Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:03:29.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

PHENOLOGY OF FALL DISPERSAL BY WINTERFORM PEAR PSYLLA (HOMOPTERA: PSYLLIDAE) IN RELATION TO LEAF FALL AND WEATHER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

David R. Horton ,
Everett C. Burts ,
Thomas R. Unruh ,
James L. Krysan ,
Leonard B. Coop  and
Brian A. Croft
David R. Horton
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 3706 West Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, Washington, USA 98902
Everett C. Burts
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 3706 West Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, Washington, USA 98902
Thomas R. Unruh
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 3706 West Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, Washington, USA 98902
James L. Krysan
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 3706 West Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, Washington, USA 98902
Leonard B. Coop
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 3706 West Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, Washington, USA 98902
Brian A. Croft
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, 3706 West Nob Hill Boulevard, Yakima, Washington, USA 98902
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phenology of fall dispersal into apple orchards is described for winterform pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola Foerster, in orchards located in Yakima and Wenatchee, Washington. Psylla in both regions first appeared on pear in mid to late September, reaching peak densities in late October or early to mid November, and then decreased in numbers to a low in December. Movement onto apple began in October; peak counts on apple occurred in late November to early December. There was considerable variation among years in phenology of leaf fall in pear and numbers of psylla entering apple. Leaf fall in pear was delayed in a cool, wet fall (1991) compared with warmer and drier years (1990 and 1992), and temperatures during leaf fall were consequently lower in 1991. Numbers of psylla moving onto apple were considerably lower in 1991 than 1990 or 1992. Catch on sticky traps and dispersal rates onto apple were both positively correlated with rates of leaf fall in pear, temperature, and density of psylla on pear.

Résumé

La dispersion d’automne de la Psylle du poirier, Cacopsylla pyricola Foerster, dans les vergers de pommiers a été étudiée à Yakima et Wenatchee, Washington. Dans les deux régions, les psylles apparaissent d’abord dans les poiriers de la mi-septembre à la fin de septembre, puis leur nombre diminue jusqu’en décembre. Les psylles gagnent les pommiers en octobre et c’est à la fin de novembre et au début de décembre qu’elles y sont le plus abondantes. La phénologie de la chute des feuilles de poirier varie considérablement d’une année à l’autre et le nombre de psylles qui gagnent les pommiers également. Par exemple, la chute des feuilles de poirier a été beaucoup plus tardive en 1991, année où l’automne a été frais et humide, qu’en 1990 ou 1992 où l’automne a été plus chaud et plus sec; les températures durant la chute des feuilles étaient nécessairement aussi plus basses en 1991. Le nombre de psylles qui ont envahi les pommiers a été beaucoup plus faible en 1991 qu’en 1990 ou 1992. Les captures dans les pièges collants et les taux de dispersion dans les pommiers étaient en corrélation positive avec les taux de chute des feuilles des poiriers, avec la température et avec la densité des psylles sur les poiriers.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 111 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.G., Domeisen, C.H., and Ford, L.J.. 1983. Visual trap for monitoring pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) adults on pears. Environmental Entomology 12: 1327–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R.G., and Los, L.M.. 1989. Use of sticky traps and limb jarring to aid in pest management decisions for summer populations of the pear psylla (Homoptera; Psyllidae) in Connecticut. Journal of Economic Entomology 82: 1448–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burts, E.C. 1983. Effectiveness of a soft-pesticide program on pear pests. Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 936–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burts, E.C., and Retan, A.R.. 1973. Detection of Pear Psylla. Washington State University Extension Service Memorandum 3069: 2 pp.Google Scholar
Croft, B.A., Burts, E.C., van de Baan, H.E., Westigard, P.H., and Riedl, H.W.. 1989. Local and regional resistance to fenvalerate in Psylla pyricola (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in western North America. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, F.P. 1960. Migration of pear psylla. USDA-ARS, Deciduous Fruit Insects Investigations, Station Annual Report, Yakima, Washington 1960: 80.Google Scholar
Dean, F.P. 1962. Pear psylla migration studies. USDA-ARS, Deciduous Fruit Insects Investigations, Station Annual Report, Yakima, Washington 1962: 94–95.Google Scholar
Fye, R.E. 1983. Dispersal and winter survival of the pear psylla. Journal of Economic Entomology 76: 311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, C.J., and Mustafa, T.M.. 1984. The dispersal and flight activity of Psylla pyricola Foerster in southern England. Lutte intégrée contre les psylles du poirier. Bulletin SROP 7(5): 97–124.Google Scholar
Horton, D.R., Burts, E.C., Unruh, T.R., Krysan, J.L., Coop, L.B., and Croft, B.A.. 1993. Intraorchard changes in distribution of winterform pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) associated with leaf fall in pear. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, D.R., Higbee, B.S., Unruh, T.R., and Westigard, P.H.. 1992. Spatial characteristics and effects of fall density and weather on overwintering loss of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Environmental Entomology 21: 1319–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaloostian, G.H. 1907. Transitory hosts of the pear psylla. Journal of Economic Entomology 62: 1039–1041.Google Scholar
Krysan, J.L. 1990. Fenoxycarb and diapause: A possible method of control for pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krysan, J.L., and Horton, D.R.. 1991. Seasonality of catch of pear psylla Cacopsyllapyricola (Homoptera: Psyllidae) on yellow traps. Environmental Entomology 20: 626–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, G.N. 1970. Diapause and polymorphism in California populations of Psylla pyricola (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63: 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., and Owens, E.D.. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28: 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, A.H., and Suslow, K.G.. 1984. Surveys of leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in pear and peach orchards and the spread of peach yellow leaf roll disease. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 1489–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 6 Edition. Cary, NC. 1028 pp.Google Scholar
Unruh, T.R. 1990. Genetic structure among 18 west coast pear psylla populations: Implications for the evolution of resistance. American Entomologist 36: 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westigard, P.H., and Hilton, R.J.. 1990. Density and activity patterns of the overwintering form of the pear psylla in southern Oregon, 1978–1989. Proceedings of the Horticultural Society of Oregon 81: 80–87.Google Scholar
Westigard, P.H., and Zwick, R.W.. 1972. The pear psylla in Oregon. Oregon State University Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 122: 22 pp.Google Scholar