Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:02:34.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Governing drug use through neurobiological subject construction: The sad loss of the sociocultural

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2011

Kevin Chien-Chang Wu
Kevin Chien-Chang Wu
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan. ccwu88@ntu.edu.twhttp://www.ntu.edu.tw/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on their “drugs as instruments” framework, Müller & Schumann (M&S) propose a staged drug policy that matches well the neoliberal governance scheme. To mend the sad loss of the sociocultural dimension in their model, I propose three such considerations: first, sociocultural interactions with the brain; second, sociocultural context and justice of drug use; and third, sociocultural preparedness for implementing their drug policy.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 327 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abi-Rached, J. M. & Rose, N. (2010) The birth of the neuromolecular gaze. History of the Human Sciences 23(1):11–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acker, C. J. (2010) How crack found a niche in the Amercan ghetto: The historical epidemiology of drug-related harm. BioSocieties 5:70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, N. (2010) Toward a critical neuroscience of “addiction.” BioSocieties 5:89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, C. (2010) Enabling places and enabling resources: New directions for harm reduction research and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review 29:337–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergen, K. (2010) The acculturated brain. Theory & Psychology 20(6):795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, S. (2005) The public health approach to the prevention of substance abuse. In: Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook, ed. Lowinson, J. H., Ruiz, P., Millman, R. B. & Langrod, J. G., pp. 1255–67. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Kawachi, I. & Berkman, L. F., eds. (2003) Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitayama, S. & Uskul, A. K. (2011) Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. The Annual Reivew of Psychology 62:419–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, A. D., Mahers, C. D., Ezzati, M., Jamison, D. T. & Murray, C. J. L. (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: Systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367: 1747–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malabou, C. (2008) What should we do with our brain? Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. & Wilkinson, R. G., eds. (2006) Social determinants of health. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D. (2008) Erasing pleasure from public discourse on illicit drugs: On the creation and reproduction of an absence. International Journal of Drug Policy 19:353–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Malley, P. (2004) Risk, uncertainty and government. Glasshouse Press.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. & Valverde, M. (2004) Pleasure, freedom, and drugs: The uses of “pleasure” in liberal governance of drug and alcohol consumption. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association 38(1):25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts-Taylor, V. (2010) The plastic brain: Neoliberalism and the neuronal self. Health 14(6):635–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. (2008) Drugging the poor: Legal and illegal drugs and social inequality. Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Valverde, M. (1998) Disease of the will: Alcohol and the dilemma of freedom. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Windle, M. (2010) A multilevel developmental contextual approach to substance use and addiction. BioSocieties 5:124–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, I. M. (2001) Equality of whom? Social groups and judgments of injustice. The Journal of Political Philosophy 9(1):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar