No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A forerunner of Darwin in the service of nihilists: the translation and reception of Vestiges in Russia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2023
Abstract
Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation by Robert Chambers, a Scottish publisher and popular writer, was one of the most influential evolutionary works in the pre-Darwinian age. This article examines the circumstances in which this treatise was published in Russia in 1863 and went through a second printing in 1868. Vestiges was translated into Russian by Alexander Palkhovsky (1831–1907), a former medical student, ideologically close to the nihilist movement, and was initially printed by the radical publisher Anatoly Cherenin, later prosecuted for his ties with revolutionary circles. Vestiges was translated not from the English original, but from a German translation by Karl Vogt. Given the popularity of German materialism among Russian radicals in the 1860s, association with Vogt's name did much to draw attention to the translation. Contrary to Vogt, who took an anti-evolutionary stance while translating Vestiges, Palkhovsky and other nihilists ardently supported evolution in the hope that it would help them combat religious belief. Praising the author of Vestiges for his evolutionary views, Russian radicals at the same time criticized him for numerous references to God, teleological thinking and blindness to social problems. In their attempts to put Vestiges into service, Russian nihilists were similar to English freethinkers of the 1840s. The study of how Vestiges was read and perceived in Russia provides a better understanding of the cross-cultural reception of evolutionary ideas on the eve of Darwin's Origin of Species.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Society for the History of Science
References
1 Secord, James A., Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception and Secret Authorship of the Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2000Google Scholar. As Secord points out (op. cit., p. 39), ‘Vestiges was the one book that all readers of the Origin of Species were assumed to have read’.
2 Millhauser, Milton, Just before Darwin: Robert Chambers and “Vestiges”, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1959, pp. 5–6Google Scholar.
3 Schwartz, Joel S., ‘Darwin, Wallace, and Huxley, and “Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation”’, Journal of the History of Biology (1990) 23, pp. 127–53, 132Google Scholar.
4 Cited in Schwartz, op. cit. (3), p. 136.
5 Secord, op. cit. (1), p. 526.
6 Podani, János and Morrison, David A., ‘A concise bibliography and iconography of Vestiges, including an overlooked use of the tree icon’, Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology (2018) 23, pp. 55–79Google Scholar.
7 Rupke, Nicolaas, ‘Translation studies in the history of science: the example of Vestiges’, BJHS (2000) 33, pp. 209–22Google Scholar.
8 Morlotti, Silvia, ‘Non rivoluzioni, ma evoluzioni: Francesco Majocchi, le scienze naturali e il progresso civile’, Storia in Lombardia (2010) 35, pp. 5–35Google Scholar.
9 Rupke, op. cit. (7).
10 Katalin Straner, ‘Science, translation and the public: the Hungarian reception of Darwinism, 1858–1875’, PhD thesis, Budapest, 2012, pp. 80–112.
11 Kozo-Polyansky., Boris M. ‘A.M. Palkhovsky: zabytyy darvinist-shestidesyatnik’ (A.M. Palkhovsky: the forgotten Darwinist of the sixties), Priroda (1951) 5, pp. 73–77Google Scholar. Rupke, op. cit. (7), p. 212, claimed that ‘the book was not translated into French, Italian, Spanish, Russian or Swedish’, while in fact Italian and Russian translations of Vestiges do exist.
12 [Robert Chambers], Estestvennaja istorija mirozdanija (The Natural History of the Universe), tr. Alexander Palkhovsky, Moscow: Cherenin A., Ushakov A., 1863, p. 337.
13 The Central State Archive of the City of Moscow: Fond 2125, Opis 3, Delo 7, p. 140.
14 The Central State Archive of the City of Moscow, Fond 418, Opis 21, Delo 381; Fond 418, Opis 274, Delo 70; Fond 418, Opis 275, Delo 28.
15 Frederick Gregory, Scientific Materialism in Nineteenth Century Germany, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1977.
16 Alexander Palkhovsky, ‘Eshche raz o zhenskom trude: po povodu zhurnalnykh tolkov ob etom voprose’ (Once more on the woman labor: with regard to the discussion on this issue in the journals), Ateney (1858) 5–6, pp. 487–503, 490.
17 Palkhovsky, op. cit. (16).
18 Palkhovsky in Amédée Guillemin, Miry populjarnaya astronomiya (The Worlds: Popular Astronomy), tr. Alexander Palkhovsky, Moscow: Grachev, 1866, p. 13.
19 Christopher Becker, ‘Raznochintsy: the development of the word and of the concept’, American Slavic and East European Review,1959, pp. 63–74.
20 Kristian Petrov, ‘“Strike out, right and left!” a conceptual-historical analysis of 1860s Russian nihilism and its notion of negation’, Studies in East European Thought (2019) 71, pp. 73–97.
21 Feodor Kuznetsov, Publitsisty 1860-kh godov: krug ‘Russkogo slova’ (Journal Authors of the 1860s: The Circle of the ‘Russian Word’), Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya, 1981, p. 188.
22 Alexander Palkhovsky, ‘O knigakh po estestvennym naukam za proshliy i nyneshniy god’ (Review of the natural-science books of this and past years), Knizhnik (1865) 2, pp. 115–25, 119.
23 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. xiii.
24 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 293.
25 I.E. Barenbaum and E. Barykin Vladimir, ‘Revoliutsionno-demokraticheskie i progressivnye izdatelstva, tipografii i knizhnye magaziny v 1850–1870-kh gg.’ (Revolutionary, democratic and progressive publishing houses, printing offices and bookshops during the 1850s–1870s), in Irina I. Frolova (ed.), Kniga v Rossii: 1861–1881 (The Book in Russia: 1861–1881), Moscow: Kniga, 1988, pp. 86–155.
26 Fedor M. Reshetnikov, Yunosheskie proizvedeniia. Otryvki iz dnevnika. Pisma. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy (Early Works. Excerpts from the Diary. Letters. Complete Works), vol. 6, Sverdlovsk: OGIZ, 1948, p. 275.
27 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 317.
28 Quoted in Gregory, op. cit. (15), p. 113.
29 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. xii.
30 [Robert Chambers] Vestiges of Natural History of Creation, London: John Churchhill, 1847, p. 239.
31 [Eygeny N. Edelson], ‘Estestvennaja istorija mirozdanija’ (The natural history of the universe), Biblioteka dlya chteniya (1863), 10, pp. 56–61, 61.
32 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 295.
33 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 296.
34 [V. Zaytsev] ‘Estestvennaja istorija mirozdanija’ (The natural history of the universe), Russkoe slovo (1863) 5, pp. 62–74, 73.
35 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 334.
36 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 334.
37 Unknown author, ‘Putevye vpechatleniya Ivana Dobronravova’ (Travel impressions of Ivan Dobronravov), Iskra (1866) 30, pp. 395–400.
38 Baden Powell, Essays on the Spirit of the Inductive Philosophy, the Unity of Worlds and the Philosophy of Creation, London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1855, p. 484; William B. Carpenter, Nature and Man: Essays Scientific and Philosophical, New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1889, p. 413; Schwartz, op. cit. (3).
39 [Chambers], op. cit. (30), p. 272.
40 [Chambers], op. cit. (30), p. 273.
41 [Robert Chambers] Natürliche Geschichte der Schöpfung des Weltalls, der Erde und der auf ihr befindlichen Organismen, begründet auf die durch die Wissenschaft errungenen Thatsachen, tr. Karl Vogt, Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 1858, p. 240.
42 Podani and Morrison, op. cit. (6), p. 60, incorrectly state that ‘Palhovsky used the 1858 German edition printed in Braunschweig, including all of the footnotes and comments added by Vogt’ (italics mine). See anti-religious footnotes by Vogt dropped from the Russian edition of Vestiges in [Chambers], op. cit. (41), pp. 10, 140, 144, 240, 260, 261 and 276.
43 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 141.
44 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 142.
45 [Zaytsev], op. cit. (34), p. 66.
46 Vogt in [Chambers], op. cit. (41), p. 276.
47 Victor D. Kudriavtsev-Platonov (1883), O proiskhozhdenii organicheskikh sushchestv (On the origin of organic species). Moscow: Lavrov M.N. and Сo., 1883, p. 89.
48 Secord, op. cit. (1), p. 314.
49 Nicolaas Rupke, ‘Neither creation nor evolution: the third way in mid-nineteenth century thinking about the origin of species’, Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology (2005) 10, p. 143–172.
50 Vogt in [Chambers], op. cit. (41), p. 138.
51 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 170.
52 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. xii.
53 [Zaytsev], op. cit. (34), p. 72.
54 [Edelson], op. cit. (31), p. 59.
55 Alexander Palkhovsky, ‘Ozon’ (Ozone), Obshchezanimatelny Vestnik (1858) 11, pp. 510–17, 512.
56 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 136.
57 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 365.
58 Palkhovsky in [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 365.
59 Dmitry Pisarev, ‘Podvigi evropeyskikh avtoritetov’ (Feats of the European authoritative scientists), Russkoe slovo (1865) 6, pp. 165–86. The Russian radicals were by no means alone in bringing politics into the issue of spontaneous generation. Pasteur himself viewed his experiments aimed at disproving spontaneous generation and abiogenesis as a means to buttress Catholic religion and the conservative agenda of the Second Empire. See John Farley, ‘The social, political, and religious background to the work of Louis Pasteur’, Annual Review of Microbiology (1978) 32, pp. 143–54; Gerald L. Geison, The Private Science of Louis Pasteur, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 121–42.
60 Iosif E. Barenbaum, ‘A.F. Cherenin i ego zhurnal “Knizhnik” (k istorii demokraticheskogo knizhnogo dela vtoroĭ poloviny XIX veka)’ (A.F. Cherenin and his journal “Booklover” (to the history of democratic publishing business of the second half of the 19th century)), Kniga: Issledovaniia i materialy (1969) 19, pp. 94–113.
61 Claudia Verhoeven, The Odd Man Karakozov: Imperial Russia, Modernity, and the Birth of Terrorism, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2009.
62 Lydia D. Polinovskaya, ‘A.F. Cherenin (1826–1892) i ego knigoprodavcheskaya i izdatelskaya deyatelnost’ (A.F. Cherenin (1826–1892) and his bookselling and publishing business), PhD thesis, Moscow, 1989.
63 [Chambers], op. cit. (12), p. 156.
64 The following books appeared in Palkhovsky's translation after the publication of the Russian edition of Vestiges: Les mondes by Amédée Guillemin (1866), Le sommeil et les rêves by Louis Maury (1867) and Aus Amerika by Rudolf Dulon (1868).
65 The Central State Archive of the City of Moscow, Fond 78, Opis 12, Delo 240.
66 Lurie, Felix M., Nechaev: Sozidatel razrusheniia (Nechaev: Creator of Destruction), Moscow: Molodaya Gvardiya, 2001, p. 39Google Scholar.
67 The Central State Archive of the City of Moscow, Fond 203, Opis 780, Delo 3530, p. 241.
68 Adrian Desmond, The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine, and Reform in Radical London, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.
69 Secord, op. cit. (1), pp. 310–16.
70 Secord, op. cit. (1), p. 314.
71 Chilton, William, ‘“Materialism” and the author of “Vestiges”’, The Reasoner (1846) 1, pp. 7–8, 7Google Scholar.
72 Rogers, James A., ‘Russia: social sciences’, in Glick, Thomas F. (ed.), The Comparative Reception of Darwinism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988, pp. 256–68Google Scholar.