česká matice, 1931)Google Scholar. Karel Kazbunda told the story of the chair of history at the University of Prague between 1783–1848 in a work published in 1930; Josef Macurek wrote a volume, published in 1933, on the history and activities of various historical societies in the Czech lands and Slovakia.

¹²⁸ Archiv pro bádání o zivotě a díle Josefa Dobrovského [Archives for Research on the Life and Work of Josef Dobrovský] (4 vols., Prague: Královská ceská spolecnost nauk, 1934–35); Spisy a projevy Jose fa Dobrovského [The Works and Papers of Josef Dobrovský] (Prague: Královská ceská spolecnost nauk, 1936—) (14 vols. have thus far appeared in print). A biography of Dobrovský was published by Arne Novák (1929). Further contributions to knowledge about his life and work were a two-volume study by Josef Volf and Milos B. Volf, published in 1934–35, and a collective work edited by Jirí Horák, Matija Murko, and Milos Weingart, which was brought out in 1929. Individual works of Dobrovský and their significance were treated by Milos Weingart (1923, 1925), Josef Hanus (1929), and Benjamin Jedlička (1934). Jaroslav Ludvíkovský evaluated the influence of classical humanity on Dobrovský and the Czech revival in a study published in 1933, while František Kubka wrote on Dobrovský's relations with the Russians (1928).

¹²⁹ See especially Josef, Fischer, Myšlenka a dílo Františka Palackého [The Thought and Work of František Palacký] (2 vols., Prague: Čin, 1926–1927)Google Scholar. Zdeněk Nejedlý published an interpretive biography of Palacký (1920). Josef Borovička reported on his research in Italy (1918), and Josef Hanus published a series of articles in Časopis Národního musea between 1921 and 1926 on Palacký's activities as editor of that journal. Karel Kálal contributed some details concerning Palacký's youth (1925); Ferdinand Hrejsa examined his religious convictions (1928). Miloslav Novotný published a critical edition of his history of the Czech people, while Václav Chaloupecký published an important essay on the significance of Palacký's history in Czech national development (1939). Jaroslav, Charvát and František, Krčma published a collection of his other works under the title Dílo Frantiska Palackého [The Works of František Palacký] (4 vols. and a supplement, Prague: L. Mazác, 1941–1945)Google Scholar, and Karel Stloukal edited Palacký's family correspondence (1930).

¹³⁰ Emanuel, Chalupný, Havliíček. Prostředí, osobnost a dílo [Havlícek. His Environment, Personality, and Work] (Prague: Melantrich, 1930)Google Scholar. Karel Kazbunda studied his relations with Austrian authorities in the pre-1848 period (1926). Miloslav Novotný published his student correspondence (1942), and Antonín Hajn edited a collection of documents and other evidence of Havlíček's popularity with the people during his lifetime and after his death (1936).

¹³¹ Jan Strakoš wrote on Mikuláš Adaukt Voight (1929); František Kutnar, on Ignác Cornova (1930); Josef Dvorský, on Count František J. Kinský (1931); and Stanislav Dvořák, on František M. Pelcl (1934). Jan Pán published Pelcl's memoirs in 1931. Václav Osvald wrote on Václav M. Kramerius (1943); and Bedřich Profeld, on Josef Regner (1925). Miloslav Hýsek published the memoirs of Jan B. Pichl (1936) and of Karel Sabina (1937). Václav Hrubý, Stanislav Soucek, and Václav Flajshans wrote on the forgeries of Václav Hanka (1919, 1924, 1931). Between 1933 and 1939 Václav Černý and Jaroslav St'astny completed the publication of the correspondence and papers of František L. Celakovský, which had been started by František Bílý in 1907. Four volumes of the collected works of Jan E. Purkyně were published between 1918 and 1941 (seven more were completed by 1968), and the centenary of his birth was commemorated in 1937 by a 2-volume collective study on his life and work (1937). Palo Brosz studied his views on the world and life in general (1938). Albert Pražák and Vojtěch Jirát wrote on Karel H. Mácha (1936, 1940). Antonín Grund wrote on Karel J. Erben (1935) and published his works (1939). Vladimír Zapletal wrote on Prince Rudolf Thurn Taxis (1933). Karel Schwarzenberg published excerpts from the notes and papers of Prince Friedrich Schwarzenberg (1934), and Augustin Neumann edited the papers and correspondence of the learned Augustinian monks of Staré Brno (1930). In 1938 Jindřich Skopec published the memoirs of the peasant scribe František J. Vavák. His biography was written by František Kutnar (1941), while his concept of Czech history was studied by Stanislava Hajkova (1929). Kutnar also published the memoirs of another peasant, Josef Dlask (1941), which also faithfully reflect the atmosphere of the Czech countryside.

¹³² Daniel, Rapant, K pociatkom mad'arizácie [The Beginnings of Magyarization] (2 vols., Bratislava: Zemedelské múzeum, 1927–1931)Google Scholar; Daniel, Rapant, Slovenský prestolný prosbopis z roku 1842 [The Slovak Petition to the Monarch in 1842] (2 vols., Liptovský S. Mikulas: Tranoscius, 1943)Google Scholar; Ján, Marták, Útok na spisovnú slovencinu roku 1847/8 a jeho cicl [The Attack against Literary Slovak in 1847–1848 and the Motives behind It] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1938)Google Scholar; Ján, Stanislav, K jazykovému dielu Antona Bernoláka [Anton Bernolák's Linguistic Work] (Bratislava: Slovenská učená spolocnost', 1941)Google Scholar; Jan, Vilikovský, Dějiny literárnich společnosti malohontských [History of the Literary Societies of Malý Hont]. Vol. XX of Spisy filosofické fakulty University Komenského (Bratislava, 1935)Google Scholar; Albert, Prazák, Dějiny spisovné slovenštiny po dobu Štúrovu [History of Literary Slovak up to the Time of Štúr] (Prague: G. Voleský, 1922)Google Scholar; Milan, Hodža, Československý rozkol. Príspevky k dejinám slovenciny [The Czechoslovak Schism. A Contribution to the History of the Slovak Language] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Nákladom vlastným, 1920)Google Scholar. Ján Oberuč edited a collection of studies on the Evangelical Song Book of 1842 and its significance (1942), and Lét Danisovic wrote a survey of Franciscan historical writing in Slovakia during this period (1934).

¹³³ Osuský, Samuel Š., Filozofia Šturovcov [The Philosophy of the Štúrites] (3 vols., Myjava: D. Pažický, 1926–1932)Google Scholar; Milan, Pišút, Počiatky básnickej školy Šturovej [The Origins of Štur's Poetical School] (Bratislava: Učená spoločnost' Šafáriková, 1938)Google Scholar. On a less sophisticated level, Karel Goláň wrote on the exodus of Štúr's students from Bratislava in 1844 (1944); Jozef Paučo, on their efforts in popular education (1943); and Rudolf Mrlian, on the use they made of folklore (1943). Štúr's works were individually published by Josef Jirásek (1931, 1935), Jozef Ambruš (1941, 1943), and Henrik Bartek (1943). Albert Pražák wrote on the Slovak question during the time of Jozef M. Hurban (1923) and on literary activities in Levoča (1936).

¹³⁴ Josef Hanuš evaluated the significance of Pavel J. Šafařik's history of Slavic literatures (1927), while Jan Vilikovský published his poetic works (1938). Rudo Brtáň traced the evolution of Ján Kollár's discourse on Slavic solidarity (1942). Ján A. Fábry wrote on Matej Bahýl (1935); Jan B. Čapek, on Augustin Doležal (1931); Alexander Hirner, on Ján Feješ (1942); Celestín Lepáček, on Vojtech Šimko (1942); štefan Adamovič, on Ján L. Bartolomaeides (1942); Vendelín Jankovič, on Ján Čaplovič (1945); Flóra Kleinschnitzová, on Andrej Sládkovič (1928); and Ludvík Kühn, on the “awakeners” in the Bratislava region (1928).

¹³⁵ Branislav, Varsik, Národnostná hranica slovensko-mad'arská v Ostatných dvoch storočiach [The Slovak-Hungarian Nationality Boundary during the Last Two Centuries] (Bratislava: Slovenská učená spoločnost', 1940)Google Scholar (also in German); František, Bokes, Vývin predstáv o slovenskom uzemi v XIX. storoči [The Evolution of Concepts of what constituted Slovak Territory in the Nineteenth Century] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1945)Google Scholar; František, Bokes, Slovensý životný priestor v minulosti a dnes [Slovak Living Space in the Past and Present] (Bratislava: Čas, 1943).Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Miloš, Weingart, Slovanskd vzájemnost. Úvahy o jejích základech a osudech [Slavic Mutuality. Reflections on Its Bases and Fortunes] (Bratislava: Academia, 1926)Google Scholar; Josef, Jirásek, Rusko a my. Studie vztahů českoalovensko-ruských od počátku 19. století do r. 1867 [Russia and We. A Study of Czechoslovak-Russian Relations from the Beginning of the Nineteenth Century to 1867] (Prague: Vesmir, 1929)Google Scholar (a new, enlarged edition was published in 1945). Karel Krejčí published a number of studies on the impact of the Polish uprising of 1830–1831 on the Czech lands (1928, 1930, 1931). Zdeněk Hájek wrote on the fate of Polish prisoners in Brno-Špilberk (1930); and Julius Heidenreich, on Mickiewicz's influence on pre-1848 Czech literature (1930). František Roubík published a study on the relations between the Czechs and the South Slavs in the nineteenth century (1931). Karel Paul edited a collection of letters of Czech writers to Stanko Vraz and Ljudevit Gaj (1923), and Oton Berkopec compiled a bibliography on the Czechs in the South Slavic lands from 1800 (1940).

¹³⁷ Special mention should be made of the biographies of Czech musicians of the first part of the nineteenth century written by Alois Hnilička (1926); a volume commemorating the foundation of the Prague conservatory of music in 1811, edited by Vlastimil Blažek (1936); and a study of the songs of the national revival of Mirko Očadlík (1940). Otakar Kamper published a monograph on František X. Brixy (1926); Vladimír Helfert, one on Jiři Benda (1929); Karel Vetterl, one on Bohumír Rieger (1929); and Josef Pivec, one on František Škroup (1941). Prokop Toman and Jaromír Pefiirka wrote about the life and work of the painter Josef Navrátil (1932, 1940); and František Zuman published a book on Czech filigrees of the first half of the nineteenth century (1934).

¹³⁸ Hugo, Traub, Bouřlivý rok 1848 v Evropě [The Stormy Year of 1848 in Europe] (Prague, 1928)Google Scholar; Karel, Kazbunda, České hnutí roku 1848 [The Czech Movement of 1848] (Prague: Historický klub, 1929)Google Scholar; František, Roubík, Cesky rok 1848 [The Czech Year 1848] (Prague: Kuncíř, 1931)Google Scholar. Jan Šverma gave a Marxist interpretation of these events in a study published in 1933. Roubík studied the impact of the 1848–1849 revolution on the Czech countryside (1928). He also wrote on the activities of the Czech National Guards in 1848–1851 (1929). Rudolf Traub analyzed the cabinet decrees of March 23 and April 8, 1848, in a study published in 1919. Hugo Traub examined the May conspiracy of 1849 (1929). Otakar Odložilík wrote on the investigation commissions of 1848 (1928); and Václav Čejchan, on Mikhail A. Bakunin's activities in Bohemia (1928). Jindřich Spáčil published a book on the Austrian parliament at Kroměříž (Kremsier) in 1848–1849 (1933). Josef Lukášek followed the fortunes of the Czech Evangelical Church during 1848 (1937). Robert Maršan published selections from the diary of František V. Karlík, of Rokycany, to demonstrate the impact of the 1848 revolution on a small town (1929).

¹³⁹ See his Slovenske povstanie roku 1848–49. Dějiny a doklady [The Slovak Uprising of 1848–49. History and Documents] (5 vols. in 12, Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1937–68).

¹⁴⁰ See especially Ján, Holák, “Politicks snahy slovenské v rokoch 1848/49” [Slovak Political Efforts in 1848–1849], Carpatica, Vol. I (1936), pp. 81–156Google Scholar. Karel Goláň contributed a study on local developments in the Bradlo region (1926) and published the memoirs and accounts of the Moravian participants in the uprising (1931). Florian Zapletal wrote on the activities of Adolf J. Dobrjanskij and the Ruthenes in 1849–1851 (1927).

¹⁴¹ Bohumil, Baxa, Dějiny veřejného práva ve střední Evropě od r. 1848 [History of Public Law in Central Europe since 1848] (Brno: Právník, 1926)Google Scholar; Zdeněk, Tobolka, Politické dějiny československého národa od r. 1848 až do dnešní doby [Political History of the Czechoslovak People from 1848 to Our Time] (4 vols. in 5, Prague: Československý kompas, 1932–1937)Google Scholar; Adolf, Srb, Politické dějiny národa českého od počátku doby konstituční [Political History of the Czech People since the Beginning of the Constitutional Era] (2 vols., Prague: J. Otto, 1926)Google Scholar; Josef, Penížek, Česká aktivita v letech 1878–1918 [Czech Activity during the Years 1878–1918] (2 vols., Prague: Český čtenář, 1930–1932)Google Scholar. The title of Penížek's work is somewhat misleading. The study actually ends in 1891.

¹⁴² Kazbunda wrote on Karel Havlíček during and after his confinement by the Bach regime (1924, 1925), the Czech national program in 1860 and the struggle for a political newspaper (1927), the Bohemian coronation project of Francis Joseph in 1861 (1927), the April, 1867, session of the Bohemian diet (1933), the attempts of the Austrian government to satisfy Czech demands (1921), and Czech attempts to obtain concessions in 1871 (1931) and in 1890 (1934, 1935). He also described the organization and archives of the supreme police authority and the police ministry for the years 1852–1867 (1923) and the archives of the Austrian constituent parliament of 1848–1849, of the imperial councíl for the years 1851–1861, of the enlarged imperial council for 1860–1861 (1924), and of the state council for 1861–1868 (1926). The 1870 and 1871 negotiations between the Austrian government and the Czechs were also discussed by Hugo Traub (1919, 1920), who, in addition, wrote on the reasons for Belcredi's selection as prime minister in 1865 (1929). František Roubík studied the administrative division of Bohemia in 1850–1868 (1938, 1939); and Miloš Kratochvíl, the development of the municipal government in Prague since 1848 (1936). Josef Volf followed the attempts to revive the Masonic movement in Bohemia after 1848 (1933). Cyril Horácek and František Soukup wrote on the origins and early years of the workers movement in the Czech lands (1933, 1938), and Karel Vlček described popular assemblies in Silesia (1938).

¹⁴³ See especially Hugo Traub, F. L. Rieger (Prague: Mánes, 1922). Traub also edited a collection of speeches given by Rieger from 1868 to 1878 (1922). Jan Heidler and Josef šusta published Rieger's correspondence (1924, 1926). Karel Kazbunda wrote about his sojourn abroad in 1849–1850 (1929) and discussed his memoranda for Napoleon III in 1869 and 1870 (1925). Among numerous biographies of Masaryk, all of a provisional nature, the most popular was the one by Jan Herben: T. G. Masaryk (Prague: Mánes, 1926) (the fifth enlarged edition was published in 1938 and a German edition in 1935). Zdeněk Nejedlý's T. G. Masaryk (4 vols., Prague: Melantrich, 1930–37) is a scholarly study not only of his earlier years between 1850 and 1886 but also of Czech society during that time. Jan B. Kozák wrote on Masaryk's philosophy (1925); Vasil K. škrach, on the influence of French thought on him (1923, 1924, 1925); and Milada Paulová, on his cooperation with the South Slavs (1938). Karel, Čapek published his autobiography in the form of a discourse: Hovory s T. G. Masarykem [Discourses with T. G. Masaryk] (2 vols., Prague: Cin, 1931)Google Scholar. Škrach, edited a whole periodical devoted to the study of Masaryk's life and work: Masarykuv sborník. Časopis pro studium života a díla T. G. Masaryka [Masaryk Review. A Journal for the Study of the Life and Work of T. G. Masaryk] (6 vols., Prague, 1924–1931).Google Scholar

¹⁴⁴ Josef Matousek discussed Karel Sladkovský as a case study in radicalism (1929). Renata Tyršová wrote a personal memoir of Miroslav Tyrš (1932). Josef Gruber and Cyril Horáček published a biography and the complete works of Albín Bráf (1922–24). Earel Hoch wrote on Alois Rašín (1934); and Zdeněk Nejedlý, Kamil Krofta, and Vladimír Sís, on Karel Kramář (1920, 1930, 1931), whose seventieth anniversary in 1930 was commemorated by a volume of contributions edited by Bohumil Němec and others (1931). Hugo Traub published the memoirs of Josef V. Frič (1939) and the correspondence between Eduard Grégr and Alfons Št'astný (1928). Miloslav Hýsek edited the memoirs of Karel Sabina (1937); Bohumila Sokolová, the prison correspondence of Karel S. Sokol (1929); and František Kamenícek, the memoirs and correspondence of Alois Pražák (1926–27).

¹⁴⁵ A series entitled Dějiny Národního divadla [History of the National Theater] included volumes by Jan Bartoš on the origins of the national theater (1933) and by Otokar Fischer and Václav Tille on the dramas (1933, 1935) and by Zdeněk Nejedlý on the operas (1935, 1936) performed in it. Jan and Josef Bartoš wrote on the dramas and operas performed in the provisional theater of Prague (1937,1939). A collective volume commemorated the founding of the Czech theater in Brno in 1884 (1934). Jaroslav Prokeš examined the fortunes of Matice česká in the Bach period (1931). The founding of Matice opavská in 1877 was commemorated by a collective work published in 1927.

¹⁴⁶ Karel, Hoch, “Dějiny českého novinářství od r. 1860 do doby současné” [History of Czech Journalism from 1860 to the Present], Československé vlastivěda, Vol. V, pp. 437–514Google Scholar; František, Roubík, Časopisectvo v Čechách v letech 1848 až 1862 [Bohemian Journalism from 1848 to 1862] (Prague: Duch novin, 1930)Google Scholar; František, Roubík, Bibliografie Časopisectvá v Čěchách z let 1863–1895 [Bibliography of Bohemian Journalism for the Years 1863–1895] (Prague: Česká akademie věd a uměni, 1936)Google Scholar. Arne Novák produced a monograph on the political and social concerns of the authors associated with the journals Ruch and Lumír (1938).

¹⁴⁷ Václav Tille wrote on Božena Němcová (1938, 1939). So also did Julius Fučík (1940), František Kubka and Miloslav Novotný (1941), and Zdeněk Nejedlý (1945). Karel Polák wrote on the national sentiments of Jan Neruda (1940), while Albert Pražák analyzed his correspondence (1941). Jaroslav Vozka published studies on Jakub Arbes (1940); Jan Kabelík, on Leopold Hausmann (1919–20); Karel V. Adámek, on Karel Adámek (1927); J. Holečková-Heidenreichová, on Sofie Podlipská (1940); Zdeněk Nejedlý and Jaromír Borecký, on Alois Jirásek (1921, 1931); František Teplý and Josef Kebrle, on Jindrich Š. Baar (1937, 1940); and Arne Novák, on Svatopluk Čech (1920).

¹⁴⁸ A large number of studies were devoted to Bedřich Smetana. Biographies of him were written by Zdeněk Nejedlý (1924), Vladimír Helfert (1924), and Josef Teichman (1944). Nejedly published a monumental study of his young years (1924–33). Helfert treated his artistic development (1924), as did Alois HniliČka (1935). Mirko Očadlík published his correspondence with Eliška Krásnohorská (1940). Otakar Šourek wrote on Antonín Dvořák (1916–33); and Vladimír Helfert, on Janáček (1938). Nejedlý also wrote on Vitězslav Novák (1921) and Otakar Ostrčil (1935); Václav štěpán, on Novák and Josef Suk (1945); and yratislav Vycpálek, on Jan Malát (1944). Rudolf Smetana and Bedřich Václavek published nineteenth century Czech songs (1940).

¹⁴⁹ Vojtěch Volavka wrote on modern Czech painting (1936–37); Jaroslav Pešina, on Czech graphics (1940); and Jan Švehla, on nineteenth-century Czech caricature (1941). Among individual artists the most attention was given to Josef Mánes, biographies of whom were written by Jaroslav Paur (1939) and Jaromír PeČírka (1940). Antonín Matějcěk and František Žákavec discussed his work (1923–28). Jan Loriš wrote on his brother Quido Mánes (1937); Vojtěch Volavka, on Karel Purkyně (1942); and Hana Volavková, on Mikoláš Aleš (1933).

¹⁵⁰ František Cinek wrote on the Catholic Archbishop Antonín C. Stojan (1933); Rudolf Říčan, on the Lutheran leader Karel E. Lány (1938); Josef Novák, on the educator Gustav A. Lindner (1941); and Otakar Josek, on the historian Josef Kalousek (1922). Jaromír Pečírka published the correspondence of Max Dvořák with the historians Jaroslav Goll, Josef Pekař, and Josef Šusta. Josef Klik edited the correspondence of Goll and Pekař (1941).

¹⁵¹ Václav, Černý, “První ministerstvo zemedělství v Rakousku (1848–1853)” [The First Ministry of Agriculture in Austria (1848–1853)], Sborník Československé akademie zemědělské, Vol. IV (1929), pp. 119–191Google Scholar; Josef, Pohl, Vylidņování venkova v Čechdch v období 1850–1930 [The Depopulation of the Bohemian Countryside between 1850 and 1930] (Prague: Československá zemědělská akademie, 1933)Google Scholar; František, Wenzl, Dějiny záložen a ostatního družstevního podnikání na Moravě do r. 1855 [The History of Savings Banks and Other Cooperative Enterprises in Moravia (to 1885)] (Prague: Centrokooperativ, 1937)Google Scholar. Josef V. šimák published Jan Krouský's correspondence (1932); and Evčen Cizl, the memoirs of Josef Volf (1932). Earel Nechvíle studied the cost of tickets on the Austrian railroads (1930–31), the organization of rail lines, and railroad administration in Austria (1932–33). Vladimír Ringes wrote on the Elbe Railroad (1932–33) and on the Czech railroads during the revolution of 1848 and the war of 1866 (1934–35), while Jan Bast a wrote a history of the railway stations of Prague (1923).

¹⁵² František, Bokes, Pokusy o slovensko-mad'arské vyrovnanie r. 1861–1868 [The Efforts of the Slovaks to attain a Compromise with the Hungarians between 1861 and 1868] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1941)Google Scholar; Jozef, Škultéty, Prvé shromaždenie národné v Turčianskom Sv. Martine [The First National Assembly in Turčiansky Sv. Martin] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1924)Google Scholar. František Hrušovský published documents relating to this assembly (1941), and Daniel Rapant analyzed the Slovak national memorandum resulting from it (1943). Rapant, Hrušovský, and Bokes followed the further fortunes of this memorandum in a joint work (1941).

¹⁵³ Július, Botto, Dejiny Matice slovenskej, 1863–1875 [History of the Matica slovenská, 1863–1875] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1923)Google Scholar; Andrej, Mráz, Matica slovenská v rokoch 1863–1875 [Matica slovenská during the Years 1863–1875] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1935)Google Scholar; Belo, Polla, Ohlas zrušenia Matice slovenskej v uhorskom sneme [The Repercussions of the Abolition of Matica slovenská in the Hungarian Diet] (Bratislava: Slovák, 1944)Google Scholar; Albert, Prašák, Literární Slovensko let padesátých až sedmdesátých [Literary Slovakia from the Fifties through the Seventies] (Prague: Orbis, 1932)Google Scholar; Zdeňka, Bokesová, Slovenské hudobne umenie [Slovak Musical Art] (Bratislava: Čas, 1942)Google Scholar; Juraj, Čečetka, Zo slovenskej pedagogiky [Slovak Pedagogy] (Turčiansky S. Martin: Matica slovenská, 1940).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁴ Július Botto wrote on Ján Francisci and Štefan M. Daxner (1922); Andrej Mráz, on Ján Kalinčiak (1936); and Jozef Ambruš, on Daniel Maróthy (1938–39). František Bokes penned a life of Viliam Paulíny-Tóth (1941) and published his newspaper editorials (1942). Albert Pražák wrote works on Samuel Tomášik (1919), Svetozár Hurban Vajanský (1925), Jozef Škultéty (1924), and Samuel Medvecký (1939). Štefan Janšák wrote on Andrej Kmet' (1941) and Štefan Fajnor (1935). Dobroslav Orel published a study of Štefan Fajnor (1935) and another one on Ján L. Bella (1924), whose correspondence with his son was published by Zdeňka Bokesová (1944). Andrej Kostolný wrote on the work of Pavel O. Hviezdoslav (1939); and Viliam Ries, on František R. Osvald (1939). Pavel Bujnák studied the influence of the Hungarian poet János Arany on Slovak literature (1924). Štefan Osuský produced biographies of less prominent Protestants who contributed to the liberation of the Slovaks (1938).

¹⁵⁵ Jóža, Vochala, Luhačovické sněmy československé [Czechoslovak Meetings in Luhačovice] (Prague: Československá jednota, 1926)Google Scholar; Josef, Rotnágl (ed.), Kniha Československé jednoty [The Book of the “Československá jednota”] (Prague: Československá jednota, 1925).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁶ Václav, Žáček, Ohlas polského povstáni r. 1863 v Čechách [The Repercussions of the Polish Uprising of 1863 in Bohemia]. In Práce Slovanského ústavu, Vol. XIV (Prague, 1935)Google Scholar; Josef, Bidlo, Michal Bobrzynski (Prague: Česká akademie věd a umění, 1936)Google Scholar; Karel, Kazbunda, Pout' Čechu do Moskvy r. 1867 a rakouská diplomacie [The Pilgrimage of the Czechs to Moscow in 1867 and Austrian Diplomacy] (Prague: Orbis, 1924)Google Scholar; Josef, Jirásek, Češi, Slováci a Rusko. Studie vzájemných vztahu. československo-ruských od roku 1867 do počdtku světové války [The Czechs, the Slovaks, and Russia. Studies in Mutual Czechoslovak-Russian Relations from 1867 to the Beginning of the World War] (Prague: Vesmir, 1933)Google Scholar; Edvard, Beneš, “Problémy slovanské politiky” [The Problems of Slavic Politics], Slovanský přehled, Vol. XVII (1925), pp. 5–19, 81–84, 241–249, and 321–344; and Vol. XVIII (1926), pp. 1–21, 81–102, and 169–208.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁷ Ottomar, Schiller, Zápas Čech a Italie za svobodu. Styky politické v 19. století [The Bohemian and Italian Struggle for Freedom. Political Contacts in the Nineteenth Century] (Prague: Pokroková revue, 1933)Google Scholar; Jan, Opočenskýacute;, “Francie a rakouští Slované v letech devadesátých” [France and the Austrian Slavs in the Nineties], Slovanský přehled, Vol. XXIV (1932), pp. 193–206, 263–276, and 334–348.Google Scholar Austrian foreign policy also figured prominently in the university lectures of Josef, Šusta, as published in Světová politika v letech 1871–1914 [World Politics during the Years 1871–1914] (6 vols., Prague: Vesmir, 1924–1931).Google Scholar

¹⁵⁸ Josef, Pekař, Světová válka. Stati o jejím vzniku a jejích osudech [The World War. Essays on Its Origins and Its Outcome] (Prague: Vesmír, 1921)Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Prokeš, “Světové válka, 1914–1918” [The World War, 1914–1918], Dvacátí století, Vol. VI (1934), pp. 7–169.Google Scholar

¹⁵⁹ František, Čáda, “Ústavní právo rakouské za světové valky od jejího počátku až do svolání říšské rady r. 1917” [Austrian Constitutional Law during the World War from its Beginning to the Convocation of the Imperial Council in 1917], Vědecká ročenka právnické fakulty Masarykovy university v Brně, 1930, pp. 221–264Google Scholar; Jan, Opočenský, Konec monarchie rakousko-uherské [The Demise of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy] (Prague: Orbis, 1928)Google Scholar (an abridged German edition was published in 1931); Jan, Opočenský, Vznik národních státu v říjnu 1918 [The Formation of the National States in October, 1918] (Prague: Orbis, 1927)Google Scholar; Josef, Teichman, Mad'aři ve válce a po válce [The Magyars during and after the War] (Prague: Melantrich, 1937)Google Scholar; Fedor, Houdek, Kapitulácia Mad'arov v roku 1918 [The Capitulation of the Magyars in 1918] (Bratislava: Prúdy, 1928).Google Scholar

¹⁶⁰ Tobolka, Zdeněk V., “Česká politika za světové války” [Czech Politics during the World War], Politika, Vol. I (1923), pp. 76–207Google Scholar; Lev, Sychrava and Jaroslav, Werstadt, Československý odboj [The Czechoslovak Revolt] (Prague: Státní nakladatelství, 1923)Google Scholar; Jan, Opočenský, Zrození našeho státu [The Birth of Our State] (Prague: Státní nakladatelství, 1928)Google Scholar (also in French, English, and German editions); Ladislav, Rašín, Vznik a uznáni českloslovenského státu [The Formation and Recognition of the Czechoslovak State] (Prague: Pražské akciové tiskárny, 1926)Google Scholar; Ján, Papánek, La Tchécoslovaquie. Histoire politique et juridique de sa création (Prague: Čin, 1923)Google Scholar; Vlastimil, Kybal, Les origines diplomatiques de l'état tchécoslovaque (Prague: Orbis, 1929)Google Scholar (also in Italian); Karel, Stloukal, Českostovensky stát v představách T. G. Masaryka za války [T. G. Masaryk's Conception of the Czechoslovak State during the War] (Prague: Politický klub národní demo-kracie, 1930)Google Scholar. Jaroslav Werstadt traced the development of Masaryk's thoughts in regard to Czechoslovakian independence from Masaryk's own writings in his Od “Českě otázky” k “Nové Evropě” Linie politického vývoje Masarykova [From the “Czech Question” to “New Europe.” The Path of Masaryk's Political Development] (Prague, 1930). See also Jaroslav, Werstadt, “Politické plány České Maffie v prvním roce války” [The Political Plans of the Czech Maffie during the First Year of the War], Naše revoluce, Vol. VI (1929–300), pp. 369–427Google Scholar; and Vol. VII (1931), pp. 292–330 and 398–423; Milada, Paulová, Dějiny Maffie [History of the Maffie], Vol. I: Ve znaku persekuce [During the Time of Persecution] (Prague: Unie, 1937)Google Scholar; and Jaroslav, Prokeš, Obrázkové dĚjiny naší samostatnosti [Pictorial History of Our Independence] (Prague: Česká grafická unie, 1930).Google Scholar

¹⁶¹ Ivan, Markovič, Slováci v zahraničnej revolúcii [The Slovaks in the Revolutionary Movement Abroad] (Prague: Pamätník odboja, 1923)Google Scholar. Karol Sidor published a book on the same subject and with the same title in 1928. Ivan Dérer wrote on Czech and Slovak activities in America in his Pittsburská dohoda [The Pittsburgh Agreement] (Bratislava, 1937). Konštantán Culen published his version of the Pittsburgh Agreement in two books bearing the same title (1937, 1938). Martin Grečo wrote on the Slovak declaration in favor of a joint Czecho-Slovak state in his Martinská deklarácia [The Martin Declaration] (Bratislava: Slovenská liga, 1939). Václav, Chaloupecký covered much the same ground in his Zápas o Slovensko, 1918 [The Struggle for Slovakia, 1918] (Prague: čin, 1930)Google Scholar. Fedor, Houdek traced the origins of the Slovak-Hungarian boundary in his Vznik hranie Slovenska [The Origins of the Slovakian Frontier] (Bratislava: Prúdy, 1932).Google Scholar

¹⁶² Masaryk, Tomáš G., Světová revoluce za války a ve válce, 1914–1918 [The World Revolution during the War, 1914–1918] (Prague: Orbis, 1925)Google Scholar (a second edition was published in 1930, and German, English, and French editions in 1925, 1927, and 1930); Masaryk, Tomáš G., L'Europe nouvelle (Paris: Imprimerie Slave, 1918)Google Scholar (English, Czech, and German editions came out in 1918, 1920, and 1922); Edvard, Beneš, Světová válka a naše revoluce [The World War and Our Revolution] (3 vols., Prague: Čin, 1927–1928)Google Scholar (abridged editions in German, French, and English were published in 1928). Josef Bartušek and Jaroslav Boháč edited the notebooks of Milan R. Štefánik (1935); Prokop Maxa and Jaroslav Papoušek, the wartime writings and speeches of Masaryk (1919–20); and Zdeněk V. Tobolka, the materials relating to the trial of Karel Kramář and his co-defendants (1919–21). Medvecký, Karol A. provided a vast amount of material on Slovak affairs in his memoirs: Slovenský prevrat [The Slovak Revolution] (4 vols., Bratislava: Komenský, 1930–1931)Google Scholar. Jindřich Vančura published a biography of Ernst Denis, a French historian and participant in the Czechoslovak independence movement (1923).

¹⁶³ Milada, Paulová, Tajná diplomatická hra o Jihoslovany za svitové války [The Secret Diplomatic Game over the South Slavs during the World War] (Prague: Vesmír, 1923)Google Scholar; and Milada, Paulová, Jihoslovanský odboj a Česká Maffie [The South Slav Resistance and the Czech Maffie], Vol. I (Prague: A. Bečková, 1928).Google Scholar