Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T15:46:58.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slip Sliding Away? The Changing Politics of European Car Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Yusaf Akbar
Yusaf Akbar*
Affiliation:
College of Business, Southern New Hampshire University
*
*Associate Professor of International Business, College of Business, Webster Hall, Southern New Hampshire University, 2500 North River Road, Manchester, NH 03105, USA. Tel: +1-603-668-2211; Fax: +1-603-644-3150; E-mail: y.akbar@snhu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the development of EU regulations in the car distribution sector. In the span of approximately fifteen years, the sector has shifted from being regarded by its critics as being one of the most protected havens of European industry to one faced with open competition. The paper claims that the inability of the car industry to resist liberalization in this sector is related to several factors. First, there was declining support from member states for their national producers, in part explained by global shifts in ownership and production which rendered concepts of “national producer” problematic. Second, technological changes combined with the impact of globalization on in the industry undermined the case for a link between sales and service of cars. Third, DG competition, led by Mario Monti, wished to push through the ability of consumers to make cross-border purchases of cars. Fourth, a more general logic embedded in the Single European Market programme (SEM) had led to several decisions to prosecute EU car producers for infringing SEM rules and thereby undermining the ability of EU member states to protect their “national producers.” This has implications more broadly: will increasing globalization of industrial ownership further undermine the state-firm nexus in the EU, thus reducing the propensity of national industries to resist liberalization? In this context, will member states be prepared to give the EU Commission a freer hand in forcing through liberalization in the remaining sectors that remain problematic?

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 2003 , pp. 175 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2003 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cawson. 1995. ‘High Definition Television in Europe.’ Political Quarterly 66 (2): 157–173.Google Scholar
Cawson. 1997. ‘Big Firms as Political Actors: Corporate Power and the Governance of the European Consumer Electronics Industry.’ In Participation and Policy Making in the European Union, edited by Wallace, H. and Young, Alasdair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coen, D. 1997. ‘Evolution of the Large Firm as a Political Actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (1): 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, T. and Holmes, P. 1997. ‘Self Restraint: Cars, Complaints and the Commission.’ European Public Law 1 (1): 85–95.Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. 2001. Representing Interests in the European Union. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Green Cowles, M. 1997. ‘Organizing Industrial Coalitions: a Challenge for the Future?’ In Participation and Policy Making in the European Union, edited by Wallace, H. and Young, Alasdair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Groves, P. J. 1995. ‘Whatevershebringswesing: DGIV rebukes the Car Industry.’ European Competition Law Review 16 (2): 98–103.Google Scholar
Hayes-Renshaw, F. and Wallace, Helen. 1997. The Council of Ministers. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P. and Smith, A. 1995. ‘Trade, Competition and Industrial Policy for Cars: Conflicts of Aims and Instruments.’ In The Coherence of European Policies Towards Trade, Competition and Industry, edited by Buiges, P., Jacquemin, A., Sapir, and A. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kohler-Koch, B. 1997. ‘Organized Interests in European Integration: the Evolution of a New Type of Government?’ In Participation and Policy Making in the European Union, edited by Wallace, H. and Young, Alasdair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A. and Mavroidis, P. C. 1995. ‘The EC-Japan Consensus on Cars: Trade and Antitrust Trade-Offs.’ The World Economy May, 345–365.Google Scholar
Middlemas, K. 1995. Orchestrating Europe: The Informal Politics of the European Union 1973–1995. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Milner, H. 1988. Resisting Protectionism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazey, S. and eds, Jeremy Richardson. 1998. Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazey, S. and Richardson, Jeremy. 2001. ‘Institutionalizing Promiscuity: Commission/Interest Group Relations in the EU.’ In The Institutionalization of Europe, edited by Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W., and Fligstein, Neil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meunier, S. 2000. What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-US Trade Negotiations. International Organization 54 (1): 103–135.Google Scholar
Moravscik, A. 1999. ‘A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation.’ International Organization, 53 (2): 267–306.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. and Caporoso, James A. 1998. ‘From Free Trade to Supranational Polity: The European Court and Integration.’ In European Integration and Supranational Governance, edited by Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, Alec. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, Alec. eds. 1998. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W. and Zysman, John. 1989. ‘Recasting the European Bargain.’ World Politics 42 (1): 95–128.Google Scholar
Telser, L. 1960. ‘Why Should Manufacturers Want Fair Trade?’ Journal of Law and Economics 3: 86–105.Google Scholar
Tsoukalis, L. 1997. The New European Economy Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. and eds, Alasdair Young. 1997. Participation and Policy Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar