Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T00:27:28.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pragmatic interpretation and the production of ideographic codes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2023

Leda Berio
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie II, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum, Germany Leda.Berio@rub.de; ledaberio.com
Berke Can
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Berke.Can@warwick.ac.uk Richard.Moore@warwick.ac.uk; https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/people/summaries/moore/ Giulia.Palazzolo.1@warwick.ac.uk; https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/people/palazzolo
Katharina Helming
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Katharina.Helming@warwick.ac.uk; https://sites.google.com/site/katharinaahelming/home
Giulia Palazzolo
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Berke.Can@warwick.ac.uk Richard.Moore@warwick.ac.uk; https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/people/summaries/moore/ Giulia.Palazzolo.1@warwick.ac.uk; https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/people/palazzolo Department of Letters and Modern Cultures, University La Sapienza, Rome
Richard Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Berke.Can@warwick.ac.uk Richard.Moore@warwick.ac.uk; https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/people/summaries/moore/ Giulia.Palazzolo.1@warwick.ac.uk; https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/philosophy/people/palazzolo

Abstract

We argue that the problem of ideographic codes stems from neither learnability nor standardization, but from a general issue of pragmatic interpretation. As ideographic codes increase in expressive power, in order to reduce ambiguity, they must become more detailed – such that production becomes more cumbersome, and requires greater artistry on the part of users, limiting their capacity for growth.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to the authorship of this commentary.

References

Moore, R. (2021). The cultural evolution of mind-modelling. Synthese, 199(1), 17511776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (2015). Evolutionary syntax. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar