Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:35:50.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patients' Perceptions of Carpal Tunnel and Ulnar Nerve Decompression Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2014

Kathleen Joy Khu ,
Mark Bernstein  and
Rajiv Midha
Kathleen Joy Khu
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
Mark Bernstein
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rajiv Midha*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
*
Division of Neurosurgery, 1195-Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29 St. NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow are the most common entrapment neuropathies seen in adults. Surgery for nerve decompression is a safe and effective treatment option, and is usually performed under local anesthesia and as an outpatient procedure. This study aimed to explore patients' satisfaction and other aspects of the overall experience with this type of surgery.

Methods:

Qualitative research methodology was used. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 30 adult patients who had undergone carpal tunnel release or ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow 6-24 months prior. Interviews were digitally audio recorded and transcribed, and the data subjected to thematic analysis.

Results:

Four overarching themes emerged from the data: (1) most patients did not perceive their condition to be serious; (2) patients were satisfied with the overall surgical experience; (3) the outcome was more important to patients than the process; and (4) majority of patients had a realistic expectation of outcomes.

Conclusions:

Patients had a positive experience with carpal tunnel and ulnar nerve decompression surgery, although their level of satisfaction was dependent on the surgical outcome. Areas requiring improvement, specifically information about post-operative care and expectations of recovery, will be implemented in the future care of patients.

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , March 2011 , pp. 268 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2011

References

1Jerosch-Herold, C, Mason, R, Chojnowski, AJ.A qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of surgery in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther. 2008;21(1):54–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Martin, H.Patients’ health beliefs and adaptation to carpal tunnel syndrome based on duration of symptomatic presentation. J Hand Ther. 2007;20(1):29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3McCormick, CA, Rath, S, Patra, PN, Pereira, J, Wilkinson, M.A qualitative study of common functional problems experienced by people with complete ulnar nerve paralysis. Lepr Rev. 2008;79(2):154–61.Google Scholar
4Hewlett, SA.Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(4):877–9.Google Scholar
5Padua, L, Padua, R, Aprile, I, D’Amico, P, Tonali, P.Carpal tunnel syndrome: relationship between clinical and patient-oriented assessment. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2002;395:128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Khu, K, Doglietto, F, Radovanovic, I, et al.Patients’ perceptions of awake and outpatient craniotomy for brain tumor: a qualitative study. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(5):1056–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Strauss, A, Corbin, J.Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc.; 1990. p. 136.Google Scholar
8Clifford, W, Sharpe, H, Khu, K, Cusimano, M, Knifed, E, Bernstein, M.Gamma Knife patients’ experience: lessons learned from a qualitative study. J Neurooncol. 2009;92(3):387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Rozmovits, L, Khu, K, Osman, S, Gentili, F, Guha, A, Bernstein, M.Information gaps for patients requiring craniotomy for benign brain lesion: a qualitative study. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(2):241–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Levine, DW, Simmons, BP, Koris, MJ, et al.A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(11):1585–92.Google Scholar
11Chung, KC, Pillsbury, MS, Walters, MR, Hayward, RA.Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(4):575–87.Google Scholar
12Hudak, P, Amadio, PC, Bombardier, C.Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–8.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Mondelli, M, Padua, L, Giannini, F, Bibbo, G, Aprile, I, Rossi, S.A self-administered questionnaire of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurol Sci. 2006;27(6):402–11.Google Scholar
14O’Toole, RV, Castillo, RC, Pollak, AN, MacKenzie, EJ, Bosse, MJ, LEAP Study Group. Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower extremity injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(6):1206–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15O’Holleran, JD, Kocher, MS, Horan, MP, Briggs, KK, Hawkins, RJ.Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after rotator cuff surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(1):121–6.Google Scholar
16Kocher, MS, Steadman, JR, Briggs, KK, Zurakowski, D, Sterett, WI, Hawkins, RJ.Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(9):1560–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed