Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T12:27:53.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural and Molecular Compartmentation in the Cerebellum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Hawkes Richard*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary
Blyth Steven
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary
Chockkan Vijay
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary
Tano David
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary
Ji Zhongqi
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary
Mascher Christa
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary
*
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Most descriptions treat the cerebellum as a uniform structure, and the possibility of important regional heterogeneities in either chemistry or physiology is rarely considered. However, it is now clear that such an assumption is inappropriate. Instead, there is substantial evidence that the cerebellum is composed of hundreds of distinct modules, each with a precise pattern of inputs and outputs, and expressing a range of molecular signatures. By screening a monoclonal antibody library against cerebellar polypeptides we have identified antigens – zebrins – that reveal some of the cerebellum’s covert heterogeneity. This article reviews some of these findings, relates them to the patterns of afferent connectivity, and considers some possible mechanisms through which the modular organization may arise.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1993

References

REFERENCES

1.Shambes, GM, Beerman, DH, Welker, W.Multiple tactile area in cerebellar cortex: another patchy cutaneous projection to granule cell columns in rat. Brain Res 1978; 157: 123128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shambes, GM, Gibson, JM, Welker, W.Fractured somatotopy in granule cell tactile areas of rat cerebellar hemispheres revealed by micromapping. Brain Behav Evol 1978; 15: 94140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Hawkes, R, Colonnier, M, Leclerc, N.Monoclonal antibodies reveal sagittal banding in the rodent cerebellar cortex. Brain Res 1985; 333: 359365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Hawkes, R, Leclerc, N.Antigenic map of the rat cerebellar cortex: the distribution of parasagittal bands as revealed by monoclonal anti-Purkinje cell antibody mabQ 113. J Comp Neurol 1987; 256: 2941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Brochu, G, Maler, L, Hawkes, R.Zebrin II: a polypeptide antigen expressed selectively by Purkinje cells reveals compartments in rat and fish cerebellum. J Comp Neurol 1990; 291: 538552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Plioplys, AV, Hawkes, R.A survey of mabQ 113 immunoreactivity in the adult rat brain: differential staining of the lateral and medial habenular nuclei. Brain Res 1986; 375: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Doré, L, Jacobson, CD, Hawkes, R.The organization and postnatal development of zebrin II antigenic compartmentation in the cerebellar vermis of the grey opossum, Monodelphis domestica. J Comp Neurol 1990; 291: 431449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Lannoo, MJ, Brochu, G, Maler, L, et al.Zebrin II immunoreactivity in the rat and in the weakly electric teleost Eigenmannia (Gymnotiformes) reveals three modes of Purkinje cell development. J Comp Neurol 1991; 310: 215233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Plioplys, AV, Thibault, J, Hawkes, R.Selective staining of a subset of Purkinje cells in human cerebellum with monoclonal antibody mabQ 113. J Neurol Sci 1985; 70: 245256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Eisenman, LM, Hawkes, R.5’-nucleotidase and the mabQ 113 antigen share a common distribution in the cerebellar cortex of the mouse. Neuroscience 1990; 31: 231235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Boegman, R, Parent, A, Hawkes, RZonation in the rat cerebellar cortex: patches of high acetylcholinesterase activity in the granular layer are congruent with Purkinje cell compartments. Brain Res 1988; 448: 237251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Leclerc, N, Doré, L, Parent, A, Hawkes, R.The compartmentation of the monkey and rat cerebellar cortex: zebrin I and cytochrome oxidase. Brain Res 1990; 506: 7078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Ingram, VI, Ogren, MP, Chatot, CL, et al.Diversity among Purkinje cells in the monkey cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1985; 82: 71317135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Leclerc, N, Schwarting, G, Herrup, K, Hawkes, R, Yamamoto, M.Compartmentation in mammalian cerebellum: zebrin II and P-Path antibodies define three classes of sagittally organized bands of Purkinje cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1992; 89: 50065010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Eisenman, LM.Organization of the olivocerebellar projection to the uvula in the rat. Brain Behav Evol 1984; 24: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Gravel, C, Eisenman, LM, Sasseville, R, et al.Parasagittal organization of the rat cerebellar cortex: direct correlation between antigenie Purkinje cell bands revealed by mabQ 113 and the organization of the olivocerebellar projection. J Comp Neurol 1987; 265: 294310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Gravel, C, Hawkes, R.Parasagittal organization of the rat cerebellar cortex: direct comparison of Purkinje cell compartments and the organization of the spinocerebellar projection. J Comp Neurol 1990; 291: 79102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Hawkes, R, Leclerc, N.Purkinje cell axon collateral distributions reflect the chemical compartmentation of the rat cerebellar cortex. Brain Res 1989; 476: 279290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Wassef, M, Sotelo, C.Asynchrony in the expression of guanosine 3’:5’-phosphate-dependent protein kinase by clusters of Purkinje cells during the perinatal development of rat cerebellum. Neuroscience 1984; 13: 12171241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Wassef, M, Zanetta, JP, Brehier, A, et al.Transient biochemical compartmentalization of Purkinje cells during early cerebellar development. Dev Biol 1985; 111: 129137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Leclerc, N, Gravel, C, Hawkes, R.Development of parasagittal zonation in the rat cerebellar cortex: mabQ 113 antigenic bands are created postnatally by the suppression of antigen expression in a subset of Purkinje cells. J Comp Neurol 1988; 273: 399420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Sotelo, C.Cerebellar synaptogenesis and the organization of afferent projection maps. Pontificae Acad Scient Scripta Varia 1987; 59: 6590.Google Scholar
23.Sotelo, C, Bourrat, F, Triller, A.Postnatal development of the inferior olivary complex in the rat. II. Topographic organization of the immature olivocerebellar projection. J Comp Neurol 1984; 222:177199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Lannoo, MJ, Ross, L, Maler, L, et al.Development of the cerebellum and its extracerebellar Purkinje cell projection in teleost fishes as determined by zebrin II immunocytochemistry. Prog Neurobiol 1991; 37: 329363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Arsénio, Nunes ML, Sotelo, C.Development of the spinocerebellar system in the postnatal rat. J Comp Neurol 1985; 237: 291306.Google Scholar
26.Voogd, J.Comparative aspects of the structure and fibre connections of the mammalian cerebellum. Prog Brain Res 1967; 25: 94135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Voogd, J.The importance of fiber connections in the comparative anatomy of the mammalian cerebellum. In: Llinás, R, ed. Neurobiology of Cerebellar Evolution and Development. Chicago: Amer Med Assoc 1969; 493514.Google Scholar
28.Voogd, J, Gerrits, NM, Marani, E.Cerebellum. In: Paxinos, G, ed. The Rat Nervous System. New York: Academic Press 1985; (2) 251291.Google Scholar
29.Marani, E.Topographic enzyme histochemistry of the mammalian cerebellum: 5’-nucleotidase and acetylcholinesterase. Thesis, University of Leiden 1982.Google Scholar
30.Crepel, F.Maturation of climbing fiber responses in the rat. Brain Res 1971; 35: 272276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31.Crepel, F.Regression of functional synapses in the immature mammalian cerebellum. Trends Neurosci 1982; 5: 266269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Crepel, F, Mariani, J, Delhaye-Bouchard, N.Evidence for a multiple innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers in the immature rat cerebellum. J Neurobiol 1976; 7: 567578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Mariani, J, Changeux, J-P.Ontogenesis of olivocerebellar relation ships. I. Studies by intracellular recordings of the multiple innervation of Purkinje cells by climbing fibers in the developing rat cerebellum. J Neurosci 1981; 1: 696702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Puro, DG, Woodward, DJ.Maturation of evoked climbing fiber input to rat Purkinje cells. Exp Brain Res 1977; 28: 85110.Google Scholar
35.Wassef, M, Sotelo, C, Thomasset, M, et al.Expression of compartmentation antigen zebrin I in cerebellar transplants. J Comp Neurol 1990; 294: 223234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Oster-Granite, ML, Gearhart, J.Cell lineage analyses of Purkinje cells in murine chimeras. In: Palay, SL, Chan-Palay, V, eds. The Cerebellum. New Vistas. Berlin, Heidelberg; New York: Springer-Verlag 1982; 7592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Herrup, K, Leclerc, N, Drink water, D, et al.Purkinje cell lineage map is congruent to the antigenic map of zebrin II in the mouse cerebellum. 20th Annual Meeting, Neurosci Soc 1990; 16: 174.Google Scholar