Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T01:13:36.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Reece's Proportional-Loss Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Brian Moores
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent publication Reece proposes to substitute for the ‘swing’ method what he labels a proportional-loss model. Although his argument against the logic of the swing method is perfectly valid, this short Note will demonstrate that what he offers as a substitute is just as unsound intellectually.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 379 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Reece, G., Voter Representation: A Study of the British Electoral System and Its Consequences (London: Conservative Action for Electoral Reform, 1985).Google Scholar