Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T23:42:27.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Signaling the credibility of private actors as public agents: transparency, independence, and expertise in environmental evaluations of products and companies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

Private firms are increasingly being regarded as moral agents of their stakeholders and the broader public. Stakeholders can use different types of evaluation organizations to monitor this division of moral labor, but must also monitor the credibility of this second layer of moral agents. This paper uses agency, signaling, and legitimacy theory to develop a novel conceptual framework showing how both firms and evaluation organizations send signals of their credibility as moral agents to earn grants of legitimacy from their moral stakeholders. The paper also describes how three specific characteristics of ratings and certifications – transparency, expertise, and independence – may signal different forms of credibility, appeal to particular stakeholder groups, and elicit different forms of legitimacy. A content analysis of the websites of 245 eco-labels, sustainability ratings and other forms of environmental evaluations reveals the multi-dimensional nature of these three characteristics, and finds that transparency is the most commonly-sent signal of credibility, followed by independence and then expertise. These results highlight the complexity of existing signals of credibility, and suggest several strategies – including voluntary credibility standards and a virtual information marketplace – that both private and public actors can pursue to improve the quality and accessibility of these signals of credibility.

Type
Research articles
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2015 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Carol A. 2004. “The Ethical, Social and Environmental Reporting-Performance Portrayal Gap.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 17 (5): 731757.Google Scholar
Adams, Carol A., Hill, Wan-Ying, and Roberts, Clare B. 1998. “Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour?The British Accounting Review 30 (1): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alagona, Peter. 2008. “Credibility.” Conservation Biology 22 (6): 13651367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auld, Graeme, and Gulbrandsen, Lars H. 2010. “Transparency in Nonstate Certification: Consequences for Accountability and Legitimacy.” Global Environmental Politics 10 (3): 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit, and Solomon, Barry D. 2003. “Eco-Labeling for Energy Efficiency and Sustainability: A Meta-Evaluation of US Programs.” Energy Policy 31 (2): 109123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, Pratima, and Roth, Kendall. 2000. “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” The Academy of Management Journal 43 (4): 717736.Google Scholar
Baur, Dorothea, and Palazzo, Guido. 2011. “The Moral Legitimacy of NGOs as Partners of Corporations.” Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (4): 579604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, Vivien, McInnes, Bill, and Fearnley, Stella. 2004. “A Methodology for Analysing and Evaluating Narratives in Annual Reports: A Comprehensive Descriptive Profile and Metrics for Disclosure Quality Attributes.” Accounting Forum 28 (3): 205236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. Cornelia, Campbell, David, Shrives, and Philip J. 2010. “Content Analysis in Environmental Reporting Research: Enrichment and Rehearsal of the Method in a British–German Context.” The British Accounting Review 42 (3): 207222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlo, David K., Lemert, James B., and Mertz, Robert J. 1969. “Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources.” Public Opinion Quarterly 33 (4): 563576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Julia. 2008. “Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes.” Regulation and Governance 2 (2): 137164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, Allen, and Naranjo, Maria A. 2012. “Does Eco-Certification Have Environmental Benefits? Organic Coffee in Costa Rica.” Ecological Economics 83: 5866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, Olivier. 2013. “Sustainability Reports as Simulacra? A Counter-Account of A and A+ GRI Reports.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 26 (7): 10361071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, Olivier, and Gendron, Yves. 2011. “Sustainable Development and Certification Practices: Lessons Learned and Prospects.” Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (5): 331347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boström, Magnus. 2006. “Establishing Credibility: Practising Standard-Setting Ideals in a Swedish Seafood-Labelling Case.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 8 (2): 135158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhr, Nola. 1998. “Environmental Performance, Legislation and Annual Report Disclosure: The Case of Acid Rain and Falconbridge.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 11 (2): 163190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Graham. 2011. “Green Grades: The Popularity and Perceived Effectiveness of Information-Based Environmental Governance Strategies.” PhD Diss., Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bullock, Graham. 2015. “Independent Labels? The Power behind Environmental Information about Products and Companies.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (1): 4662.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Cam, Karri, Ranjan, and Vollmar, Pamela. 2006. “Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the Follower's Perspective.” Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2/3): 207223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, David, Clark, William, Alcock, Frank, Dickson, Nancy, Eckley, Noelle, and Jäger, Jill. 2002. “Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making.” In John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP02-046. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School of Government.Google Scholar
Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. “Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority.” Governance 15 (4): 503529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, Michelene T.H., Glaser, Robert, and Farr, Marshall J., eds. 1988. The Nature of Expertise. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Charles H., Guidry, Ronald P., Hageman, Amy M., and Patten, Dennis M. 2012. “Do Actions Speak Louder than Words? An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Environmental Reputation.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 37 (1): 1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Communications, Cone. 2012. 2012 Cone Green Gap Trend Tracker. Accessed August 25, 2013. <http://www.conecomm.com/2012-cone-green-gap-trend-tracker>..>Google Scholar
Costa, Sandine, Ibanez, Lisette, Loureiro, Maria L., and Marette, Stéphan. 2009. “Quality Promotion through Eco-Labeling: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 7 (2): 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Credibility.” 2014. Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster. Accessed April 1, 2010. <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/credibility>..>Google Scholar
Dando, Nicole, and Swift, Tracey. 2003. “Transparency and Assurance: Minding the Credibility Gap.” Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2/3): 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, Michael R., and Karni, Edi. 1973. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud.” The Journal of Law and Economics 16 (1): 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan, Craig. 2002. “The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15 (3): 282311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman. 2013. 2013 “Edelman Trust Barometer Finds a Crisis in Leadership.” Edelman. Accessed January 19, 2015. <http://www.edelman.com/trust-downloads/press-release/>..>Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Smith, Jacqui, eds. 1991. Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farneti, Federica, and Guthrie, James. 2009. “Sustainability Reporting by Australian Public Sector Organisations: Why They Report.” Accounting Forum 33 (2): 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fifka, Matthias S., and Drabble, Maria. 2012. “Focus and Standardization of Sustainability Reporting – A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Finland.” Business Strategy and the Environment 21 (7): 455474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, B. J., and Tseng, H. 1999. “The Elements of Computer Credibility.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI Is the Limit.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1970. “The Social Responsibility Of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” The New York Times, September 13.Google Scholar
Friedman, Monroe. 1999. Consumer Boycotts: Effecting Change through the Marketplace and the Media. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frost, Geoffrey R. 2007. “The Introduction of Mandatory Environmental Reporting Guidelines: Australian Evidence.” Abacus 43 (2): 190216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2013. “Infotopia: Unleashing the Democratic Power of Transparency.” Politics and Society 41 (2): 183212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Archon, Graham, Mary, and Weil, David. 2007. Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gereffi, Gary, Garcia-Johnson, Ronie, and Sasser, Erika. 2001. “The NGO-Industrial Complex.” Foreign Policy (125): 5665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, E. James, M. 2010. “Effective Shareholder Engagement: The Factors That Contribute to Shareholder Salience.” Journal of Business Ethics 92: 7997.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Dirk Ulrich, and Rasche, Andreas. 2008. “Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives – A Stakeholder Theory Perspective.” Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3): 755773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Mary. 2002. Democracy by Disclosure: The Rise of Technopopulism. Washington, DC: Governance Institute/Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Rob, Kouhy, Reza, and Lavers, Simon. 1995. “Methodological Themes: Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK Companies.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 (2): 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James T. 2005. Regulation through Revelation: The Origin, Politics, and Impacts of the Toxics Release Inventory Program. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, David. 2007. “Social Reporting and New Governance Regulation: The Prospects of Achieving Corporate Accountability through Transparency.” Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3): 453476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickle, Garth. 2007. “Promoting Product Stewardship with Eco-Labels, Certification Programs, and Product Standards.” Environmental Quality Management 16 (3): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, Carl I., Janis, Irving L., and Kelley, Harold H. 1953. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ilchman, Warren Frederick, and Uphoff, Norman Thomas. 1969. The Political Economy of Change. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “(No?) Accounting for Expertise.” Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 157162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, Anita, and Lee, Shang-Mei. 2007. “Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures.” Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4): 307321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesel, Kristin, and Villas-Boas, Sofia B. 2007. “Got Organic Milk? Consumer Valuations of Milk Labels after the Implementation of the USDA Organic Seal.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 5 (1): 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppell, Jonathan G.S. 2005. “Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of ‘Multiple Accountabilities Disorder.’Public Administration Review 65 (1): 94108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2012. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce. 1969. “The Analytic-Synthetic and the Descriptive-Evaluative Distinctions.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (2): 9199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. Richard, and Koch, Gary G. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddick, Don. 2006. Eco-Terrorism: Radical Environmental and Animal Liberation Movements. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Lin, J. 2012. “Governing Biofuels: A Principal-Agent Analysis of the European Union Biofuels Certification Regime and the Clean Development Mechanism.” Journal of Environmental Law 24 (1): 4373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, M. Victoria, Garcia, Arminda, and Rodriguez, Lazaro. 2007. “Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index.” Journal of Business Ethics 75 (3): 285300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludescher, Jessica Christie, Mahsud, Rubiná, and Prussia, Gregory E. 2012. “We Are the Corporation: Dispersive CSR.” Business and Society Review 117 (1): 5588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkinen, Jukka, and Kourula, Arno. 2012. “Pluralism in Political Corporate Social Responsibility.” Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (4): 649678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2005. “Accountability in Accounting? The Politics of Private Rule-Making in the Public Interest.” Governance 18 (3): 399429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maury, Mary D. 2000. “A Circle of Influence: Are All the Stakeholders Included?Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1): 117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165179.Google Scholar
McKnight, D. Harrison, Choudhury, Vivek, and Kacmar, Charles. 2002. “The Impact of Initial Consumer Trust on Intentions to Transact with a Web Site: A Trust Building Model.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (3–4): 297323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mena, Sébastien, and Palazzo, Guido. 2012. “Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives.” Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3): 527556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Molly. 2004. “How Do Investors Assess the Credibility of Management Disclosures?Accounting Horizons 18 (3): 185196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, Markus J., Walton, Sara, and Tregidga, Helen. 2009. “Words Not Actions! The Ideological Role of Sustainable Development Reporting.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 22 (8): 12111257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadaï, Alain. 1999. “Conditions for the Development of a Product Ecolabel.” European Environment: The Journal of European Environmental Policy (Wiley) 9 (5): 202211.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Phillip. 1970. “Information and Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 78 (2): 311329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, Helen, Tunçer, Burcu, and Thidell, Åke. 2004. “The Use of Eco-Labeling like Initiatives on Food Products to Promote Quality Assurance-Is There Enough Credibility?Journal of Cleaner Production 12 (5): 517526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter-Morland, Mollie. 2007. “Defining Accountability in a Network Society.” Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (3): 515534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parguel, Béatrice, Benoît-Moreau, Florence, and Larceneux, Fabrice. 2011. “How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter ‘Greenwashing’: A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication.” Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1): 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Dennis M. 1992. “Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (5): 471475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulraj, Antony. 2009. “Environmental Motivations: A Classification Scheme and Its Impact on Environmental Strategies and Practices.” Business Strategy and the Environment (John Wiley and Sons Inc) 18 (7): 453468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, Matthew, and Prakash, Aseem. 2004. “The Regulation Dilemma: Cooperation and Conflict in Environmental Governance.” Public Administration Review 64 (2): 152163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, Matthew, and Prakash, Aseem. 2009. Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Potoski, Matthew. 2006. The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Regulations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynolds, Laura T., Murray, Douglas, and Heller, Andrew. 2007. “Regulating Sustainability in the Coffee Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Third-Party Environmental and Social Certification Initiatives.” Agriculture and Human Values 24 (2): 147163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynolds, Laura T., Long, Michael A., and Murray, Douglas L. 2014. “Regulating Corporate Responsibility in the American Market: A Comparative Analysis of Voluntary Certifications.” Competition and Change 18 (2): 91110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Robin. 1992. “Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (6): 595612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, Brian, and Sheldon, Ian. 2007. “Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (4): 10201033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romzek, Barbara S., and Ingraham, Patricia Wallace. 2000. “Cross Pressures of Accountability: Initiative, Command, and Failure in the Ron Brown Plane Crash.” Public Administration Review 60 (3): 240253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondinelli, Dennis, and Vastag, Gyula. 2000. “Panacea, Common Sense, or Just a Label?: The Value of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems.” European Management Journal 18 (5): 499510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Tim, and Berman, Shawn. 2000. “A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance.” Business and Society 39 (4): 397418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadowski, Michael, Whitaker, Kyle, and Buckingham, Frances. 2010. “Rate the Raters Phase Two: Taking Inventory of the Ratings Universe.” SustainAbility. Accessed 5 December 2010. <www.sustainability.com/library/rate-the-raters-phase-two>.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. “Economic Integration, Democracy and the Welfare State.” Journal of European Public Policy 4 (1): 1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1995. “Cordelia's Love: Credibility and the Social Studies of Science.” Perspectives on Science 3 (3): 255275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, Julius, and Wright, Chris C. 2005. “The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements.” Physical Therapy 85 (3): 257268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, N. Craig, Palazzo, Guido, and Bhattacharya, C. B. 2010. “Marketing's Consequences: Stakeholder Marketing and Supply Chain Corporate Social Responsibility Issues.” Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (4): 617641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starobin, Shana, and Weinthal, Erika. 2010. “The Search for Credible Information in Social and Environmental Global Governance: The Kosher Label.” Business and Politics 12 (3): 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sustainable Commodity Initiative. 2010. “The State of Sustainability Initiatives: A Window into the World of Voluntary Sustainability Initiatives.” Accessed December 2, 2010. <http://sustainablecommodities.org/ssi/update1>..>Google Scholar
Turban, Daniel B., and Cable, Daniel M. 2003. “Firm Reputation and Applicant Pool Characteristics.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (6): 733751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission. 2010. Proposed Revisions to the Green Guides. Available from: <http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-10-15/html/2010-25000.htm> Accessed December 5, 2010.+Accessed+December+5,+2010.>Google Scholar
U.S. Green Building Council. Distinguishing Your Expertise. Accessed April 27, 2014. <http://www.usgbc.org/leed/credentials>..>Google Scholar
Environment, UL and Group, Shelton. 2014. “Claiming Green: The Influence of Green Product Claims on Purchase Intent and Brand Perception.” Available from: <http://environment.ul.com/claiminggreen/> Accessed December 20, 2014.+Accessed+December+20,+2014.>Google Scholar
Uphoff, Norman. 1989. “Distinguishing Power, Authority & Legitimacy: Taking Max Weber at His Word by Using Resources-Exchange Analysis.” Polity 22 (2): 295322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potentials and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Cynthia A. 1999. “The Securities and Exchange Commission and Corporate Social Transparency.” Harvard Law Review 112 (6): 11971311.Google Scholar
Wood, Dorothy, and Ross, Donald G. 2006. “Environmental Social Controls and Capital Investments: Australian Evidence.” Accounting and Finance 46 (4): 677695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Resources Institute and Big Room. 2010. “Global Ecolabel Monitor.” Accessed December 1, 2010. <http://www.wri.org/publication/global-ecolabel-monitor>..>Google Scholar