Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T18:43:02.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring developmental and functional status in children with disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1999

Kenneth J Ottenbacher
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Michael E Msall
Affiliation:
The Child Development Center, Providence, Rde Island, USA.
Nancy Lyon
Affiliation:
Robert Warner Rehabilitation Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Linda C Duffy
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Carl V Granger
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Susan Braun
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Get access

Abstract

This study compared performance on the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIMTM), the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test (BDIST), and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in children with developmental disabilities. The three instruments were administered to 205 children with identified disabilities. All 205 children were tested using the WeeFIM instrument. The BDIST was administered to 101 children and the VABS to the remaining 104 children. Administration was counterbalanced and randomized across all three instruments. A proportional sampling plan was used to select the 205 children, who ranged in age from 11 to 87 months. A variety of medical diagnoses and levels of severity of motor, cognitive, and communication impairments were systematically included in the sample. Correlations (r) among subscales for all three instruments ranged from 0.42 to 0.92. Correlations for total scores ranged from 0.72 to 0.94. Analyses of potential moderator variables found no significant relation between age and severity of disability (r=0.05) or between socioeconomic status (SES) and severity of disability (r=0.21). Correlations with age were strongest for those subscale scores involving gross and fine motor skills. Correlations with SES and subscale scores ranged from 0.03 to 0.18. The three instruments provide important information regarding childhood performance in motor, self-care, communicative, cognitive, and social skills. The WeeFIM instrument requires less administration time and provides information directly relevant to evaluating functional outcomes for children with disabilities and their families.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 1999 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)