Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T12:16:24.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Direct Measurement of the Relation Between Swelling Pressure and Interlayer Distance in Li-Vermiculite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Brian E. Viani
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Charles B. Roth
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Philip F. Low
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Abstract

To test the double-layer theory of swelling as applied to layer silicates, the interlayer separation, λ, in a Li-saturated vermiculite from Grouse Creek, Utah, was measured as a function of the swelling pressure, II. An oriented sample of the vermiculite (46-105 μm) was placed in an environmental chamber mounted on an X-ray diffractometer and compressed between N2 gas and a porous membrane in contact with a solution draining to the outside atmosphere. After equilibration at each of several successively higher gas pressures, the c-axis spacing was measured by X-ray diffraction, and the corresponding X was calculated by subtracting the thickness of an elementary silicate layer. The results of these measurements showed that. (1) the relation between II and λ for vermiculite is the same as that previously observed for Na-montmorillonite, i.e., II is an exponential function of 1/λ. (2) the values of II predicted by double-layer theory are much smaller than those observed if the surface potential is assigned the appropriate value; an. (3) the observed relation between II and λ does not have the form predicted by this theory. On the basis of these results, a repulsive force not ascribable to double-layer overlap must be primarily responsible for swelling; this force must result from the in-depth perturbation of the water by the surfaces of the vermiculite layers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1985, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Journal paper 9688.

References

Bolt, G. H. and Miller, R. D., 1955 Compression studies of illite suspensions Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc 19 285288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebula, D. J., Thomas, R. K., Middleton, S., Ottewill, R. H. and White, J. W., 1979 Neutron diffraction from clay-water systems Clays & Clay Minerals 27 3952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, D.Y.C., Pashley, R. M. and Quirk, J. P., 1984 Surface potentials derived from co-ion exclusion measurements on homoionic montmorillonite and illite Clays & Clay Minerals 32 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derjaguin, B. V. and Churaev, N. V., 1974 Structural component of disjoining pressure J. Colloid Interface Sci 49 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derjaguin, B. V., Titijevskaia, A. S., Abricossova, I. S. and Malinka, A. D., 1954 Investigations of the forces of interaction of surfaces in different media and their application to the problem of colloid stability Faraday Soc. Disc 18 2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, D. H. and Thomas, G. W., 1964 X-ray studies of crystalline swelling in montmorillonites Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc 28 747750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, W. R., Savins, J. G. and Waite, J. M., 1955 Lattice expansion and rheological behavior relationships in water-montmorillonite systems Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 3rd Natl. Conf., Houston, Texas, 1954 395 296316.Google Scholar
Friend, J. P. and Hunter, R.J., 1970 Vermiculite as a model system in the testing of double layer theory Clays & Clay Minerals 18 275282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, A., 1963 X-ray Diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies San Francisco Freeman.Google Scholar
Hemwall, J. B. and Low, P. F., 1956 The hydrostatic repulsive force in clay swelling Soil Sci 82 135145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israelachvili, J. N. and Adams, G. E., 1978 Measurement of forces between two mica surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions in the range 0-100 nm J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 74 9751001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L., 1974 Soil Chemical Analysis—Advanced Course 2nd.Google Scholar
Low, P. F., 1980 The swelling of clay: II. Montmorillonites Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J 44 667675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, P. F., 1981 The swelling of clay: III. Dissociation of exchangeable cations Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J 45 10741078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, P. F. and Anderson, D. M., 1958 Osmotic pressure equations for determining thermodynamic properties of soil water Soil Sci 86 251253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, P. F. and Deming, J. M., 1953 Movement and equilibrium of water in heterogeneous systems with special reference to soils Soil Sci 75 178202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, P. F. and Margheim, J. F., 1979 The swelling of clay: I. Basic concepts and empirical equations Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J 43 473481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, D. J. and Low, P. F., 1983 The molar absorptivity of interparticle water in clay-water systems J. Colloid Interface Sci 95 5160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K., 1954 The swelling of montmorillonite Faraday Soc. Disc 18 120134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrish, K., Rausell-Colom, J. A., Swineford, A. and Franks, P. C., 1963 Low-angle X-ray diffraction studies of the swelling of montmorillonite and vermiculite Clays and Clay Minerals, Proc. 10th Natl. Conf, Austin, Texas, 1961 New York Pergamon Press 123149.Google Scholar
Pashley, R. M., 1981 Hydration forces between mica surfaces in aqueous electrolyte solutions J. Colloid Interface Sci 80 153162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashley, R.M., 1981 DLVO and hydration forces between mica surfaces in Li+, Na+, K+, and Cs+ electrolyte solutions: a correlation of double-layer and hydration forces with surface cation exchange properties J. Colloid Interface Sci 83 531546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashley, R. M., 1982 Hydration forces between mica surfaces in electrolyte solutions Adv. Colloid Interface Sci 16 5762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashley, R. M. and Quirk, J. P., 1983 The effect of cation valency on DLVO and hydration forces between macroscopic sheets of muscovite mica in relation to clay swelling Colloids and Surfaces 9 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, J. P., 1968 Particle interaction and soil swelling Israel J. Chem 6 213234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravina, I. and Low, P. F., 1972 Relation between swelling, water properties and b-dimension in montmorillonite-water systems Clays & Clay Minerals 20 109123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, J. D., Ingvalson, R. D. and Stumpf, H. T., 1969 Interlayer spacings of expanded clay minerals at various swelling pressures: an X-ray diffraction technique for direct determination Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc 33 473475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, C. B., Jackson, M. L. and Syers, J. K., 1969 Deferration effect on structural ferrous-ferric iron ratio and CEC of vermiculites and soils Clays & Clay Minerals 17 253264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, R. K., 1946 Ionic forces in thick films of liquid between charged surfaces Trans. Faraday Soc 42B 219225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y., 1983 The isothermal compressibility and isobaric expansibility of water in montmorillonite-water systems .Google Scholar
van Olphen, H., 1963 An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry London Interscience.Google Scholar
Viani, B. V., Low, P. F. and Roth, C. B., 1983 Direct measurement of the relation between interlayer force and interlayer distance in the swelling of montmorillonite J. Colloid Interface Sci 96 229244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwey, E. J. W. and Overbeek, I Th G, 1948 Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids New York Elsevier.Google Scholar
Walker, G. F., 1960 Macroscopic swelling of vermiculite crystals in water Nature 187 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warkentin, B. P., Bolt, G.H. and Miller, R.D., 1957 Swelling pressure of montmorillonite Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc 21 495497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar