Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T22:21:56.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bioethics Forum of Cardiology in the Young. Quo Vadis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2022

Constantine Mavroudis*
Affiliation:
Chief of Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery, Peyton Manning Children’s Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA Professor Emeritus of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Associate Editor for Ethics, Cardiology in the Young, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Congenital Heart Center, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA Editor-in-Chief, Cardiology in the Young, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Constantine Mavroudis, MD, Peyton Manning Children’s Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Cell: 312-952-9806. E-mail: constantinemavroudis@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Editorial Board of Cardiology in the Young has recently discussed the need for a Bioethics Forum and has given authorisation to proceed with its creation. Herein, we provide the organisational structure and launch process to introduce properly this interesting and timely endeavour. By this communication, we are establishing this Bioethics Forum of Cardiology in the Young. We hope to attract manuscripts concerning timely bioethical subjects and to offer the readership the opportunity to respond to these topics with supporting or opposing views as appropriate. New articles regarding timely topics will be written by the readership, as well as by invited authors, and these articles will be published. We hope to stimulate interactive discussion concerning the published manuscripts, and these manuscripts and the associated discussions will be open to all interested parties.

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Background

Quo Vadis?Reference Parenzan1

Bioethical controversies have been widely recognised in patients with congenital cardiac disease over the years.Reference Mavroudis, Cook and Mavroudis2Reference Mavroudis, Cook, Mavroudis, Mavroudis, Siegel and Jacobs4 These controversies include, but are not limited toReference Jacobs, Cerfolio and Sade5Reference Jacobs, O’Brien and Hil18:

These topics are highly controversial and have been debated in multiple domains, including but not limited to:

  • scientific meetings,

  • State Houses,

  • Multiple governmental organisations including the United States Congress,

  • Supreme Courts around the world,

  • the literature, and

  • private conversations.

The role of discussion, debate, and inquiry is to offer informed deliberation that can be processed by the readership and allow a venue for continued thought and debate.

The Editorial Board of Cardiology in the Young has recently discussed the need for a Bioethics Forum and has given authorisation to proceed with its creation. Herein, we provide the organisational structure and launch process to introduce properly this interesting and timely endeavour. By this communication, we are establishing this Bioethics Forum of Cardiology in the Young . We hope to attract manuscripts concerning timely bioethical subjects and to offer the readership the opportunity to respond to these topics with supporting or opposing views as appropriate. New articles regarding timely topics will be written by the readership, as well as by invited authors, and these articles will be published. We hope to stimulate interactive discussion concerning the published manuscripts, and these manuscripts and the associated discussions will be open to all interested parties. We also plan to have dialogues with established Societies to introduce a Bioethics Forum at their meetings, which could then be published in Cardiology in the Young .

So, what are the benefits of such an enterprise and how will success be judged?

Clearly, participation by the readership will be the ultimate marker of acceptance and academic value. Further, interesting pragmatic interchange of established ideas, development of new ideas, thoughtful debate of controversial issues, and increased interest in Cardiology in the Young will all extend our readership more broadly. It is anticipated that “Letters to the Editor” with give-and-take positions will serve as the method of debate and further inquiry. A new small group of Reviewers will be recruited to judge and edit the new manuscripts that will be submitted. Fortunately, many candidates exist, both in Surgery and Pediatric Cardiology, to fulfil this role.

So, what are the challenges?

The study of Bioethics is, by its nature, controversial. There are Pro sides and Con sides to almost every topic:

  • For instance, the topic of Abortion Rights is clearly in the news and has many opposing advocates.

  • Further, Medical Futility has been considered by State Legislatures with some controversy.

  • In addition, there has been active discussion of regionalising and combining congenital heart programmes, with the argument that this would strengthen established high-volume programmes and eliminate low-volume programmes.

While the challenges can be defined, an Editorial Board will have the unenviable task of deciding what is appropriate to publish and what is not:

  • Will Freedom of Speech prevail when a submitted manuscript has highly controversial messages, which might result in legal actions?

  • Will a well-written controversial manuscript be rejected if the topic is over the top?

  • While bioethical controversies should be discussed, what will be the role of considered censorship by the Editorial Board?

  • At what point will controversy fall into sedition?

These issues have been approached before in medical journals and can be successfully navigated.

So, the question arises, is this all worth the effort?

Since the introduction of philosophy, important and controversial topics have been discussed, mostly to the benefit of Society. Highly consequential discussions about the banning of nuclear weapons in war have resulted in a moratorium, despite the amassing of unused nuclear weapons. The abortion issue has been debated for centuries without a clear-cut understanding of when personhood and life are attained. Global warming, climate change, and racism are debated every day without resolution. Is it worth the effort to make inquiries into the status of Pediatric Cardiology, and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery? We would submit that the answer is, “Yes!!!”

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

References

Parenzan, L. Quo vadis? Cardiol Young 1991; 1: 12. doi: 10.1017/S1047951100000032. PMID: 21114876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroudis, C, Cook, T, Mavroudis, CD, eds. Bioethical Controversies in Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag Inc., London, 2020. [https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-35660-6].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroudis, CD, Jacobs, JP, Siegel, A, Mavroudis, C. Chapter 23: Ethical Issues Confronting Outcomes Analysis and Quality Assurance. In: Barach, P, Jacobs, JP, Lipshultz, SE, Laussen, P (eds). Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care - Volume 1: Outcomes Analysis. Springer-Verlag, London. 1515. ISBN: 978-1-4471-6586-6 (Print). 978-1-4471-6587-3 (Online). [https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4471-6587-3]. Published in 2014. Pages 295–303.Google Scholar
Mavroudis, C, Cook, JT, Mavroudis, CD, Mavroudis, CL, Siegel, A, Jacobs, JP. Ethical Issues in Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery. In: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Cardiothoracic Surgery E-Book. [https://ebook.sts.org/sts/]: Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Section. Senior Editor: Jeffrey P. Jacobs, MD. (Jacobs JP, Baumgartner WA, Darling GE, eds. Associate Editors: Erle H. Austin, Carl Lewis Backer, Robert [Jake] D.B. Jaquiss, John Edmund Mayer, James S. Tweddell, Winfield J. Wells.) Published by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published June 30, 2021.Google Scholar
Jacobs, JP, Cerfolio, RJ, Sade, RM. The ethics of transparency: Publication of cardiothoracic surgical outcomes in the lay press. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 679686. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.12.043. PMID: 19231369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dokholyan, RS, Muhlbaier, LH, Falletta, JM, Jacobs, JP, Shahian, D, Haan, CK, Peterson, ED. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 971982. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.03.023. PMID: 19464406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavroudis, C, Mavroudis, CD, Jacobs, ML, Jacobs, JP. Ethics of Innovation in Surgery for Congenital Cardiac Diseases. In: Jacobs JP, Cooper DS, Wernovsky G, Goldberg D, Anderson RH (eds). 2009 Supplement to Cardiology in the Young: Annual Heart Week in Florida Supplement Number 7 - Innovation Associated with the Treatment of Patients with Congenital and Pediatric Cardiac Disease. Cardiology in the Young. 2009 Nov; 19 (Suppl 2): 100–105. doi: 10.1017/S1047951109991697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, A, Hickey, E, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, JP, Jacobs, ML, Backer, CL, Gevitz, M, Mavroudis, CD. Impact of noncardiac congenital and genetic abnormalities on outcomes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun; 89: 1805–1813; discussion 1813–1814. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.004. PMID: 20494032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroudis, C, Mavroudis, CD, Farrell, RM, Jacobs, ML, Jacobs, JP, Kodish, ED. Informed consent, bioethical equipoise, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2011 Dec; 21 (Suppl 2): 133–140. doi: 10.1017/S1047951111001715. PMID: 22152540. In: Jacobs JP, DeCampli, WM, Cooper DS, Dadlani G, Goldberg DJ, Everett, AD, Wernovsky G, Anderson RH (eds). 2011 Supplement to Cardiology in the Young: Annual Heart Week in Florida Supplement Number 9 - Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome And Other Challenges Related To Pediatric And Congenital Cardiac Disease: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Cardiology in the Young. 2011 Dec; 21 (Suppl 2): 1–176.Google Scholar
Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, CD, Mavroudis, C. Ethical issues related to the impact of noncardiac congenital and genetic abnormalities on outcomes of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Newsletter Sect Bioethics Am Acad Pediatr 2012, 69.Google Scholar
Mavroudis, C, Mavroudis, CD, Green, J, Sade, RM, Jacobs, JP, Kodish, E. Ethical considerations for post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cardiol Young 2012; 22: 780786. doi: 10.1017/S1047951112001540. PMID: 23331602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavroudis, CD, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, JP, Siegel, A. The role of research for sustainable paediatric cardiac programmes in developing countries. Cardiol Young 2012; 22: 787795. doi: 10.1017/S1047951112001989. PMID: 23331603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karl, TR, Jacobs, JP. Culture, ethics, and humanitarian affairs: often relevant, sometimes compelling, always interesting. Cardiol Young 2014; 24: 577578. doi: 10.1017/S1047951114000687. Epub 2014 May 8. PMID: 24811904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavroudis, CD, Mavroudis, C, Jacobs, JP. The elephant in the room: ethical issues associated with rare and expensive medical conditions. Cardiol Young 2015; 25: 16211625. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115002103. PMID: 26675614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, JP, Wernovsky, G, Cooper, DS, Karl, TR. Principles of shared decision-making within teams. Cardiol Young 2015; 25: 16311636. doi: 10.1017/S1047951115000311. Epub 2015 Aug 18. PMID: 26282115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavroudis, CD, Cook, T, Jacobs, JP, Mavroudis, C. Ethical considerations of transparency, informed consent, and nudging in a patient with paediatric aortic stenosis and symptomatic left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 15731580. doi: 10.1017/S1047951116002456. PMID: 28148333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welke, KF, Pasquali, SK, Lin, P, et al. Hospital distribution and patient travel patterns for congenital cardiac surgery in the United States. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107: 574581. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.047. Epub 2018 Sep 21. PMID: 30248321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, JP, O’Brien, SM, Hil, KD, et al. Refining The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Mortality Risk Model With Enhanced Risk Adjustment for Chromosomal Abnormalities, Syndromes, and Noncardiac Congenital Anatomic Abnormalities. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 108: 558566. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.01.069. Epub 2019 Mar 7. PMID: 30853592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar