Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T23:08:34.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High- or low-technology measurements of energy expenditure in clinical gait analysis?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Roslyn Boyd
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Stefania Fatone
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jill Rodda
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Christine Olesch
Affiliation:
Department of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Roland Starr
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Elise Cullis
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Donnacha Gallagher
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
John B Carlin
Affiliation:
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Royal Children's Hospital Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Gary R Nattrass
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Kerr Graham
Affiliation:
Hugh Williamson Gait Laboratory, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The repeatability of energy-expenditure measurements were studied in five children and four adults without disabilities using the Cosmed K4 (high technology). The ability to detect change in measurements was compared between this instrument and the Physiological Cost Index (PCI; low technology). The results of repeatability (95% range) for oxygen cost were 13.1% in children and 13% in adults. In contrast, the SD of PCI was 6 to 72% of the mean in adults and wider in children (91%; 95% range). The validity of PCI as an outcome measure was questioned. In addition, 177 children with motor disability were prospectively studied using the Cosmed K4. Previous experience with the Cosmed K2 (intermediate technology) helped to develop a practical and repeatable protocol for testing children with disability using the Cosmed K4. The protocol commenced with 5 minutes of rest to achieve baseline values of heart rate and oxygen consumption, followed by 10 minutes of continuous walking at a self-selected speed on a 10-metre level oval walking track. The test concluded with 5 minutes of rest to monitor the return to baseline values. Ninety-one percent of the children with disability quickly reached a steady-state of oxygen consumption and carbon-dioxide production. The carbon-dioxide sensor in the Cosmed K4 has enabled a new group of severely involved children with cerebral palsy (9%) to be defined. These children have been termed ‘physiologically marginal ambulators’.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 1999 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)